The National Park Service would receive millions of dollars through the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 to tackle climate change impacts in the National Park System/Kurt Repanshek file
Conservation groups are applauding Senate passage of the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022, which carries about $1 billion for the National Park Service to hire more staff and continue to prepare for climate change.
If the House of Representatives passes the Senate version later this week as expected, the Park Service is in line to receive $500 million over a decade to hire additional personnel, and some $500 million would be split between the Park Service and the U.S. Bureau of Land Management on habitat restoration and climate change resiliency. Another $200 million would be targetted to address backlogged maintenance items in the National Park System, according to John Gardner, the National Parks Conservation Association's senior director of budget and appropriations.
“The Inflation Reduction Act makes record investments to address climate change from many angles, substantially reducing U.S. greenhouse gas emissions, building climate resiliency to protect people and nature and preparing our national economy for a clean energy future," said Chesapeake Conservancy President and CEO Joel Dunn. "Included in the bill’s $369 billion for provisions addressing climate change is nearly $1 billion for the National Park Service for staffing and projects to protect parks and natural landscapes, $2.6 billion for the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration to protect coastal communities and marine habitats and $250 million for the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to protect wildlife and habitats.
“Global climate change directly impacts the health and dynamics of local ecosystems, and the Chesapeake Bay watershed is no exception. The long-term health of the Chesapeake Bay and the health of the people and wildlife that live in the watershed are threatened by the increasing temperatures, increasing flooding, storms, and sea level rise that are occurring in our region due to a warming planet.
“Chesapeake Conservancy and partners are working to build climate resiliency locally by conserving 30% of the Chesapeake Bay watershed by 2030.
“To protect its national treasures like the Chesapeake Bay, the United States must implement climate policies and investments that put our country and our world on a fast track to reducing carbon and greenhouse gas emissions, and on this extraordinary challenge the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 meets the mark.”
At American Rivers, Tom Kiernan called the legislation "a historic step forward, and the work is far from finished. Along with the forward-thinking provisions, the deal also includes investment in fossil fuel infrastructure, as well as a possible agreement to weaken vital safeguards such as the Clean Water Act. We must stay vigilant, defending our rivers and clean drinking water supplies from harm and ensuring impacted communities are in control of their futures."
“Rivers are the source of powerful, equitable, cost-effective climate solutions," added Kiernan, the group's president. "A healthy river is a community’s first line of defense against climate impacts, offering clean drinking water, flood protection, sustainable food, and safe places to stay cool and connect to nature and culture."
It wasn't immediately clear what climate change-related projects the Park Service would tackle if the funding comes through.
Comments
Some good news!
Oh boy let's celebrate the gov spending more money that it doesn't have.
Are you under the impression that NPS personnel is a major source of wasteful spending in the government? Wouldn't a smart government adjust funding to meet new needs and social patterns? Read up a little bit on: 1) the decline in Frontline staff due to underfunding of the NPS and 2) the employee.morale problem at the NPS which is largely a result of underpaying our national park rangers and understaffing them.
"the employee.morale problem at the NPS which is largely a result of underpaying our national park rangers and understaffing them. "
As a former NPS worker for two major parks I can tell you that this is not the problem at all. In fact its the lack of upward mobility in the park service and the abundance of willing workers who will fill your (seasonal) position in a heartbeat that is a large problem... The main problem is a lack of career paths, corruption, and the often remote locations of the parks
Well - Burt isn't complaining the NPS got money. He is lamenting they massive, destructive spending that accompanied it to the detriment of the American middle class. Unforutnely too many are happy to let this unbridled destructive spending go on as long as they get their own little piece.
Isn't properly funding the national park service worthy government spending?
Not when it comes at the expense of $750 billion inflationary waste.
Weird. Because we are talking about 500 million dollars here. Are you under the impression that the National Park Service has ever had anything close to 750 billion dollars over the entire history of the agency?