An annual elk hunt intended to keep the overall population in check begins this weekend at Grand Teton National Park, though likely not without controversy.
The hunt is called for in the park's enabling legislation, passed by Congress in 1950. That legislation directs Grand Teton National Park to jointly develop the hunt with the Wyoming Game and Fish Department, and for the governor of Wyoming and Interior secretary to approve the annual plan. Respective federal and state biologists and administrators have reviewed available biological data and concluded that the 2015 program is necessary for the proper management and protection of the elk, including keeping the herd at or near the population objective.
Earlier this year the National Park Service, Interior Department, and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service were sued by the Sierra Club and Western Watersheds Project because the Fish and Wildlife Service had decided that the region's grizzly bear population would be able to withstand the loss of four bears killed over seven years in connection with the elk hunt.
“Authorizing the killing of four grizzly bears in a national park is not good management for grizzlies or national parks,” Earthjustice attorney Tim Preso said when the lawsuit was filed in April. “The government should be working to eliminate grizzly mortality threats, not handing out authorizations to kill grizzly bears in one of our nation’s premiere national parks.”
And it was a year ago when a Wyoming-based media outlet reported that federal wildlife authorities expect more grizzlies to be killed by hunters than initially thought.
In November 2012, three elk hunters in the park shot and killed a grizzly that charged within ten feet of them. An investigation later absolved the hunters, saying they acted in self-defense.
For this year's hunt, the areas open to the program, Wyoming Game and Fish Department Elk Hunt Areas 75 and 79, are generally located on the east side of the park, and north of the Gros Ventre River, according to park staff. The Snake River Bottom, between Deadman’s Bar access road to Ditch Creek west of US Highway 26/89/191, is closed to the program. The Antelope Flats area is closed to the program after November 30, and the entire program ends December 13. The areas remain open to park visitors, and the wearing of orange or other bright colors is highly recommended during this time.
Grand Teton staff say the elk reduction program "is an important management tool that differs somewhat from other elk hunting programs in the region. Participants in the program must carry appropriate state license, conservation stamp and permits, use non-lead ammunition, and are limited in the number of cartridges they are able to carry each day. The use of archery, hand guns, or other non-center fire ammunition rifles is not permitted, nor is the use of artificial elk calls. In addition, participants, regardless of age, are required to carry a certified hunter safety card, wear fluorescent orange and carry and have immediately accessible bear spray as a non-lethal deterrent for use during potential bear encounters. Information packets accompanying each permit warn participants of the risk of bear encounters and offer tips on how to minimize the probability of human-bear conflicts."
The need for this reduction program, according to park officials, "stems partly from an intensive management framework that includes annual winter feeding programs on the National Elk Refuge and in the upper Gros Ventre Drainage. Feeding sustains high numbers of elk with unnaturally low mortality rates. A majority of elk that are fed during the winter on the refuge also summer in Grand Teton National Park or use migration routes across park lands. The reduction program targets elk from three primary herd segments: Grand Teton, southern Yellowstone National Park, and the Teton Wilderness area of Bridger-Teton National Forest."
Park rangers will monitor and patrol elk reduction areas to ensure compliance with rules and regulations, interpret the elk reduction program to visitors, and provide participants with information on local conditions associated with this wildlife management program.
An information line for the 2015 elk reduction program is available at 307-739-3681. A brochure on elk ecology and a map showing locations open to these special permit hunters is available online.
Stories about:
Story Categories:
A copy of National Parks Traveler's financial statements may be obtained by sending a stamped, self-addressed envelope to: National Parks Traveler, P.O. Box 980452, Park City, Utah 84098. National Parks Traveler was formed in the state of Utah for the purpose of informing and educating about national parks and protected areas.
Residents of the following states may obtain a copy of our financial and additional information as stated below:
- Florida: A COPY OF THE OFFICIAL REGISTRATION AND FINANCIAL INFORMATION FOR NATIONAL PARKS TRAVELER, (REGISTRATION NO. CH 51659), MAY BE OBTAINED FROM THE DIVISION OF CONSUMER SERVICES BY CALLING 800-435-7352 OR VISITING THEIR WEBSITE. REGISTRATION DOES NOT IMPLY ENDORSEMENT, APPROVAL, OR RECOMMENDATION BY THE STATE.
