National Park Service officials are not commenting on how much the recent deployment of law enforcement rangers from around the country to parks on the U.S.-Mexico border is costing the agency, where the money is coming from, or how that will impact law enforcement in crowded parks this summer.
As the Traveler reported early this month, teams of law enforcement rangers are being dispatched from around the National Park System to Organ Pipe Cactus National Monument in Arizona and Amistad National Recreation Area in Texas on a rotating basis to help with border control.
Under the deployment plan, teams of seven rangers -- four law enforcement rangers, two U.S. Park Police officers, and one Investigative Services Branch ranger -- are being sent "to increase staffing and capacity at the designated border parks," according to a memo from R. Duane Michael, acting chief ranger for the National Park Service's Northeast Region. "These resources will be under the operational control of the assigned park and will (1) support normal park operations and (2) conduct operations that support CBP border security objectives."
The deployments come when border crossings have dropped significantly; in fiscal 2017, apprehensions were down to their lowest level since 1971, according to the Migration Policy Institute in Washington, D.C. Too, more of those caught crossing the U.S.-Mexico border were likely doing so to seek asylum.
And the head of the union that represents Border Patrol agents has called the administration's recent move to send National Guard troops to the border lands "a colossal waste of resources."
"We have seen no benefit," Brandon Judd, president of the union that represents 15,000 agents, the National Border Patrol Council, told the Los Angeles Times this past week.
The Park Service deployments also come as most parks are heading into the busiest months of the year, when the hiring of seasonal rangers has been adversely impacted by the Park Service wrongly applying hiring regulations, and when the ranks of National Park Service law enforcement rangers are shrinking, according to a May 2017 report from Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility.
Jeremy Barnum, the chief spokesman for the National Park Service, declined to answer Traveler questions pertaining to:
* The costs of the deployments;
* Whether Organ Pipe and Amistad have seen a recent uptick in illegal border crossings;
* Which parks are being asked to provide rangers for this program;
* Whether any parks along the U.S.-Canada border will see similar deployments, and;
* Whether anything was being done to help short-staffed parks across the system that are trying to protect resources and provide visitors with an enjoyable experience.
"We do not share specifics of law enforcement operations," he said in an email.
Also seeking answers relating to the deployment is U.S. Rep. Raúl M. Grijalva, an Arizona Democrat who is the ranking member on the House Natural Resources Committee. He wrote Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke for answers to a number of questions:
1 – How much will this deployment cost?
2 – Did (the Department of Homeland Security) ask for additional assistance with U.S. Customs and Border Patrol enforcement objectives along the border? If so, how did the DOI coordinate with DHS to determine the appropriate personnel to deploy?
3 – What specific activity will be conducted by U.S. Park Police? Will NPS personnel be responsible for arresting, detaining or holding individuals? If so, please describe the relevant training that prepares U.S. Park Police to “stop illegal border crossing.”
4 – Of the various National Park Service assets on the U.S. borer with Mexico, how were these two sites selected?
5 – The U.S. Park Police is traditionally located in three urban areas: San Francisco, New York, and Washington, D.C. How will this deployment impact law enforcement personnel in these locations? How will the deployment impact law enforcement capabilities at other national parks?
6 – You stated that this deployment is “the first of many steps Interior will take to secure the homeland.” What other steps does DOI plan to take?
Story Categories:
A copy of National Parks Traveler's financial statements may be obtained by sending a stamped, self-addressed envelope to: National Parks Traveler, P.O. Box 980452, Park City, Utah 84098. National Parks Traveler was formed in the state of Utah for the purpose of informing and educating about national parks and protected areas.
