Editor's note: This updates to include the purchase price of the land acquisition in graph 4.
Expansion of Sand Creek Massacre National Historic Site in Colorado will allow the National Park Service to better interpret the 1864 military assault on an encampment of roughly 750 Arapaho and Cheyenne Plains tribal members that led to the deaths of more than 200, according to an Interior Department release.
Interior Secretary Deb Haaland and Park Service Director Chuck Sams visited the site on Wednesday. They participated in an event with leaders from the Northern Arapaho Tribe, the Northern Cheyenne Tribe, the Cheyenne and Arapaho Tribes, U.S. Sens. Michael Bennet and John Hickenlooper, Colorado Lieutenant Governor Dianne Primavera, and other community partners including The Conservation Fund, Great Outdoors Colorado and the National Park Foundation.
“It is our solemn responsibility at the Department of the Interior, as caretakers of America’s national treasures, to tell the story of our nation. The events that took place here forever changed the course of the Northern Cheyenne, Northern Arapaho, and Cheyenne and Arapaho Tribes,” said Haaland. “We will never forget the hundreds of lives that were brutally taken here – men, women and children murdered in an unprovoked attack. Stories like the Sand Creek Massacre are not easy to tell but it is my duty – our duty – to ensure that they are told. This story is part of America’s story.”
The ceremony included the announcement of the acquisition of 3,478 acres for the National Historic Site that was made possible through funding from the Land and Water Conservation Fund. The cost of the aquisition was $3.3 million, which was $315,000 below the appraised value of $3,615,000, according to NPS staff.
The additional land will allow the Park Service to increase public opportunities to experience and interpret the site’s stories and history. In addition, the expansion of the historic site will contribute to one of the most intact shortgrass prairie ecosystems within the National Park System, providing habitat for a wide range of plants, wildlife and species of special concern.
The Conservation Fund was critical to facilitating the acquisition from a willing seller, with financial support from Great Outdoors Colorado and the National Park Foundation.
“The newly acquired property will help to protect the historic site and sacred Tribal lands,” said Janet Frederick, Sand Creek Massacre National Historic Site superintendent. “These new parcels include lands listed on the National Register of Historic Places for their significance to the devastating events of November 29, 1864. These lands also have significant archaeological remains of the massacre, including evidence of the village where Cheyenne and Arapaho families were camped, and an intact viewshed that is key to the historical integrity of the National Historic Site.”
On November 29, 1864, U.S. soldiers attacked an encampment of approximately 750 Native people. During the attack, the Native Americans took shelter in the high banks along Sand Creek. As they fled, many were wounded and killed. Well over half of the 230 dead were women and children.
Sand Creek Massacre National Historic Site was established in 2007 in southeastern Colorado near the Town of Eads. The site preserves lands where the massacre took place and adjacent features critical to the historic cultural landscape. The Northern and Southern Cheyenne and Arapaho Tribes consider these lands sacred.
The LWCF was established by Congress in 1964 to fulfill a bipartisan commitment to safeguard natural areas, water resources and cultural heritage, and to provide recreation opportunities to all Americans. The Great American Outdoors Act authorized permanent funding of LWCF at $900 million annually to improve recreational opportunities on public lands, protect watersheds and wildlife, and preserve ecosystem benefits for local communities. The LWCF has funded $4 billion worth of projects in every county in the country for over 50 years.
Stories about:
Story Categories:
A copy of National Parks Traveler's financial statements may be obtained by sending a stamped, self-addressed envelope to: National Parks Traveler, P.O. Box 980452, Park City, Utah 84098. National Parks Traveler was formed in the state of Utah for the purpose of informing and educating about national parks and protected areas.
Residents of the following states may obtain a copy of our financial and additional information as stated below:
- Florida: A COPY OF THE OFFICIAL REGISTRATION AND FINANCIAL INFORMATION FOR NATIONAL PARKS TRAVELER, (REGISTRATION NO. CH 51659), MAY BE OBTAINED FROM THE DIVISION OF CONSUMER SERVICES BY CALLING 800-435-7352 OR VISITING THEIR WEBSITE. REGISTRATION DOES NOT IMPLY ENDORSEMENT, APPROVAL, OR RECOMMENDATION BY THE STATE.
- Georgia: A full and fair description of the programs and financial statement summary of National Parks Traveler is available upon request at the office and phone number indicated above.
- Maryland: Documents and information submitted under the Maryland Solicitations Act are also available, for the cost of postage and copies, from the Secretary of State, State House, Annapolis, MD 21401 (410-974-5534).
- North Carolina: Financial information about this organization and a copy of its license are available from the State Solicitation Licensing Branch at 888-830-4989 or 919-807-2214. The license is not an endorsement by the State.
- Pennsylvania: The official registration and financial information of National Parks Traveler may be obtained from the Pennsylvania Department of State by calling 800-732-0999. Registration does not imply endorsement.
