You are here

UPDATED: Former Yellowstone Chief Ranger Investigated For Letting Guests Stay In His Park Housing

Share

Tim Reid, a former Yellowstone National Park chief ranger, on occasion let family and friends, and even a family from France, use his government-owned housing at Mammoth Hot Springs/NPS

Editor's note: This updates with comment from Yellowstone Superintendent Dan Wenk.

A former chief ranger of Yellowstone National Park, although required to live in the park, opened his government-owned housing to friends and relatives, and even a family from France looking for a house exchange, while he lived in nearby Gardiner, Montana, according to an Interior Department investigation.

Timothy Reid, who was promoted to Devils Tower National Monument superintendent last June, over a number of years let 19 individuals use the one-bedroom apartment at Mammoth Hot Springs, the Office of Inspector General report (attached below) released Monday stated.

"Among the Yellowstone visitors who have stayed at Reid’s apartment was a family from France who resided there for 8 days. In exchange for staying in the apartment, the French family agreed to allow Reid and his family to stay in one of their homes in France as part of a home exchange program," the reported noted. "The remaining visitors to the apartment were Reid and his wife’s family members, friends, or family of friends. None of these guests provided compensation to Reid and his wife.

"We also determined that Reid—despite annually certifying that his on-park government housing was his primary residence—violated the terms of his required occupancy agreement by living at (his wife's) family-owned bed-and-breakfast, not the on-park apartment. The Yellowstone superintendent and deputy superintendent both admitted that they knew Reid did not comply with the required occupancy condition of his employment and that they took no action."

The report noted that while Reid did not receive compensation for letting others use his apartment, the practice raised concerns over the propriety of his decision to live several miles north of the park in Gardiner.

Ironically, it was Yellowstone Superintendent Dan Wenk, during a stint as acting director of the National Park Service, who signed the service-wide order stating that, "(T)hose NPS employees assigned housing as a condition of employment are referred to as required occupants because their positions require them to reside in government housing. Their physical presence is required within a specific geographic area to provide a timely response to emergencies involving human life and safety and/or park resources, and to provide a reasonable level of deterrent protection."

Superintendent Wenk said Tuesday that while he inherited the situation with Reid, he "should have handled it differently." Moving forward, the superintendent said he has reviewed the staff positions affected by the required occupancy rule and reduced the number of those required to live in the park by about 25 percent, from 201 to 149, and outlined how government housing can be used. While Superintendent Wenk said he saw no problem with family and friends staying in government housing, he said there's an expectation that the leaseholder should be present at the time.

In his interview with OIG personnel, Deputy Superintendent Iobst said he believed "that Reid lives within a reasonable response time from his off-park residence."

Reid told the OIG investigators that he had lived in government housing since his arrival in Yellowstone in 1994, and eventually worked his way up to a four-bedroom duplex in Officer's Row at Mammoth Hot Springs. In 2008, however, he moved out to his wife's B&B in Gardiner. 

"Reid told us he knew he had to keep an on-park apartment as a condition of employment. To satisfy the required occupancy condition, when his family moved to Gardiner, Reid surrendered the large NPS duplex, then bid on and was awarded a small efficiency apartment, reducing his monthly housing cost," the report said. "He also explained that for the first couple of years he stayed at the apartment 3 nights per week, but has gradually reduced his time to very few nights. He does use the apartment during peak operation periods, such as fire season, to remain in the area while getting some sleep. Otherwise, the apartment is vacant unless used by family and friends."

The French family used the apartment in 2013. 

"We spoke with the French couple, who explained they found Reid and his wife’s bed-and-breakfast on a home-exchange website and emailed Reid’s wife in the fall of 2012 to negotiate a home exchange at her bed-and-breakfast. The French couple also explained that prior to the couple’s arrival, Reid’s wife emailed them, explaining that the cabin they had booked was no longer available," the OIG report stated. "She offered them the on-park government apartment as an alternative place to stay.

"When the family arrived on September 7, 2013, Reid’s wife also provided them with a free vehicle park pass to Yellowstone. The French couple told us that Reid escorted them to the on-park apartment, showed them around, and provided them with the key to the apartment. Even though Reid and his wife did not know the French family prior to their arrival, the family stayed in the on-park apartment unsupervised for 8 nights among other NPS employees," it went on. "The French couple told us that, as part of the home exchange, they offered Reid and his family a stay at one of their homes in France as compensation."

The Reids never took up the French couple's offer, according to the report. 

Mrs. Reid told the OIG investigators that, "since the apartment is vacant most of the time, she takes it upon herself to offer its use to their personal contacts, friends, and family as a 'courtesy.'"

