These guys get free entry into Zion National Park, but your cost is going up a bit on July 1/Kurt Repanshek
By the time you read this, it already will be more expensive to visit Cedar Breaks National Monument this year than it was a year ago, and higher fees are coming to nearby Bryce Canyon and Zion national parks, too.
Higher fees went into effect for Cedar Breaks on Friday -- from $4 per person to $5 per person, and in 2017 the entrance fee will inch up to $6 per person. At Bryce Canyon and Zion, the per-vehicle charge will go from $25 to $30 on July 1 in both parks. That fee is good for seven days in the parks. Higher fees also are being implemented for camping and backcountry travel in Zion and Bryce Canyon. Those increases are outlined below.
The higher fees were recommended by National Park Service Director Jon Jarvis in August 2014. At the time, the director called for the 131 units of the National Park System that charge fees to be structured in four tiers, and recommended entrance fee levels for each tier.
At Zion, Bryce Canyon, and Cedar Breaks, all in southwestern Utah, entrance fees had not been raised since 2007.
'During the public comment period, very few of the comments were negative. Politicians, visitors and local community members alike seemed to understand the need for additional funding to help with deferred maintenance projects at parks, especially with the increases in visitation we have seen recently,' said Cedar Breaks Superintendent Paul Roelandt.
'By law, these funds can only be used to help cover costs that are directly related to providing visitor services,' added Bryce Canyon Superintendent Lisa Eckert. 'For example, entrance fees have supported a wide range of projects that improve the park and visitor experiences, including rehabilitating trails, developing and installing exhibits in visitor centers, improving park water systems and other infrastructure, and improving ADA accessibility.'
'This modest increase in fees will allow us to continue to improve facilities and services important to visitors,' said Zion Superintendent Jeff Bradybaugh. 'After carefully considering the impact of a fee increase on visitors and community members, we came to the conclusion that this is the right course of action to help us protect, preserve and share these special places with current visitors and future generations.'
National Park entrance fees are not charged for persons under 16 years of age. Costs for passes covered under the America the Beautiful National Parks and Federal Recreational Lands Pass Program will not be changed at this time. All Interagency Passes available for admission to federal fee areas will remain at the current rates: Annual ($80) ' valid for one year from month of purchase; Senior ($10) ' valid for life for U.S. citizens, 62 years and older; Access Pass ($0) ' valid for life for permanently disabled U.S. citizens; and Military Pass ($0) ' valid for one year from month of purchase for active military personnel.
Zion National Park
Entrance Fees |
Current Fee |
New Fee |
Effective Date |
Per Vehicle |
$25 |
$30 |
July 1, 2015 |
Per Person |
$12 |
$15 |
July 1, 2015 |
Motorcycle |
$12/person |
$25/motorcycle |
July 1, 2015 |
Zion Annual Park Pass |
$50 |
$50 |
No Change |
Watchman Campground Tent Sites |
$16 |
$20 |
January 1, 2016 |
Watchman Campground RV Sites w/Hookups |
$18 |
$30 |
January 1, 2016 |
|
South Campground No Hookups |
$16 |
$20 |
January 1, 2016 |
Watchman Group Camp |
$3/person |
$50 for 7-15 people $90 for 16-25 people $130 for 26-40 people |
January 1, 2016 |
Wilderness Permits |
Current Fee |
New Fee |
Effective Date |
Wilderness Permit 1-2 people |
$10 |
$15 |
January 1, 2016 |
Wilderness Permit 3-7 people |
$15 |
$20 |
January 1, 2016 |
Wilderness Permit 8-12 people |
$20 |
$25 |
January 1, 2016 |
Bryce Canyon National Park
Entrance Fees |
Current Fee |
New Fee |
Effective Date |
Per Vehicle |
$25 |
$30 |
July 1, 2015 |
Per Person |
$12 |
$15 |
July 1, 2015 |
Motorcycle |
$12/person |
$25/motorcycle |
July 1, 2015 |
Bryce Canyon Annual Park Pass |
$30 |
$35 |
July 1, 2015 |
Commercial Tour Rate |
$150 |
$150 |
No Change |
Camping |
Current Fee |
New Fee |
Effective Date |
Sunset and North Campground RV Sites |
$15 |
$30 |
July 1, 2015 |
Sunset and North Campground Tent Sites |
$15 |
$20 |
July 1, 2015 |
Backcountry Camp Sites |
$5 1-2 people $10 3-6 people $15 7+ people |
$5/person |
July 1, 2015 |
Cedar Breaks National Monument
Entrance Fees |
Current Fee |
New Fee |
Effective Date |
Per Person |
$4 |
$5 $6 |
May 22, 2015 May, 2017 |
Cedar Breaks Annual Park Pass |
$20 |
$25 |
May, 2017 |
Camping |
Current Fee |
New Fee |
Effective Date |
Point Supreme Campground |
$14 |
$18 $20 |
May 22, 2015 May, 2017 |
Story Categories:
A copy of National Parks Traveler's financial statements may be obtained by sending a stamped, self-addressed envelope to: National Parks Traveler, P.O. Box 980452, Park City, Utah 84098. National Parks Traveler was formed in the state of Utah for the purpose of informing and educating about national parks and protected areas.
