A drug overdose, not a bear attack, killed a man poaching ginseng in Great Smoky Mountains National Park last fall/NPS file
Drugs, not a bear, killed a Tennessee man who headed into Great Smoky Mountains National Park last fall to poach ginseng roots, according to the autopsy results.
Unfortunately, park officials decided in September that a bear believed to have fed on William Lee Hill, Jr.'s body might have attacked and killed him, so they killed it.
Hill had gone into the park last September 7 to hunt for ginseng, a high-priced root used by some as a traditional home medicine. Prices can go as high as $800 a pound for ginseng. While the root can be collected outside the park, it is illegal to do so inside the boundaries.
The man's body was found September 9 in the woods about 2 miles north of Cades Cove and about a half-mile from the Rich Mountain Road. When searchers found his body, which had signs of being fed on by predators, they also encountered a black bear that was acting aggressively towards them.
Since it wasn't known whether the bear had killed Hill or fed on his body, a decision was made to sedate the bear and place a GPS radio collar on it and let it go pending further information, park staff said at the time. The next day, park staff, in discussions with Superintendent Cassius Cash, decided to destroy the bear. Park staff announced on September 16 that the bear was killed that morning near where Hill's body was found.
The effort to kill the bear was complicated, requiring five shots over three days.
"The biologists spent several days tracking the bear and were consistently challenged by weather, terrain, thick vegetation, and the elusive behavior of the bear," park spokeswoman Dana Soehn told the Traveler in October. "The bear was located on the second day of tracking in a thick stand of rhododendron, and a biologist did attempt to shoot it, but the shot was not lethal. Three days later, park staff successfully located and euthanized the bear via gunshot (four shots)."
A necropsy on the bear indicated that it was not in a weakened condition and desperate for food. Its teeth were in good shape, and its belly was "full" of acorn meat," noted the pathologist, who made no mention of human remains in the stomach.
Park staff said Monday that they recently had received the autopsy report on Hill, and pathologists had determined that he had died of accidental methamphetamine intoxication.
"An autopsy revealed extensive postmortem animal predation, but no findings of antemortem/perimortem trauma (i.e. Mr. Hill was not attacked by a bear)," the report added.
Great Smoky is home to an estimated 1,500 bears. Very few bears exhibit aggressive behavior towards humans. Wildlife biologists and park rangers work hard to prevent bears from becoming food-conditioned or habituated to high-use areas. Out of an abundance of caution for the park's 11 million park visitors, park staff implement aversive-conditioning techniques and, on rare occasions, euthanize individual bears that pose a threat to visitor safety.
Stories about:
Story Categories:
A copy of National Parks Traveler's financial statements may be obtained by sending a stamped, self-addressed envelope to: National Parks Traveler, P.O. Box 980452, Park City, Utah 84098. National Parks Traveler was formed in the state of Utah for the purpose of informing and educating about national parks and protected areas.
Residents of the following states may obtain a copy of our financial and additional information as stated below:
- Florida: A COPY OF THE OFFICIAL REGISTRATION AND FINANCIAL INFORMATION FOR NATIONAL PARKS TRAVELER, (REGISTRATION NO. CH 51659), MAY BE OBTAINED FROM THE DIVISION OF CONSUMER SERVICES BY CALLING 800-435-7352 OR VISITING THEIR WEBSITE. REGISTRATION DOES NOT IMPLY ENDORSEMENT, APPROVAL, OR RECOMMENDATION BY THE STATE.
- Georgia: A full and fair description of the programs and financial statement summary of National Parks Traveler is available upon request at the office and phone number indicated above.
- Maryland: Documents and information submitted under the Maryland Solicitations Act are also available, for the cost of postage and copies, from the Secretary of State, State House, Annapolis, MD 21401 (410-974-5534).
- North Carolina: Financial information about this organization and a copy of its license are available from the State Solicitation Licensing Branch at 888-830-4989 or 919-807-2214. The license is not an endorsement by the State.
