You are here

If You're Keeping Count, There Are Now 61 "National Parks"

Share

Published Date

February 16, 2019

Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore is now Indiana Dunes National Park/NPS

The spending bill President Trump signed on Friday included a provision that changed the name of Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore to Indiana Dunes National Park. This change takes place immediately.

The bill also changes the name of the Miller Woods Trail to the Paul H. Douglas Trail in honor of the late Illinois senator who helped lead the fight along with Save the Dunes and other citizen groups to create the national lakeshore in 1966.

"One-hundred-and-three years in the making, what a terrific tribute to the neighbors, partners, visitors and National PARK staff," said Indiana Dunes Superintendent Paul Labovitz. "We are so appreciative to the entire Indiana delegation for their recognition and support of this national treasure."

The park staff looks forward to celebrating this name change in the near future and to working with local communities and partners on spreading the word about the nation’s 61st national park.

Related Stories:

Support National Parks Traveler

Your support for the National Parks Traveler comes at a time when news organizations are finding it hard, if not impossible, to stay in business. Traveler's work is vital. For nearly two decades we've provided essential coverage of national parks and protected areas. With the Trump administration’s determination to downsize the federal government, and Interior Secretary Doug Burgum’s approach to public lands focused on energy exploration, it’s clear the Traveler will have much to cover in the months and years ahead. We know of no other news organization that provides such broad coverage of national parks and protected areas on a daily basis. Your support is greatly appreciated.

 

EIN: 26-2378789

Support Essential Coverage of Essential Places

A copy of National Parks Traveler's financial statements may be obtained by sending a stamped, self-addressed envelope to: National Parks Traveler, P.O. Box 980452, Park City, Utah 84098. National Parks Traveler was formed in the state of Utah for the purpose of informing and educating about national parks and protected areas.

Residents of the following states may obtain a copy of our financial and additional information as stated below:

  • Florida: A COPY OF THE OFFICIAL REGISTRATION AND FINANCIAL INFORMATION FOR NATIONAL PARKS TRAVELER, (REGISTRATION NO. CH 51659), MAY BE OBTAINED FROM THE DIVISION OF CONSUMER SERVICES BY CALLING 800-435-7352 OR VISITING THEIR WEBSITE. REGISTRATION DOES NOT IMPLY ENDORSEMENT, APPROVAL, OR RECOMMENDATION BY THE STATE.
  • Georgia: A full and fair description of the programs and financial statement summary of National Parks Traveler is available upon request at the office and phone number indicated above.
  • Maryland: Documents and information submitted under the Maryland Solicitations Act are also available, for the cost of postage and copies, from the Secretary of State, State House, Annapolis, MD 21401 (410-974-5534).
  • North Carolina: Financial information about this organization and a copy of its license are available from the State Solicitation Licensing Branch at 888-830-4989 or 919-807-2214. The license is not an endorsement by the State.
  • Pennsylvania: The official registration and financial information of National Parks Traveler may be obtained from the Pennsylvania Department of State by calling 800-732-0999. Registration does not imply endorsement.
  • Virginia: Financial statements are available from the Virginia Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, 102 Governor Street, Richmond, Virginia 23219.
  • Washington: National Parks Traveler is registered with Washington State’s Charities Program as required by law and additional information is available by calling 800-332-4483 or visiting www.sos.wa.gov/charities, or on file at Charities Division, Office of the Secretary of State, State of Washington, Olympia, WA 98504.

Comments

Chicago businessman and the first Director of the National Park Service, Stephen Mather, proposed protection of the Indiana dunes as Sand Dunes National Park in 1916. It was the first park he proposed after he became Director.  If Congress had acted on that proposal Indiana Dunes would have been the 10th national park in the country. 


CJDillon:

Chicago businessman and the first Director of the National Park Service, Stephen Mather, proposed protection of the Indiana dunes as Sand Dunes National Park in 1916. 

To me Mather will always be a native San Franciscan and graduate of UC Berkeley.  UC Berkeley grads were prominent in the early days of the National Park Service, including Mather, Secretary of the Interior Franklin Lane, and Horace Albright.


It is a beautiful and ecologically significant place. But it is too small. The park should be expanded to include 2.200-acre Indiana Dunes State Park and some key adjacent tracts of land should be acquired from willing sellers.


It is just me, or do the last two National Parks (Indiana Dunes and Gateway Arch) feel like political payoffs rather than meaningful and necessary upgrades?


The Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore had just celebrated it's 50th anniversary in 2016, it's been around for a while. The designation as a National Park recognizes its import with respect to it housing the  greatest biodiversity in the continental US east of the Rockies. It is not just beaches. Over 3 million people visit the Park every year and the designation was buried in must pass legislation, as is tradition.


The 1966 law that created Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore specified that "The Indiana Dunes State Park may be acquired only by donation of the State of Indiana, and the Secretary is hereby directed to negotiate with the State for the acquisition of said park." So, the law does direct the National Park Serivce to seek the acquisition of the state park. However, the state of Indiana has never been agreeable to this. As for land acquisition, there are two obstacles: 1) the park has no money for land acquisition, 2) there are very few willing sellers who own land within the park's authorized boundaries.


Exactly how does changing a park name consist of a "political payoff?" The park gets no more money or staff because of the name change and the employees do not get raises. Literally, the only thing that changes is the name. Changing the name of a place from "national seashore" to "national park" is not an "upgrade." It is nothing other than a name change. Laws governing the management of the park are unchanged.


The name change also reflects the diversity of the park. It is in the top ten most biologically diverse parks in the National Park System and contains dozens of historic buildings, ancient and modern dunes, archeological sites dating back more than 10,000 years, trails, campground, an education center, a USGS field station, and more.


Add comment

CAPTCHA

This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.

Your urgent support helps the National Parks Traveler increase awareness of the wonders and issues confronting national parks and protected areas.

Support Our Mission

INN Member

The easiest way to explore RV-friendly National Park campgrounds.

The Essential RVing Guide to the National Parks

Here’s the definitive guide to National Park System campgrounds where RVers can park their rigs.

Our app is packed with RVing- specific details on more than 250 campgrounds in more than 70 national parks.

You’ll also find stories about RVing in the parks, tips helpful if you’ve just recently become an RVer, and useful planning suggestions.

The Essential RVing Guide to the National Parks

FREE for iPhones and Android phones.