You are here

OIG: National Park Service Didn't Exploit Trump Inauguration Crowd Size

Share

National Park Service personnel did not exploit the size of the crowd at President Donald Trump's inauguration, nor did agency staff discuss with the media a call from the president to acting Park Service Director Mike Reynolds that day, an Interior Department investigation has concluded.

President Trump and his staff maintained that the crowd at his inauguration was one of the largest ever -- " I looked out the field was, it looked like a million, a million and half people," the president said the day after his inauguration. -- but photos released by the Park Service showed that the crowds for both of President Obama's elections were larger.

Interior's Office of Inspector General looked into the matter after an unidentified individual complained that National Park Service "officials and employees took questionable actions during and after the 58th presidential inauguration ceremony." Specifically, the complaint alleged:

  • That an NPS National Mall and Memorial Parks (NAMA) official instructed NPS employees to alter records related to crowd size estimates for the inauguration ceremony. 
  • That two NPS public affairs employees released information to the press, without authorization, about a January 21, 2017, phone call from President Donald Trump to Acting NPS Director Michael Reynolds.
  • That one of the public affairs employees circumvented the NPS chain of command for the inauguration when responding to a request from Reynolds. (although the complainant did not know what Reynolds requested, we determined that Reynolds asked the public affairs employee to help obtain inauguration photographs after the President requested them during the January 21 phone call).
  • That a NAMA employee assigned to the inauguration engaged in personal activities at work that interfered with the performance of his duties.

"We did not find evidence to substantiate any of these allegations," the OIG report released Monday concluded. "All of the witnesses we interviewed denied that the (National Mall) official instructed staff to alter reports on the inauguration or to remove crowd size information. We also found no evidence that the public affairs employees released any information to the media about the president’s phone call, or that the employee who responded to Reynolds’ request was required to go through the chain of command."

President Obama's 2009 inauguration/NPS

President Obama's 2013 inauguration/NPS

President Trump's 2017 inauguration/NPS

The complainant, whose identify was not disclosed under guidelines of the Privacy Act, had charged that a National Mall official had ordered staff to "scrub" attendance numbers from President Trump's inauguration. However, it long has been Park Service policy not to provide crowd estimates.

"The official told us that she instructed the staff not to include crowd size estimates in the reports because she wanted to make sure that the reports did not contain nonfactual references to crowd size," the OIG report noted. "She explained that the NPS did not have the necessary methodology in place to do an accurate crowd count and, since the Million Man March in 1995, had made it a practice not to collect or provide any crowd size information for events held at the National Mall."

Had the complainant been aware of this practice, they would not have raised the issue, the report added.

The OIG investigation also could not substantiate the charge that Park Service public affairs personnel had released word that the president had called Mr. Reynolds about the inauguration crowd.

"Reynolds and NPS National Capital Region Director Bob Vogel told us that knowledge of the phone call was widespread throughout the NPS, since the initial call from the White House came in to the U.S. Park Police operations center," the OIG report pointed out, adding that, "Reynolds stated that he did not consider his conversation with the president protected information."

The OIG report was provided to acting Director Reynolds.

Comments

This was a case of political retribution from the start. I am glad that the OIG came to their conclusion but sad that we wasted ANY money on such a frivolous complaint. 


Not much doubt where the anonymous complaint started.


I don't see how crowd size is much of an indication of anything. Is it really that suprising that in a city with a huge black population and filled with government employees that a black President from the party of big government would have a much larger turn out at their inaguration?  It was a silly point made by whoever posted the petulant comment on the NPS twitter feed and it was evan sillier for the incoming adminstratoin to comment.

Republican voters just arn't the kind of people who like to mix in huge crowds in urban centers. 


There was a lot of concern with violence and potential terrorism at the event, thanks Obama. I remember hearing people talk about not going out of fear and the constant coverage of the far left extremists disrupting Trumps campaign events. 


Dumb - most of the "thanks Obama" for violent protests are reflective of the hateful and racist protests against President Obama for 8 years. Somehow I doubt that you "heard" those fears from enough people to explain the significantly lower turnout for one as unpopular as Trump. The only "constant coverage" of "far left extremists' disrupting Trump campaign events was on far right wing radio and Faux News. And most of what I saw was violence BY Trump supporters of the random hippie or person of color who walked into those events.


Rick, no doubt there are racists out there - on both sides of the color spectrum.  However, the vast majority of the protests against Obama had nothing to do with race. It was about policy.  But, like most of your ilk, you are unequipped or unwilling to debate policy and instead fall back on unfounded personal attacks.  Trump has not said or done anything racist nor has he endorsed racist acts by others - unlike Obama's support for the real racist, Rev. Wright. 


ecbuck is playing the game again.  I guess Donald dosent support racists?  Bannon?


OK argalite, show us where Trump has supported a racist act by Bannon. 


The Essential RVing Guide

The Essential RVing Guide to the National Parks

The National Parks RVing Guide, aka the Essential RVing Guide To The National Parks, is the definitive guide for RVers seeking information on campgrounds in the National Park System where they can park their rigs. It's available for free for both iPhones and Android models.

This app is packed with RVing specific details on more than 250 campgrounds in more than 70 parks.

You'll also find stories about RVing in the parks, some tips if you've just recently turned into an RVer, and some planning suggestions. A bonus that wasn't in the previous eBook or PDF versions of this guide are feeds of Traveler content: you'll find our latest stories as well as our most recent podcasts just a click away.

So whether you have an iPhone or an Android, download this app and start exploring the campgrounds in the National Park System where you can park your rig.