Its worth noting that in a below post, you described a $150 million increase in the Park Service's operating budget a "drop in the bucket." If that's so, then when wonders what the $5 million in earmarks you listed above amount to.
Well, we all know that the Parks need money to operate - and as you have amply demonstrated, they need a lot more money than they are getting currently. The question, then, is should all American contribute equally to the funding of the Parks? Or should Americans who use the Parks contribute some bit more to the Parks than Americans who don't use the Parks?
Kurt, one thing to consider with the fee issue is that they are not donation based, but instead fine based. For Forest Service and BLM lands, for instance, if you put off getting the proper parking permit and backcountry fee, you could get fined or even put in jail for repeat offences.
Woah there pardner. Y2Y is not about "removing people from the landscape." You've leaped to a conclusion that's not borne out by the language in the Y2Y proposal. In brief, Y2Y (and all the other conservation network proposals I'm aware of) is about restoring corridors linking core wild areas. People are very much a part of these proposals.
Although the idea of an unrestricted corridor from Wyoming to the Yukon is inspiring, it is in reality, a pipedream. As much as some of us would like to remove human beings from the Mid-American landscape this is just not practical.
We used to hear this in the Air Force (I was on active duty for 10 years and in the Air Force Reserve for another 16 years). It's called do more with less. And it is a pernicious trend. Here again, the problem is only likely to worsen pending a great waking up by the mass confused public.
I think that they are greatly misrepresenting that "96% satisfaction" statistic. Of course it would be hard to go to some place as amazing as Yellowstone and "not be satisfied" - but they shouldn't kid themselves that people don't notice outdated exhibits, or that it is harder than ever to spend time with an experienced Park Ranger while in the Park.
There's another factor that doesn't get reported when discussing NPS visitor statistics. In my own park, where there is no entrance gate and there are many different places and ways that visitors enter, we rely on NPS staff and volunteers to count visitors.
Kurt - Thanks for posting these additional numbers. One thing that jumps out at me from them is that with visitation bottoming-out in 1990, and visitation peaking in 1990, its clear that economic conditions affect visitation. I think you're right that fees can also affect visitation.
For what it's worth, after NPS visitation peaked at a record 287.2 million in 1987, it plummeted all the way down to 255.8 million in 1990, rebounded a bit to 274.7 million in 1992, and then slid again to 265.8 million in 1996 before climbing back up to 287.1 million in 1999.
Actually, I think that declining visitation to the National Parks is something worth being concerned about. From 1986 - 1988, National Park visitation consistently topped 280 million recreational visits, and the NPS has never topped the 287.2 million recreational visits recorded in 1987 - coming closest in 1999. In 2005, the NPS only had 273 million recreational visits.
In light of a giant maintenance backlog, falling operational budgets, and fewer park personnel, it is surprising that the Govt would be worried about lower visitation numbers to the NPS. If anything, they should be exploring ways to restrict public access to the parks until there is a budget that can support the numbers of visitors today.
In the last ten years, the federal recreation fee programs have increased entrance fees, some of them have doubled. This could be a key factor impacting visitation. However, 277 million Americans continue to visit parks and are willing to pay for the experience.
John, while you raise questions in need of answers, I didn't intend to suggest that NPS trends mirrored those at New Mexico's state parks or vice versa. Rather, it was simply to point out that just as NPS visitation goes up and down, so does that at New Mexico's state parks yet Tourism Secretary Michael Cerletti didn't seem as concerned about that in his testimony.
Some aspects of this post don't ring true. For example, Kurt wonders if Carlsbad's remote location has been a factor in its declining visitation - but unless Carlsbad Caverns have moved recently, its location should not have played any role in declining visitation.
Get off the snowmobile issue. They are vile, loud, smokey, and intrusive! But more damage is done to back country features by skiers tracking through runoff chanels, or climbing to the top of geyser cones for pictures with the tips of their skis poking the fragile geyserite. We need an honest evaluation of how to use the parks that is inclusive - not exclusive.
Mike does a good job of encapsulating the whole Norton-era debacle. It will only get worse under Kempthorne. I've been watching him for years. I'm a native of Idaho.
Readers interested in the issue of light pollution should check out the International Dark Sky Association at http://www.darksky.org , and which is dedicated to combatting light pollution.
I saw the Milky Way (our galaxy!!) while standing in the surf after dusk at Popham Beach, Maine, last September, fly fishing for striped bass. I hadn't seen the galaxy like that for years, not since leaving New York's Adirondack region.
I wonder, though, given all the needs of the National Park System, if a road has been destroyed by hurricanes in two consecutive years, should we really spend the money to rebuild it? The article reports that the lack of human activity on the fragile seashore - activity which used to include bustling campgrounds and commercial concessions - has produced an increasing abundance of wildlife.
What's truly astonishing about this proposal is that the Blue Ridge Parkway already boasts 11 Visitor's Centers, not counting the facilities at Mabry Mill and the shared Oconoluftee VC with Great Smoky Mountains, which I believe makes it the Nationl Park with greatest number of Visitor's Centers in the System.
I agree with you. Why build a multi-million dollar centerpiece on top of a crumbling infrastructure? I think this politician is going after the "sexy" headline grabbing project for his community, rather than the more prudent but less noteworthy long term solution. I have seen the effects of funding cuts along the Parkway.
