You are here

Colorado River Flows Will Keep Shrinking As Climate Warms

Share

A late-afternoon view of the Colorado River in Marble Canyon looking upstream from the Navajo Bridge, near Lees Ferry, Arizona. New research finds 21st century warming reduced Colorado River flows by at least 0.5 million acre-feet, about the amount of water used by 2 million people for one year./Stewart Tomlinson/U.S. Geological Survey.

Editor's note: The following article was prepared by the University of Arizona, Colorado State University and the American Geophysical Union (AGU).

Warming in the 21st century reduced Colorado River flows by at least 0.5 million acre-feet, about the amount of water used by 2 million people for one year, according to new research.

The research is the first to quantify the different effects of temperature and precipitation on recent Colorado River flow, said authors Bradley Udall of Colorado State University and Jonathan Overpeck of the University of Arizona.

“This paper is the first to show the large role that warming temperatures are playing in reducing the flows of the Colorado River,” said Overpeck, UA Regents’ Professor of Geosciences and of Hydrology and Atmospheric Sciences and director of the UA Institute of the Environment. The new paper has been accepted for publication in Water Resources Research, a journal of the American Geophysical Union.

From 2000-2014, the river’s flows declined to only 81 percent of the 20th-century average, a reduction of about 2.9 million acre-feet of water per year. One acre-foot of water will serve a family of four for one year, according to the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation.

From one-sixth to one-half of the 21st-century reduction in flow can be attributed to the higher temperatures since 2000, report Udall and Overpeck. Their analysis shows as temperature continues to increase with climate change, Colorado River flows will continue to decline.

Current climate change models indicate temperatures will increase as long as humans continue to emit greenhouse gases into the atmosphere, but the projections of future precipitation are far less certain.

Forty million people rely on the Colorado River for water, according to the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation. The river supplies water to seven U.S. Western states plus the Mexican states of Sonora and Baja California.

Udall, a senior water and climate scientist/scholar at CSU’s Colorado Water Institute, said, “The future of Colorado River is far less rosy than other recent assessments have portrayed. A clear message to water managers is that they need to plan for significantly lower river flows.”

The study’s findings, he said, “provide a sobering look at future Colorado River flows.”

The Colorado River Basin has been in a drought since 2000. Previous research has shown the region’s risk of a megadrought – one lasting more than 20 years – rises as temperatures increase.

Overpeck said, “We’re the first to make the case that warming alone could cause Colorado River flow declines of 30 percent by midcentury and over 50 percent by the end of the century if greenhouse gas emissions continue unabated.”

The U.S. Bureau of Reclamation estimates annual natural upper Colorado River flow based on data recorded from streamgages at Lees Ferry. At that location, Colorado River streamflow reflects water that has drained from the upper basin, which includes Colorado, Wyoming, Utah and New Mexico. Credit: U.S. Geological Survey

The team began its investigation because Udall learned that recent Colorado flows were lower than managers expected given the amount of precipitation. The two researchers wanted to provide water managers with insight into how future projections of temperature and precipitation for the Colorado River Basin would affect the river’s flows.

Udall and Overpeck began by looking at the drought years of 2000-2014. About 85 percent of the river’s flow originates as precipitation in the Upper Basin – the part of the river that drains portions of Wyoming, Utah, Colorado and New Mexico. The team found during 2000-2014, temperatures in the river’s Upper Basin were 1.6 degrees F (0.9 C) higher than the average for the previous 105 years.

To see how increased temperatures might contribute to the reductions in the river’s flow that have been observed since 2000, Udall and Overpeck reviewed and synthesized 25 years of research about how climate and climate change have and will affect the region and how temperature and precipitation affect the river’s flows.

Water loss increases as temperatures rise because plants use more water, and higher temperatures increase evaporative loss from the soil and from the water surface and lengthen the growing season.

In previous research, Overpeck and other colleagues showed current climate models simulated 20th-century conditions well, but the models cannot simulate the 20- to 60-year megadroughts known to have occurred in the past. Moreover, many of those models did not reproduce the current drought.

