You are here

UPDATED: Former Yellowstone Chief Ranger Investigated For Letting Guests Stay In His Park Housing

Share

Tim Reid, a former Yellowstone National Park chief ranger, on occasion let family and friends, and even a family from France, use his government-owned housing at Mammoth Hot Springs/NPS

Editor's note: This updates with comment from Yellowstone Superintendent Dan Wenk.

A former chief ranger of Yellowstone National Park, although required to live in the park, opened his government-owned housing to friends and relatives, and even a family from France looking for a house exchange, while he lived in nearby Gardiner, Montana, according to an Interior Department investigation.

Timothy Reid, who was promoted to Devils Tower National Monument superintendent last June, over a number of years let 19 individuals use the one-bedroom apartment at Mammoth Hot Springs, the Office of Inspector General report (attached below) released Monday stated.

"Among the Yellowstone visitors who have stayed at Reid’s apartment was a family from France who resided there for 8 days. In exchange for staying in the apartment, the French family agreed to allow Reid and his family to stay in one of their homes in France as part of a home exchange program," the reported noted. "The remaining visitors to the apartment were Reid and his wife’s family members, friends, or family of friends. None of these guests provided compensation to Reid and his wife.

"We also determined that Reid—despite annually certifying that his on-park government housing was his primary residence—violated the terms of his required occupancy agreement by living at (his wife's) family-owned bed-and-breakfast, not the on-park apartment. The Yellowstone superintendent and deputy superintendent both admitted that they knew Reid did not comply with the required occupancy condition of his employment and that they took no action."

The report noted that while Reid did not receive compensation for letting others use his apartment, the practice raised concerns over the propriety of his decision to live several miles north of the park in Gardiner.

Ironically, it was Yellowstone Superintendent Dan Wenk, during a stint as acting director of the National Park Service, who signed the service-wide order stating that, "(T)hose NPS employees assigned housing as a condition of employment are referred to as required occupants because their positions require them to reside in government housing. Their physical presence is required within a specific geographic area to provide a timely response to emergencies involving human life and safety and/or park resources, and to provide a reasonable level of deterrent protection."

Superintendent Wenk said Tuesday that while he inherited the situation with Reid, he "should have handled it differently." Moving forward, the superintendent said he has reviewed the staff positions affected by the required occupancy rule and reduced the number of those required to live in the park by about 25 percent, from 201 to 149, and outlined how government housing can be used. While Superintendent Wenk said he saw no problem with family and friends staying in government housing, he said there's an expectation that the leaseholder should be present at the time.

In his interview with OIG personnel, Deputy Superintendent Iobst said he believed "that Reid lives within a reasonable response time from his off-park residence."

Reid told the OIG investigators that he had lived in government housing since his arrival in Yellowstone in 1994, and eventually worked his way up to a four-bedroom duplex in Officer's Row at Mammoth Hot Springs. In 2008, however, he moved out to his wife's B&B in Gardiner. 

"Reid told us he knew he had to keep an on-park apartment as a condition of employment. To satisfy the required occupancy condition, when his family moved to Gardiner, Reid surrendered the large NPS duplex, then bid on and was awarded a small efficiency apartment, reducing his monthly housing cost," the report said. "He also explained that for the first couple of years he stayed at the apartment 3 nights per week, but has gradually reduced his time to very few nights. He does use the apartment during peak operation periods, such as fire season, to remain in the area while getting some sleep. Otherwise, the apartment is vacant unless used by family and friends."

The French family used the apartment in 2013. 

"We spoke with the French couple, who explained they found Reid and his wife’s bed-and-breakfast on a home-exchange website and emailed Reid’s wife in the fall of 2012 to negotiate a home exchange at her bed-and-breakfast. The French couple also explained that prior to the couple’s arrival, Reid’s wife emailed them, explaining that the cabin they had booked was no longer available," the OIG report stated. "She offered them the on-park government apartment as an alternative place to stay.

