You are here

Concern Growing Over Health Of Tule Elk At Point Reyes National Seashore

Share
Flowing water in McClures Creek in the southern portion of the Tomales Point Tule Elk Reserve. August 19, 2020/NPS

Staff at Point Reyes National Seashore released this photo of McClure's Creek, taken on August 19, 2020, to assure the public that the seashore's elk had sufficient water/NPS

Concerns that Tule elk at Point Reyes National Seashore don't have enough water for survival prompted a letter Monday to the seashore's acting superintendent, the National Park Service's acting director, and Interior Secretary David Bernhardt asking that they ensure the elk don't die from thirst.

"...there is evidence that the majority of the limited water sources upon which these fenced elk depend have already become dry or may become dry in the immediate future due to drought," reads a letter sent to those officials by the director of the Animal Law & Policy Clinic at Harvard Law School.

"It appears that at least six elk have recently died on Tomales Point, of unknown causes but under similar drought conditions to 2012-2014," Katherine A. Meyer continued. "The last time the Tomales Point elk were faced with this kind of dire situation—during the drought of 2012-2014—nearly half (more than 250 of the 540 elk) of the Tomales Point elk population died from a lack of water, and their inability to migrate to find water due to the elk fence which the Park Service maintains."

In her letter (attached below), Meyer claimed that water resources for the seashore's four Tule elk herds were growing dire:

  • The South Herd: The two ponds normally used by this herd—South Pond I and South Pond II—are completely dry and have been for a while. 
  • The North Herd: Of the two ponds normally available to the elk, North Pond I is now completely dry; North Pond II has some water, but it is way below capacity. 
  • The Plateau Herd: of the two ponds normally available to this herd, Central Pond I is already completely dry; Central Pond II is very close to dry. 
  • The White Gulch Herd: There do not appear to be any ponds available to this herd, and it is not currently ascertainable whether the seep normally used by this herd (that drains toward the Tomales Bay) is running.
Elk tracks near a seep at Point Reyes National Seashore/NPS

Elk tracks near a seep at Point Reyes National Seashore/NPS

At Point Reyes, staff recently created a detailed "Frequently Asked Questions" page specific to the elk herd, and used words and photos taken in mid-August to assure the public that the elk currently have adequate water even though some manmade stock ponds have gone dry.

"Brown grass and a dry pond near the road above Pierce Ranch might give you the impression that Tule elk can't get enough water during California's dry season. But looks can be deceiving," reads one section. "Tucked in the rushes just behind this dry pond, the spring feeding the pond has standing pools of water with fresh elk tracks. A few hundred yards from there, another seep down in the willows has water oozing out of the ground. A wildlife camera shows tule elk and other animals drinking there regularly. The creek down to McClure’s Beach is flowing well ... If you hike three miles out on the Tomales Point trail, you'll see a large pond with plenty of water for the Tule elk herd in that area."

Meyer also stated in her letter that a fence prevents the elk from migrating to additional water sources.

"The fence prevents Tomales Point elk from gaining access to forage and water used by livestock owners who lease adjacent public land in the national seashore for their cattle," she wrote. "Thus, although the cattle have access to water sources south of this fence, the Tule elk—who, unlike the cattle, are required by federal law to be 'conserved' —are denied such access by the National Park Service. This conflicts with the statutory mandate to conserve the elk."

But park staff said they haven't seen elk congregating along the three-mile-long fence, and don't plan to remove it, a point made in the 1998 Tule Elk Management Plan and Environmental Assessment.

"Elk tend to closely remain within their home ranges, and we observed elk distributed across Tomales Point in the usual places during our surveys, indicating that the elk had the necessary resources (forage and water) needed within their occupied areas," the FAQ page said. "We have no evidence of elk trying to leave Tomales Point in search of water."

In a press released issued last week, acting Point Reyes Superintendent Carey Feierabend said her staff was closely monitoring the elk herds.

"Park staff are making regular field observations and using wildlife cameras to ensure the herd has access to water sources," she said. "If needed, we will provide water to the elk in the southern portion of the reserve."

Supplemental water would be provided "by placing a trough in a location where the elk are already accustomed to finding water. Providing water in a trough is preferred over adding water to any dry ponds that occur within the reserve, partly because most added water would just drain into the dry soil initially," reads one section of the FAQ page.

At the Center for Biological Diversity, which was in support of Meyer's letter, Senior Conservation Advocate Jeff Miller told the Traveler they were still worried about the elk herds, despite the Park Service's assurances that they wouldn't go without water.

"We still have concerns about the low water levels, given that we have 2-3 more months of the dry season," he said.

Each fall the seashore staff performs a census on the park's elk population. Last fall the tally was 445 individuals, near the high end for the average population (300-500) noted from 1998 to the present, according to the seashore's records.