And of course, the ironic thing is that the so-called Revised Management Policies still do far too little to recognize the sheer diversity of sites within the National Park System.
The good news, however, is that I believe that Park Pass money is all sent back to the Parks. I have to believe, though, that the 2007 Parks Pass will be a bit more than $50 - which will be good for the Parks....
The good congressman's stance, I'd be willing to bet, has less to do with enhancing the transportation alternatives available to a handful of constituents than it does with accommodating some very special interests -- those who've kicked in campaign dollars to his re-election warchest. No, no, that couldn't be the case. Or could it?
This post ends with the question "can the NPS afford another National Park at this time?" One thing about the maze of designations within the National Park System is that ultimately I don't think that there would be much cost difference in the way a Cedar Breaks National Park would be run from the way Cedar Breaks NM is being run right now.
ADVISE THAT THE SHIP IS SINKING AT DOI AND THE RATS ARE FLEEING. NEXT IN LINE BUREAU OF RECLAMATION JOHN KEYS ANNOUCED RESIGNATION EFFETIVE APRIL 15, COULD FRAN MANELLA BE NEXT. INTERESTING FOUR DAYS AFTER SEC. NORTO ANNOUNCEMENT.
HANK HOWARD
BOR CRITIC
Having worked as a seasonal ranger at Mesa Verde relatively recently, I doubt that Mesa Verde is any better funded than any other park. The summer I worked there, the park administration saved money by not leasing government vehicles and requiring interpreters to drive their own vehicles to and from tour sites.
A local park has 50 permanent vacancies. They are hoping that retirements will occur so that they can keep the remainder of the staff. Meanwhile the appearance of the park is worsening because of a decimated maintenance staff. Parks should quit trying to keep services at "normal" level and shut down facilities commensurate with the parks ability to maintain them properly.
I agree. How is anyone supposed to know which federal agency manages the many scattered National Monuments across our country. The distinction is very important. Mt. St. Helens National Monument is managed by the Forest Service, and within the monument Weyerhaeuser presumably still holds some logging rights.
Myrna Johnson is absolutely right that any look at revamping the National Park Service aught to encompass a broader look at the organization of Federal Lands.
In defense of Craters of the Moon NM, I think that it is one of the most unique locations in all of the United States, and because of that uniqueness, is worthy of preservation. There are, after all, only a handfull of lava fields in the US - and I believe that Craters of the Moon is the largest.
My question is why would this site give so much exposure to PEER?
PEER seems to me to support it self with doom and gloom articles that only gives half truths.
This type of extreme spin does nothing to help the environment.
I Looked at Jeff Ruch's site and he has not one positive Idea to help.
I bet they'll receive a number of very creative ideas. I'm sure a number of them will involve a snowmobile in some form, or at least a nod towards the commercial end of the Interior's recent activities.
Shouldn't Director Mainella's legacy be that the national park areas that she manages are in better shape than they were when she assumed her position? Now that would be a legacy about which to be proud. Sadly, that's not the case and almost everyone knows it.
"Yellowstone Bison Numbers Plummet".
These are the Kind of headlines that give most of the cubicle people a misunderstanding of the goals of the experts in charge.
They Culled most of those Bison.
"Opponents of the management plan continue to criticize the way officials are dealing with the issue".
What would be their plan?
Great post. Another factor here is that most middle-class kids have their lives managed to a very high degree by parents concerned that every possible opportunity for enrichment be realized. It's certainly possible that nature can be scheduled into kids' lives this way and is; but still, parents are busy and convenience is a big decisionmaking factor.
Thank you for highlighting this important issue. As a baby boomer and a new grandfather of a "whatever the 200X generation will be called" this has given me the inspiration to make sure that my granddaughter does not grow up with nature deficit disorder.
You sold me on it Kurt! This looks like an important and interesting book. I've got to read it still of course, but it seems that kids these days have a lot to keep them from both entering and exploring they're public lands.
Help support us– the one source for journalism dedicated to our National Parks.
All Recent Comments
Conservation Groups Sue to Get Yellowstone Trout Protection
So What if the NPS Needs to Cinch Its Financial Belt?
Watch Out for Those Recreation Fees
Lawsuit Focuses on Two Everglades Bird Species
Yellowstone to Yukon: Freedom to Roam
Talking Points...and Points of Concern
Of Pigs and Parks
Park Visitation Trends: Is There a Problem?
Are Park Inholdings Good Partnerships?
Park Visitation, Part Two
Secretary Norton's Farewell
TWS Wants Kempthorne To "Correct" Norton's Damage
How Long Will the Parks Last?
Keeping the Night Dark in the Parks
Gulf Islands National Seashore Still Recovering
Blue Ridge Head Scratcher
Denver Post Has Suggestion for Kempthorne
Entrance Fees Going Up
Has Secretary Norton Opened the Way for OHV Use in Parks?
That Road To Nowhere
Cedar Breaks National....Park?
Global Warming's Impact on Glacier NP to Be Discussed By UNESCO
Park Lodging Bargains Beginning to Sprout
Funding the Parks: A Mixed Bag
Reaction to Rethinking the NPS
Do We Need to Rethink The NPS?
What Yellowstone Rangers Say, and Don't Say
Time for a New Interior Department Logo?
Director Mainella Pats Herself on Her Back
Yellowstone Bison Numbers Plummet
Last Child in the Woods....