You are here

U.S. Fish And Wildlife Service Again Sued Over Mexican Wolf Management Plan

Share

Another lawsuit claims the Fish and Wildlife Service's recovery plan for Mexican wolves is faulty/USFWS

Another lawsuit has been filed against the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service with claims that the agency has failed to develop a sound management plan for recovering Mexican gray wolves, an endangered species, in the Southwest.

The filing cites many of the same complaints that EarthJustice raised back in July when it sued the agency, saying the current plan fails to ensure genetic diversity of the species and leaves the wolves "vulnerable to human-caused mortality and removal from the wild, and by preventing wolves from occupying suitable habitat north of Interstate 40."

Smaller cousins of North American gray wolves, Mexican wolves long have been endangered. The predators historically ranged "throughout mountainous regions from central Mexico, through southeastern Arizona, southern New Mexico, and southwestern Texas," according to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. It's possible that the wolf's historic range touched Saguaro National Park, Big Bend National Park, Guadalupe Mountains National Park, and Gila Cliff Dwellings National Monument, while Organ Pipe Cactus National Monument is thought to be on the fringe of the range.

The Mexican wolf is said to prefer mountain woodlands, such as those found in the Rincon District of Saguaro and the high country of Big Bend and Guadalupe Mountains national parks.

“The Service is once again ignoring the science and its clear legal mandate to manage Mexican wolves in a manner that allows for the true recovery of this critically imperiled species,” said Kelly Nokes, Shared Earth wildlife attorney for the Western Environmental Law Center. “We stand ready to once again hold the agency accountable for failing to comply with the Endangered Species Act’s strict conservation commands.”

According to a release Monday from the Western Watersheds Project, the wolves' recovery is "being hampered by politically motivated management decisions, like arbitrary population goals and geographic boundaries that fall short of what the species truly needs.”

Greta Anderson, deputy director of Western Watersheds Project, added that, “Mexican wolves won’t be on a path to real recovery until the scientific recommendations are no longer being watered down by policies that appease the states and special interests.”

While Western Watersheds Project said the best available science recommends a population of at least 750 animals in the wilds of the Southwest, including subpopulations in the Southern Rockies and in the Grand Canyon Ecoregion, Fish and Wildlife has set a target of at least 320 wolves in a single area of eastern Arizona and western New Mexico and prohibits wolf access to promising but unoccupied recovery habitat in the Grand Canyon and southern Rockies region, according to EarthJustice.

Conservation groups maintain that while the new Fish and Wildlife Service rule calls for the release of enough captive wolves to improve the wild Mexican gray wolf population’s genetic diversity, it will consider the population’s genetic problems solved if these released wolves merely survive to a certain age, regardless of whether they ever breed.

The Fish and Wildlife Service rule challenged by the conservation groups represents the agency’s effort to revise a prior Mexican gray wolf management framework after it was successfully challenged by conservationists.

In 2015 the Service put forth a management rule that critics said threatened to compound many of the threats to the subspecies’ survival. Conservation groups won their challenge to this rule in March 2018, as a federal court in Arizona found the rule violated the Endangered Species Act. In its ruling, the court faulted the agency for ignoring the advice of key scientists upon whose work the agency purported to rely. The court directed the Service to issue a new management rule by July 1, 2022, and that revision immediately brought a challenge from the Center for Biological Diversity and Defenders of Wildlife, and now from Western Environmental Law Center on behalf of the Grand Canyon Wolf Recovery Project, New Mexico Wild, Western Watersheds Project, WildEarth Guardians, and Wildlands Network.

“The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service should treat our single, vulnerable population of Mexican wolves in the wild as ‘essential’ to the survival of the species,” said Sally Paez, staff attorney for New Mexico Wild. “We urge the court to reject the Service’s justification of lesser protections for Mexican wolves based on improper reliance on the genetically impoverished captive population and a small population of wolves in Mexico.”
 
“Sadly, the cycle of bad faith government efforts necessitating litigation continues,” said Chris Smith, Southwest wildlife advocate for WildEarth Guardians. “The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service knows exactly what it needs to do in order to further lobo recovery - a federal court told the agency - but unfortunately they won’t do it without being sued over and over again.”
 
