You are here

Concerns Voiced That Border Wall Construction Is Damaging Quitobaquito Springs At Organ Pipe

Share
Quitobaquito pond during better times/Patrick Cone file

Quitobaquito pond during better times/Patrick Cone file

Quitobaquito Springs long has shimmered as a small but vital oasis in the southwestern corner of Organ Pipe Cactus National Monument in Arizona. This small pool surrounded by the prickly Sonoran Desert landscape has been drawing thirsty travelers for centuries, and no doubt has many stories to tell.

The latest story is that construction of the border wall between the United States and Mexico might be doing considerable harm to the springs, which could be on the doorstep of ecological collapse because of the construction.

When I visited Quitobaquito back in May 2017 with Patrick Cone, Traveler's special projects editor, the vegetation rimming the small pond was lush and filled with singing birds and buzzing insects. Rivulets streaming down the nearby hillsides to the pool of water were alive with schools of little blue fish—the Sonoyta pupfish, also known as the Quitobaquito pupfish.

Listed as endangered under the Endangered Species Act, these warm-water fish are thought to exist nowhere else outside the monument.

Visit Quitobaquito now, and you might be greeted by cracked mudflats on the floor of the pond. A group of 25 scientists -- ecologists, hydrologists, botanists and archaeologists -- maintains the setting is the result of work by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers as it goes about building the wall.

This is how Quitobaquito pond appeared on July 18, 2020/Alisa Reznick, Arizona Public Media

This is how Quitobaquito pond appeared on July 18, 2020/Alisa Reznick, Arizona Public Media

"The agency’s construction of the border wall has precipitated groundwater overdraft and rock fracturing by dynamite that have dramatically dried up springs and degraded critical habitat for endangered species over the last four months," they wrote last week in a letter asking the federal government to stop the construction.

"Quitobaquito is facing an unprecedented crisis. In less than three months, the flow rates of the remaining springs at Quitobaquito have fallen by 44 percent, from 10.65 gallons per minute in March, to below 6 gallons per minute by July 15th, the lowest level on record," they wrote in the letter. "In the 1990s, flow rates were around 30 gallons per minute. We estimate that the pond level has dropped 15 inches in the last three to four months, leaving 15 to 20 percent of the former pond surface as mudflats, and 60 percent to 75 percent of the remaining pond with less than a foot of water above the mud, algae, and aquatic plants on the bottom."

The loss of water has led to a loss of migratory waterfowl and wading birds, they said, and the rivulets that come down the hillsides are vanishing.

"Only two of the spring flows from the hill above the oasis run more than 50 feet; four others are now small seeps with no above-ground flow; and the rest of the ancient springs have no standing surface water."

According to the scientists, the National Park Service at Organ Pipe has been "shunting all spring flows directly into an almost sterile, lined pond to save endangered desert pupfish and Sonoran mud turtles. But the Park Service should not dismiss the need to sustain the riparian and semi-aquatic plants that provide wildlife and fish with shade, nutrients, insect foods and other resources they depend upon for survival."

Kevin Dahl, the National Parks Conservation Association's Arizona senior program manager, was optimistic Friday that the situation can be reversed.

"It is shocking and sad to see Quitobaquito pond – a true desert oasis that supports several endangered species – so dry. Apparently a hole in the clay layers at the bottom of the pond caused it to shrink rapidly," he said in an email. "While it looks bad now, and this has been compounded by a troublesome delay in summer rains, I am confident that National Park Service and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service restoration efforts will stop the damage and their work will enable the pond to return."

Still, Dahl said, "(I)t is hard not to conclude that the use of heavy machinery to construct Trump’s unneeded border wall almost adjacent to the pond has something to do with the leak that caused this. I personally saw bulldozers and other earth-moving equipment scrap a swath of desert and riparian vegetation way too close to the pond."

"The fact is that the Department of Homeland Security waived dozen of laws thus preventing needed studies and public involvement before building a wall in this sensitive location," he added. "More than a thousand scientists and conservation leaders signed a petition months before wall construction reached Quitobaquito asking that other security measures be used here. A massive one-size-fits-all wall is bound to impact this fragile and rare location, in addition to stopping wildlife connectivity and interfering with traditional Native American practices.

"The pond drying up is emblematic of the needless damage being done by this unnecessary, expensive, and ultimately ineffective campaign-promise project."

Featured Article

Comments

Hmm - and now we find out the wall had nothing to do with the loss of water.  Yeah it wasn't hard to conclude if that is what you wanted to conclude.  Wonder if Dahl will come out and correct himself?


"Still, Dahl said, "(I)t is hard not to conclude that the use of heavy machinery to construct Trump's unneeded border wall almost adjacent to the pond has something to do with the leak that caused this. I personally saw bulldozers and other earth-moving equipment scrap a swath of desert and riparian vegetation way too close to the pond."

 

Kevin Dahl was right.  EC, can't you read?


Mike, apparently you didn't read Kurt's latest article on Quintobaquito.  The loss of water was due to a deteriorating liner in the artificial pond.  It nothing to do with construction that occurred elsewhere.


Nothing in the article on the liner replacement excluded the earthmoving equipment of having an impact. One comment here says "elsewhere" and one says "almost adjacent to"... seems the difference should be clearly determined.


Rick, I know you like to disagree with me no matter what I say but the article is quite clear.  It speaks of deterioration of the liner of the pond.  Not damage but deterioration.  Deterioration occurs over time, i.e like the decades that liner was in place.  Whether "elsewhere" or "almost adjacent to" it is not "in".  To damage the liner you would have to be "in" the pond.  There is nothing in either article that suggests the equipment was in the pond.

 


Add comment

CAPTCHA

This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.

The Essential RVing Guide

The Essential RVing Guide to the National Parks

The National Parks RVing Guide, aka the Essential RVing Guide To The National Parks, is the definitive guide for RVers seeking information on campgrounds in the National Park System where they can park their rigs. It's available for free for both iPhones and Android models.

This app is packed with RVing specific details on more than 250 campgrounds in more than 70 parks.

You'll also find stories about RVing in the parks, some tips if you've just recently turned into an RVer, and some planning suggestions. A bonus that wasn't in the previous eBook or PDF versions of this guide are feeds of Traveler content: you'll find our latest stories as well as our most recent podcasts just a click away.

So whether you have an iPhone or an Android, download this app and start exploring the campgrounds in the National Park System where you can park your rig.