You are here

Interior Secretary, National Park Service Director Lament Looming Budget Cuts

A budget sequestration could reduce the ranks of national park rangers this summer and make emergency responses to visitor accidents slow. NPS photo of Grand Teton climbing rangers at work.

Fewer rangers for search-and-rescue missions, closed campgrounds, and possibly more devastating forest fires are facing the National Park Service as a result of the looming budget fiasco, Interior Secretary Ken Salazar and National Park Service Director Jon Jarvis said Monday.

If Congress fails to avert the budget sequestration set to arrive Friday, the Park Service will delay plowing in snow-bound parks such as Yellowstone, Yosemite, and Glacier, seasonal hires will be delayed, leading to problems down the road, and some park facilities will be shuttered, the two said during a conference call with reporters.

"This department faces a perfect storm of impact, because we do so much in the summer months, which is so important to tourism here in this country," Secretary Salazar said. "So for us, when you’re looking at this level of cuts, it means impacts to visitors, our ability to fight fires, our ability to do the maintenance, and education, and support the hunting and fishing world which is so much a part of our economy.”

The phone call was just the latest step by Interior and Park Service officials to raise public concern over the opening and operational ability of national parks with the summer travel season just a few short months off.

In late January, Director Jarvis sent a memo out across the system that directed park officials to begin planning for layoffs and reductions in the hours of visitor centers. Then last week another, more detailed, memo of possible closures was released, and park superintendents were given permission to discuss how the sequestration would affect their specific parks.

On Monday the two officials reiterated those potential impacts.

“This will include reduced hours of operation for visitor centers, shorter seasons and closing of campgrounds, hiking trails, and other recreational areas when there is insufficient staff to ensure the protection of visitors, staff and the resources," said the Interior secretary.

Added Director Jarvis, "Great Smoky Mountains National Park will be closing five campgrounds and picnic areas, Blue Ridge Parkway will have to close seven contact stations, and Mammoth Cave will actually have to close a portion of the cave tours because we don’t have the staff to operate that. That could affect hundreds of thousands of visitors.”

To help cope with the cut, which comes atop $159 million in reduced federal funding the past three years, the Park Service already has delayed filling vacant permanent positions.

When a question was raised over how a 5 percent cut could lead to such extensive reductions in visitor services, Director Jarvis explained that, in reality, 85-90 percent of a park's budget is tied up in fixed costs, such as salaries and benefits and utilities, and so that 5 percent must come out of the remaining fraction. Too, he stressed, parks are being asked to exact 5 percent of their entire fiscal year over a period of six months.

"The last little bit of discretionary funding, which often runs arounds 10 percent, sometimes less in the smaller parks, is what you run your summer operation on. That’s your seasonal workfoce, that’s your little bit of discretionary budget that you can make decisions with each year," said the director. "And of course a lot of that varies on weather, how much snow you need to plow or whether you’ve got a lot of trees down in the campground to pick up at the beginning of the season.

"So 5 percent is really a significant hit on the discretionary part of a park’s operating budget. And so we have to figure out how to absorb it, and so it really comes into the front-line visitor services, which is really the thousands of seasonals that we hire every year.”

Alternate Text
In something of a budgetary oxymoron, parks would be allowed to retain entrance fee revenues, but might not have the staff to operate the entrance stations. Kurt Repanshek photo.

To add to that perspective, a 5 percent decrease in the Park Service's budget reduces it to roughly $2.45 billion, which is about what the agency's budget was in 2008. Against that reduction, inflation has driven up the agency's costs in terms of fuel and utilities. And, since nearly six months of the fiscal year have passed, the agency has already obligated about 42 percent of its budget for full-time employee salaries, according to the Coalition of National Park Service Retirees.

With those figures in mind, it would take a cut of roughly 60 percent of the agency's seasonal hires, about 6,000 jobs, to achieve the 5 percent reduction this late in the fiscal year.

Though some might view the media event by Secretary Salazar and Director Jarvis as an effort to massage public opinion, their staff pointed out that national parks "are inspirational, provide respite from daily stress, encourage exercise and are just plain fun."

"They are also important drivers of our national economy, especially for the local communities near national parks," the staff added.

To buttress that last point, Secreteary Salazar and Director Jarvis noted both the economic might of the parks, and the impact that will be felt by gateway communities if the sequestration is implemented.

Visitation to the National Park System in 2011 visitors generated $30.1 billion in economic activity and supported 252,000 jobs nationwide, according to a peer-reviewed report released Monday by the National Park Service.

“Places like the Grand Canyon or the Statue of Liberty take our breath away and inspire us with their beauty and history, but our national parks also serve as anchors for our nation’s economy,” said Secretary Salazar. “People who visit parks need transportation, places to stay, and meals to eat – all of which support businesses and provide jobs in local communities.”

