Archaeologists say border wall construction would destroy archaeological sites at Organ Pipe Cactus National Monument/Patrick Cone
Editor's note: This updates with response from National Park Service.
President Trump's determination to see a towering border wall built between the United States and Mexico very likely would destroy archaeological resources in Organ Pipe Cactus National Monument, a National Park Service report says.
A quick field survey along 11 miles of the national monument in Arizona near where the wall is proposed to be built identified five archaeological sites, and left the archaeologists of the mind that "significant, presently-unrecorded surface-level and buried archaeological deposits persist across the project (are), and we must assume that all such unrecorded deposits will be destroyed over the course of ensuing border wall construction."
The survey was done between June 24 and June 28 along the monument's southern boundary. That quick reconnaissance identified five sites, two that the Park Service archaeologists believe qualify for National Register of Historic Places listing.
Construction got under way in Organ Pipe earlier this summer. To facilitate that, the Park Service closed a road in the monument that runs east from the Lukeville, Arizona, port of entry almost all the way to the monument's eastern boundary.
Dr. Andrew Veech, who works for the Park Service's Intermountain Region Archaeology Program, couldn't talk about his field work Tuesday, saying he had been told not to speak to reporters.
In Washington, D.C., the agency's chief spokesman, Jeremy Barnum said that, "Due to their geographic orientation along the United States/Mexico border, a handful of parks are challenged with managing impacts stemming from various cross-border illegal activities. As such, the National Park Service works closely with the Department of Homeland Security to provide for life and safety and to protect monument resources. The National Park Service appreciates the role of an integrated Border Security approach and values the ongoing interagency efforts to address the multidimensional issue."
Earlier this year, the U.S. Customs and Border Protection announced its desire to build a tall barrier wall along the monument's 63-mile-long boundary with Mexico. While a federal judge in California initially blocked the plan to build a wall with concrete-filled steel bollards that would be approximately 6 inches in diameter, the U.S. Supreme Court overturned that ruling and cleared the way for construction to commence.
"The project entails the wholesale replacement of all existing vehicle barriers and pedestrian fencing along (Organ Pipe's) southern boundary with a new, continuous 9.1 m- (30-foot-) tall, steel bollard fence, undergirded by a 2.44 to 3.04 m- (8 to 10 foot-) deep concrete and steel foundation," noted the archaeological report, which the Washington Post obtained through a Freedom of Information Act request. "Likewise, the project includes the construction, expansion, and/or improvement of existing roads along the U.S. side of the border and the installation of spotlights and surveillance equipment."
Veech noted in the report that the Park Service had been told that once the construction began, the work would occupy a 60-foot wide swath of what's known as the "Roosevelt Reservation" in the monument. All told, the work could affect 218 acres within Organ Pipe, the report said.
"...the NPS regards the entire 18.3 m- (60-foot-) wide Roosevelt Reservation as an area of great concern, whose cultural and natural resources are imperiled."
In light of that prospect, he recommended that "all presently unsurveyed (or under-surveyed) sections of (Organ Pipe's) southern boundary be completed as soon as is possible, in light of impending border fence construction along the park’s entire 48.3 km- (30 mi-) long southern boundary, entailing ground disturbance across the whole, 18.3 m- (60 ft-) wide Roosevelt Reservation."
A mollusk shell found by archaeologists pointed to an ancient trade route/NPS, Andrew Veech
The Sonoran Desert cradled by Organ Pipe Cactus is unlike most other deserts in the world. It receives more rainfall, on average, than other deserts, and is biologically rich, with more than 600 plant species and more than 50 mammalian species. Nearly 300 bird species, and 50 types of amphibian and reptilian species, also have been counted in the monument. Taken as a whole, it’s understandable why the park in 1976 was designated an International Biosphere Reserve.