Residents of the following states may obtain a copy of our financial and additional information as stated below:
- Florida: A COPY OF THE OFFICIAL REGISTRATION AND FINANCIAL INFORMATION FOR NATIONAL PARKS TRAVELER, (REGISTRATION NO. CH 51659), MAY BE OBTAINED FROM THE DIVISION OF CONSUMER SERVICES BY CALLING 800-435-7352 OR VISITING THEIR WEBSITE. REGISTRATION DOES NOT IMPLY ENDORSEMENT, APPROVAL, OR RECOMMENDATION BY THE STATE.
- Georgia: A full and fair description of the programs and financial statement summary of National Parks Traveler is available upon request at the office and phone number indicated above.
- Maryland: Documents and information submitted under the Maryland Solicitations Act are also available, for the cost of postage and copies, from the Secretary of State, State House, Annapolis, MD 21401 (410-974-5534).
- North Carolina: Financial information about this organization and a copy of its license are available from the State Solicitation Licensing Branch at 888-830-4989 or 919-807-2214. The license is not an endorsement by the State.
- Pennsylvania: The official registration and financial information of National Parks Traveler may be obtained from the Pennsylvania Department of State by calling 800-732-0999. Registration does not imply endorsement.
- Virginia: Financial statements are available from the Virginia Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, 102 Governor Street, Richmond, Virginia 23219.
- Washington: National Parks Traveler is registered with Washington State’s Charities Program as required by law and additional information is available by calling 800-332-4483 or visiting www.sos.wa.gov/charities, or on file at Charities Division, Office of the Secretary of State, State of Washington, Olympia, WA 98504.
INN Member
The easiest way to explore RV-friendly National Park campgrounds.
Here’s the definitive guide to National Park System campgrounds where RVers can park their rigs.
Our app is packed with RVing- specific details on more than 250 campgrounds in more than 70 national parks.
You’ll also find stories about RVing in the parks, tips helpful if you’ve just recently become an RVer, and useful planning suggestions.
Comments
For a picture of what State "Management" of public lands means, here is an example from today's Salt Lake Tribune. While this particular land is actually owned by the state, it is land that was set aside upon statehood as "school lands." Developers have been drooling over these lands for years, and now the legislature has seen fit to grant some of their wishes. Note the ridiculously low prices of this prime real estate.
But hey, whatever it takes to plunk money into the pockets of their good friends . . . . . .
http://www.sltrib.com/news/2562099-155/utah-to-auction-scenic-properties...
Gee - the lands are being used for exactly the purpose they were established - raising school funds. Horrors!. If it so ridiculously low Lee, why don't you go buy it. It is an auction after all so you have as much right to buy it as "their good friends". As usual, you totally mischaracterize the situation.
This from KSL TV news in Salt Lake:
http://www.ksl.com/?sid=34880651&nid=1070&fm=home_page&s_cid=toppick2
Thanks for the link, Lee. A very interesting article. Is Arches the next Yosemite Valley in terms of severe over-crowding during peak season? The story says the park staff is trying ways to encourage people to visit outside of peak hours and seasons (including higher entrance fee at peak hours, lower fee at off-peak) and even raised the idea of a reservation system during peak season.
A local business owner has a counter-idea: "... the park should do more to accommodate crowds. He points to Yellowstone and Grand Canyon national parks, which provide a good visitor experience for much larger hordes of tourists. He said the National Park Service at Arches should create more parking, access roads, trails, picnic areas and other user-friendly features to encourage tourists to spread out inside the park."
A classic example of the dilemma facing a number of parks.
The article did point out that the issue wasn't crowding in the park it was a back-up at the gate.