Residents of the following states may obtain a copy of our financial and additional information as stated below:
- Florida: A COPY OF THE OFFICIAL REGISTRATION AND FINANCIAL INFORMATION FOR NATIONAL PARKS TRAVELER, (REGISTRATION NO. CH 51659), MAY BE OBTAINED FROM THE DIVISION OF CONSUMER SERVICES BY CALLING 800-435-7352 OR VISITING THEIR WEBSITE. REGISTRATION DOES NOT IMPLY ENDORSEMENT, APPROVAL, OR RECOMMENDATION BY THE STATE.
- Georgia: A full and fair description of the programs and financial statement summary of National Parks Traveler is available upon request at the office and phone number indicated above.
- Maryland: Documents and information submitted under the Maryland Solicitations Act are also available, for the cost of postage and copies, from the Secretary of State, State House, Annapolis, MD 21401 (410-974-5534).
- North Carolina: Financial information about this organization and a copy of its license are available from the State Solicitation Licensing Branch at 888-830-4989 or 919-807-2214. The license is not an endorsement by the State.
- Pennsylvania: The official registration and financial information of National Parks Traveler may be obtained from the Pennsylvania Department of State by calling 800-732-0999. Registration does not imply endorsement.
- Virginia: Financial statements are available from the Virginia Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, 102 Governor Street, Richmond, Virginia 23219.
- Washington: National Parks Traveler is registered with Washington State’s Charities Program as required by law and additional information is available by calling 800-332-4483 or visiting www.sos.wa.gov/charities, or on file at Charities Division, Office of the Secretary of State, State of Washington, Olympia, WA 98504.
National parks and their natural resources belong to you. The National Parks Traveler works to ensure you know how these essential places are being cared for.
Sign Up For Our Weekly Newsletter
Unsubscribe at any time.
INN Member
The easiest way to explore RV-friendly National Park campgrounds.
Here’s the definitive guide to National Park System campgrounds where RVers can park their rigs.
Our app is packed with RVing- specific details on more than 250 campgrounds in more than 70 national parks.
You’ll also find stories about RVing in the parks, tips helpful if you’ve just recently become an RVer, and useful planning suggestions.
Comments
Here's a little known fact. DOI LE personnel have been deployed to the southern border to do border enforcement under EVERY administration. The only difference is that the current DOI administration is making it public. Ask any DOI LEO and they will tell you the same thing.
True but keeping the costs hidden wasn't part of the game plan. DOI may be making it public but only in a way that can score political points.
If unlawful traffic thru the border parks are causing immense resource damage, and drug smuggling is creating dangerous conditions for visitors and staff alike, it seems proper that NPS law enforcement respond.
Any more updates? Last one I saw was in May where 13 arrests were made and a firearm seized.
https://www.doi.gov/pressreleases/department-interior-border-surge-shows...
I guess our Interior Officers must comply with the "zero tolerance" orders as well.
But how much of that press release can be believed?
All of it, unless you have evidence to the contrary.
Only a complete fool would accept anything coming out of Washington these days without questioning it.
Anon- Do you have evidence to the contrary? It is so ironic that all those that want the government to be bigger get distraught when government is not acting the way they want. This is exactly why we must have a limited Federal government as the Constitution requires. You never know who is going to be in charge.
An additional question for the NPS (that will go unanswered) could be if any personnel have had to separate migrant children from their parents at the border.
As opposed to what? Sending them to jail with their parents?
Which is exactly what your orange hero has decided to do. Send them to jail with their parents. I still haven't heard how he is going to deal with the thousands of kids in cages that will have to be reunited with their parents.
Once again, Buck. I hope your vioice isn't silenced. Someone has to speak up for the uglier nature of some of our citizens, lest people forget and think things are all daisies and unicorns.
There were people just like you excusing Manzanar, Tule Lake, Minadoka, and the rest. Of course the 1988 Ronald Reagan commission found that these camps were a result of "race prejudice, war hysteria, and a failure of political leadership", and, this is the important part to you no doubt, over $1 billion in reparations were paid to the families, with yet another apology and an additional $400 million by President George HW Bush in 1991 [$1.6B disbursed by 1998].