There’s rich human history here, too, dating back 15,000 years. The Old Salt Trail was used by cultures down through the centuries to bring salt, seashells, and obsidian gathered from Sea of Cortez salt beds at Sonora, Mexico, northward through this landscape. The Tohono O’odham culture relied on the fruit of the saguaros and organ pipe cactus for food.
More recent history is seen in the clutter of abandoned mines that prospectors had hoped would make them rich in gold and copper. Early ranchers also impacted the landscape, as cattle overgrazed many areas before the animals were finally removed in 1975.
It was this rich history and unique ecology that led President Franklin Delano Roosevelt to designate the 520-square-mile Organ Pipe Cactus as a national monument in April 1937. A wild desert garden grows here, unlike any other in the United States. There are plenty of cacti, from the Saguaro and Organ Pipe to Senita and hedgehogs. Even the rare Acuna cactus grows here.
Conservationists have expressed their concern over the impact the wall's construction would have on the park.
"The entire southern boundary of Organ Pipe would be walled off by what has been described as a 30-foot wall with all-night floodlighting," Dan Mills, of the Sierra Club's Grand Canyon Chapter Borderlands Program, told the Traveler in July. "I camped out at the campground there by the visitor center there. You can see the wall from the campground. What I experienced last week, of dark skies full of stars and the Milky Way and everything, that might be one of the last times that people get to experience that because of the floodlights that would be on this new wall.”
Veech's team found five archaeological sites during their brief survey, all of which contained various flaked lithic artifacts, such as obsidian, chalcedony, basalt, or chert, and volcanic igneous rock. Three of the sites contained either brownware or red ceramic sherds, or both, and two contained marine shell fragments.
The sites were fairly small in area, from nearly a half-acre to as little as 0.05-acre in size. Some could have been used for a "short-term encampment, perhaps one used and occupied at some point during the Archaic period (8,500 BCE-300 CE)," the report noted. The largest site contained flaked obsidian artifacts as well as five "marine shell fragments."
"Together with the 5 marine shell fragments, these obsidian artifacts denote the southwest-to-northeast transport of exotic raw materials from ... the Gulf of California and Pinacate Peaks of Sonora, Mexico, into southwestern Arizona," the report added.
A brass .45-.70 caliber rifle shell casing from the late 1800s also was discovered. "The .45-.70 rifle cartridge was adopted by the U.S. Army in 1873 as the service cartridge for its trap-door Springfield rifle," the archaeologists' report noted. "The Army continued using the .45-.70 cartridge until 1892, when it was replaced by the .30-.40 caliber Krag cartridge."
Stories about:
Story Categories:
A copy of National Parks Traveler's financial statements may be obtained by sending a stamped, self-addressed envelope to: National Parks Traveler, P.O. Box 980452, Park City, Utah 84098. National Parks Traveler was formed in the state of Utah for the purpose of informing and educating about national parks and protected areas.
Residents of the following states may obtain a copy of our financial and additional information as stated below:
- Florida: A COPY OF THE OFFICIAL REGISTRATION AND FINANCIAL INFORMATION FOR NATIONAL PARKS TRAVELER, (REGISTRATION NO. CH 51659), MAY BE OBTAINED FROM THE DIVISION OF CONSUMER SERVICES BY CALLING 800-435-7352 OR VISITING THEIR WEBSITE. REGISTRATION DOES NOT IMPLY ENDORSEMENT, APPROVAL, OR RECOMMENDATION BY THE STATE.
- Georgia: A full and fair description of the programs and financial statement summary of National Parks Traveler is available upon request at the office and phone number indicated above.
- Maryland: Documents and information submitted under the Maryland Solicitations Act are also available, for the cost of postage and copies, from the Secretary of State, State House, Annapolis, MD 21401 (410-974-5534).
- North Carolina: Financial information about this organization and a copy of its license are available from the State Solicitation Licensing Branch at 888-830-4989 or 919-807-2214. The license is not an endorsement by the State.
