Interior Secretary David Bernhardt has refused Grand Canyon National Park's request to close due to the coronavirus pandemic/Rebecca Latson file
Editor's note: This updates with some services reduced at Grand Canyon National Park, but park remains open.
Hours after Coconino County officials in Arizona, frustrated that Grand Canyon National Park is still open despite the worsening coronavirus pandemic, urged Interior Secretary David Bernhardt on Thursday to follow guidance from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and close the park, the National Park Service announced some operational changes at the park.
However, the South Entrance remained open, entrance fees were not being collected, and visitors were being allowed to enjoy overlooks along the South Rim of the park. Backcountry permits for camping at Bright Angel, Indian Garden, and the Cottonwood campgrounds were suspended, as was access to the Bright Angel, South Kaibab, and North Kaibab trails. Reservations for the Mather Campground also were suspended, as were those for the South Rim Trailer Village.
Meanwhile, the Coconino County Board of Supervisors was hoping that other "local, state and federal officials" would join them in seeking the park's full closure.
Shutting down the park was necessary "for the safety and health of Coconino County healthcare providers, residents and visitors," read a letter sent from the county board of supervisors to Bernhardt on Thursday.
"The Grand Canyon is the crown jewel of parks across the county and country. However, it is important that the park adheres to proven guidance to help slow the spread of COVID-19," read the letter. "Social distancing measures in response to pandemics work. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, closures aimed to reduce the spread of infection have been proven to be extremely effective. Keeping the park open and allowing travelers from all over the world to come here and risk spreading COVID-19 is an unnecessary risk."
Last weekend a similar letter from Colorado officials convinced Bernhardt to close Rocky Mountain National Park. In that situation, Estes Park Mayor Todd A. Jirsa said his town would be overwhelmed if the coronavirus pandemic swept over the bucolic gateway town.
"We have an older, high-risk population with many retirees, and limited critical resources," the mayor wrote. "Some of our businesses are closing and others are on restrictions to comply with public health orders. Medical and emergency servides, as well as basic supplies like groceries, must be available to meet the needs of our community at this time.
"Estes Park is not in a position to support the potential needs of extra guests at this time."
Earlier Thursday, the Interior secretary was strongly criticized by the head of the National Parks Conservation Association, who called Bernhardt "beyond reckless" for failing to act.
“Many of our most iconic national parks remain open during this public health crisis, and this could come at great risk. National parks are home to some of our country’s greatest natural wonders, and the parks are designed to direct visitors to them. While visitors expect to encounter crowds on popular trails and overlooks under normal circumstances, during this global pandemic it could put them in harm’s way," said NPCA President and CEO Theresa Pierno.
“Warnings on the National Park Service website and closed park facilities are not enough to deter people. In fact, the visitors are still coming in droves. Parking lots are full and attractions are too crowded as people try to seek respite in this incredibly stressful time," she added. "On a popular trail in the Grand Canyon, a ranger had 600 contacts with visitors in just one day, proving that social distancing just isn’t possible, despite people’s best intentions. If an outbreak were to occur in one of these parks, the rural community hospitals and staff would be overrun.
“Secretary Bernhardt’s refusal to close iconic parks like the Grand Canyon and Zion, despite pleas from national park staff and local communities, is beyond reckless. He is needlessly putting lives at risk by operating as if this is business as usual."
Pierno added that the Interior secretary's stance was "giving people a false sense of security by inviting them to national parks, despite the risk."
Mary Risser, the national park's acting superintendent, had met earlier this week with area officials to get their input on whether the park should close in the face of the pandemic, and indicated her position was to close the park.
"Our board weighed in and supported the park superintendent’s recommendation. The Interior secretary denied that, and then so the board followed up with a letter directly to the Interior secretary asking them to reconsider," Matt Rudig, the public information officer for Coconino County, told the Traveler on Thursday.
There were reports that the acting director of the National Park Service's Intermountain Region office had supported the decision to close. National Park Service officials in Grand Canyon National Park did not respond to a request for comment.
Alexandra Picavet, the acting chief spokesperson in the agency's Washington, D.C., headquarters, said Thursday evening that Park Service officials were evaluating "the conditions and operation" at the park and that the Park Service had not made a decision about closing Grand Canyon.
"We have not sent a request to the secretary of the Interior specific to Grand Canyon National Park," she said.