“Allowing wolves to roam north of I-40 and seek out new habitat is essential to their long-term survival,” said Michael Dax, western program director for Wildlands Network. “Across the west, wildlife managers are promoting connectivity and protecting corridors with the Mexican gray wolf seemingly the only exception.”
 

Support National Parks Traveler

National Parks Traveler is a small, editorially independent 501(c)(3) nonprofit media organization. The Traveler is not part of the federal government nor a corporate subsidiary. Your support helps ensure the Traveler's news and feature coverage of national parks and protected areas endures. 

EIN: 26-2378789

Support Journalism about National Parks!

National Parks Traveler is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit.

A copy of National Parks Traveler's financial statements may be obtained by sending a stamped, self-addressed envelope to: National Parks Traveler, P.O. Box 980452, Park City, Utah 84098. National Parks Traveler was formed in the state of Utah for the purpose of informing and educating about national parks and protected areas.

Residents of the following states may obtain a copy of our financial and additional information as stated below:

  • Florida: A COPY OF THE OFFICIAL REGISTRATION AND FINANCIAL INFORMATION FOR NATIONAL PARKS TRAVELER, (REGISTRATION NO. CH 51659), MAY BE OBTAINED FROM THE DIVISION OF CONSUMER SERVICES BY CALLING 800-435-7352 OR VISITING THEIR WEBSITE WWW.FRESHFROMFLORIDA.COM. REGISTRATION DOES NOT IMPLY ENDORSEMENT, APPROVAL, OR RECOMMENDATION BY THE STATE.
  • Georgia: A full and fair description of the programs and financial statement summary of National Parks Traveler is available upon request at the office and phone number indicated above.
  • Maryland: Documents and information submitted under the Maryland Solicitations Act are also available, for the cost of postage and copies, from the Secretary of State, State House, Annapolis, MD 21401 (410-974-5534).
  • North Carolina: Financial information about this organization and a copy of its license are available from the State Solicitation Licensing Branch at 888-830-4989 or 919-807-2214. The license is not an endorsement by the State.
  • Pennsylvania: The official registration and financial information of National Parks Traveler may be obtained from the Pennsylvania Department of State by calling 800-732-0999. Registration does not imply endorsement.
  • Virginia: Financial statements are available from the Virginia Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, 102 Governor Street, Richmond, Virginia 23219.
  • Washington: National Parks Traveler is registered with Washington State’s Charities Program as required by law and additional information is available by calling 800-332-4483 or visiting www.sos.wa.gov/charities, or on file at Charities Division, Office of the Secretary of State, State of Washington, Olympia, WA 98504.

Comments

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006320717312776

There is so much misinformation in this article that is easily exposed with publicly available information.  Please see the peer-reviewed paper above to the truth about why we can't recovery Mexican wolves north of I-40 and also listen to this podcast that explains the origin of what some people are calling "Best Available Science".  Its laughable actually.  You will be shocked to find out where the 750 number comes from and the notion about recovery north of I-40. Let us embrace and work with our Mexican collegues instead of lying about Mexico being unsuitable.  Educate yourself with peer-reviewed science and not talking points from advocacy NGOs.

https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-good-the-bad-and-the-ugly-of-m...


Interesting perspective and information.

 

Thanks.


Add comment

CAPTCHA

This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.

The Essential RVing Guide

The Essential RVing Guide to the National Parks

The National Parks RVing Guide, aka the Essential RVing Guide To The National Parks, is the definitive guide for RVers seeking information on campgrounds in the National Park System where they can park their rigs. It's available for free for both iPhones and Android models.

This app is packed with RVing specific details on more than 250 campgrounds in more than 70 parks.

You'll also find stories about RVing in the parks, some tips if you've just recently turned into an RVer, and some planning suggestions. A bonus that wasn't in the previous eBook or PDF versions of this guide are feeds of Traveler content: you'll find our latest stories as well as our most recent podcasts just a click away.

So whether you have an iPhone or an Android, download this app and start exploring the campgrounds in the National Park System where you can park your rig.