You are here

Secrecy Shrouds Future Of Caneel Bay Resort At Virgin Islands National Park

Share
Caneel Bay, Virgin Islands National Park/Carolyn Sugg via flickr

Much is unknown about the physical, environmental, and economic status of the Caneel Bay Resort/Carolyn Sugg via flickr

Nearly two years since a one-two hurricane punch pounded Virgin Islands National Park and ravaged the high-end Caneel Bay Resort, secrecy shrouds not just the future of the resort but the extent of environmental contamination of its grounds.

National Park Service authorities acknowledge there is some environmental contamination at the resort that requires following the guidelines of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980. But they have been silent as to what, if any, progress has been made in determining the extent of the contamination and whether any cleanup has occurred.

For its part, CBI Acquisitions, LLC, the subsidiary of Stoneleigh Capital that operates the resort, not only wants to wash its hands of the storm-battered resort, but wants $70 million in compensation and indemification from any environmental problems there. 

The late Laurance S. Rockefeller, who donated the land for the national park and in 1956 built the 170-acre resort within the park's boundaries, intended for the resort to revert to full National Park Service ownership in 2023. In 1983, the Jackson Hole Preserve, which Rockefeller had established, donated the land to the park; but it came with a Retained Use Estate agreement that gave the Preserve free use of the property and its facilities for 40 years. At the end of that four-decade period, September 2023, the RUE document dictated that the buildings and their improvements be donated to the Park Service.

In 2010, Congress passed a law directing the Interior Department to weigh whether it was better to keep the facilities under the RUE or create a concessions agreement for the resort, which CBI Aquisitions assumed from the Preserve in 2004. Three years later the Park Service, after studying which management approach made the most sense for the agency via an environmental assessment, recommended that the operating agreement be redefined as a long-term lease more in line with typical concessions agreements. 

The resort occupies a relatively small footprint on a peninsula on the island's northwestern shore, an area rich in cultural and archaeological resources.

"Culturally, Caneel Bay contains historic resources, and it reflects Rockefeller’s vision of a close community of man and nature," the Park Service said in the EA. "It also contains numerous archaeological resources and is under consideration by NPS for listing in the National Register of Historic Places as an historic district."

Among the archaeological resources is a site "noted for being one of the largest villages on the island," and there are historic remains associated with the Caneel Bay Plantation complex that dates to the early 1700s and which, during the Slave Rebellion in 1733, "served as a refuge for the plantation owners during four to six months" of the revolt, according to the Park Service.

The EA said there could be impacts to land use, archaeology, cultural and historic resources, and species such as sea turtles and corals if the RUE remains in place. However, it also said there could be negative socio-economic impacts if the property was managed as a concession and a new concessionaire reduced employment levels.

Until recently, CBI has fought to see the RUE extended by six decades, and has worked with U.S. Rep. Stacy Plaskett, D-Virgin Islands, to land that extension. Gary Engle, the CEO of Stoneleigh Capital, has said a 60-year term is the minimal amount of time needed to "redesign and rebuild, and ... reestablish a resort in a highly competitive marketplace."

Those extension efforts, unsuccessful so far and possibly facing greater headwinds now that Democrats control the House of Representatives, have overshadowed what, if any, efforts the National Park Service has made to see the property revert to its oversight as Rockefeller intended.

Also out of the public's eye is the environmental condition of the property. When Rockefeller structured the RUE that allowed the Caneel Bay Resort to be operated for private profit, among the provisions he saw inserted was the requirement that the operator use and maintain the grounds in a way that is "consistent with the preservation of such outstanding scenic and other features of national significance, and preseve the Premises to the extent feasible in their natural condition for the public benefit, enjoyment, and inspiration..."

Whether that has been done is questionable. 

Initial documents Traveler obtained through a Freedom of Information Act request included a 2014 environmental assessment of the Caneel Bay Resort property that raised questions of contamination from SVOCs -- semivolatile organic compounds -- often related to pesticides, and arsenic. "In addition, there are concerns for leachability of SVOCs, arsenic and mercury to groundwater," the report noted.

The surveys also found concentrations of total petroleum hydrocarbons and diesel range organics above acceptable levels set by the Virgin Islands Department of Planning and Natural Resources.

While the assessment called for more extensive testing to determine the extent of these contaminants -- both across the ground surface and to determine depth of contamination -- records Traveler obtained said CBI had refused to allow a contractor for the Park Service to access the grounds to perform further testing.

Those May 2017 briefing notes made by Gordy Kito, the Park Service's leasing program manager, pointed out that "(T)he Department of Interior Solicitors Office believes that the NPS has the right to access the property to drill test wells." But at the time, no follow-up request for access had been made.

While Traveler's FOIA request has not been answered completely  by the Park Service -- it was delayed by the partial government shutdown earlier this year and, more recently, by litigation involving a different orgnization's FOIA request -- agency Service personnel in Washington, D.C., and the Park Service's Southeast Regional Office have been unable to say whether additional testing has been done.

But the specter of serious environmental contamination of some extent to the resort property that fronts its namesake bay with its sugar-sand beaches and turquoise waters was raised by Rep. Plaskett late last month when she announced in a press release that CBI has asked to be paid $70 million to be released from the RUE and wants to be indemnified "from any environmental claims ... " (emphasis added.)

Plaskett issued the release on May 30 to inform her constituents that she had written Interior Secretary David Bernhardt to formally request that Interior provide her with "full transparency" concerning Caneel Bay Resort, CBI's request that it be allowed to terminate the RUE and walk away, and Interior's response to that request.