"When the family arrived on September 7, 2013, Reid’s wife also provided them with a free vehicle park pass to Yellowstone. The French couple told us that Reid escorted them to the on-park apartment, showed them around, and provided them with the key to the apartment. Even though Reid and his wife did not know the French family prior to their arrival, the family stayed in the on-park apartment unsupervised for 8 nights among other NPS employees," it went on. "The French couple told us that, as part of the home exchange, they offered Reid and his family a stay at one of their homes in France as compensation."

The Reids never took up the French couple's offer, according to the report. 

Mrs. Reid told the OIG investigators that, "since the apartment is vacant most of the time, she takes it upon herself to offer its use to their personal contacts, friends, and family as a 'courtesy.'"

"It’s basically a nice thing we can do for somebody," she told the investigators. "She said that she and her husband agreed that she could allow family and friends to stay in the apartment. She also said her husband did not know all of her friends, but if she told him someone was her friend, he accepted it."

The OIG investigators told Deputy Superintendent Iobst that, "families with children and suitcases frequently stay in Reid’s apartment for several days and then depart via rental car, creating the perception that Reid is using the apartment as an overflow for his family’s bed-and-breakfast. Iobst stated that he understood the perception and that the chief ranger position is a position of incredible responsibility and should be held to NPS ethical standards. In addition, he would have similar concerns if the allegations were concerning any park employee.

"He added that the allegations were disturbing, disrupting, and disconcerting," the report noted.

While the OIG referred the matter to the U.S. Attorney's Office in Montana for disposition, that office declined to prosecute Mr. Reid and the report was forwarded to Park Service Director Jon Jarvis "for any action deemed appropriate."

Comments

On its face, a questionable investigation.

Does the matter become more significant if you ask, "How do you decide which rules and regulations should you follow, and which can you ignore?," or when you realize that rent paid on government housing might be deductible from federal income taxes?

Finally, what's the message to the rank-and-file workforce?

Obviously, as Superintendent Wenk stated, the required occupancy rule needed to be revised, and he did so after the OIG investigation. 


I'm absolutely mystified by multiple comments suggesting that this wasn't newsworthy, "such a non-story," or "isn't a big deal." The man broke the specified rules and lied about his primary residence. That smacks of an "I'm too important to be constrained by petty regulations" attitude and a considerable degree of arrogance. Perhaps worse, it sets a horrible example for rank-and-file employees, and don't think for a moment that these individuals didn't notice or that this didn't impact morale.

 

NPT has done precisely what any solid news source does. It reported the facts. There's minimal if any editorializing, and sound journalism doesn't involve selective reporting. It covers the good, the bad, and the ugly. This is definitely bad and at least a bit ugly.

 

Jim Casada


It's lucky for him he didn't write a book. Then he would be in trouble! Meanwhile, does his wife run a B & B at Devils Towers, or is she just "standing by her man?" What everyone is forgetting here is the "new" dynamic in America in which both husbands and wives want careers. But, honey, I have to sleep in the park tonight. Does that sound reasonable for any married couple?

In the old days, when men were men, as Mae West used to say, wives did as they were told. Now women are telling us what they want--and they don't want to live in government housing. You wonder why the superintendent let this "slide?" Try reasoning with an angry wife.

What are the rank and file doing? The exact same thing. They would like better housing and a better life.

What amuses me here again is all these rules puppies who have no common sense whatsoever. He broke the rules! Off with his head! I can just imagine telling my wife she has to live in a government dump. Then she would be having MY head. Pick your Devil, and if you now say that government housing is wonderful, how can you justify that $12 billion backlog? At that price, something can't be wonderful. Oh, I get it. It's just the roads again.


So change the rules, don't just ignore them and claim pius indignation when you're caught.    That is how a true leader would handle it.  So which employee gets to choose which rules are rediculous and don't need to be followed?  If so, you have chaos.   


