You are here

Interior Secretary Calls For Reduction In Size Of Bears Ears National Monument

Share

Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke believes Bears Ears National Monument should be reduced in acreage/BLM

Bears Ears National Monument in Utah is unnecessarily large at 1.35 million acres, according to Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke, who has recommended to President Trump that the monument be reduced in size, but not abolished.

How much of a reduction in acreage remains to be determined, the secretary told reporters Monday.

“The goal is to protect the historic and prehistoric structures, for sure. It’s a little premature to throw out an acreage," he said.

In an interim report sent to the president Saturday, Secretary Zinke said the monument boundaries should be shifted to focus on preserving cultural and scientific objects in as small an area as necessary, as the Antiquities Act states.

Additionally, he recommended that tribes co-manage the monument, that Congress identify areas within the current monument boundaries that could better serve as national recreation areas or conservation areas, and that Congress clarify "the intent of the management practices of wilderness or WSAs (wilderness study areas) within a monument." That last recommendation was needed, the secretary told reporters, because wilderness protections are more stringent than those provided via a national monument designation.

The Interior secretary told reporters he did not recommend that the monument designated by President Obama near the end of 2016 be abolished because there are cultural and scientific sites that should be protected.

“There is no doubt that there are historic and prehistoric structures and other objects of scientific interest within the Bears Ears Monument. These items and objects can be identified, segregated, and reasonably separated," he said during a half-hour conference call. “Certainly, rescinding the monument was an option, but looking at it, there are some antiquities within the monument that I think deserve to be protected."

Secretary Zinke's recommendation was requested by President Trump back in April. In signing an executive order calling for it, the president said his aim was to "end another egregious abuse of federal power, and to give that power back to the states and to the people where it belongs."

Specifically, President Trump said his predecessor had used the Antiquities Act "to unilaterally put millions of acres of land and water under strict federal control. Eliminating the ability of the people who actually live in those states to decide how best to use that land."

Along with calling for a review of the Bears Ears designation, the president also directed Secretary Zinke to review 26 other monuments designated as long ago as 1996, when President Clinton established the Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument, which, like Bears Ears, is in southern Utah. 

Secretary Zinke planned to visit Maine later this week to review Katahdin Woods and Waters National Monument, which was designated late last year after Roxanne Quimby, the Burt's Bees heiress, donated 87,500 acres of her own land to the Interior Department to create the monument.

By July 10, the Interior secretary is to provide the president with a final report on his views of how the last three presidents have used the Antiquities Act and whether any revisions to monuments they designated should be made.

One key message the secretary made clear in his call with reporters Monday was that the Obama administration had been "heavy handed" in designating Bears Ears without appropriately considering local input. Utah's all-Republican congressional delegation and its governor, also a Republican, had called on President Trump to rescind the monument designation.

Pressed on how small he thought the monument should be, Secretary Zinke declined to give a specific acreage, but focused on the geologic area right around the two buttes known as the Bears Ears, as well as cultural artifacts and sites ranging from Newspaper Rock -- a Utah state historic monument centered on a rock panel with hundreds of Native American petroglyphs on it -- continuing on north an unspecified distance.

"One could argue that those are the areas that stick out among it, and those are the areas we’re going to concentrate on," the secretary said.

He also called for infrastructure that would provide a visitor center, access roads and parking areas, as well as bathroom facilities, and said a management plan needed to be crafted. Law enforcement also was needed to prevent pilfering of sites, said Secretary Zinke.

While the secretary said there was buy-in to his plan from the Utah congressional delegation, the governor, tribal leaders, and local community leaders, others were critical of his decision.

“The Secretary’s report is nonsense. The memo released today doesn’t give any accounting of the public comments the Interior Department received as part of this review process," said U.S. Rep.  Raúl M. Grijalva, the ranking Democrat on the House Natural Resources Committee. "It doesn’t reference any maps or specify legislative language. It doesn’t explain what the president will do regarding Bears Ears. It doesn’t even explain what alleged problem this review is trying to solve.

“If you stack this memo up against the years of administrative work that went into designating Bears Ears, including extensive, detailed consultations with Utah’s elected representatives, it’s not worth the three pieces of paper it’s printed on," the Arizona Democrat added in a written statement. "This is just like health care. Republicans want to wreck everything Barack Obama put in place, but in each case they can’t seem to explain what the real problem is or what they actually plan to do about it.”

Jennifer Rokala, executive director of the Center for Western Priorities, called the secretary's recommendation "an undeniable attack on our national monuments and America's public lands. The decision should be an easy one — more than 1 million Americans, including Utahns by a 9 to 1 margin, have asked President Trump to leave Bears Ears National Monument alone. Instead of reinforcing America’s conservation heritage, Secretary Zinke is recommending President Trump take actions that are both unprecedented and illegal."

