You are here

Interior Secretary Calls For Reduction In Size Of Bears Ears National Monument

Share

Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke believes Bears Ears National Monument should be reduced in acreage/BLM

Bears Ears National Monument in Utah is unnecessarily large at 1.35 million acres, according to Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke, who has recommended to President Trump that the monument be reduced in size, but not abolished.

How much of a reduction in acreage remains to be determined, the secretary told reporters Monday.

“The goal is to protect the historic and prehistoric structures, for sure. It’s a little premature to throw out an acreage," he said.

In an interim report sent to the president Saturday, Secretary Zinke said the monument boundaries should be shifted to focus on preserving cultural and scientific objects in as small an area as necessary, as the Antiquities Act states.

Additionally, he recommended that tribes co-manage the monument, that Congress identify areas within the current monument boundaries that could better serve as national recreation areas or conservation areas, and that Congress clarify "the intent of the management practices of wilderness or WSAs (wilderness study areas) within a monument." That last recommendation was needed, the secretary told reporters, because wilderness protections are more stringent than those provided via a national monument designation.

The Interior secretary told reporters he did not recommend that the monument designated by President Obama near the end of 2016 be abolished because there are cultural and scientific sites that should be protected.

“There is no doubt that there are historic and prehistoric structures and other objects of scientific interest within the Bears Ears Monument. These items and objects can be identified, segregated, and reasonably separated," he said during a half-hour conference call. “Certainly, rescinding the monument was an option, but looking at it, there are some antiquities within the monument that I think deserve to be protected."

Secretary Zinke's recommendation was requested by President Trump back in April. In signing an executive order calling for it, the president said his aim was to "end another egregious abuse of federal power, and to give that power back to the states and to the people where it belongs."

Specifically, President Trump said his predecessor had used the Antiquities Act "to unilaterally put millions of acres of land and water under strict federal control. Eliminating the ability of the people who actually live in those states to decide how best to use that land."

Along with calling for a review of the Bears Ears designation, the president also directed Secretary Zinke to review 26 other monuments designated as long ago as 1996, when President Clinton established the Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument, which, like Bears Ears, is in southern Utah. 

Secretary Zinke planned to visit Maine later this week to review Katahdin Woods and Waters National Monument, which was designated late last year after Roxanne Quimby, the Burt's Bees heiress, donated 87,500 acres of her own land to the Interior Department to create the monument.

By July 10, the Interior secretary is to provide the president with a final report on his views of how the last three presidents have used the Antiquities Act and whether any revisions to monuments they designated should be made.

One key message the secretary made clear in his call with reporters Monday was that the Obama administration had been "heavy handed" in designating Bears Ears without appropriately considering local input. Utah's all-Republican congressional delegation and its governor, also a Republican, had called on President Trump to rescind the monument designation.

Pressed on how small he thought the monument should be, Secretary Zinke declined to give a specific acreage, but focused on the geologic area right around the two buttes known as the Bears Ears, as well as cultural artifacts and sites ranging from Newspaper Rock -- a Utah state historic monument centered on a rock panel with hundreds of Native American petroglyphs on it -- continuing on north an unspecified distance.

"One could argue that those are the areas that stick out among it, and those are the areas we’re going to concentrate on," the secretary said.

He also called for infrastructure that would provide a visitor center, access roads and parking areas, as well as bathroom facilities, and said a management plan needed to be crafted. Law enforcement also was needed to prevent pilfering of sites, said Secretary Zinke.

While the secretary said there was buy-in to his plan from the Utah congressional delegation, the governor, tribal leaders, and local community leaders, others were critical of his decision.

“The Secretary’s report is nonsense. The memo released today doesn’t give any accounting of the public comments the Interior Department received as part of this review process," said U.S. Rep.  Raúl M. Grijalva, the ranking Democrat on the House Natural Resources Committee. "It doesn’t reference any maps or specify legislative language. It doesn’t explain what the president will do regarding Bears Ears. It doesn’t even explain what alleged problem this review is trying to solve.

“If you stack this memo up against the years of administrative work that went into designating Bears Ears, including extensive, detailed consultations with Utah’s elected representatives, it’s not worth the three pieces of paper it’s printed on," the Arizona Democrat added in a written statement. "This is just like health care. Republicans want to wreck everything Barack Obama put in place, but in each case they can’t seem to explain what the real problem is or what they actually plan to do about it.”