 Pick your Devil

That is right Alfred, make your choice.  You can choose your job and follow its rules or you can choose your wife and follow her rules.  The choice is yours but the government doesn't have to accomodate your wife and your wife doesn't have to accomodate the government.  Put another way, you shouldn't cheat on your wife and you shouldn't cheat your employer. 


Nice post Rocky Mountain Wanderer, I agree. I lived in NPS housing 32 years of my 37 year tenure. In the late sixties, I lived in the bachelor ranger quarters in Yosemite Valley (the Ranger Club it was called). You agreed to have no women quests in your assigned room. Visiting hours were carefully observed in the commons area, woe be the young ranger that invited a delightful member of the female gender into the Club, you were in the Superintendents office the next day explaining yourself. There were no female rangers, period. When my spouse and I got married, I was assigned married housing, a small 2 bedroom apartment, housing was assigned then mostly by rank.  At that point there were no restrictions on who my guests could be. I paid the rent and had tenant rights with some restrictions, I could only bid on certain housing in some areas of park if I was a required occupant. Housing is in short supply, some quarters are assigned only to emergency operations personnel for obvious reasons.  Needless to say, no sub-leasing, etc. My spouse was  employed by the old Yosemite Park and Curry Company as the manager of the High Sierra Camps Reservation Desk, that is where I met her.   I was informed that as we were married, there were certain expectations for a rangers spouse.  The spouse (always defined as a women in those days),  could not keep her job and she was expected to be a stay at home MOM! With a BS in biological science, post graduate work, one of the top 10 seniors of her graduating class, well you can imagine me going home and telling her what the Chief Ranger told me was expected of her. I will never forget it, she immediately called the Chief Ranger and informed him that while she did marry me, she did marry the NPS and immediately hung up.  I never heard anther word on the subject. 

It maybe news to some, but the women really got the short end of the stick in those days, those that pioneered eliminating the barriers paid a price. My hat is off to Tim Reid's spouse. Further, I agree with RMW, there were no criminal, or ethics violations here as I understand them. It would have been a simple matter to change Tim's occupancy status, it is simply an administrative determination made to ensure key emergency personnel are available in certain assigned quarters.  Housing is a critical need, if all are allowed to bid on all units there is a problem in assigning quarters to meet emergency operational goals. My wife owned a piece of property, we decided to build on it. I was 6 years from retirement, as you all know you had better plan ahead if you want to live in a home of your own post employment.  I went into my boss, explained the situation to him, and he not only understood but took me off the required occupants list. Here it is 46 years later, she is still speaking to me, I am blessed. This situation with Tim Reid has been blown all out of proportion in my own view.  I wish Mr. Reid the best in his new assignment. 


I will never forget it, she immediately called the Chief Ranger and informed him that while she did marry me, she did(n't?) marry the NPS and immediately hung up.  I never heard another word on the subject.

A wonderful story, Ron, but do you think EC will get it? After all, you were cheating on the government.

 


The OIG says he did not receive compensation .......... Horsehockey! He received a rent free home in France while on vacation and owes the American Taxpayer for the money he did not have to pay in exchange for the French family using the government provided 4 bedroom duplex. NON-STORY? I think not ........ this is stealing from the taxpayer and I wonder how many others have done the same thing from Jarvis on down the list!


Add comment

CAPTCHA

This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.

The Essential RVing Guide

The Essential RVing Guide to the National Parks

The National Parks RVing Guide, aka the Essential RVing Guide To The National Parks, is the definitive guide for RVers seeking information on campgrounds in the National Park System where they can park their rigs. It's available for free for both iPhones and Android models.

This app is packed with RVing specific details on more than 250 campgrounds in more than 70 parks.

You'll also find stories about RVing in the parks, some tips if you've just recently turned into an RVer, and some planning suggestions. A bonus that wasn't in the previous eBook or PDF versions of this guide are feeds of Traveler content: you'll find our latest stories as well as our most recent podcasts just a click away.

So whether you have an iPhone or an Android, download this app and start exploring the campgrounds in the National Park System where you can park your rig.