You are here

Senate Committee Passes Legislation To Attack Parks' Maintenance Backlog

Share

Senate committee approves legislation to address maintenance backlog in National Park System/NPS file

A Senate committee has passed out to the full chamber legislation designed to make a significant cut in the roughly $12 billion maintenance backlog across the National Park System, but it faces long odds to become law this year.

The Restore Our Parks Act, which could provide upwards of $6.5 billion over five years specifically for backlogged maintenance in the parks, cleared the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee on a bipartisan 15-5 vote Tuesday. The House Natural Resources Committee approved similar legislation back in June, though it remains to be seen if either measure appears before either the full Senate or full House for final action this year.

“This legislation could do more to restore our national parks than anything that has happened in the last half century, and the reason we need to restore them is so Americans can enjoy the 419 sites – from the National Mall in Washington, D.C., to the Great Smoky Mountains National Park to the Grand Canyon – for generations to come,” said U.S. Sen. Lamar Alexander, R-Tennessee, who helped sponsor the Senate version. “This bill will help restore the campgrounds, trails, and roads in what one of America’s greatest story tellers, Ken Burns, calls ‘America’s best idea’ – our National Park System. This bill will allow future generations to enjoy America’s best idea in the same way that we have.”

At The Pew Charitable Trusts, Marcia Argust said the Senate committee's vote was "yet another sign of the overwhelming public and congressional support to fix our parks. It’s now up to leadership in the Senate and House of Representatives to advance the bipartisan Restore Our Parks legislation. Enacting this measure into law would be a historic end-of-the-year gift to our national parks, their millions of visitors, and local economies.”

At the Property and Environment Research Center in Bozeman, Montana, Shawn Regan applauded the committee's action, but questioned whether the measure in its current form could gain full congressional passage. Complicating that is the fact that the committee also passed out legislation calling for full funding for the Land and Water Conservation Fund, which, like the parks' legislation, calls for funding from federal energy royalty revenues.

"Several challenges remain. The Senate committee today also approved full mandatory funding for the Land and Water Conservation Fund — a bill that, like the Restore Our Parks Act, is derived from federal energy revenues. There is bipartisan support for both bills, but it is unlikely that Congress will be able to pass both," said Regan. "These bills are also advancing at a time when the leading Democratic presidential candidates are calling for an end to the revenue sources that both bills depend on. Funding for both bills is derived from federal energy leases. It is unclear how these efforts will succeed under future Democratic administrations that are committed to banning such leasing."

National Parks and Conservation Association President and CEO Theresa Pierno said the parks' legislation is desperately needed.

"As our parks face years of record-breaking visitation, they are falling into disrepair,” she said. “Billions of dollars are needed to fix parks’ crumbling roads, overgrown trails, broken water and sewer systems and outdated visitor centers. This isn’t the legacy we should be leaving for our children and grandchildren. After years of urging by communities and park advocates, today lawmakers are banding together, across the aisle, to fix our parks. We are grateful for the leadership of Senators (Rob) Portman, (Mark) Warner, Alexander and (Angust) King, as we move one important step closer to providing our parks, rangers and local communities with the support they so desperately need and deserve.”

Comments

Has anyone gone on record opposing such a bill? Who were the five in the 15-5 vote?


Rick B., the article states, "At the Property and Environment Research Center in Bozeman, Montana, Shawn Regan applauded the committee's action, but questioned whether the measure in its current form could gain full congressional passage. Complicating that is the fact that the committee also passed out legislation calling for full funding for the Land and Water Conservation Fund, which, like the parks' legislation, calls for funding from federal energy royalty revenues.  'Several challenges remain. The Senate committee today also approved full mandatory funding for the Land and Water Conservation Fund -- a bill that, like the Restore Our Parks Act, is derived from federal energy revenues. There is bipartisan support for both bills, but it is unlikely that Congress will be able to pass both,' said Regan."

Does that suggest an answer to your question?


I guess you answered some questions with your quote, however my fairly simple question: "Has anyone gone on record opposing such a bill? Who were the five in the 15-5 vote?" remains unanswered.


Pretty confusing and possibly misleading article. Opener goes with 12 billion $ cut, then goes to 6.5 billion funding. Funding to come from federal energy revenues, but is this a run around to just get more access to drill and mine the parks system?


This action does not (yet) appear on the Congress.gov site that tracks the progress of legislation.  I wonder if this report is totally accurate.

 


Hmmm - it does appear on the Committee's agenda as passed 15-5.  Committee web page doesn't not indicate who was for and against.

 


Why was the $$$ withheld in the first place?


Add comment

CAPTCHA

This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.

The Essential RVing Guide

The Essential RVing Guide to the National Parks

The National Parks RVing Guide, aka the Essential RVing Guide To The National Parks, is the definitive guide for RVers seeking information on campgrounds in the National Park System where they can park their rigs. It's available for free for both iPhones and Android models.

This app is packed with RVing specific details on more than 250 campgrounds in more than 70 parks.

You'll also find stories about RVing in the parks, some tips if you've just recently turned into an RVer, and some planning suggestions. A bonus that wasn't in the previous eBook or PDF versions of this guide are feeds of Traveler content: you'll find our latest stories as well as our most recent podcasts just a click away.

So whether you have an iPhone or an Android, download this app and start exploring the campgrounds in the National Park System where you can park your rig.