Comments

The plight of Tule elk, at Point Reyes and elsewhere, has already been extensively discussed on this website before, with little or nothing changing for the better; it just gets worse.  The situation is so disgusting and the people involved are so ignorant, degenerate, and corrupt that it's truly even hard for me to force myself to comment on any of it, so much ignorance, deliberate disinformation, and wanton duplicity.  But, in the interests of saying something in defense of rare and threatened wildlife, let's look at what has already been said about this species in past NPT comments.

There were originally at least six, probably eight or more, elk species or subspecies in North America.  All but four are now extinct; the others are wildlife varieties that have been lost forever.  Of the remaining elk, Tule Elk are generally considered the most unique, and, unfortunately, also the rarest.  Out of a population estimated from between half and three quarters of a million prior to European colonization, no more than a few dozen survived by the end of the nineteenth century.  In notional terms, that represents an evolutionarily recent reduction in their gene pool of up to twenty thousand to one.  Current estimates are that as many as five thousand Tule Elk exist today; however, today's five thousand elk are the recent descendants of that remnant gene pool of no more than a few dozen.  That's an inbreeding catastrophe waiting to be recognized.

Let's try to put it in terms that even the worst narcissists, and that's who we're dealing with, might understand.  Imagine that the more than three hundred million Americans in our nation's current human gene pool suffered a twenty thousand to one gene pool reduction like the one suffered by Tule Elk and only perhaps fifteen thousand Americans survived to reconstitute our population.  Would they be our best or would they be among our worst?  After such a calamity, would our future be more likely to be utopian or dystopian?  Now, go back and consider all the traits, capabilities, and survival skills Tule Elk may have lost.  Remember also that the state of the science on predicting if, when, and where inbreeding effects are going to appear is nowhere near mature or reliable.

Many, if not most of the Tule Elk at Point Reyes are fenced into this Tomales Point area, trapped there so they can't eat grass "leased" at outrageously subsidized rates to a few degenerate ranchers.  More than two hundred of these rare elk died in a previous drought event because they were trapped, without water or forage, in this same Tomales Point area.  And, the response of the National Park Service (NPS) to that previous drought event was to actually be willing to consider killing even more of these rare elk in other areas of Point Reyes, all because those few degenerate ranchers were complaining that the remnant specimens of Tule Elk were eating grass, grass within a NPS unit, that these degenerate ranchers wanted reserved for their cattle.  At that time cattle were already outnumbering Tule Elk by "nearly 10 to 1" in this shamefully mismanaged NPS unit.

How did this situation arise?  In its enabling legislation, ranching was not intended at Point Reyes National Seashore.  As indicated in other articles and comments, the federal government payed ranch owners tens of millions of dollars in American taxpayers' money to purchase these ranches in the 1960s and 1970s, with ranch owners only retaining the right to stay for not more than 25 years or for a term ending at the death of the owner or the death of his or her spouse, whichever came later.  The purchase of the ranches clearly indicates that the intent was to remove the ranching operations from the park unit lands.  However, after fifty years, long after ranchers used up the time limits that they agreed to when they accepted those millions of dollars in purchase money, after all of those original ranchers have long been gone, hirelings are still being used to try to squat on the park's valuable lands until corrupt and disingenuous political dodges and manipulations can be used to connive the lands away from the public and eventually into private development schemes.  After all those years, the hired squatters, their trojan horse ranch and dairy operations, and thousands of cattle remain in this park unit.

The NPS's own NEPA analyses and documentation attest that the ranches and their operations pose significant threats, causing damage to park air and water quality, native vegetation, and wildlife; adversely affecting the experience of park visitors; and preventing visitors from accessing a third of their own public NPS lands at Point Reyes.  Even worse, the cavalier and derelict dairy operations at Point Reyes have introduced often fatal Johne's disease and spread the infection into the Tule Elk at Point Reyes.  Johne's disease is a "contagious, chronic, and usually fatal infection" caused by the bacterium Mycobacterium avium paratuberculosis (MAP).  This bacterium is spread by exposure to the colostrum, milk, or manure of an infected animal.  The pathogen attaches to the intestinal wall of the next victim and causes an inflammatory immune response that deteriorates the victim's ability to digest and absorb nutrients.  The results are symptoms mimicking a fatal form of a chronic wasting disease.  Roughly half of the dairy herds at Point Reyes have tested positive.  Studies have also shown abnormally high levels of the MAP bacterium in humans suffering from Crohn's disease.  Although pasteurization should prevent its spread into the milk supply used for human consumption, the high rate of infection in the dairy herds at Point Reyes, coupled with the ease of contagion through exposure to the dried and windblown manure of poorly contained and managed dairy cattle, raises the risk of infection for both the Tule Elk population and human hikers and other visitors.