Those researchers and others suggest the risk of a multidecadal drought in the Southwest in the 21st century is much higher than climate models indicate and that as temperatures increase, the risk of such a drought increases.

Udall said, “A megadrought in this century will throw all our operating rules out the window.”

Udall and Overpeck found all current climate models agree that temperatures in the Colorado River Basin will continue rising if the emission of greenhouse gases is not curbed. However, the models’ predictions of future precipitation in the Basin have much more uncertainty.

Overpeck said, “Even if the precipitation does increase, our work indicates that there are likely to be drought periods as long as several decades when precipitation will still fall below normal.”

The new study suggests Colorado River flows will continue to decline.

Udall said, “I was surprised at the extent to which the uncertain precipitation aspects of the current projections hid the temperature-induced flow declines.”

The U.S. Bureau of Reclamation lumps temperature and precipitation together in its projections of Colorado River flow, he said.

“Current planning understates the challenge that climate change poses to the water supplies in the American Southwest,” Udall said. “My goal is to help water managers incorporate this information into their long-term planning efforts.”

The Colorado Water Institute, National Science Foundation, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and the U.S. Geological Survey funded the research.

Comments

Maybe what the article is saying is the same thing scientists are saying.  This is an extremely complex question with thousands upon thousands of variables THAT NEED TO BE STUDIED CAREFULLY.

Part of good science is to look at all possibilities -- especially at any apparent or seeming contradictions.

Good science recognizes that the process is messy and can take a lot of time to complete.  In the meantime, should we simply ignore it or should we err on the side of caution and begin looking for solutions to the problem if the hypethesis proves to be correct?

I'm old enough to recall the furor over the hypothesis of continental drift and plate tectonics back when I was in college in the early 1960's.  It's settled science now.  In that case, however, the possibility that effects of tectonics might wipe out civiliztion wasn't a factor.  Climate is an entirely different game.

Wouldn't it be wise to pay heed to alarms that are going off around us?

I remember the night a neighboring fire department that had been called to a home several times in one evening for a sounding smoke alarm disconnected the alarm when they couldn't find a reason for its blaring.  Guess what happened a few hours later when the cracked chimney in the attic finally ignited roof trusses?

 


Lee, I wholeheartedly agree with everything you just said. The problem is that is not what I see happening. Any time someone suggests the science isn't perfect the environmental lynch mob shows up. A mob of environmental activists, everyday people with good intentions and what is the scariest, scientists who have all but backed themselves into a corner by (in my opinion) over selling the current science. What if, (and I am not saying this is what I believe), what if tomorrow these scientists learned that their models were wrong for some reason and man made global warming is not true. Do you think the way this has been sold to the public they would have the will to come out and say it? Quite frankly I doubt it because it has been sold as being beyond question, there is so much money involved and so many reputations at stake it would be nearly impossible for an individual or even a few to turn the ship around. That is what I find so troubling. Personally I have far more confidence and respect for a person or scientist who tells me what their conclusions are but also is open about the weaknesses in their hypothesis. That is what advances science and makes it better.


"I am not a climate scientist" should be a complete sentence, never to be followed by 'but' or anything else.


Most of the time I actually select articles to read based on whether EC comments on them.  Always posts good arguments that test the group think of the pseudo environmental bubble.  


"I am not a climate scientist" 

Anon - who said that? 


Add comment

CAPTCHA

This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.

The Essential RVing Guide

The Essential RVing Guide to the National Parks

The National Parks RVing Guide, aka the Essential RVing Guide To The National Parks, is the definitive guide for RVers seeking information on campgrounds in the National Park System where they can park their rigs. It's available for free for both iPhones and Android models.

This app is packed with RVing specific details on more than 250 campgrounds in more than 70 parks.

You'll also find stories about RVing in the parks, some tips if you've just recently turned into an RVer, and some planning suggestions. A bonus that wasn't in the previous eBook or PDF versions of this guide are feeds of Traveler content: you'll find our latest stories as well as our most recent podcasts just a click away.

So whether you have an iPhone or an Android, download this app and start exploring the campgrounds in the National Park System where you can park your rig.