"The law is clear: only Congress can modify or erase a national monument. This report, while disappointing, is not a surprise," she added in a statement. "President Trump made it clear the fix was in from the moment he signed the executive order, despite overwhelming public support for national monuments."

Also speaking out against the secretary's recommendations was Trout Unlimited.

“Attempting to remove protections for public lands by diminishing a national monument would be unprecedented in the modern era and may jeopardize other monuments,”said  Corey Fisher, senior policy director for Trout Unlimited’s Sportsmen’s Conservation Project. “President Trump will still need to act on recommendations from the Secretary. We hope that the president sees the folly in such an action and the harm it would cause to our public land legacy and special places.”

Comments

So, does ecbuck give a Buck about the national parks? does he support the prospective losses of our national Parks and Monuments?
And yes, fracking ..so healthy for the environment.
When the rich and greedy can do as they please with public lands..it's time to push back and hard.


Yes Eric I do care about the Parks and Monuments- which is why I would like to see them economically sustainable.  I have no problem with a review of the existing inventory.  Its a process undertaken by any healthy organization.  As to fracking - I haven't seen it be unhealthy to the environment but have seen it as very beneficial to American economy and its people.  Far more beneficial than the likes of Gore and DiCaprio flying round in their private jets yelling the sky is falling.  


No, he doesn't.


He certainly doesn't care about Indians. They were conquered fair and square, so who cares about their religions and gravesites?


Since I haven't expressed an opinion about Bears Ear, it interesting your reach that conclusion LMGTFY.  Oh, and by the why, the indians conquered it fair and square and gave little heed about their predecessors's religion and gravesites.  But then, that is the way mankind has acted for tens of thousands of years all over the world.  


Thanks guys, for your supportive comments.  Some people, however, just don't seem to realize that all of us who live on this poor, beat up old planet have to try the best we can to get along in the world we've inherited from those who went before.

None of us can go back to change anything in the past.  But those who care may try as hard as we can to change the future.  We may have only very limited choices of the kinds of cars we drive, houses we live in, sources of our food and utilities, and so many other things that have been handed to us.  But that doesn't mean we can't --- or shouldn't --- work to try to ensure that the future will be better and wiser.

Then there are those poor folks who fear the future because they fear any kind of changes.  Or they fear some kind of possible inconvenience or reduction in personal wealth.  They cling desperately to a past they remember as safe and secure and happy. A past that actually is probably more imaginary than real.  They lack courage required to face uncertainty and changes.

They forget that the people who actually made our nation free and strong and great were those who didn't fear the future but embraced it and worked to make it better.  Think of where we'd be today if people like that hadn't had courage to declare independence or write a Constitution or explore the West and invent the tools we enjoy and depend upon today.

We can move backwards or we can move forward.  One depends upon fear, the other upon optimism and hope. 

I know which course I've chosen.  And it's usually not difficult to figure out which route others have selected.

For me, I'll stick with trying to make the future better for all of us.  Maybe I'll even help us all succeed. 

 


 We may have only very limited choices of the kinds of cars we drive, houses we live in, sources of our food and utilities, and so many other things that have been handed to us.

No we don't.  Our choices are unlimited as long as we don't allow the government to dictate what our choices are. Of course you are limited if you are waiting for "things that have been handed to us"  We all want to make the future better, we just have different views on how to make it happen.  Others have suggested some readings.  I will suggest "A Conflict of Visions" by Thomas Sowell. 


Sowell's book posed some interesting ideas, but I much prefer the philosophy found in "The Righteous Mind" by Johnathan Haidt (I think I spelled that correctly).  Haidt's ideas don't tend to pigeonhole people into only two main categories and allow the option that even within one person there may be widely differing beliefs and reactions to various pressures and influences at play within that person's experiences and accumulated knowledge. 

He points out that optimism is an essential component of "progressivism," while "conservatism" is largely a product of a pessimistic view of the world. 

 


Add comment

CAPTCHA

This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.

The Essential RVing Guide

The Essential RVing Guide to the National Parks

The National Parks RVing Guide, aka the Essential RVing Guide To The National Parks, is the definitive guide for RVers seeking information on campgrounds in the National Park System where they can park their rigs. It's available for free for both iPhones and Android models.

This app is packed with RVing specific details on more than 250 campgrounds in more than 70 parks.

You'll also find stories about RVing in the parks, some tips if you've just recently turned into an RVer, and some planning suggestions. A bonus that wasn't in the previous eBook or PDF versions of this guide are feeds of Traveler content: you'll find our latest stories as well as our most recent podcasts just a click away.

So whether you have an iPhone or an Android, download this app and start exploring the campgrounds in the National Park System where you can park your rig.