As if all of this is not bad enough, the ranchers and dairy operators squatting on Point Reyes continue to complain about "their" grass being consumed by Tule Elk in the park and continue to advocate for, indeed insist on, the continuous killing of Tule Elk in the park, despite the fact that the killing of rare, native, Tule Elk for the benefit of these scoundrel ranchers runs contrary to both National Park Service and conservation biology principles.  Only public outrage and outcry have limited the killing, especially in this election year with so many wildlife advocates watching.  But, I suspect this current drought and heat event may have given the Trump Administration's acting park superintendent, the National Park Service's acting director, and Interior Secretary David Bernhardt another option.  If they just stall and dither a while, leave the Tule Elk tightly fenced into this Tomales Point area, trapped without water and forage; then nature can and will do their dirty work for them.  And, a malicious little politically connected clique of derelict ranchers and dairies that were paid to leave and legally required to leave this NPS unit fifty years ago will have been supported in their schemes to stay in the park and keep their sleazy disease-ridden operations going.

What's a few more dead native elk for a corrupt political regime that ignores the Hatch Act, spits on Congress and its subpoenas, sneers at the emoluments clause, and scoffs at prohibitions against Conflicts of Interest?  Even if they are a rare and threatened species with an already damaged gene pool, the Trump Administration's acting park superintendent, the National Park Service's acting director, and Interior Secretary David Bernhardt couldn't care less.  The intent of this administration has clearly been to undermine the rule of law across the board, normalize lawlessness when it's perpetrated by their cronies, and  ...you know, make America function just like Putin and his oligarchic friends operate Russia and Xi and his party associates operate China.

But, again, as I've said before, it isn't just Trump.  No, no, republicans, republican enablers, and republican appointees are the problem.  If we get rid of Trump, but leave the Senate in republican hands, we won't have accomplished anything close to what is needed.  We need to hold the House and take both the executive branch and the Senate.  We need to vote this November or as soon as we can in our individual jurisdictions and we need to remember that our problem isn't just Trump; it's an entire corrupt political party, from Greg Gianforte and Steve Daines in the north, to Cory Gardner and Ken Buck in the middle, to Lindsey Graham and Ron DeSantis in the south.  So, don't just sit there, get up and vote!

If we win and we're lucky, there might even be enough of a Tule Elk gene pool left to resurrect.


But, again, as I've said before, it isn't just Trump.  No, no, republicans, republican enablers, and republican appointees are the problem. 

And yet this "problem" has existed for decades.  Who was President when the herd was cut in half in 2012-2014?  Who was President when the elk management plan was put in place?  There may be issues with the policy but this has nothing to do with political parties. 

 


You kind of had me until you went political with all of your BS and then you called his administration a regime. Also you put in Putin's name in there which that has been debunked


OK, Jason, now if you'll just turn off the FOX and turn on something with more objectivity [Judy Woodruff on PBS is good]. It might take a little while to flush and clean the indoctrination of the Fox echo chamber out, but if you try you can get there. You have to try, though.


I am not sure an anti republican  political rant makes much sense in this case. When the biggest most recent die off of the herd occurred while Obama was president.  That the twenty-five year time limit was up when in 1995 when Clinton was President.  And when the State where Point Reyes is located is controlled by Democrats and both Senators are Democrats.  No doubt there are political shennanigans going on regarding Point Reyes but it appers that if one were to do even a cursory investigation that the problem is not a republican one.   Lets just say money talks and money has no political party boundaries.


Thank you, Humphrey Ploughjogger, for an excellently written and clear explanation.

Although I agree with everything you wrote, I also agree that this is not really a partisan issue; our Democratic, "environmental" Congressman, Jared Huffman,has come down clearly on the side of the ranchers, and wants to give them 20 more years, and allow them to add pigs, chickens and crops to OUR bought and paid-for parkland; he is also in favor of killing some elk to accommodate the criminal ranchers who squat on our land. I guess he is also bought and paid for. This outrage had been going on for decades.


Better yet Rick, investigate and think on your own and don't rely on Fox or Woodruff (or anybody else) to tell you how to think. 


ok Rick B so when some of the ones saying they had proof to the public and en their emails show there was nothing zip zilch yet they still pushed it for their own agenda, some have even testified under oath that there was nothing,  still people like you won't believe it 


Add comment

CAPTCHA

This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.

The Essential RVing Guide

The Essential RVing Guide to the National Parks

The National Parks RVing Guide, aka the Essential RVing Guide To The National Parks, is the definitive guide for RVers seeking information on campgrounds in the National Park System where they can park their rigs. It's available for free for both iPhones and Android models.

This app is packed with RVing specific details on more than 250 campgrounds in more than 70 parks.

You'll also find stories about RVing in the parks, some tips if you've just recently turned into an RVer, and some planning suggestions. A bonus that wasn't in the previous eBook or PDF versions of this guide are feeds of Traveler content: you'll find our latest stories as well as our most recent podcasts just a click away.

So whether you have an iPhone or an Android, download this app and start exploring the campgrounds in the National Park System where you can park your rig.