Eliminating park entrance fees, while an attractive concept, isn't as simple, nor likely to be as successful, as Scott Silver and others suggest.
Why?
1. The authority to impose and collect fees is established by Congress, not the NPS. Congress clearly intends fee revenue to supplement their own less-than-adequate appropriations for the national parks.
Thanks Kurt,
I think you've got a really great blog going here. Between new management policies, solicitation for private dollars, continued threats from development, not to mention hiking, camping and traveling, there is so much going on in the National Park Service, we will probably have a hard time keeping up with it all!
The New River superintendent is right. How could anyone argue otherwise. I would go even further in the strict preservation mode.
Too many conservationists are too willing to settle for too little these days. Compromise is the name of the game. Bah humbug. Where's the John Muir model?
Great article Kurt! It's truly a sad state of affairs these days with the American Recreation Coalition and other commercialization/privatization groups making significant gains in using the starving the beast strategy as a major vehicle in turning our parks and forests into amusement parks.
Bingo! You have connected the dots that some in the Bush Administration ideologue camp hoped would not be made. It should be added that it is not "all-them" involved in this effort. There are current career NPS employees working to develop some of these changes.
A quick note:
While I do not support Manson's policies, you need to research the reason he's leaving-- it is health related. He's not just walking out, his health is forcing the decision.
Thanks for the great blog.
It's inevitable that travel accommodations like these have to be repaired. At least, even if the lodge is temporarily unavailable, it is being improved to serve its guests better. It also means having more time to enjoy the panoramic view of the mountains.
egads! i`ve seen a number of state parks. some good. many just ok. some terrible.
i`d wager that few states have the moolah to maintain their own parks in addition to taking over national parks.
the only places where i think this could work is where a national park abuts a state one. like big bend in texas, or redwoods in california.
I still work in the 9-5 world. ;-)
I've been at 3 different companies in the last six years. Many of them have moved to a review format like this one. (In fact, my current company uses the exact same 5-point designation.)
I wonder if at times we aren't fighting losing battles on more than one front.
I think we tend to fund accessibility projects to a far greater degree than basic conservation projects.
Case in point is the $150 million that's now need to rebuild the Going-to-the-Sun highway. True, we haven't been keeping up with maintenance on that road, so the bill is now due.
It seems that if the Grizzlies could be removed from the list, it could justify and vouch for the idea of endangered species protections in general...
So, is the population strong enough in numbers to survive without protection?
You have to love this one. The Bush folks are getting paranoid I would say. First, remember that all federal civil servants take an oath to defend the U.S. Constitution. That has been done, well, for a long time (here is a link addressing that history: (http://www.opm.gov/constitution_initiative/oath.asp.)
Well, I was going to comment with a rather unconstructive "oh, crap," but your last para - and Howard's elucidation of it - gives me a constructive response to this project that will not die.
Whether or not Kaiser follows through on their promise to appeal, and whether the BLM joins them, will affect the near-term course of events in the fight against the unneeded and ill-conceived Eagle Mountain landfill. Regardless, park supporters should rest assured that all plaintiffs remain committed to fighting this project.
Many people avoid public lands with fees. Furthermore, the higher the fees the fewer the number of low-income visitors will visit the park. While a $5 increase may not seem like much to many Americans, it is for others. Especially those living in rural areas surrounding parks with steep entrance fees. From my experience, many locals avoid parks in their backdoors for this very reason.
Cindy,
I do have a call in to the National Park Foundation. However, I'd be surprised to see them comment on what's going on with the Management Policies, as the foundation was created by Congress and isn't likely to bite back.
Thanks so much for summarizing the current state of play so helpfully for us. I needed to understand where the useful points of influence might be.
I wonder if you've had an opportunity to talk to Vin Cipolla and the folks at the National Park Foundation and get their take on these proposed policy changes?
Never have I been more ashamed to be from Tracy (the district that Rep. Pombo represents in Congress.)
In September, I had written to Resources Chairman Pombo and called his office to express my distinct displeasure at his erstwhile proposal to sell off 15 national parks and naming rights within other parks in order to get Democratic support for drilling in ANWR.
Gracias por su conversation with Presidente Kiernan.
Yo soy del Paso del Norte in Chihuahua (en Mexico), but I now live in El Paso. My favorite park is the massive Big Bend National Park which is about four hours away.
Good to hear that those who have a bit of the public's attention are making their opinions known. Even better that they are coming down on the side of clear thinking and sensible policy-making.
Would you be so kind as to give us an idea of what kind of timeline the Interior Department is working on to implement the new NPS Management Policies?
Joan,
The base material of the tights blends four-way stretch 80 percent Coolmax and 20 percent Lycra, while the conditioning web itself is two-way stretch 80 percent nylon and 20 percent Lycra.
I really dislike most synthetics that I have to wear against sweaty skin as it is difficult to keep it free of odor wash after wash.
Do you know what material this gear is made of?
I checked out the website but it couldn\'t answer my question.
Are you going to be testing this gear over the long-term and reporting your results?
I really liked this. It looks like Glacier is the only park to do this. Am I right?
