You are here

Traveler's View | Factoring The Ecological Value Of The National Park System

Share
We need a better value of the ecosystem services provided by national parks/Wrangell Mountains and Copper River, NPS

We need a better value of the ecosystem services -- nature -- provided by national parks/Wrangell Mountains and Copper River, NPS

There are places in the National Park System where seemingly endless forests store carbon, filter water and air, and provide habitat for countless species. There are snowfields and glaciers that help fill downstream lakes and reservoirs from spring into summer. There are places viewed as potential refugia for flora and fauna grappling with climate change impacts. There are marshes and mangrove forests that help prevent flooding.

But unlike the economic output of lodges, restaurants, and campgrounds, placing a value on these "ecosystem services" nature in the park system provides hasn't seemed to be a priority. 

There is a generally accepted view in Washington, D.C., that big dollar numbers justify funding of the National Park Service and the park system. And so every year the Park Service crunches the "economic benefits" of tourism to the parks and applauds them. Last year the collective dollar amount was "a record" $50.3 billion, up from $42.5 billion in 2021.

Unfortunately, that dollar figure, built around "the number of visitors who visit each park, visitor spending patterns in local gateway regions, and regional economic multipliers that describe the economic effects of visitor spending in local economies," misses the total value of the National Park System, that which reflects the ecosystem services it provides.

"...we need a transformational shift in the way markets, and the discipline of economics more broadly, value nature," suggests the Paulson Institute

At a time when we're losing biodiversity, when more than half of the bird species in the United States are in decline, when invasive species are crippling some ecosystems, a companion "ecosystem services" report to that economic analysis would be a welcome tool to lobby for both better preservation of the National Park System and expansion of it.

We're partway there, with spending traced to recreation in the park system. It was pegged at $2.1 billion in 2022. But that represented just 8.64 percent of the park system's economic output, according to the Park Service, and didn't place a dollar value on the forests, glaciers, wetlands, grasslands, rivers and lakes above and beyond that specifically associated with recreation.

Place numbers on those natural elements and the ecosystem services they provide and the value of the park system will skyrocket, and the surrounding communities will benefit, too. 

"Flourishing communities, strong and resilient social institutions, thriving natural ecosystems and a stable climate underpin economic and societal prosperity," points out the Capitals Coalition, an organization striving to see by 2030 that "the majority of businesses, financial institutions and governments will include the value of natural capital, social capital and human capital in their decision-making and that this will deliver a fairer, just and more sustainable world."

An understanding and appreciation of the suite of ecosystem services — the benefits that we gain from natural systems, such as clean water, air filtered by forests, biodiversity, wildlife, carbon sequestration, etc. — would be just as, if not more, powerful than simply tracking sales and paychecks in calculating the value of the park system.

Support National Parks Traveler

National Parks Traveler is a small, editorially independent 501(c)(3) nonprofit media organization. The Traveler is not part of the federal government nor a corporate subsidiary. Your support helps ensure the Traveler's news and feature coverage of national parks and protected areas endures. 

EIN: 26-2378789

Support Essential Coverage of Essential Places

Support Journalism about National Parks!

National Parks Traveler is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit.

A copy of National Parks Traveler's financial statements may be obtained by sending a stamped, self-addressed envelope to: National Parks Traveler, P.O. Box 980452, Park City, Utah 84098. National Parks Traveler was formed in the state of Utah for the purpose of informing and educating about national parks and protected areas.

Residents of the following states may obtain a copy of our financial and additional information as stated below:

  • Florida: A COPY OF THE OFFICIAL REGISTRATION AND FINANCIAL INFORMATION FOR NATIONAL PARKS TRAVELER, (REGISTRATION NO. CH 51659), MAY BE OBTAINED FROM THE DIVISION OF CONSUMER SERVICES BY CALLING 800-435-7352 OR VISITING THEIR WEBSITE WWW.FRESHFROMFLORIDA.COM. REGISTRATION DOES NOT IMPLY ENDORSEMENT, APPROVAL, OR RECOMMENDATION BY THE STATE.
  • Georgia: A full and fair description of the programs and financial statement summary of National Parks Traveler is available upon request at the office and phone number indicated above.
  • Maryland: Documents and information submitted under the Maryland Solicitations Act are also available, for the cost of postage and copies, from the Secretary of State, State House, Annapolis, MD 21401 (410-974-5534).
  • North Carolina: Financial information about this organization and a copy of its license are available from the State Solicitation Licensing Branch at 888-830-4989 or 919-807-2214. The license is not an endorsement by the State.
  • Pennsylvania: The official registration and financial information of National Parks Traveler may be obtained from the Pennsylvania Department of State by calling 800-732-0999. Registration does not imply endorsement.
  • Virginia: Financial statements are available from the Virginia Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, 102 Governor Street, Richmond, Virginia 23219.
  • Washington: National Parks Traveler is registered with Washington State’s Charities Program as required by law and additional information is available by calling 800-332-4483 or visiting www.sos.wa.gov/charities, or on file at Charities Division, Office of the Secretary of State, State of Washington, Olympia, WA 98504.

Comments

It may be more complicated because visitation creates impacts.  Obviously people driving cars that emit CO2 and other pollutants.  However, last time I visited Redwood National Park, a park ranger noted that they had EV charging at a park administration center that was free and open to the public.  It wasn't convenient, but was something where they tried to provide a benefit to the visitor.

But as long as visitation is encouraged beyond minimal visits for scientific purposes, there will be negative impacts to the environment.  But there doesn't necessarily need to be entry into a national park system for that.  Other agencies like the Forest Service and BLM have responsibility for land management where ecosystems are valued.  An example would be the Headwaters Forest Reserve in Northern California that's administered by BLM.


Yes. we have forgotten WE depend on nature, not the other way around. 


Add comment

CAPTCHA

This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.

The easiest way to explore RV-friendly National Park campgrounds.

The Essential RVing Guide to the National Parks

Here’s the definitive guide to National Park System campgrounds where RVers can park their rigs.

Our app is packed with RVing- specific details on more than 250 campgrounds in more than 70 national parks.

You’ll also find stories about RVing in the parks, tips helpful if you’ve just recently become an RVer, and useful planning suggestions.

The Essential RVing Guide to the National Parks

FREE for iPhones and Android phones.