I sure it doesn't. The Federal government only has the powers enumerated in the Constitution. There is nothing in the enumerated powers that gives the Federal government the power to regulate animals on non-federal land.
ecbuck:
Visitor, exactly what provision of the Constitution prevents the Wyoming legislature from regulating grizzly hunts outside of Federal territory?
Uh - Supremacy Clause?
Visitor, exactly what provision of the Constitution prevents the Wyoming legislature from regulating grizzly hunts outside of Federal territory?
Feb 21st - 17:05pm |
Judith Rollins
I have visited Yellow Stone and sadly did not get to see ANY bears. We tried to see one. People are the problem. Educate yourselves to what is safe and do it. I believe if we are smart then bears and humans can live in peace. Camping in bear areas is a problem waiting to happen. Cooking food that smells good smells good to animals too. Humans use some common sense and respect the right
Feb 21st - 15:54pm |
Visitor in Yell...
"The state of Wyoming has enacted a law that directs the Wyoming Game and Fish Department to schedule a hunt for grizzly bears despite the fact that the Endangered Species Act absolutely forbids the killing of a listed species," Western Watersheds Executive Director Erik Molvar told the Jackson Hole Daily. "Clearly, the Wyoming Legislature once again doesn't understand its role under the U.S.
Feb 21st - 15:49pm |
Bill
And how will hunting a select few affect that? The problem with bears asaulting campers is the campers themselves who leave food behind or accessable and in general being irresponsible creating the situation where the bear is attracted to that area.
Feb 21st - 14:46pm |
Wyoming Born an...
Alison have you ever been to Wyoming? Ever taken your family camping and had grizzlies come into camp because they are scared of nothing? My guess is no. How about you stay in CT and let us locals manage how we seem best.
Feb 21st - 11:59am |
Alison James
What is wrong with the governor of Wyoming? He has a beautiful state and between ranchers and hunters who seem to be very backward looking and spiteful, he is determined to show everywhere else in America how to run a state into the ground.
Alison James
Sandy Hook, CT
I find the comments and tone of the article interesting, as the NPS has spent millions of dollars cleaning up ore and topsoil that never contained anything except ore. If the ore is safe, why were millions wastes? Even more disturbing is the medial reports that NPS personnel dumped these buckets down the mine shaft. This is a superfund site, and by doing so, the NPS has incurred more liaibil
Feb 22nd - 11:51am |
Ranger1
Not to completely downplay this-but all the reporting has been about "Uranium" when this is actually Uranium Ore. It's still radioactive, and should not have been stored in a public space, but it's relatively common in many places in the Southwest and was routinely used to glaze ceramics until the 1960s.
Feb 22nd - 10:12am |
Owen Hoffman
Once the results of a more detailed investigation become availabl, I expect estimates of past radiation exposures to employees and members of the visiting public to be substantially less than what has been reported thus far online and by mainstream media.
About time that the Midwest and specifically the Great Lakes picked up another National Park designation! This makes 2 now on the lakes (Isle Royale the other). Compare that to Canada's six great lakes parks. That being said, this is a small park and neither are we protecting new land. We need more of that to.
@Scott Jorgenson
You mean like Hot Springs National Park in Arkansas, one of the earliest National Parks? I agree with your point about local folks thinking changing the designation to National Park will bring in more visitors and more money to them, but as y_p_w pointed out, that belief is not particularly well-backed up by data.
@cjdillon I'm not doubting you, Costa, nor bashing Indiana Dunes, but what are the sources & data for your claims that Indiana Dunes NP is top 10 biodiversity in NPS, and greatest east of the Rockies? Folks at Great Smoky Mountains would certianly dispute the latter, and I'd bet on Big Bend for all taxa species richness, birds, vascular plants, and probably reptiles over Indiana Dunes NP.
Feb 18th - 20:41pm |
John thompson
I digress, the congress - the president when he signs a bill to law, whatever it may be. I fully agree with everything you say, I have been to 38 of them and blown away. I have even psyched myself out when visiting some of them, thinking this wont be that spectacular and then I visit everything in WY, HI, UT, CO, AZ, NV, NM ,the WEST Coast and the EAST coast, the Dakotas, ev
Hal, part of the title is "Why every Anerican should care" I think this book and many books for that matter are above your educational level Hal. I'm an American & enjoy reading different perspectives on life. I'm a white man and you certainly don't speak for me or my three adult sons Hal.
ecbuck:
Bears are already, for the most part, being relocated. What is more dangerous to people about putting them in CA instead of WY? As to the link - just google "grizzly bears in California", you will get plenty of articles discussing the potential.
ypw
Grizzly bears are trapped and RELOCATED in Wyoming and in SOME cases are euthanized (emphaisis mine)
Bears are already, for the most part, being relocated. What is more dangerous to people about putting them in CA instead of WY? As to the link - just google "grizzly bears in California", you will get plenty of articles discussing the potential.