- Pennsylvania: The official registration and financial information of National Parks Traveler may be obtained from the Pennsylvania Department of State by calling 800-732-0999. Registration does not imply endorsement.
- Virginia: Financial statements are available from the Virginia Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, 102 Governor Street, Richmond, Virginia 23219.
- Washington: National Parks Traveler is registered with Washington State’s Charities Program as required by law and additional information is available by calling 800-332-4483 or visiting www.sos.wa.gov/charities, or on file at Charities Division, Office of the Secretary of State, State of Washington, Olympia, WA 98504.
INN Member
The easiest way to explore RV-friendly National Park campgrounds.
Here’s the definitive guide to National Park System campgrounds where RVers can park their rigs.
Our app is packed with RVing- specific details on more than 250 campgrounds in more than 70 national parks.
You’ll also find stories about RVing in the parks, tips helpful if you’ve just recently become an RVer, and useful planning suggestions.
Comments
Did the Superintendent, Cassius Cash, follow NPS protocol in putting this bear down? Seems like the investigation was not complete when the bear was euthanized.
I'd be surprised if the policy isn't to put down a bear after consuming human flesh, even if the bear didn't directly cause the death.
The story said this bear was full on acorn meant. There wasn’t any human flesh in it. The poor bear was just living it’s life until a meth head overdosed! The bear was innocen!
This bear did nothing wrong. The story said the bear had acorn meat inside not human flesh. The bear was innocent, it was another meth head that caused it. Until of course a man comes along that obviously can’t aim, and injures the bear.. and takes days to put it out of his misery. Stupid people!!
How do they know it was even a bear that "consumed his flesh"? It could have been a coyote. Bears eat mostly vegetation but are opportunists. That said, had there been human remains in the bear's necropsy, they likely would have released that information to the public. I believe that they should have concluded the poacher's autopsy BEFORE assuming that it was "an aggressive bear". That man was breaking the law in bear habitat. His actions killed this animal, not the other way around. Focus needs to be on educating and penalizing visitors first and foremost. Never assume ANYTHING especially when all the facts aren't determined and the investigation is incomplete.
I agree. And really, is there really any way to tell that he wasnt attacked & eaten? Even if the man was super high on drugs, black bears are super predatious, especially the males. They made no mention of human remains in the stomach, but the bear could have pooped that out by then . Cade's Cove has a lot of aggressive black bears there, and the larger their numbers, the more attacks happen across the U.S. I believe people are blinded by biologists and others in the NPS just how dangerous its getting for encounters between people and bears. They're not called predators for nothing.
Black bear's are not "super predatious" their main diet consists of grasses, berries, nuts, fruits and insects. They will scavenge a carcus. But predatory behavior does arise and is extremely rare towards humans.
Usually not a bad dog (bear) but a bad human.
The NPS needs target practice in order to humanely kill an innocent bear. This is reeks of incompetence.
Carl--
I honestly don't know whether the Superintendent or Chief of Natural Resources followed the policy & procedures, and I don't know their specific policies, which may or may not explicitly cover this case. But even if the written policy & procedures was against killing a bear who _might_ have scavanged the human body absent stronger proof than the bear aggressively defending the corpse, I don't know how many days the Superintendent could have held out against public outcry & pressure, as they'd presumably have to close that part of the park to visitors. [The policies would be different for a park in Alaska or even the Rockies vs Great Smoky Mountains or Shenandoah.]
From my peripheral understanding of the science (grizzly bear DNA & environmental DNA, plus scat analyses), I don't think there was any good way to "complete" the investigation before taking action. If they didn't kill the bear and test stomach contents, they'd have to track it and stay close enough to collect its scat for several days to test for human DNA in the scat. That's putting staff in danger for several days, and has a possibility of missing scat or not enough human DNA surviving the digestion. I could be wrong, but I don't think that they could have held the bear in a pen to collect scat for a couple of days, then released it afterward. Collecting bear DNA around the body, then testing for a match against that bear's DNA collected during the sedation, is theoretically possible, but still several years away from being readily do-able.