- Georgia: A full and fair description of the programs and financial statement summary of National Parks Traveler is available upon request at the office and phone number indicated above.
- Maryland: Documents and information submitted under the Maryland Solicitations Act are also available, for the cost of postage and copies, from the Secretary of State, State House, Annapolis, MD 21401 (410-974-5534).
- North Carolina: Financial information about this organization and a copy of its license are available from the State Solicitation Licensing Branch at 888-830-4989 or 919-807-2214. The license is not an endorsement by the State.
- Pennsylvania: The official registration and financial information of National Parks Traveler may be obtained from the Pennsylvania Department of State by calling 800-732-0999. Registration does not imply endorsement.
- Virginia: Financial statements are available from the Virginia Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, 102 Governor Street, Richmond, Virginia 23219.
- Washington: National Parks Traveler is registered with Washington State’s Charities Program as required by law and additional information is available by calling 800-332-4483 or visiting www.sos.wa.gov/charities, or on file at Charities Division, Office of the Secretary of State, State of Washington, Olympia, WA 98504.
INN Member
The easiest way to explore RV-friendly National Park campgrounds.
Here’s the definitive guide to National Park System campgrounds where RVers can park their rigs.
Our app is packed with RVing- specific details on more than 250 campgrounds in more than 70 national parks.
You’ll also find stories about RVing in the parks, tips helpful if you’ve just recently become an RVer, and useful planning suggestions.
Comments
Holy guacamole! I feel sorry for the poor rangers who have to deal with this insanity. Teton's enabling legislation & FWS feeding need to be changed to end this disgraceful so-called hunt:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/todd-wilkinson/is-grand-teton-hunt-right_b...
http://www.jhnewsandguide.com/news/environmental/onlookers-dismayed-by-e...
Tahoma: YOU and others like you are doing all they can to stop this hunt, the feeding program, etc. When the already diminished numbers that migrate to or stick around all year in Jackson/GTNP proper COLLAPSE like the 80 drop off in the North Yellowstone elk herd, after the Invasive sub species wolf dumping. I hope you and the Mangelsens, Mayos, WIlkinsons of the world stay FAR away from any wolves and Grizzly bears that will be starving to death as they will no doubtedly begin to pick off MUCH easier human beings.
The enabling legislation enabled the Park and cannot be changed. The People of Wyoming agreed to the Park based upon the enabling legislation so to change the enabling legislation is a dishonor.
Yes, it is so much more humane to let them starve to death.
Agreed, Tahoma. Last year's hunt was a grotesque display, as documented by the Traveler report.
Justinh and tahoma. I'm curious, are you vegans? Or is shooting that elk somehow more grotesque than the way they kill cattle, pigs and chickens?
I am a vegan. But I don't have the slightest idea how that could be relevant to my comment.
I guess that depends. Are you a vegan for misguided dietary reasons or because you don't like what happens to the animals? If the latter, it clearly is relevant to your comment. And if that is the case, I fully respect (though don't agree with) your opinion.
I'm not a vegan for either of those "reasons" exactly. In any case, even if I weren't a vegan, I would still have seen last year's "hunt" as a grotesque display.
Please expand justinh, why are you a vegan (off topic) and what did you find grotesque about the hunt (on topic)?
justinh: "last years hunt.......... grotesque display"???????
It is the migration hunt, PERIOD. I'm sorry you are ignorant to the many variations "hunting" takes place. It is not the same as stalking animals in a "stationary" setting, there are massive numbers of elk on the move, and we do our best to anticipate their movements and intercept them. Every year has similar OPPORTUNITIES for families to fill the freezers for the next year. Schwabachers landing, Blacktail Ponds, Antelope flats etc. have OPPORTUNITIES that YOU find "grotesque". Now that the Snake river bottoms are closed, those opportunities are more exposed to those who aren't hunting in areas near Kelly and Mormon row, sorry you're offended. Tell me, do you find the Buffalo Jumps that native Americans ochestrated a "grotesque display" as well?