Actually, regardless of what the article might have said, the park is usually crammed. Parking lots overflow and cars park off the roads for long distances along main roads near turnoffs to parking lots. In this case, the situation at the gate became so bad that the highway patrol actually stepped in and closed the park entrance road. They sent people who had been waiting on the highway down the road to break up the traffic jam.
Another issue is the first few miles of access road past the entrance station. It is a steep grade with a narrow roadway carved out of the side of a cliff. Traffic glomps up there, too, and sometimes one slow vehicle like a megaRV backs traffic up to the entrance stations.
This article doesn't tell the full story. This is the transcript of a short TV news spot. TV news accuracy is often affected when they try to cram a big story into 30 to 60 seconds. A lot gets left out of those sound bites.
I've not been there for many years, but an interesting quote from the story cited above: "The entire Moab area was experiencing what many residents say was the heaviest traffic, by far, that they have ever seen. For much of the weekend, cars headed for many destinations in the region created bumper-to-bumper traffic all the way through town, for a distance of several miles. Many residents say they were astounded by what they saw."
Sounds like, for better or worse, the area has been "discovered."
Previous stories on the Traveler have discussed the lack of parking at popular spots in the park - and the usual solution to expand parking lots is underway for at least one location. Opinions will vary about whether that is the best long-term solution.
Its your article Lee, if you don't believe it why did you post it? But what is your point anyway? People are going to the parks. Is that a bad thing?
Overcrowding in popular parks is a serious problem. Yet, there seems to be a reluctance to some form of peak season and peak weekend reservation system.
Without a reservation system what other options are there: (1) do nothing and let the UT State Highway Patrol close the park down due to traffic concerns, (2) build more roads and parking lots, (3) build more parking lots out of the park and implement a mandatory shuttle system like in Zion NP, (4) charge cars $100.00 per vehicle during peak hours? There's no easy solution, but the status quo isn't acceptable either.
After all, when there's a conflict between intensity of park use and the protection of park resources and the visitor experience, stated NPS policy is that protection of park resources and the provision of a quality visitor experience should have top priority. First time visitors who experience overcrowding, might be reluctant to return for a second chance to visit.
Personally, I'm all in favor of some form of a park reservation system for entrance by private vehicle, along with a shuttle system alternative.
Yeah, nobody goes there anymore - its too crowded.
Last year in the height of the summer I spent two week traveling and went through 8 different park units including Yosemite and Yellowstone. Not once did I get a sense of overcrowding or have difficulty parking. Are there occasions when a park might get crowded? I am sure there are but it certainly isn't a systemic issue. Peak period pricing and optional shuttle systems could be useful in certain situations but I would be reluctant to endorse a reservation system. And as to the article Lee posted - the issue was clearly identified as a bottleneck at the entrance not overall crowding within the park.
Sounds like yet another variation on Yogi's "If people don't want to come out to the ball park, nobody's gonna stop 'em."
Obviously, EC is an overcrowding denier, with reports of recent surges in park visitation and traffic congestion exceeding park's capacities being merely the outcome of the limited and local effect of traffic bottlenecks.
But is the solution really merely one of constructing and operating additional lanes for the entrance station and hiring more ranger-fee collectors? If the issue is only a short-term traffic bottleneck, why not simply stop charging fees, open the entrance station gates wide, smile big, and wave everyone through, allowing them to enter unencumbered and park their cars wherever they find roadside space? Simple isn't it? The local communities will be happy too when the crowds come back into town after their day in the park to find a place to eat and sleep.
On the other hand, isn't it prudent planning to look ahead and consider what might be feasible and effective to limit or even reduce traffic on park roads? We have reservations for backcountry use. Why not the front country too? Isn't it the responsibility of the NPS to ensure resource protection and a quality park experience?
The current surge in park traffic congestion is likely due to an increase in organized public relations efforts promoting tourism of UT parks. There's also the commensurate spike in vacation travel among baby boomer retirees. I suspect park visitation will only increase further in the future with a rising population, and the subset of that population seeking relief from the daily routine of urban and semi-urban environments. However, we might also expect future park visitation to increase markedly when the majority of Americans finally wake up to the fact that their earned vacation time woefully pales in comparison to what other developed nations offer their employees. Hike the inner canyon of the Grand Canyon and just listen to the diversity of languages being spoken.
http://m.deseretnews.com/article/865629809/Jammed-highway-lights-fire-un...
More background on the traffic jam at Arches National Park and the reluctance of local businesses to endorse a park reservation system.
That is the same article Lee posted. The one that said the issue wasn't a crowded park but rather a back up at the entry.