You are here

National Park Service Passes On Wilderness For Big Cypress National Preserve

Share

By

Kurt Repanshek

Published Date

November 10, 2024

A Backcountry Access Plan for Big Cypress National Preserve does not recommend any official wilderness/NPS file

The National Park Service, although identifying more than 190,000 acres that would qualify as official wilderness at Big Cypress National Preserve, has passed on recommending any of it for official wilderness in its Backcountry Access Plan.

The nearly 400-page document that considers four alternatives for managing that access settles on one calling for slight increases in the number of off-road vehicle miles in the nearly 730,000-acre preserve that adjoins Everglades National Park in South Florida, and calls for a slight realignment of the Florida National Scenic Trail. Official wilderness is not recommended, though, because of opposition from the Miccosukee and Seminole tribes and the need for the Park Service to have access for management purposes.

The preserve's landscape is part of the tribes' "homelands and ... under the preserve’s enabling legislation [the tribes] are entitled to co-management consideration and enjoy 'usual and customary use and occupancy of federal or federally acquired lands and waters within the preserve and the Addition, including hunting, fishing, and trapping on a subsistence basis and traditional tribal ceremonials,'” park spokesperson Scott Pardue told the Traveler in an email late last week.

"The tribes' largest concern was that a wilderness proposal would risk the exclusion of tribal members from accessing ceremonial grounds and sacred sites on wilderness lands by motorized means," he added.

Pardue said preserve staff opposed wilderness designation because of "the need to routinely access and/or take management actions on wilderness eligible lands for resource management purposes, such as wildland and prescribed fire, invasive species management, and ecological restoration, including future manipulations to restore a more naturally functioning hydrologic regime, which were also concerns expressed by those opposed to wilderness designation."

Everglades National Park has the largest official wilderness east of the Rocky Mountains, the nearly 1.3-million-acre Marjory Stoneman Douglas Wilderness that was designated in 1978.

"We’re extremely disappointed that, in its final decision on this topic, NPS decided not to designate any of the wilderness it found in its assessment for eventual inclusion into the National Wilderness System," Matthew Schwartz, executive director of the South Florida Wildlands Association, said in an email. "Opponents of wilderness have focused only on what you can’t do in a designated wilderness.  Mainly that means the use of motorized recreation.  What wilderness does accomplish is the preservation of intact natural areas for the benefit of rare plants and wildlife, many that are state and federally listed as threatened and endangered. It also offers an unparalleled outdoors experience for the many visitors who appreciate a vision of nature as it was."

He added that the Park Service "has decades of management of motorized recreation in the wetlands of the Big Cypress — and is aware of the effects of what the agency itself calls a 'high-impact' recreational activity. Those include noise, pollution, rutting and erosion of soils, disturbances to wildlife, and the transport of invasive plant species throughout the preserve."

In its preferred alternative, which will be adopted after 30 days of public review, the Park Service calls for the reopening of 15 miles of primary off-road-vehicle trails and of 39 miles of airboat trails, bringing to 331 miles the combined total mileage of primary ORV and airboat trails in Big Cypress. In addition, 53 miles of secondary ORV trails would be added. Secondary trails are out-and-back trails that veer off from a primary trail to reach a specific backcountry destination.

The 15 additional miles of primary trails would be distributed among the Bear Island Unit, the Corn Dance Unit and Northeast Addition, the Corn Dance Unit east of Raccoon Point, and the Turner River Unit. The 39 miles of reopened airboat trail would be in the Stairsteps Unit Zones 3 and 4.

According to the final document, the preferred approach "would expand the preserve's trail systems, and the consequent visitor use, while avoiding impacts on 99.9 percent of the preserve."

In decades past there had been more than 23,300 dispersed miles of ORV routes in Big Cypress. In 2000, a plan adopted by the Park Service whittled that down to 400 miles of designated trails.

The preferred plan also calls for an additional 114 miles of hiking trails, bringing the preserve's total to 141 miles (not counting 44 miles of the Florida National Scenic Trail), and 87 new backcountry destinations for camping that would "augment 24 existing backcountry campsites across the preserve, two existing backcountry campgrounds in the Bear Island Unit, and two primitive group camping areas along the Florida National Scenic Trail."

The document does note that the preferred alternative would "affect" nearly 800 acres of Florida panther habitat. It adds, though, that "large expanses of suitable habitat would remain available for panthers and their prey populations in the preserve, and the NPS would implement adaptive closures if visitor use interfered with known den sites."

The Florida panther long has been designated an endangered species, with no officially designated critical habitat.

The preferred alternative also would "adversely affect 5.23 acres of red-cockaded woodpecker habitat in the preserve; nearly double other alternatives but still representing less than 0.5 percent of suitable habitat" for the species, which is listed as threatened under the Endangered Species Act. 