The reduction hunt used to issue THOUSANDS of tags, it is now down to 650+/-. As the wolves and Grizzlys continue to kill off the elk herd the number of HUMANS feeding their families with GYE elk will decline. To most adhereants to the "Green" RELIGION, the fewer humans, the better. Your choice of what you ingest for sustinance and views of "ALTERNATIVE Lifestyles" should not infringe on others right to obtain what we feed our families with, no matter how "offended" you are.
I'm not a vegan or a hunter, ec, and have nothing against either group. Some of my neighbors will be shooting elk nearby soon and I look forward to some fresh liver.
I'm concerned about the safety of the non-hunting public; I think the few other NPS units at least exclude the public when ungulate culling is done.
The Teton herd reduction 'hunt' would not be necessary if the population was not wildly inflated by supplemental feeding at the nearby FWS refuge, also mandated by local politicians, no doubt. The taxpayers get screwed at both ends when federal agencies have conflicting, let alone unnecessary, mandates. The feeding should be phased out, as should the hunt. If this involves a few years of starving elk until a naturally sustainable herd size is reached, then so be it.
The current arrangement seems not much different than that game farm where Cheney shot his buddy or having a sausage factory in the National Cathedral.
I would guess the safety of the the public in the parks - given the NPS oversight - is greater than that of the public in National Forests during hunting season. And if you nothing against hunters, why did you feel last years hunt was grotesque?
As to the feeding, you may indeed have a point there. BTW - I am not a hunter either.
I would think the public is safer in the parks with the NPS oversight than the public in the national forest during hunting season. And BTW - I am not a hunter either.
(sorry for the repeat) the first one didn't show for 1/2 hr
Yeah, pretty damn off topic. And intrusive.
I always chuckle at the apocalyptic "they'll all starve to death" comments. There were large numbers of elk here before feeding began and there'll be large numbers of elk after feeding ends.
Ending artificial feeding of elk on the National Elk Refuge and the various WGFD feed grounds will result in a healthier elk herd, a healthier refuge, a healthier park and a healthier ecosystem.
The Park hunt is an anachronism that should be ended. Things have changed over the 65 years since the hunt was included in the park's organic act. We have better science that concludes that feeding elk damages biodiversity.
Feeding elk equals less of everything else: birds, small mammals, aspens, willows, etc. If you doubt this, just look at the elk refuge; it is obviously badly overgrazed. It is lousy habitat now, even for elk. It used to look a lot like Willow Flats in the park.
The people who hate the Park Hunt will ALWAYS go directly to starving the elk to death/end feeding to stop the hunt. Because they KNOW that the hunt will end if the feeding does. They would rather see elk starve to death than be hunted where the elk have always been hunted. Any arguement that "they didn't used to be fed" is ludicrous as the town of Jackson and everything around it didn't exist before the feeding started. Go look at the pictures from 100 years ago with elk carcasses littering the landscape. It will repeat.
Sounds like a matter of carrying capacity and development. That said, Yellowstone's bears once relied on garbage dumps. Once that practice ended the landscape wasn't littered with bear carcasses.
As for possible solutions and impacts of closing the elk feeding grounds, the Wyoming Wildlife Advocates had some interesting ideas:
http://wyomingwildlifeadvocates.org/dashboard/wp-content/uploads/2014/11...
Kurt you provide a link to a group who is openly doing whatever they can to stop the GTNP elk hunt. Why should anyone look at what they put out as unbiased????
Well, one could say that knife cuts two ways...
That said, the paper does cite articles from the Journal of Wildlife Management, the Wyoming Outdoor Council, the Bureau of Land Management, the Bridger-Teton National Forest, The Wildlife Professional, as well as the USFWS and NPS.
Please offer any countering materials.
This.
http://www.nps.gov/grte/learn/management/upload/Grand-Teton-NP-enabling-...
Is the reason anti-hunters are trying so desperately to lower the elk population through starvation. They would sacrifice thousands of elk to stop the GTNP hunt.
I don't have anything against the hunt if needed, but I'm not sure who are the advocates for the feeding?
http://www.jhnewsandguide.com/opinion/columnists/the_new_west_todd_wilki...