- Pennsylvania: The official registration and financial information of National Parks Traveler may be obtained from the Pennsylvania Department of State by calling 800-732-0999. Registration does not imply endorsement.
- Virginia: Financial statements are available from the Virginia Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, 102 Governor Street, Richmond, Virginia 23219.
- Washington: National Parks Traveler is registered with Washington State’s Charities Program as required by law and additional information is available by calling 800-332-4483 or visiting www.sos.wa.gov/charities, or on file at Charities Division, Office of the Secretary of State, State of Washington, Olympia, WA 98504.
INN Member
The easiest way to explore RV-friendly National Park campgrounds.
Here’s the definitive guide to National Park System campgrounds where RVers can park their rigs.
Our app is packed with RVing- specific details on more than 250 campgrounds in more than 70 national parks.
You’ll also find stories about RVing in the parks, tips helpful if you’ve just recently become an RVer, and useful planning suggestions.
Comments
"Dr. Andrew Veech, who works for the Park Service's Intermountain Region Archaeology Program, couldn't talk about his field work Tuesday, saying he had been told not to speak to reporters. "
That one sentence tells us all we need to know about the trump administration regard for truth.
It is SOP for any federal office under any administration to have interviews with the press go through approved channels.
My four decades of practical experience disagrees with that, EC.
But I'd add that the Obama administration was not as transparent as it claimed to be.
I've yet to find any administration more in fear of a full and open sunlight exposure than the current one.
Kurt, I have no doubt you got folks to talk to you as anonymous sources. I am skeptical you were able to do citable interviews with personel that had not recieved either blanket or specific clearance to speak.
I have no reason to lie, ec. names named. supts and other staff.
I can tell you in my 20 years as a superintendent I did hundreds of news interviews and issued hundreds of news releases between 1993 and 2013. Never was I told by DOI or NPS in Washington what I could or could not say and I never had to have a news release or reply to reporters approved unless it related to proposed legislation.
Just remember if he doesn't want it to be true he'll just call it "fake news".
Thank you, Kurt, for resuming reporting on this. I hadn't noticed any news updates since before this past summer's Supreme Court decision, and thought that NP Traveler had decided to stay away from this controversy. Thank you for not playing it safe. If this wall expands beyond the immediate environs of Lukeville, into the open desert, it will be a travesty and the public needs to know what they are losing.
Didn't say you lied Kurt. Just think we may be talking issues at very different levels.
dscott - the travesty is what is currently happening at our southern border and its threat to our sovereignty, security and safety. Builiding a wall that will disturbed less than 1/10 of one percent of the footprint of the park is hardly a travesty. Tell me, how many women will be raped, children enslaved, people killed by the disturbance of that mollusk and some old brass rifle shells?
You have some serious issues there conflating who knows what.
CJ - Perhaps because that ability was embedded in your authority as Superintendent. It would be interesting to know who told Veech he couldn't speak.
I believe the inference is that in past administrations that Superintendents and others such as field workers would have been free to speak about any nearly any matter rather than being muzzled like staff under the current administration.
y_p_w - exact what did I conflate? Dscott said building the wall was a travesty. The wall is to stop illegal immigration. Seems quite linear and logical to me.
That somehow this will put a dent iinto people being raped, enslaved, or killed.
y_p_w - you don't think the wall will slow the flow?
Well...
1) Not really. The majority of illegal aliens in the US overstayed their visas and just disappear.
2) Your premise that this will somehow be an effective block against rapists. I think the word is "scapegoating".
3) No I don't believe that building barriers in the middle of the desert is going to do much to stem the flow. Smuggling of contraband is primarily through regular ports of entry although there are tunnels.
Overstays are definately a problem, but at least they have been vetted. Illegal overstays aren't coyotes for drugs and children. Illegal overstays aren't raping the women and children that entered with them. Scapegoating - are you really denying the problem of women and children being abused on their caravans into the country? If so, you really haven't been paying attention. As to not being effective the experiences of Operation Gatekeeper and Operation Hold the Line would suggest otherwise.