- Virginia: Financial statements are available from the Virginia Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, 102 Governor Street, Richmond, Virginia 23219.
- Washington: National Parks Traveler is registered with Washington State’s Charities Program as required by law and additional information is available by calling 800-332-4483 or visiting www.sos.wa.gov/charities, or on file at Charities Division, Office of the Secretary of State, State of Washington, Olympia, WA 98504.
National parks and their natural resources belong to you. The National Parks Traveler works to ensure you know how these essential places are being cared for.
Sign Up For Our Weekly Newsletter
Unsubscribe at any time.
INN Member
The easiest way to explore RV-friendly National Park campgrounds.
Here’s the definitive guide to National Park System campgrounds where RVers can park their rigs.
Our app is packed with RVing- specific details on more than 250 campgrounds in more than 70 national parks.
You’ll also find stories about RVing in the parks, tips helpful if you’ve just recently become an RVer, and useful planning suggestions.
Comments
. The events that took place here forever changed the course of the Northern Cheyenne, Northern Arapaho, and Cheyenne and Arapaho Tribes,” said Haaland.
They sure did.
“We will never forget the hundreds of lives that were brutally taken here – men, women and children murdered in an unprovoked attack
Sadly, Sand Creek was preceded by dozens of unprovoked attacks against innocent settlers (men, women & children) by NAs, resulting in scores of civilian deaths. So, it's absolutely inaccurate to assert that Sand Creek was "unprovoked".
It's just so disappointing that the White-NA narrative has swung so far in the opposite direction that we cannot even acknowledge the entire, nasty, evil, tragic context.
And that's sad for NAs, the stories of settlers, the US, and this historical site.
“We will never forget the hundreds of lives that were brutally taken here – men, women and children murdered in an unprovoked attack
When will the NPS purchase the sites of Ruby Ridge or Mt. Carmel Center (Waco) so that those stories can be told and interpreted? (just to name a few)
When victims have to fit a mold, and perpetrators have to fit into another, we're not getting the whole story.
We need to fess up and tell all of it. Sadly, niether today's NPS nor Sec'y Haaland is up to the task.
Anybody who thinks Ruby Ridge should be a NPS site is ridiculous.
Many believe that a hookup bar named Stonewall Inn did not deserve to become an NPS property.
Again, we need to tell the ENTIRE narrative of US history, not just what some may consider ridiculous.
Is a monument to a domestic terrorist ridiculous? Becuase we have one for John Brown. The NPS is also looking into monuments for groups like the Black Panthers who killed far more people than died at Ruby Ridge.
Mainly the NPS should stick to preserving and protecting public lands rather than trying to "tell stories"
Again, the idea that Ruby Ridge should be a NPS site is perhaps the single dumbest comment ever made here.
While driving through Eads, CO in the fall of 2020 I was gutpunched by the Sand Creek Massacre display at the park. I had never heard of this horrendous crime. It wouldn't leave my head and heart. By the time I reached Kearney, NE this song was finished.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MVYRWMBgWvo
#LookingBacktoMoveForward
#FeeltoHeal
Please Listen.
We live in a culture which wants to judge the past through the lens of today. But the past cannot be changed. So the NPS "interpretive" parks can only make people feel bad. On the other hand, a "historic site" can be an uplifting educational experience. People can do their own interpretation. Do we need NPS to tell us how to think?
Feeling insecure are we? Yes, NPS has a real and significant responsibility to research and tell American history in full. In many ways historical parks are significant to our identity as Americans and citizens; an identity that has transended Evans and Chivington. The Honorable Deb Haaland is a god-send to American ideals. Think on why I would say that before your head blows up in your rage. Oh, and read up on the constitution and the principles on which the legislation creating NPS was enacted.
"Yes, NPS has a real and significant responsibility to research and tell American history in full."
But not to shape it from what is was to some woke version that some want to believe.
but what does "woke" mean? Stop using code tell us what you think with real words. Oh, and read some honest histories. they are out there
If you don't know what "woke" means you are pretty out of touch. Woke means doing things for appearances and ignoring reality.
Woke means people want to believe that the native americans sat around the campfire singing kumbyya and wouldn't hurt a fly. That any attack was "unprovoked". Its a fairy tale. Was the white man brutal to native americans? Yes. Were the native americans brutal to the white man AND other native americans, yes. That is the real history.
Well, almost, but we have some nice consolation prizes for you, Mr Buck. The dictionary function on Wikipedia defines "woke" as "alert to injustice and discrimination in society, especially racism", but it is easy to see how someone who is __insensitive__ to injustice and discrimination in society, especially racism would go there. Generally, when I run into the term in online discusssion is is usually used derisively.
Rick, it is laughable that you count on Wikipedia for your "definitions". Might as well go to Facebook or Twitter to define "free speech".