You are here

President Signs Public Lands Bill That Contradicts His Budget Proposal

Share

President Trump on Tuesday signed into law a massive public lands bill/Gary Vogt

Though President Trump's Fiscal 2020 budget proposal zeroes out funding for the Land and Water Conservation Fund, on Tuesday he signed into law a massive public lands bill that permanently reauthorizes the fund.

"The Trump administration does not appear to be dealing in reality. Just one day after proposing devastating budget cuts to the National Park Service and the Land and Water Conservation Fund, President Trump and Acting Interior Secretary Bernhardt patted themselves on the back today while celebrating bipartisan legislation to save the LWCF and conserve public lands across the nation," said Phil Francis, chair of the Coalition to Protect America's National Parks. "We can only hope that Congress will stand up to this hypocrisy and take action to ensure that our parks and public lands are safe from this administration's relentless attacks."

Along with permanently reauthorizing the LWCF, the legislation, which had overwhelming congressional support, expands the size of both Death Valley and Joshua Tree national parks, creates a national monument honoring civil rights icon Medgar Evers in Mississippi and a Mill Springs Battlefield National Monument in Kentucky, while changing the designations of some other park system units. It also protects Yellowstone and North Cascades national parks from mining on their doorsteps, and designates some 1.3 million acres of wilderness.

"The Land and Water Conservation Fund is America’s most beloved land conservation program – and for good reason. This law ends the uncertainty around the program and ensures it will endure for generations to come," said Tracy Stone-Manning, associate vice president for public lands at the National Wildlife Federation. "This milestone ironically coincides with the release of the administration’s budget, which shows the president is not putting his money where his mouth is. He recommended just $8 million for land purchase — a pittance of what is needed to provide public access and protect our resources. The next step is to make sure Congress fully funds the Land and Water Conservation Fund in the future. For too long, money has been siphoned away for pet projects, leaving conservation and recreation plans under-funded. That practice must stop.”

The bill, officially known as the John D. Dingell Jr. Conservation, Management, and Recreation Act, was made up of more than 100 individual bills that were introduced by 50 Senators and several House members. 

“President Trump knows that federal lands are meant to provide both peace and prosperity for the American people, and signing this bill allows us to continue managing public lands in a balanced way,” said Acting Interior Secretary David Bernhardt, who was in the Oval Office when the president signed the measure. “This bill is extremely beneficial to the American people and I look forward to working with Congress and local communities to implement the many local conservation wins within the bill.”

Interior Department staff did not immediately respond to a Traveler question regarding the seeming contradiction between signing the bill that permanently reauthorizes the LWCF while providing no funding for it in the president's budget proposal.

At the Center for American Progress, Mary Ellen Kustin, director of policy for public lands, pointed to the irony of the president signing the package.

"As President Trump signs this bill into law, it’s worth remembering that he and his administration have stripped protections from far more acres of public lands than this bill protects," she noted. "Since taking office, Trump has removed protections from 13.5 million acres of land through executive actions. This bill happened in spite of President Trump’s anti-conservation crusade and neither he nor his administration deserves a shred of credit for this congressional accomplishment."

Still, a strong bipartisan effort in Congress pulled the package together and passed it, noted Paul Edmondson, interim president and CEO of the National Trust for Historic Preservation.

“This package of public lands bills represents an important victory in preserving programs and places of great cultural importance to our nation: Ocmulgee National Monument, a land rich in meaning and spiritual significance to several Native American tribes; LWCF, which has enabled the preservation of lands and landmarks where our human history is written; historic sites that reveal important and difficult stories of the Reconstruction Era, and HBCU campuses, which are integral to the story of equality, civil rights, and higher education in our country," he said.

"Passage of this legislative package speaks to the power of historic preservation to transcend party lines and unite lawmakers through a shared appreciation for our country’s rich heritage and the places that illuminate our diverse and complicated histories," added Edmondson. "We commend the many members of Congress who played key roles in advancing the individual legislation to this point and thank the many citizens and partner groups we worked with for years, in some cases, to help advocate for this outcome.”

Comments

Mary Ellen Kustin is mistaken. Trump does deserve credit for this bill because he signed it into law.  He could have vetoed it and he didn't. I'm a conservationist who deeply cares about our public lands. I was watching on how Trump would vote on this bill. With Trump signing this bill he once again has won my vote for 2020. 


Even after he has designated that 13.5 million acres of land do not deserve protection? And let us not skip past his deregulation that will hurt the enviroment.


This bill passed 92 to 8 in the Senate and 363 to 62 in the House, whch would EASILY have overridden any Presidential veto.  The president did nothing to champion this bill and a veto would have not have been in his best interest given the overwhelming Congressional support.  The two people who deserve credit for the passage of this bill are Senators Murkowski and Cantwell, who worked for two years crafting a bipartisian bill, and certainly not Donald Trump.


Just sweep under the rug the scandals, racist tweets, relentless attack on federal employees, thousands of confirmed lies, etc.  Trump wouldn't have vetoed this because it had massive support.  Please educate yourself.  


I dont care what president signed it but am just glad that they did. That's what counts. 


I am troubled that your bar for approval of the President is so low. This one bill is really not even close to a counterbalance to the environmentally destructive policies of this administration. The NPS, among other land management agencies, will emerge from the Trump years worse than they did going in. 

But maybe that doesn't concern you. Hope there are not too many with such low expectations for Presidential success. 

 


Nice to see at least a couple people here who are able to appreciate a good thing.


This bill is pretty much meaningless if the government doesn't prpvide the money to back it up. Personally I think this is part of a republican pattern of defunding federal agencies until they can no longer function and then blaming those agencies for being dysfunctional. If Trump put the same amount of money into public lands that he wants to put into his border wall, he could wipe out the maintenance backlogs and fund public lands for years. Instead he wants to carve up a sensitive desert ecosystem and in the end the wall will do very little to stop illegal immigration. This president is no conservationist and if you care at all about public lands you should definitely vote for someone else.


Add comment

CAPTCHA

This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.

The Essential RVing Guide

The Essential RVing Guide to the National Parks

The National Parks RVing Guide, aka the Essential RVing Guide To The National Parks, is the definitive guide for RVers seeking information on campgrounds in the National Park System where they can park their rigs. It's available for free for both iPhones and Android models.

This app is packed with RVing specific details on more than 250 campgrounds in more than 70 parks.

You'll also find stories about RVing in the parks, some tips if you've just recently turned into an RVer, and some planning suggestions. A bonus that wasn't in the previous eBook or PDF versions of this guide are feeds of Traveler content: you'll find our latest stories as well as our most recent podcasts just a click away.

So whether you have an iPhone or an Android, download this app and start exploring the campgrounds in the National Park System where you can park your rig.