Wasn't sure what you were referring to. Sounded a lot like the claims that illegal aliens were responsible for various crimes once they entered the US.
However, no I don't believe that building more wall here is going to help. The system of barriers near population centers has worked pretty well. But in there areas it really makes no sense given what it's going to do to the landscape, flow of wildlife, desctruction of the land, etc. We already have technology. Any additional border wall is running into diminishing returns, adding to maintenance, as well as taking away money from boots on the ground.
Well that is true too
As to diminishing returns, I disagree. Without a complete barrier, physical, technological or human, folks will just go around. There are better solutions but the left would howl even more if they were implemented.
That IS the politics of fear that the Trump administration is propulgating. "Don't let that brown menace come across the border and sully our lilly white daughters."
In my entire medical career, stretching back 30 years, I delivered medical care to large numbers of undocumented aliens. They were rarely the agressors in their injury.
"There are better solutions but the left would howl even more if they were implemented." Such a shame that the term 'final solution' lost favor after the last time it was used by some of your ilk.
Honestly, Buck, you are coming more and more closer to sincerely speaking your honest opinion than ever.
"
The portion of the monument affected by this wall is not just some randomly-scattered and diffuse fraction - that is highly misleading. It is concentrated along the entire southern border of the monument, including the entire southern half of Puerto Blanco Drive, one of two scenic drives in the monument, and among the three areas in the monument most heavily used by visitors (the others being the Ajo Mountain Drive, and the visitor center / campground area). What is today a peaceful desert experience visiting unique Senita Basin and Quitobaquito Springs, accessible only from Puerto Blanco Drive, will be ruined by a giant rusty ugly industrialized/militarized barrier far more intrusive to the visitor experience than today's vehicle fence. Quitobaquito in fact is right on the border. This wall will completely alter (ruin) a visit to these two scenic highlights, which comprise about a quarter of the primary frontcountry "destinations" in the park. Not to mention this wall and its floodlighting will be visible from the campground where overnight visitors spend a lot of their time and enjoy the natural desert dark.
And so far I've just talked about the aesthetics and visitor experience. The impacts from more serious concerns (impacts on the free flow of flash flood waters; animal migration; and access to water - Quitobaquito is by far the largest water source in the park), plus direct destruction of park resources directly adjacent to the border like cactus and archaelogical artifacts, need to be considered as well.
The current vehicle fence has been effective at blocking the most destructive form of cross-border access here, ie vehicular access, while having none of the deleterious side-effects this wall will have. True, the vehicle fence does not block passage of people on foot, but patrol and surveillance are effective at interdicting that kind of traffic. All of the recent mass-group crossings in this area have been asylum-seekers anyway, who are not seeking to evade capture; they cross, and then sit down and wait to be picked-up. I'm sure some smuggling (people, drugs, etc) goes through here on foot, but the desert here is so dangerous and remote on the American side that its no wonder that most unauthorized entries occur near the relative safety of towns and official ports-of-entry in the first place, by the government's own figures. Most crossers know they can't handle a many-day backpack on foot through the bone-dry and (in the summer) hot desert wilderness which stretches dozens of miles north from the border at Organ Pipe. They know about the bodies still out there, and don't wish to join them.
Politcs of fear - BS. This from that bastion of conservatism the Huffington Post:
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/central-america-migrants-rape_n_5806972?g...
80% of the women crossing illegally into the US have been raped. But then, Rick, I suppose you believe that after raping these women and crossing the boarder illegally, the illegal aliens immediately turn in to model citizens. The news is ripe with reports of illegals committing heineous crimes, often multiple times after bleeding hearts like you release them back into the public.
There is nothing political about the issue. A strong border was the Democratic position in the recent past. Operation Gatekeeper and Hold the Line were implemented under Clinton admin. What is political is the left's opposition to anything Trump wants to do even if it where exactly the Dem policy only a few years ago.