You are here

Interior Secretary Moves To Expand eBike Access In National Parks

Share

Interior Secretary David Bernhardt late Thursday issued an order to allow eBikes to use the same trails in the National Park System that are open to muscle-powered mechanical bikes.

"E-bikes shall be allowed where other types of bicycles are allowed; and E-bikes shall not be allowed where other types of bicycles are prohibited," read the order, released Thursday evening in Washington, D.C.

In issuing the order (attached below), Bernhardt said the decision "simplifies and unifies regulation of electric bicycles (e-bikes) on Federal lands managed by the Department and also decreases regulatory burden."

The policy change came without public disclosure and without an opportunity for the public to comment on the proposal before it is implemented, moves that appear in conflict with the Code of Federal Regulations. The secretarial order calls for the policy to be adopted "unless otherwise prohibited by law or regulation" within two weeks. It also calls for public comment, after the fact, some time in the future.

Secretary Bernhardt's order adds that within 30 days of the order agencies within the department should "provide appropriate public guidance regarding the use of e-bikes on public lands within units of the National Park System, National Wildlife Refuge System, lands managed by BLM, and lands managed by (Bureau of Reclamation)."

At the National Parks Conservation Association, Senior Vice President of Government Affairs Kristen Brengel told the Traveler on Wednesday that implementing a change in where motorized vehicles, including eBikes, can go in the park system requires the Park Service to embark on a rulemaking process, as required under 36 CFR 1.5.

Except in emergency situations, a closure, designation, use or activity restriction or condition, or the termination or relaxation of such, which is of a nature, magnitude and duration that will result in a significant alteration in the public use pattern of the park area, adversely affect the park’s natural, aesthetic, scenic or cultural values, require a long-term or significant modification in the resource management objectives of the unit, or is of a highly controversial nature, shall be published as rulemaking in the FEDERAL REGISTER.

"If eBikes are to be used on trails already designated for bikes, that is completely contrary to the Park Service’s current policy," said Brengel, adding that a change in policy should be formally reviewed to ensure there are no conflicts with existing user groups.

“How does this affect the rest of the public visiting a park? We want to make sure everyone has a great experience," she added. “What does (an eBike) do to everyone else’s experience there? That’s why there needs to be a rulemaking and public comment. Depending on what this policy says, it could be completely violating the Park Service’s own regulations and policies.”

National Park Service staff in Washington, D.C., could not immediately be reached Thursday evening to say what process the agency would follow in opening trails to eBikes.

After the order was released Thursday, Brengel said that "(T)he Interior Department is rushing guidance on a use they haven’t properly evaluated for potential impacts to park natural and cultural resources, visitors or wildlife. Sadly, this new policy was created behind closed doors and with no public involvement. E-bikes have a place on national parks’ roads and motorized trails. But this announcement disregards well-established policies for how visitors can enjoyably and safely experience the backcountry in national parks."

The suddenly hot-button topic of where eBikes could travel in the National Park System arose this summer out of Acadia National Park, where staff made the decision that the motorized bikes couldn't travel the park's iconic carriage roads. Fines for those caught on the roads start at $130, according to the park's website.

Reaction to that decision drew dozens of comments to Traveler article, and opposition to allowing eBikes on non-motorized trails in the federal lands system came from dozens of conservation groups, who fear permitting the motorized bikes on those trails will create a "slippery slope" that will lead to future problems with managing those trails.

Bernhardt referred to the controversy in his order.

Uncertainty about the regulatory status of e-bikes has led the Federal land management agencies to impose restrictive access policies treating e-bikes as motor vehicles, often inconsistent with State and local regulations for adjacent areas. The possibility that in some cases e-bikes can be propelled solely through power provided by the electric motor, a function often used in short duration by older or disabled riders as an assist, has contributed to confusion about e-bike classification. Further, Federal regulation has not been consistent across the Department and has served to decrease access to Federally owned lands by e-bike riders.

According to NPCA, so far Arches and Canyonlands national parks in Utah specifically ban eBikes from trails in the parks that are open to bicycles. Additionally, the park advocacy group notes that:

To designate a Park Service trail as appropriate for e-bikes and other kinds of motorized vehicles, a superintendent would need to evaluate the suitability of the trail and the costs involved, conduct an environmental assessment or environmental impact statement evaluating potential harm to the trail, allow a public comment period, and show that the use of the vehicle is appropriate using the agency’s five criteria for “appropriate use”:

Consistency with applicable laws, regulations and policies 

Consistency with existing park plans for public use and resource management

The actual and potential effects on park resources and values

The total costs to the Park Service

Whether the public interest will be served

There are three "classes" of eBikes:

* Class 1: eBikes that are pedal-assist only, with no throttle, and have a maximum assisted speed of 20 mph.

* Class 2: eBikes that also have a maximum speed of 20 mph, but are throttle-assisted.

* Class 3: eBikes that are pedal-assist only, with no throttle, and a maximum assisted speed of 28 mph.

"Class 2 may not be suitable for singletrack mountainbike trails - it has been shown that they pose greater physical damage to trails due to the throttle-actuation," writes eBike manufacturer Bosch on its website. "Class 2 may be better suited for multi-use OHV trails designed for more rugged off-road vehicles.

"Class 3 eBikes are typically allowed on roads and on-road bike lanes (“curb to curb” infrastructure), but restricted from bike trails and multiuse paths. While a 20-mph maximum speed is achievable on a traditional bicycle, decision makers and agencies consider the greater top-assisted speed of a Class 3 eBike too fast for most bike paths and trails that are often shared with other trail users."