Jennifer Rokala, executive director of the Center for Western Priorities, called the secretary's recommendation "an undeniable attack on our national monuments and America's public lands. The decision should be an easy one — more than 1 million Americans, including Utahns by a 9 to 1 margin, have asked President Trump to leave Bears Ears National Monument alone. Instead of reinforcing America’s conservation heritage, Secretary Zinke is recommending President Trump take actions that are both unprecedented and illegal."

"The law is clear: only Congress can modify or erase a national monument. This report, while disappointing, is not a surprise," she added in a statement. "President Trump made it clear the fix was in from the moment he signed the executive order, despite overwhelming public support for national monuments."

Also speaking out against the secretary's recommendations was Trout Unlimited.

“Attempting to remove protections for public lands by diminishing a national monument would be unprecedented in the modern era and may jeopardize other monuments,”said  Corey Fisher, senior policy director for Trout Unlimited’s Sportsmen’s Conservation Project. “President Trump will still need to act on recommendations from the Secretary. We hope that the president sees the folly in such an action and the harm it would cause to our public land legacy and special places.”

Comments

Lee, you must not have read Sowell very carefully.  He repeatedly makes the point that the constrained and unconstrained visions aren't black and white but intead cover a broad spectrum and can lead to many differing beliefs.  As to conservatives being the pessimistic ones, that is laughable.  What is more pessimistic than the statement "We may have only very limited choices of the kinds of cars we drive, houses we live in, sources of our food and utilities, and so many other things that have been handed to us.".  Conservatives are realistic about the nature of man but believe the opportunities are unlimited for those that strive to achieve and aren't hindered by undue government interference. 


This is getting a bit far afield and it's been at least ten years since I read Sowell, but if what you say: "Conservatives are realistic about the nature of man but believe the opportunities are unlimited for those that strive to achieve and aren't hindered by undue government interference." is true, why don't we have world peace and trucks that get 50 mpg?  Could it be that another hindering force is the profit motive in some folks.

 

As for our parks, all we can do is hope that Drumpfiment hinderance doesn't mess them up too badly.

Thanks for a happy exchange of philosophies.  Now it's time to allow other readers to make their own decsions regarding all this. 

 


Well we can start with "undue government interference."  I think you would be hardpressed to find where the profit motive has been a hinderence to the advancment of the individual.  That would only be true if you have the pessimistic view that assumes a zero sum game.  Conservatives are far more opptomistic looking for ways to expand the pie rather than just arguing over how to cut it.  


Utah's PBS Channel 7 just ran an excellent and very well balanced discussion of what's happened -- and happening -- to Bears Ears and Escalante/Grand Staircase.  It featured David Nimkin, National Parks Conservaton Association's regional director; Boyd Matheson, head of the conservative Sutherland Institute; and Judy Fahys, environment reporter for Utah's public radio station.  It was moderated by Jason Perry of Utah's Hinkley Institute for Politics.

This program was the very best thing I've seen regarding the questions surrounding the monuments and trump's actions to reduce them.  If you are someone who is interested in this issue, I'd highly recommend that you take half an hour to watch this.  

You should be able to find it online at : http://www.kued.org/whatson/the-hinckley-report/depth-public-lands-utah

And this excellent op-ed just popped up on Deseret News' website: 

https://www.deseretnews.com/article/865694341/Op-ed-Utahs-public-lands-a...

Maybe we can begin to hope that once the emotional explosion about Bears Ears and Grand Staircase have started to calm down a bit, more moderate voices will begin to be heard. 

 


Add comment

CAPTCHA

This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.

The Essential RVing Guide

The Essential RVing Guide to the National Parks

The National Parks RVing Guide, aka the Essential RVing Guide To The National Parks, is the definitive guide for RVers seeking information on campgrounds in the National Park System where they can park their rigs. It's available for free for both iPhones and Android models.

This app is packed with RVing specific details on more than 250 campgrounds in more than 70 parks.

You'll also find stories about RVing in the parks, some tips if you've just recently turned into an RVer, and some planning suggestions. A bonus that wasn't in the previous eBook or PDF versions of this guide are feeds of Traveler content: you'll find our latest stories as well as our most recent podcasts just a click away.

So whether you have an iPhone or an Android, download this app and start exploring the campgrounds in the National Park System where you can park your rig.