The Park Service and CBI Acquisitions supposedly have been trying for years to reach a lease agreement to succeed the RUE. While Engle told a congressional committee a year ago that the Park Service has never engaged in "substantive discussions" about a successive lease agreement beginning in 2023, Traveler has learned that Jo Pendry, the former chief of the Park Service's concessions program, had made trips to the Virgin Islands as long ago as 2010 to discuss a lease with CBI.

How extensive those talks have been is unclear, as the Park Service has not responded substantively to Traveler requests about them, other than to say "high-level discussions on the matter continue." The agency also so far has not fully responded to Traveler's March 2018 FOIA request for any and all documents and records relating to negotiations and correspondence pertaining to a lease for the Caneel Bay Resort. 

Meanwhile, the resort remains closed and no reservations are being accepted through 2020. Engle has said he needs $100 million to rebuild the resort. Exactly how much insurance funds he has received to pay for the hurricane damage itself, as well as business interruption insurance, is unknown.

A copy of National Parks Traveler's financial statements may be obtained by sending a stamped, self-addressed envelope to: National Parks Traveler, P.O. Box 980452, Park City, Utah 84098. National Parks Traveler was formed in the state of Utah for the purpose of informing and educating about national parks and protected areas.

Residents of the following states may obtain a copy of our financial and additional information as stated below:

  • Florida: A COPY OF THE OFFICIAL REGISTRATION AND FINANCIAL INFORMATION FOR NATIONAL PARKS TRAVELER, (REGISTRATION NO. CH 51659), MAY BE OBTAINED FROM THE DIVISION OF CONSUMER SERVICES BY CALLING 800-435-7352 OR VISITING THEIR WEBSITE WWW.FRESHFROMFLORIDA.COM. REGISTRATION DOES NOT IMPLY ENDORSEMENT, APPROVAL, OR RECOMMENDATION BY THE STATE.
  • Georgia: A full and fair description of the programs and financial statement summary of National Parks Traveler is available upon request at the office and phone number indicated above.
  • Maryland: Documents and information submitted under the Maryland Solicitations Act are also available, for the cost of postage and copies, from the Secretary of State, State House, Annapolis, MD 21401 (410-974-5534).
  • North Carolina: Financial information about this organization and a copy of its license are available from the State Solicitation Licensing Branch at 888-830-4989 or 919-807-2214. The license is not an endorsement by the State.
  • Pennsylvania: The official registration and financial information of National Parks Traveler may be obtained from the Pennsylvania Department of State by calling 800-732-0999. Registration does not imply endorsement.
  • Virginia: Financial statements are available from the Virginia Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, 102 Governor Street, Richmond, Virginia 23219.
  • Washington: National Parks Traveler is registered with Washington State’s Charities Program as required by law and additional information is available by calling 800-332-4483 or visiting www.sos.wa.gov/charities, or on file at Charities Division, Office of the Secretary of State, State of Washington, Olympia, WA 98504.

Comments

DITTO! We honeymooned there in 1994 and came back 5 years ago. Only difference was internet access.


Please spare me with the negative Trump comments.  This is a travelling site. Think about it. I'd rather it reopen than go to the US governtment, which will guarantee to ruin this beautiful property.


Only other property that I think comes close is Peter Island. But Caneel is indeed beautiful.  My partner and I are holding out as we want to get married there but.... not sure I want to wait that long


After graduating from college with degree in hotel management in 1957 I took position as an Assistant Manager.   Working at Caneel was a true experience as the work was in a beautiful place ajacent to the ocean.  I worked with a great staff and guests all of whom loved just being there.  I left to get married and to continue my education.  Surely one of the most interesting jobs I ever had.

 


We spent our honeymoon at Caneel Bay in 1971 and have been back many times since then, our favorite place to stay being on Scott Beach.  We've rented a condo in February at Gallows Point.  Is there any chance the beautiful beaches at Caneel are open to the public since the resort is no longer open?


I love Caneel. Going there to celebrate the new year has been a tradition my Grandparents started, and has been passed down for over 20 years. When it was destroyed, we all mourned. We have waited until the last minute to get hotel rooms anywhere else because we want to see if Caneel opens first. We're all so very excited for them to rebuild. I still have a Caneel Bay flashlight, and those things are super bright! I'm saving it until I go back. 

Until next time,

Caneel Bay Lover


That will not happen. My family has been going here for generation after generation, over 20 years. (I think 50.) We will do everything we can as valued guests to prevent this.

Sincerley,

Caneel Bay Lover


The beaches are destroyed, and since it is private property to use their dock, I'm afraid you can't get on. But, if you manage to get a paddle board or something, the beaches are public and Caneel Bay can not prevent you from staying off of them. I would not advise of this though, as the disaster that happened may have caused some dangers to arise.


Add comment

CAPTCHA

This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.

The Essential RVing Guide

The Essential RVing Guide to the National Parks

The National Parks RVing Guide, aka the Essential RVing Guide To The National Parks, is the definitive guide for RVers seeking information on campgrounds in the National Park System where they can park their rigs. It's available for free for both iPhones and Android models.

This app is packed with RVing specific details on more than 250 campgrounds in more than 70 parks.

You'll also find stories about RVing in the parks, some tips if you've just recently turned into an RVer, and some planning suggestions. A bonus that wasn't in the previous eBook or PDF versions of this guide are feeds of Traveler content: you'll find our latest stories as well as our most recent podcasts just a click away.

So whether you have an iPhone or an Android, download this app and start exploring the campgrounds in the National Park System where you can park your rig.