Support National Parks Traveler

National Parks Traveler is a small, editorially independent 501(c)(3) nonprofit media organization. The Traveler is not part of the federal government nor a corporate subsidiary. Your support helps ensure the Traveler's news and feature coverage of national parks and protected areas endures. 

EIN: 26-2378789

Support Essential Coverage of Essential Places

A copy of National Parks Traveler's financial statements may be obtained by sending a stamped, self-addressed envelope to: National Parks Traveler, P.O. Box 980452, Park City, Utah 84098. National Parks Traveler was formed in the state of Utah for the purpose of informing and educating about national parks and protected areas.

Residents of the following states may obtain a copy of our financial and additional information as stated below:

  • Florida: A COPY OF THE OFFICIAL REGISTRATION AND FINANCIAL INFORMATION FOR NATIONAL PARKS TRAVELER, (REGISTRATION NO. CH 51659), MAY BE OBTAINED FROM THE DIVISION OF CONSUMER SERVICES BY CALLING 800-435-7352 OR VISITING THEIR WEBSITE. REGISTRATION DOES NOT IMPLY ENDORSEMENT, APPROVAL, OR RECOMMENDATION BY THE STATE.
  • Georgia: A full and fair description of the programs and financial statement summary of National Parks Traveler is available upon request at the office and phone number indicated above.
  • Maryland: Documents and information submitted under the Maryland Solicitations Act are also available, for the cost of postage and copies, from the Secretary of State, State House, Annapolis, MD 21401 (410-974-5534).
  • North Carolina: Financial information about this organization and a copy of its license are available from the State Solicitation Licensing Branch at 888-830-4989 or 919-807-2214. The license is not an endorsement by the State.
  • Pennsylvania: The official registration and financial information of National Parks Traveler may be obtained from the Pennsylvania Department of State by calling 800-732-0999. Registration does not imply endorsement.
  • Virginia: Financial statements are available from the Virginia Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, 102 Governor Street, Richmond, Virginia 23219.
  • Washington: National Parks Traveler is registered with Washington State’s Charities Program as required by law and additional information is available by calling 800-332-4483 or visiting www.sos.wa.gov/charities, or on file at Charities Division, Office of the Secretary of State, State of Washington, Olympia, WA 98504.

Comments

As the first superintendent of Big Cypress National Preserve, I would also express my disappointment with the continuing trends of the BICY management to lessen the focus on protecting BICY's critical natural resources, ignore and misinterpret BICY's founding legislation and legislative history, and continue to place an emphasize on a "multiple use" concept for managing recreational uses within the Preserve.
 
There is nothing within BICY's legislation or legislative history that states or suggests that "[the tribes] are entitled to co-management consideration". Rather the legislation and legislative history states [the tribes) "usual and customary use and occupancy of Federal or federally acquired lands and waters, including hunting, fishing, and trapping on a subsistence basis and traditional tribal ceremonials" shall be subject to reasonable regulations established by the Secretary.  While we made an effort to initiate such regulations during my tenure, no such regulations have been proposed or established.  Such regulations and the process involved in establishing them, would provide an opportunity to assess and thus manage the usual and customary use and occupancy while protecting the resources of the preserve as fundamentally required by its legislation.
 
The quotes from BICY staff acknowledge the impacts to the Florida Panther and red-cockaded woodpecker and suggest the expansion of ORV trails is okay because 99.9 % of the Preserve would not be impacted.  This does not meet the legislative requirement for allowing consumptive recreational use.  This falls significantly short of the legislative requirement to show, i.e., document and prove, there is no impact to the critical resources of the Preserve.  Additionally, if it cannot be proved to be non-detrimental, the use should not be allowed.  Rather, this expansion of trails fits more closely within the perspective of recent management and proposed management documents that continue to suggest the Preserve is to be managed for "multiple use."  The use of this term is completely inappropriate in any reference to management of Big Cypress National Preserve.
 
I am afraid that the poor example set by management regarding the recent seismic damages within the Preserve are now being continued as they seek to expand recreational uses within the preserve without first meeting the legislative requirements to ensure the critical resources of the preserve are protected and uses are only allowed after management has proved there is no additional detriment to preserve resources.  I do not believe the proposed expanded ORV use is appropriate or justified.
 


Add comment

CAPTCHA

This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.

Your support helps the National Parks Traveler increase awareness of the wonders and issues confronting national parks and protected areas.

Support Our Mission

INN Member

The easiest way to explore RV-friendly National Park campgrounds.

The Essential RVing Guide to the National Parks

Here’s the definitive guide to National Park System campgrounds where RVers can park their rigs.

Our app is packed with RVing- specific details on more than 250 campgrounds in more than 70 national parks.

You’ll also find stories about RVing in the parks, tips helpful if you’ve just recently become an RVer, and useful planning suggestions.

The Essential RVing Guide to the National Parks

FREE for iPhones and Android phones.