The statistics for 2011 are based on the spending of nearly 279 million national park visitors; more than one third of that total spending, or $13 billion, went directly into communities within 60 miles of a park. The numbers are on par with previous years, though last year the park system welcomed about 283 million visitors.

The sequestration would have an immediate economic impact on the gateway communities, said Director Jarvis.

“Yellowstone and Glacier will be delaying the plowing of the roads (by up to a month) to open those up, as much as a month, and that will have a direct impact in the gateway communities around Cody, or Jackson Hole or up in Glacier at White Fish," he said. "The communities there know that their season starts the day the road opens, and it closes the day the road closes. And that can be as much as $1 million a day lost to local economies.

“Grand Teton will be closing the Jenny Lake Visitor Center and the visitor center at the Rockefeller Preserve as well, impacting as many as 300,000 visitors this summer," he added.

Alternate Text
Parts of Mammoth Cave might not have tours this summer due to staffing shortages. NPS photo.

At Yosemite, plowing of the Tioga Road through the park's high country will be delayed, affecting tourism on the eastern side of the park in towns such as Bishop, Mammoth and Lee Vining.

At Mount Rainier National Park, the Ohanapecosh Visitor Center would be closed this year.

“I am concerned about the impact to visitor safety, because there will be a reduction in the number of our rangers in the field this year as a result of these impacts," added the Park Service director. "As we gear up for summer, we hire a lot of summer seasonals, many of them are returning seasonals that have extraordinary skills in fire-fighting, and search-and-rescue, and river running and high-angle work, and if we are not able to hire that seasonal workforce, then clearly our capacity to respond to emergencies will be reduced.

“As a consequence we may be reducing access to some areas because of that concern."

But all these impacts don't need to occur, said the Interior secretary.

“This is certainly an avoidable consequence that just requires the members of Congress to do the right thing," he said.


Pure histrionics. Obama has all his troops out screaming chicken little. Salaries aren't fixed costs - cut them 5%'. Utilities aren't a fixed cost, lower the heat 3 degrees and turn off the lights an hour early. Reduce the benefits. Everyone else has taken a hit, why not the government employees?

and of course you could get rid of programs that the feds have no business in. Heck, closing the Dept of Education alone would get us more than 80% there.

Or how about the $30 billion we send in incremental unemployment benefits to encourage people not to work?

The list of areas that could/should be cut is a mile long but Obama and his minions what you to believe that Smokey Bear is on the chopping block. Shows you where their priorities are.

ec--As you no doubt know, salaries of federal employees are established by the Congress so they are, in fact, fixed costs. An agency such as the NPS or a Department such as Interior has no ability to reduce them by 5%. Nor can benefits be reduced without Congressional action.

As to the Department of Education, it was established by the Congress. The President cannot simply abolish it.

The fact is that the Executive branch operates on funds appropriated by the Congress. You need to preach to them, not to the NPS or other government agencies if you want reductions.


I tend to agree with Ecbuck. If we can't federal employees salaries, then Congress should cut them.

Congress is setting the salary of every NPS employee? i doubt it it. They may set a grade level but then reduce everyone one grade. Bingo - done.

Yes Congress makes laws. Why doesnt O tell them to kill the DOE and save the parks? Because the parks don't give him power to control your life.

Besides Rick - I think you missed my point. I am not blaming the NPS, other than Salazaar and Jarvis who are just doing Obama's bidding. The point is that there are many programs that could be cut but Obama threatens the "warm fuzzy" ones ( Parks, Police, Fireman, Teachers - the latter 3 the US government has no business funding in the first place) to save his sources of power.

ec--You need to get your head screwed on straight. You don't just reduce everyone's grade by one level. Those grades are classified by the Office of Personnel Management according to strict criteria. You make it sound like someone waves a magic wand and it is done. It would require a massive reclassification effort that would probably cost way more than a one grade reduction would, not to mention the costs of all the adverse actions that would result. I repeat again. If you want to reduce the cost of the Federal governmnent, preach to the Congress. They are the ones who appropriate the money to run the government.

As to the "warm fuzzy ones", I don't think that you probably consider the Department of Defense in that category. Yet it is likely that DOD will take the biggest hit of all. Can you imagine applying your formula of reducing every soldier's rank by one stripe while they are serving their country? And is their service any more important than the teachers serving in the America Corps, the Peace Corps Volunteers doing the same in foreign countries around the world or the wildland fire fighters who protect our public lands and the surrounding communities? Come on, get real.


As a federal employee, I would have to say that cutting the salary of every employee is not a good idea. As it is, I only bring home about $23k and I've been working for the NPS for 10 years.

National Parks Traveler's Essential Park Guide