Across the country more than three dozen parks have closed, including such iconic ones as Yellowstone, Grand Teton, Yosemite, Rocky Mountain, and even Valley Forge. Why Grand Canyon and Zion national parks have remained open has drawn criticism from some circles.
Last week Zion National Park staff in Utah posted a photo of a crowd of hikers passing each other as they were either on their way up or down the popular Angels Landing Trail and used it as an example of park visitors not practicing social distancing. Days later the park closed the trail, and on Wednesday it also closed its two sprawling campgrounds in Zion Canyon.
At the Coalition to Protect America's National Parks, Phil Francis said he had been told that Shenandoah National Park's superintendent also was denied permission to close that park. While the coalition has not yet called for all national parks to close because of the pandemic, Francis said they were close to making that call.
At the Southwest Utah Health Department, spokesperson David Heaton said Thursday that the department doesn't see a sizable risk in keeping Zion open. According to the department, there have been seven confirmed COVID-19 cases in its five-county jurisdiction. Six of those are in Washington County, which part of Zion touches.
For now, the health board is urging residents and visitors to practice social distancing, and schools, universities, churches, nursing homes, and other facilities in the counties have already been temporarily closed.
Heaton said a health department employee who lives in Springdale, the main gateway to Zion, told him Thursday morning that visitor traffic was way down from usual levels.
"She said it's markedly light in Springdale as far as people coming through into the park," the spokesman said.
Comments
Finally, got a press release yesterday at 5:20, that GRCA trails close and all back country permits rescinded as of noon March 27. It's about time.
Too little too late. Study it and nauseum until conditions change. Overlooks are still open...
Bernhardt is a monster, but most superintendents at flagship parks are spineless and craven. The federal bureacracy is not the military and closing Zion and the Grand Canyon and others is within their legally delegated authority. They've just chosen to put their (telework-eligible) careers ahead of the health and safety of the public and frontline contract, concession, and park staff.
Same story here in Moab, with Arches and Canyonlands National Parks still open despite appeals by the Southeast Utah Health Department and the City of Moab to close. Our 17-unit hospital is ill-equipped to handle the needs of tourists who continue to visit.
I was at Grand Canyon last Saturday. I have never seen so FEW people. I was shocked, given the weather, time of year, free entrance fees and closed services. Parking lots at major areas were nearly EMPTY. The only area where I encountered many cars were near Yaki Point.
Spare me your ignorance. If the place looked like Miami Beach two weeks ago, I'd agree with your comments. That's not the reality. LEARN the reality before you make comments.
Notice the number of "actings" in this story. Lots of people in the NPS upper management are not in permanent assignments. Grand Canyon, Yosemite, and other SES jobs have not been filled. Its hard to fault a temporarily assigned superintendent who has to go back to their regular job and hope to have a career in front of them. Far from "spineless," superintendents like Mike Reynolds at Yosemite and Dan Wenk at Yellowstone lost their jobs because they stood up to DOI.
Absolutely correct, CJDillon, there are actually at least three reasons why the Trump Administration and the party that backs it have kept so many of the "little people" of the federal government in "acting" positions. First, an employee in an "acting" position is less able to speak out or defend themselves when the corrupt hoodlums that the Trump team have placed in positions above them muscle them into doing things that they know are wrong and that they would not do on their own. In the case of "acting" park superintendents who, as SES, can be sent wherever on a moment's notice, any even suspected move in any direction other than what Trump/Bernhardt want will get them reassigned to a special study of restroom paper goods inventory systems and warehouse operations based out of Hot Springs. Second, it's easier to deflect blame onto or otherwise scapegoat someone in an "acting" position when whatever the Trump team muscled them into doing is revealed and the investigations begin (I don't know; you'll have to ask Michael Cohen; and by the way, I don't know Michael and wouldn't know him if I met him.). Third, it's very hard to invoke the 25th Amendment when almost all of the "the principal officers of the executive departments" are just lower level party flunkies who have been "snookered" into positions as "acting" department secretaries. In these cases as well, any even suspected move in any direction other than what the Trump team wants will get them thrown out and discredited with a career ending RINO label.
What rubish Rump. A sitting director can be canned just as easlily as an acting one. A sitting director can be blamed as easily as a sitting one and the 25th Amendment calls on the majority of the "principal officers" of the executive departments to make an Article 25 determination. An acting director would be the principal officer. Further, of the 15 current officers, only 1 is acting.