In his order, the Interior secretary didn't differentiate between the three classes, and directed the Park Service, Bureau of Land Management, and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to "exempt all e-bikes ... from the definition of motor vehicles."

Comments

Due to the article in NPT, during my recent travels to numerous CA, OR & WA parks, I gave this due consideration.  Mixed use bicycle and pedestrian paths are dangerous enough without adding any propelling device.  Changes as suggested will open rental companies to pressing the limits of the motors and throttling.  The simplest and safest solution is to maintain these paths as non-mechanical only.  At Yosemite I was required to walk from the parking lot on mixed use paths.  I do not believe "real bicyclists" used them, but people on rental bikes who did not appear to be 'good bikers' used them.  While I was trying to dodge groups of pedestrians who covered the width of walkways, the bicycles created a definite hazard.  On non-paved paths, I feel they will damage the areas more than appropriate.  While I attempt to support most Administration policies, this is definitely inappropriate and needs to go through due process. 


I have been using my e-bike to get me places I wouldn't otherwise be able to go. I am disabled and have multiple issues with my back and knees and hips and feet that limit my mobility. I personally just use pedal assist and keep it at about 15mph. Withoutmy e-bike I wouldn't be able to go the places I go or see the things I see. I do hope that more places allow e-Bikes. 


I am a senior and ride a class 2 ebike. My bike use is no different than a person with a traditional bicycle, except I have assistance as needed. Excluding ebikes is like restricting highways only to vehicles that cannot go over the speed limit....the issue is the rider /driver obeying rules of the road or being fined. Most ebike owners are seniors or have some limitations/disabilities that prevent or limit them from using traditional bicycles. I had not been able to ride a bicycle for 50 years before I got my ebike. I am a taxpayer who wishes to enjoy the parks like everyone else. Please consider looking at each situation. Perhaps all bicycle riders should walk their bikes where there is heavy pedestrian traffic. Simple rules for everyone makes much more sense...Hoping to enjoy the parks!


In my travels over 30 states last year I found many  "real bicyclists" to be rude and not paying much attention to posted rules., especially speed limits, they were extremely dangerous to share any path with.  If you were on a paved bike path and were going down hill, look out because they are flying by, easily hitting 30 - 40 mph. Many seemed to act like they owned the paths, it was often that they would make inconsiderate remarks  to ebike riders. Where on the other hand I found "ebike bicyclists" to be kind and considerate to the rules. Ebike riders are very stable in my experience in well over 100 mixed trails nationwide. I came upon many rental bike riders and not once see someone that was dangerous or unstable. I did not travel on national park trails because I knew ebikes were not allowed.  My wife is a triathlete, until ebikes came into play, I didnt participate with her riding.  Now I can enjoy the day with her. I happen to be in favor of not allowing ebikes on single track trails, I do believe they would be unsafe to other riders. Ebikes are well over 40lbs, they just don't belong on the single track trails.  Your high end ebikes are being designed for single track riders, not sure why.


Access to trails and more remote areas shoudl not be limited to only the young and super-fit. E-Bikes provide those of us with a lower level of fitness to enjoy more areas.


Irrational, overreaching policies by a few Park superintendents have caused this ruling to be made.  Arcadia was given as an example, but Arches and Canyonlands are much worse. 

There are zero "trails" in Arches or Canyonlands where bicycles are allowed.  The only "trails" where bikes are allowed are actually Jeep roads like White Rim, Elephant Hill, Confluence Overlook, and Turret Arch.  Despite the fact that Jeeps and motorcycles are ALLOWED on these roads, the Arches and Canyonlands park administration banned Class 1 ebikes!   Silly kneejerk blanket bans like this are why people get mad at Park policies. 

 


I have been a mountain bike enthusiast since their inception in the 1980's, and now that I am approaching the magic number 60, I find myself slowing down a bit on the single track trails. Late last year I purchased a pedal-assist mountain bike to supplement my hardtail on the more extreme treks. Since its purchase, I have received nothing but positive feedback from my fellow cyclists, both e-powered and non-powered.

I equate the uproar on electrified bikes to the implementation of snowboards onto ski slopes in the 1970's. Initial skepticism gave way to acceptance rather quickly, and since then both parties tend to cohabitate well.

Are there going to be Mountain-Dew drinking ebikers taking advantage of the situation by riding elecrified bikes like motocross racers? Absolutely. Of course, the traditional cyclists tend to ignore that a subsection of the non-motorized cycling group can be just as rude and selfish. Every group has their outcasts. 

The type of cycling equipment you choose to implement does not regulate the attitude or courtesy-level of the operator.


Class 1 and 2 ebikes are the same as regular bikes. Try one. The real terror on trails are the gravel speed bikes, not ebikes. 


Add comment

CAPTCHA

This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.

The Essential RVing Guide

The Essential RVing Guide to the National Parks

The National Parks RVing Guide, aka the Essential RVing Guide To The National Parks, is the definitive guide for RVers seeking information on campgrounds in the National Park System where they can park their rigs. It's available for free for both iPhones and Android models.

This app is packed with RVing specific details on more than 250 campgrounds in more than 70 parks.

You'll also find stories about RVing in the parks, some tips if you've just recently turned into an RVer, and some planning suggestions. A bonus that wasn't in the previous eBook or PDF versions of this guide are feeds of Traveler content: you'll find our latest stories as well as our most recent podcasts just a click away.

So whether you have an iPhone or an Android, download this app and start exploring the campgrounds in the National Park System where you can park your rig.