There's a joke in here somewhere about "when Wyoming's sending it's grizzlies, they're not sending their best grizzlies, they're sending grizzlies that have lots of problems...". But seriously, re-introduction of grizzly bears to California would need to be individuals of rather specific age, sex, and ancestry (unrelated) in order to re-establish a population. As far as I know, non-random, h
Feb 20th - 20:05pm |
Ty isbell
You are very right Ed, I like the way you think i vot for you anytime.
"Doomed", Ed? Makes me wonder how any deer and elk survived these terrible predators for the hundreds of thousands of years before we recently arrived to 'manage' them. Not to forget dire wolves, short-faced bears and sabre-toothed tigers...
Feb 20th - 10:34am |
Ed Willy
Send them. Cant wait til left wing PCT hikers from Marin County get ripped outta there tents. First wolves, than Grizzlies. Nice. Deer and elk in this state are doomed.
ecbuck:
No Y_p_k I can't see the snark. Troublesome animals are frequently relocated. And unfortunately, your link didn't work for me so I didin't see him clearly exposing his intent.
No Y_p_k I can't see the snark. Troublesome animals are frequently relocated. And unfortunately, your link didn't work for me so I didin't see him clearly exposing his intent.
ecbuck:
y_p_w - I don't understand why you are so convinced this is snark and not sincere? People have long lamented the loss of grizzlies in CA and I am sure many would like them back if reintroduction could be successful.
y_p_w - I don't understand why you are so convinced this is snark and not sincere? People have long lamented the loss of grizzlies in CA and I am sure many would like them back if reintroduction could be successful. http://www.takepart.com/article/2014/06/20/new-move-bring-back-grizzly-b...
Mark Gordon would be doing CA a favor if he just shot the Grizzlies in Wyoming, if Wyoming can't get a hunting season approved for those things after they've become succesfully established there's no way in hell the liberals in CA will allow a hunting season for them. The only way I think it would be good for CA is if they released the grizzlies in downtown Los Angeles and San Diego!!!!
Kurt--
{edited to fix misspelling of aerial and border. Dang I can't spell...}
Al is certainly the railroad expert around here, but I can give partial answers, especially since those are very similar to the questions I had about where the coal would go. tl;dr: exporting via Ensenada makes no sense to me.
I'm just a little curious where the market is for this coal? California doesn't want it. There don't appear to be any ports in California willing to ship it overseas. This from the Salt Lake Tribune last summer:
Feb 19th - 18:36pm |
Ergoman
Those of you who love our National Parks yet voted for Trump share the blame. Elections have consequences. We have a chance to vote for a real president next year. Trump and his swamp creatures like David Bernhardt need to go.
Feb 19th - 18:23pm |
yves kraus
Of course, primarily to China. Australia is in the process of ramping up it's production also for the chinese market.
berbransan - it might be "old" but it still supplies 30% of our electricity and only recently was surpassed by natural gas which many want to eliminate as well. We have a long way to go before these two can efficiently be replaced by other sources. The number of trucks does seem to be somewhat of a concern - not so much to the Park but to the traffic and residents along that road. It does sa
Feb 19th - 18:07pm |
yves kraus
Have you driven those roads? We spent an idyllic week there in september. I can imagine what it would have been like with a humongous coal truck barreling down on me each time I turned off to Gawk and every 10 minutes no less. I would never go back and I would tell everyone the same. Until we find a way to use the coal intelligently and locally, leave the coal in the ground.
Feb 19th - 12:39pm |
berbransan
Coal is old technology. The revenue coal provides is nothing compared to what will be lost in tourit dollars People want areas that are unspoiled by mining. Trucks every 10 minutes 24 hours a day that is ridiculous
So about 45,000 trucks per year, compared to 4.5 million annual visitors to the park. And they are going to argue which one is bad for the environment?
I certainly don't relish increased noise or the sound of trucks rumbling down the road either but I'd really have a difficult time using this argument.
Some interesting info about a Nat'l Park event - BUT, it would have been a LOT more interesting with some detailed info about the who, what and why behind the shooting!
"11 murders on the Appalachian trails. I would stay clear of that place. Bad vibes"
Yes, 11 over a 45 year period and along 2,100 miles. It would be hard to find a safer place.
Feb 18th - 20:31pm |
Jason
11 murders on the Appalachian trails. I would stay clear of that place. Bad vibes.
Help support us– the one source for journalism dedicated to our National Parks.
All Recent Comments
Groups Challenge Law Allowing Wyoming To Stage Grizzly Bear Hunts
Investigation Launched Into Buckets Of Uranium Rock Samples At Grand Canyon National Park
If You're Keeping Count, There Are Now 61 "National Parks"
Legacy On The Land: A Black Couple Discovers Our National Inheritance And Tells Why Every American Should Care
Wyoming Governor Signs Legislation That Allows Trapped Grizzlies To Be Sent To California
Interior Department Approves Expansion Of Coal Mine Near Bryce Canyon National Park
Marker Pinpoints 1943 Shootout At Joshua Tree National Park
Grand Canyon National Park Ranger Elyssa Shalla Receives National Freeman Tilden Award
New Lodging In America’s National Parks
Photography In The National Parks: Negative Space And Color Space
Mystery Of How Ohio Woman Got Lost In Great Smoky Mountains National Park May Never Be Solved