"It’s basically a nice thing we can do for somebody," she told the investigators. "She said that she and her husband agreed that she could allow family and friends to stay in the apartment. She also said her husband did not know all of her friends, but if she told him someone was her friend, he accepted it."

The OIG investigators told Deputy Superintendent Iobst that, "families with children and suitcases frequently stay in Reid’s apartment for several days and then depart via rental car, creating the perception that Reid is using the apartment as an overflow for his family’s bed-and-breakfast. Iobst stated that he understood the perception and that the chief ranger position is a position of incredible responsibility and should be held to NPS ethical standards. In addition, he would have similar concerns if the allegations were concerning any park employee.

"He added that the allegations were disturbing, disrupting, and disconcerting," the report noted.

While the OIG referred the matter to the U.S. Attorney's Office in Montana for disposition, that office declined to prosecute Mr. Reid and the report was forwarded to Park Service Director Jon Jarvis "for any action deemed appropriate."

Comments

Once again, the NPS double-standard is on display.  If a rank & file employee had pulled this stunt, they would probably have lost their job, let alone been promoted.  Apparently this management cult's mission is so holy that the ends justify the means.

I recall an Assistant Superintendent at Olympic who got a paper transfer to Denver Service Center, then stayed in his private Port Angeles residence while drawing travel expense payments for years.


The Jarvis model of arrogance filters to the Superintendents.  In what other place would someone have the audacity to act in such a way.  Ethics?  What is that?

Jarvis needs to go.  But Jewell will never do it.  I have personally witnessed this arrogance in the Smokies with the former Superintendent.  That culture is rampant in the agency and the only way to stop the cancer is send a clear message.  These are PUBLIC lands.  Not playgrounds for the bureaucrats supposedly in charge.


Somehow, this unfortunate situation hardly qualifies as "news." The issue seems to be that the former Chief Ranger didn't actually use his in-park government housing as frequently as required by his official capacity as chief ranger. However, he paid for this housing, and therefore it was his place of official in-park private residence. As such, I see nothing at all wrong with friends and members of his greater family being invited to stay over, even during times of absences. If he was actively subleasing occupancy to his in-park residence as a source of extra income, that of course would be another matter entirely. Otherwise, I doubt this issue is of such importance that it should merit reporting within NPT. I doubt if other staff members would be administratively reprimanded for inviting friends and family to stay over in their homes, even if their homes were considered rented "government housing."


Am I the only one who thinks this isn't a big deal? I think it's downright unreasonable to say that a person shouldn't let relatives stay in his or her residence.

He didn't lease or airbnb his place.

I fail to see an ethical violation here, but rather a patronizing attitude towards government employees.


Sometimes perception is more important than reality,  "families with children and suitcases frequently stay in Reid's apartment for several days and then depart via rental car, creating the perception that Reid is using the apartment as an overflow for his family's bed-and-breakfast. Iobst stated that he understood the perception and that the chief ranger position is a position of incredible responsibility and should be held to NPS ethical standards."  While the actual activity is not a horrible infraction, if I was staff there and perceived they were using the housing as overflow for the B&B, I would be livid!  It is hard to hold yourself up to a higher standard when you see or hear what is happening in Congress and the SCOTUS, but we are held to a higher standard, if you don't like it, change jobs.


I agree Owen, employee housing issues in our large western parks get quite complicated.   


I don't see the breech in his willingness to let others stay in the place. Instead, his job description indicated he was to be in the park to be able to respond in a timely manner.  This is where he failed.  Now Gardner isn't far from Mammoth Springs and probably didn't materially impact his response times but this is something he should have cleared with his superiors.


I have to agree with Raphael that this is such a non-story.  The report says the US Attorneys declined to prosecute.  Prosecute what?  That he stayed in his home with his family 3 miles from the boundary?  They found no evidence that he was being compensated yet the title of the story makes it look like it was an important criminal investigation.  Would have preferred to see them report up front that the only thing he was guilty of was not staying in his apartment - something the park could have worked out by granting a reasonable waiver from the required occupancy without an OIG investigation.  


Add comment

CAPTCHA

This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.

The Essential RVing Guide

The Essential RVing Guide to the National Parks

The National Parks RVing Guide, aka the Essential RVing Guide To The National Parks, is the definitive guide for RVers seeking information on campgrounds in the National Park System where they can park their rigs. It's available for free for both iPhones and Android models.

This app is packed with RVing specific details on more than 250 campgrounds in more than 70 parks.

You'll also find stories about RVing in the parks, some tips if you've just recently turned into an RVer, and some planning suggestions. A bonus that wasn't in the previous eBook or PDF versions of this guide are feeds of Traveler content: you'll find our latest stories as well as our most recent podcasts just a click away.

So whether you have an iPhone or an Android, download this app and start exploring the campgrounds in the National Park System where you can park your rig.