I suspect it was a judgement call: they were damned either way, and they'd never get a definitive answer if they made the other call. At least they tested the stomach contents to find out if they made the right call for this particular bear. I'm willing to give them a pass on this one, and be thankful I'm not in their shoes. If you want to attack the Superintendent, there are almost certainly other better grounds to do so.
I hate when any bear has to be put down, but in this situatio, where the bear showed aggression toward rangers, they made the correct decision.
Tomp2 has very good points, but they could have waited for the autopsy on the dead man. That gave all the answers they needed. The bear wasn't a threat to anyone at the time. I agree it was a judgement call, but he should have waited for that autopsy report.
I agree- otherwise, what was the purpose for the autopsy?Certainly the bear could have been caught and sedated. When necessary, they do it all the time with the Grizzlies out west.
i believe there was someone with the deceased and was hunting ginseng in the park also. They become separated and the ither man did not notify authorities for several days that his part was missing. the Other man supposedly admitted to hunting ginseng in the park. My question is “has this man been prosecuted“ for his crime? If not, he should be.
His friend, Joshua David Morgan did inorm the authorities, resulting in the search, and is now dead.
The deceased man’s friend is dead as well?
The other man was my son and he notified Wills mother the same night that Will disappeared, not several days later. Wills mother contacted the police the next day after they went back up there looking for him and when he did not return home the next morning the police were notified. I really wish people would not throw out information that isn't true.
So the best died for nothing but being a bear. Some of us are so quick to judge one another (animals inc.) That bear was in his habitat where he should be allowed to do what bears do and because some tweeter died , doing something illegal , its the bears fault ? Smh
The fact that they had a hard time tracking the bear,even with a collar, should have been there first clue this bear was not aggressive but was trying to evade them. And to take so many trys to as they say "destroy" the bear. Killing is killing destroy is semantics, senseless loss of life, the bears not the dirt bag ginseng poacher! He should have used some of the ginseng to get off meth!
It might be self enlightening for some of you to go back and read your original comments on this story: https://www.nationalparkstraveler.org/2018/09/rangers-kill-black-bear-mi...
What a tragedy. So their idea of solving the problem. Is to go into the woods, happen across the first bear that “acts aggressively” (because apparently bears are supposed to welcome humans graciously) and kill ill it to say THAT was the Same beat that may or may not have killed the man? This is wildlifeanagamtn? That bear just happened to be in the wrong place at the wrong time since obviously they were just looking for a scapegoat to kill and make people feel safe with zero evidence. Kill kill kill. And the bear suffered for days. Disgusting.
Really, I suspect that the methamphetamine ingestion was not accidental. The death may have been an unintended consequence, but the use itself was intentional
”The effort to kill the bear was complicated, requiring five shots over three days. ”
What?? How many employees to accomplish that screw-up? Just no excuse. If weather was problematic they could have waited; this Bear was apparently not a clear and present danger.
A bear who posed no danger to humans suffered from shotgun wounds for THREE DAYS! before succumbing to them! What kind of clowns are working at that Park? They decided to shoot the bear with no proof it was the bear's fault the man died. Not only was it the guy's own fault, but the bear had to pay for it with his life! What a horrible thing! Everyone involved in shooting the bear needs to be fired NOW and never be allowed to work for the US govt again! The whole thing is despicable!
Missing 411. Another cryptid kill. Don‘t believe anything coming from a government agency
Horrible! This is a gruesome story. The use of drugs not only effected the user but also this poor bear. Ginseng is big business in that area and is part of the culture, illegal or not. The meth added to the mix is a recipe for disaster.
I don't get why they killed that innocent bear. Why didn't they wait to get the autopsy back before they went and killed it. They should be ashamed of themselves. That bear did nothing wrong and he died because of some addicted goof doing illegal stuff. People make me sick how they jump to always blame the animals of the land and just think it's ok to take them out.