A new communication tower is going up at the North Unit of Theodore Roosevelt National Park in North Dakota, and while Verizon Wireless will have equipment on the tower, it has been designed not to bleed a cell signal into official wilderness in the park.
The issue of a signal bleed was raised last fall by Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility, which worried that Verizon's signal from the tower would "blanket designated wilderness with cell phone coverage."
National Park Service staff recently issued a Final Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact for the tower, which is a replacement. The current tower provides communication functions essential to public safety and efficient operations for the park and the U.S. Forest Service. The NPS will issue Verizon Wireless a right-of-way permit to co-locate their cellular equipment and replace the existing NPS communications tower northeast of the park entrance and east of U.S. 85.
Verizon Wireless initially proposed construction of a cellular communication tower on private lands near the park’s existing communication tower. The NPS and Verizon Wireless have determined that only one tower is needed to provide radio service to the NPS and USFS while providing cellular service for the U.S. 85 corridor. The new 190-foot high guyed tower will replace the existing 220 foot high guyed tower, eliminating the need for aviation safety lighting. Verizon Wireless will co-locate its telecommunications equipment on the tower and construct a slightly larger support shed to accommodate NPS, USFS, and Verizon equipment.
Park managers have successfully collaborated with companies in western North Dakota to reduce impacts to scenery, dark night skies, and natural sound.
“Verizon Wireless cooperated with the park to address concerns raised with the company’s proposal for installation of an additional communication tower near the park,” said Superintendent Wendy Ross. “The company’s willingness to work with the park in reducing light pollution and tower proliferation improves the North Unit visitor experience.”
Public comments during the EA review raised concerns about cellular phone service bleeding into designated wilderness areas, creating potential cell phone use conflicts between wilderness users. In response to these concerns, Verizon Wireless cellular equipment will only target the U.S. 85 corridor and will not provide additional cell service in designated wilderness areas.
The FONSI establishes that there would be no significant impact on the environment as a result of the selected action. The Final EA and the FONSI will be available through the NPS Planning
Stories about:
Story Categories:
A copy of National Parks Traveler's financial statements may be obtained by sending a stamped, self-addressed envelope to: National Parks Traveler, P.O. Box 980452, Park City, Utah 84098. National Parks Traveler was formed in the state of Utah for the purpose of informing and educating about national parks and protected areas.
Residents of the following states may obtain a copy of our financial and additional information as stated below:
- Florida: A COPY OF THE OFFICIAL REGISTRATION AND FINANCIAL INFORMATION FOR NATIONAL PARKS TRAVELER, (REGISTRATION NO. CH 51659), MAY BE OBTAINED FROM THE DIVISION OF CONSUMER SERVICES BY CALLING 800-435-7352 OR VISITING THEIR WEBSITE. REGISTRATION DOES NOT IMPLY ENDORSEMENT, APPROVAL, OR RECOMMENDATION BY THE STATE.
- Georgia: A full and fair description of the programs and financial statement summary of National Parks Traveler is available upon request at the office and phone number indicated above.
- Maryland: Documents and information submitted under the Maryland Solicitations Act are also available, for the cost of postage and copies, from the Secretary of State, State House, Annapolis, MD 21401 (410-974-5534).
- North Carolina: Financial information about this organization and a copy of its license are available from the State Solicitation Licensing Branch at 888-830-4989 or 919-807-2214. The license is not an endorsement by the State.
- Pennsylvania: The official registration and financial information of National Parks Traveler may be obtained from the Pennsylvania Department of State by calling 800-732-0999. Registration does not imply endorsement.
- Virginia: Financial statements are available from the Virginia Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, 102 Governor Street, Richmond, Virginia 23219.
- Washington: National Parks Traveler is registered with Washington State’s Charities Program as required by law and additional information is available by calling 800-332-4483 or visiting www.sos.wa.gov/charities, or on file at Charities Division, Office of the Secretary of State, State of Washington, Olympia, WA 98504.
National parks and their natural resources belong to you. The National Parks Traveler works to ensure you know how these essential places are being cared for.
Sign Up For Our Weekly Newsletter
Unsubscribe at any time.
INN Member
The easiest way to explore RV-friendly National Park campgrounds.
Here’s the definitive guide to National Park System campgrounds where RVers can park their rigs.
Our app is packed with RVing- specific details on more than 250 campgrounds in more than 70 national parks.
You’ll also find stories about RVing in the parks, tips helpful if you’ve just recently become an RVer, and useful planning suggestions.
Comments
Just another example of how silly PEER can be in their environmental extremism.
Perhaps, EC, but after PEER raised their concerns the NPS and Verizon worked it out to direct their signal down the U.S. 85 corridor and keep it out of wilderness.