The pictures of the trees, the sounds of the birds, and the talks from the rangers all make it a part of a complete little tour. Only Smell-A-Vision (TM) would make it better.
Wow! Messrs Hayden, Restivo and Gilk are to be commended for their efforts. What a way for those of us who've enjoyed our visits to Glacier to enjoy them again from the comfort of home.
The final solution to the problem of protecting and managing national parks. Create virtual parks where all that is needed is the ability to manipulate computer images. Cynical, perhaps. Possible, very much so.
Just a note to say thank you for the recognition of Neo Commons on your blog.
Your coverage of the NPS and the many issues the agency faces today is, at least from my view point, appreciated. I hope that members of the Coalition of NPS Retirees are reading and posting here. If not, I will have to encourage them to do so.
Is there hunting allowed there, for elk or other fair game?
Texas is home to a vast amount of hunters. Now, I know that a part of those hunting licenses' fees go to the Texas Parks & Wildlife Commission, but it still bothers me.
Why would ANYONE want to kill a moose?
Amen, MM.
I stopped by your place via Chris' blog, Creek Running North.
The recent governmental assaults on our public parks are scandalous, if not outright criminal. I'm not a skilled wilderness explorer (although, I would love to have that as a fulltime profession), but it doesn't take an expert to see the road ahead is not good in terms of preservation and conservation.
And don't forget the latest outrage, Bush Instituting Political Loyalty Tests for National Park Service Employees (http://tinyurl.com/ar9zu) Will it never end?
From parks to public transit and all points between, each administration inside the beltway tends to neglect the public trust in favor of private friends. This administration, the one led by George W. Bush, has reached historically new lows in its handling of the public's trust.
My hiking stick epiphany came on a (stick-free) hut-to-hut hike in Switzerland some years back. As I watched Swiss farmers, sticks in hand, tending cattle on steep Alpine slopes, it occurred to me that people all over the world who run up and down mountainsides chasing cows, sheep or whatever all use sticks, not just to shake at their livestock but also for stability on uneven slopes.
Good questions for Manson. Many of his replies are disingenuous. For instance, when he talks about the $4.9 billion invested in wiping out the maintenance backlog, he forgets to mention that almost none of this is "new" money. He is simply adding up what the NPS would have spent on regular maintenance and calling it backlog maintenance money.
Great interview with Manson. The title indicating he doesn't think there is a need to tinker with the Organic Act should apply also to the NPS Management Policies.
Macombs Dam and Mullaly Parks across the street from historic Yankee Stadium in Bronx, NY may be destroyed until we rise up and voice our concerns. The Yankees want to build a new stadium on top of these parks. If these parks are seized by business, is any park really safe?
Macombs Dam and Mullaly Parks across the street from historic Yankee Stadium in Bronx, NY may be destroyed until we rise up and voice our concerns. The Yankees want to build a new stadium on top of these parks. If these parks are seized by business, is any park really safe?
There's a word that we use here in Virginia when we read a letter like Judge Manson's, and it begins with "chicken".
What utter nonsense. Their agenda is clear as Hoffman is being driven by the likes of Bill Horn, lobbyist for the Blue Ribbon Coalition
I don't think you're imagining when it comes to the word "balance." This has long been a part of the Bush administration's spin vocabulary. "We must have balance in how we trash the land . . . " I came to the same conclusion upon reading Director M's letter to the NYT.
Kurt,
Impressive that this management policy story keeps getting covered across the country, in news and editorials. Its a demonstration of the profound respect that most regular Americans have for our nation's treasured places.
Help support us– the one source for journalism dedicated to our National Parks.
All Recent Comments
Who's Viewing Traveler?
Should Park Entrance Fees be Eliminated?
Another Parks Blogger Joins the Ranks
Give to the Parks
New River Gorge Superintendent Speaks Out Against Rim-top Development
Slowly Starving the Parks
Manson Resigns from Interior Department
Rainier's Paradise Inn Closing for Rehab
Newspaper Suggests Pennsylvania Take Valley Forge Back
NPS Managers Directed On How to Evaluate Employees
A Story Congress Should Be Told
Should We Delist Grizzlies in the Yellowstone Ecosystem?
Retired NPS Employee Laments New 'Loyalty Oaths'
Joshua Tree's Landfill: Battle Not Over
NPCA President Kiernan On Entrance Fee Hikes
Management Policies Primer
Pombo Measure Just Might Allow Mining in Parks
A Conversation With NPCA President Kiernan
Bangor Daily News Condemns MP Revisions
When It's Time for Tights
Acadia: A Timeless Jewel
Glacier Rolls Out Innovative "eHikes"
Blogroll Etiquette
Mesa Verde--Stepping Back into Time
Moose Poached Near Grand Teton
What Did the National Park Service Do to the GOP?
Well, At Least DOI Was Pleased
NPS Management Policies Revision Toned Down
NPS Organic Act To be Examined
What Should be Done With Our Parks?
Pack A Stick
Manson: No Need To Tinker With Organic Act
Pombo Fallout Continues
How Serious Are Today's Threats to National Parks?
Mr. Manson Responds
Sure Is Quiet Back There
If Hoffman Gets His Way....