And what did that accomplish other than denying service to some who would like it in the park and perhaps even putting lives at risk because of an in ability to contact help?
Well, I guess if you want to be assured of cell coverage, you don't go into wilderness. How did we ever manage to survive those pre-cell phone days?
I have to admit that I have very mixed feelings about this. I was just "rescued" in Big Bend when the water pump on my truck failed at Rio Grande Village Campground. There's no cell phone coverage there which makes it wonderfully peaceful but it was only with help from the campground host using an NPS landline that I was able to contact AAA. I could've been in a world of hurt if this had happened out on a remote back road somewhere. The nearest tow truck had to come from nearly 200 miles away to tow me and my trailer 120 miles to Alpine, Texas where the nearest mechanic was located.
The real problem probably isn't cell phone signals bouncing off the rocks but a few inconsiderate slobs who don't know how to keep the volume of their conversations down to dull roar. Cell phones have made a lot of national park experiences, such is watching an eruption of Old Faithful, nearly nightmarish experiences. Maybe what we need to do is to make inconsiderate use of cell phones a cause for justifiable homicide.
Yes, they are blanketing the wilderness with cell phone coverage. There still is not enough evidence that these signals are benign. There are studies out there that show effects of cell towers on life. Whatever happened to the precautionary principle? As for the other subject, wilderness allows you to be in the wild. when in the wild, anything can happen, and the inherent risk of that wildness is part of the experience. If you expect to be saved by a cell phone, you are not experiencing true wilderness. It is what I would call Disneyfied. People have a right to die. If you are worried about your life, then maybe you don't need to be in wilderness. We might as well allow mountain bikes in wilderness now.
Argalite - that was at the same time callous and incoherent. Would you like to try again?
I dunno, Rick, I think his mix of satire and hyperbole pretty much hit the mark. I vote for the precautionary principle.
Glad Verizon and TRNP were able to work this out. Knowing that an area is "blanketed" with cell phone coverage diminishes the notion of wilderness I otherwise imagine myself to be entering.
OK, Kurt. Satire is often in the eyes of the beholder, and I guess I beheld that a skosh bit differently than you. Life is good.
Precaution against what?
This discussion is a perfect example of how the NPS -- and the rest of our government and society -- face an almost impossible challenge when it comes to serving ALL our citizens. That's why we sometimes have to trust people who have been elected or otherwise handed responsibility for managing our nation, our parks, indeed our world, to try to make the best decisions they can.
And having said that, No, I don't trust Congress because they respond to MONEY and not to good sense.
And no evidence it is dangerous.
https://www.cancer.org/cancer/cancer-causes/radiation-exposure/cellular-...
Besides, if it were dangerous what difference would it make that wilderness had no signal when the the areas you spend 99% of your time in do have signal.
What difference does it make when 99% of the Bear Valley Trail at Point Reyes is open to mountain biking, and the last 1/4 mile is wilderness and I can't take my bike? The fact that you ask that question seems to indicate you do not grasp what wilderness is.
ecbuck, The link you provided in your last post has this on the page;
"Public exposure to radio waves from cell phone tower antennas is slight for several reasons. The power levels are relatively low, the antennas are mounted high above ground level, and the signals are transmitted intermittently, rather than constantly."
they admitted that there is exposure. it may be slight for humans, but what about everything else?
Beside the fact I think you should be able to ride your bike in that last 1/4 mile your simile is flawed. A more accurate version would be if I can ride my bike 99% of the time in the Wilderness why can't I ride it the other 1%. In otherwords if damage is being done 99% of the time what difference dobes the other 1% make.
As to everything else? Bring on the evidence that anything else is threatened by RF waves.
ecbuck,
If you bothered to read my first post, I mentioned the precautionary principle. Look it up.
I was thinking we were just concerned about wilderness areas. Under that scenario, my simile is not flawed.
I thought we we concerned with radio waves. If not what are you being cautious about? Sounds to me that you would like to have all human activity come to a halt because of the precautionary principle.
Yes, RF energy in wilderness areas, that is the topic.
Hey, thanks you guys!
You just helped me solve a mystery that has really been bugging me for a couple of months now. Ever since I started wearing a new pair of eyeglasses, I've been hearing voices.
I thought I was just hallucinating again. But now I know that the fake gold rims and earpieces are picking up cell phone conversations from those RF waves.
What a relief! Now if I can just figure out how to tap into them so I can transmit, I'll be able to cancel my Verizon account and save a lot of money every month.
I wonder if I can get TV for free, too?
So, Argalite, what is your concern with RF energy in Wilderness areas?