You are here

National Park Service, In Court Filing, Claims Xanterra Trying To Block Competition In Grand Canyon Concessions Business

Share

In a strongly worded response to Xanterra Parks & Resort's request for an injunction to remain in business past year's end on the South Rim of Grand Canyon National Park, lawyers for the National Park Service argue that the concessionaire is trying to thwart competition and feels its history on the rim entitles it to remain there.

Less than three weeks remain until Xanterra's current contract to operate lodging and dining facilities on the South Rim expires, and there is no temporary contract in place to ensure continued operation of the El Tovar Hotel, Bright Angel Lodge, Maswick Lodge, and other lodgings and restaurants beyond New Year's Eve. 

On December 16 a U.S. District Court judge in Denver is scheduled to hear arguments over Xanterra's request that the Park Service be barred from closing the South Rim lodging and dining operations on December 31 and allow the concessionaire to remain in business there until a new 15-year contract is awarded.

Doing so, the federal government counters in its 48-page response, would not maintain the "status quo," but rather upset it, cause competitive harm, and prevent the Park Service from making concessions contracts more competitive as Congress directed it to through the National Parks Omnibus Management Act of 1998.

"In its Complaint and Motion for a Preliminary Injunction, Xanterra stresses that it has operated at the South Rim of the Grand Canyon for over a century, as though this history constituted an entitlement to continued operations," the government's response reads. "Xanterra has resisted the Park Service'™s efforts to enhance competition for the South Rim concessions, complaining, for example, that the Park Service'™s $100 million buy-down of its LSI was 'not requested nor welcomed by Xanterra.'

"In an effort to maintain its advantageous position, Xanterra now seeks a preliminary injunction that would allow it to continue operating nearly all of the South Rim concessions, deprive Delaware North of the benefit of its successful bid for a new contract that includes some concessions that Xanterra now operates, prevent the Park Service from entertaining bids from any competitors, and limiting the terms of a temporary contract to essentially the terms of Xanterra'™s expiring contract '” all for the duration of this litigation."

Alternate Text
The clock is winding down on efforts to keep the El Tovar Hotel open past year's end/Xanterra Parks & Resorts

The standoff between the Park Service and Xanterra has been brewing for more than a year, and has laid open the problem of possessory interest, or "leaseholder surrender interest," in the National Park System. That interest essentially is built up as a concessionaire invests in properties it operates for the Park Service. If a new concessionaire is awarded a contract, it must pay the outgoing concessionaire the amount of LSI it has accumulated.

At the Grand Canyon, Xanterra's LSI was determined in 2013 to stand at $198 million -- "the highest amount associated with a single contract in Park Service history," according to the government's response to Xantera's request for an injunction. Park Service officials viewed that amount as a barrier to other companies that might be interested in operating the South Rim concessions, and a decision was made to 1) break the single concessions contract for the South Rim in two, and 2) buy down Xanterra's LSI by $100 million, a sum 88 park units contributed to earlier this year. 

It was in 2013 that the Park Service announced that it would split the single South Rim contract into two, and both Xanterra and Delaware North bid on the smaller of the two. This past August the Park Service announced that it was awarding the contract to Delaware North. That left the larger contract, known as the "001 Contract," up in the air. That contract had been extended three times to Xanterra after the initial contract expired. The third extension, which runs out this Dec. 31, is the last one allowed by law.

It's the contractual expiration of the 001 contract that is the "status quo," the government argues, not Xanterra's right to continue to run the concessions. If the court grants the injunction, it would go against the status quo, the government contends. Granting of an injunction also would deny Delaware North the contract it rightfully won for the other concessions on the South Rim, the motion argues.

"...Xanterra fails to show that it will suffer irreparable harm because of any actions by the Park Service. Instead, the alleged harms are the result of the expiration of Xanterra'™s existing contract (which has already been extended for the maximum period allowed by law) and its failure to be the successful bidder on one of the new contracts," the motion reads. " In addition, the balance of equities favors the Park Service. In contrast to Xanterra, whose alleged injuries are not traceable to any NPS action and are therefore illusory, an injunction would prevent the Park Service from exercising its lawful authority to execute a contract with Delaware North.

"In the larger scheme, it would also thwart the goal of fostering competition among prospective concessioners, and would introduce uncertainty into the concession contracting process going forward. Moreover, an injunction would be adverse to the public interest, because it would stymie the competitive process that helps ensure satisfactory service to Park visitors and a fair return to taxpayers."

Park officials did not respond Thursday to an inquiry into whether they have a plan for managing South Rim concessions if the injunction is denied and if a temporary 1-year contract is not awarded. However, in the government's response park officials said they were working hard to negotiate a temporary agreement. Too, they denied that visitors to the park would be greatly impacted if there's a lapse in hotel and restaurant operations.

"Even in the unlikely event that the Park Service is unable to enter into a temporary contract to address the services covered by the 001 Prospectus before the existing contract expires on December 31, 2014, the Park itself will remain open to day visitors and tent campers, and the concessions under the new 003 (Delaware North) Contract would be available, including an RV campground," the motion notes.

"Visitors may be inconvenienced by restaurant and other closures, but only a small minority will have planned to stay in concessioner lodging, and given the time of year, they will doubtless be able to find accommodations nearby. Nonetheless, even a short interruption of some services in the Park is not a desirable outcome, and NPS is working hard to prevent this. However, it is not in the public interest to keep all of the South Rim concessions open at any cost." 

 

Comments

Roger, re LSI figures, the Park Service and Xanterra agreed on a figure of $198 million. Under the new Delaware North contract for South Rim operations, that concessionaire agreed to pay Xanterra $41 million. The NPS buy-down of $100 million left a balance of $57 million, which Xanterra would be owed if a different concessionaire landed the outstanding South Rim contract.

As to whether Fred Harvey was operating for "decades" before the Grand Canyon became a park, that can be debated I'm sure. The El Tovar was built in 1905, Phantom Ranch in 1922. Grand Canyon National Monument was established in 1908, and it was redesignated a national park in 1919.

 

 


the Park Service and Xanterra agreed on a figure of $198 million.

And therein lies the root of the whole problem.  The properties aren't worth $198 million.


ec, they very well might just be worth the figure.  Most all of the Historic Village including El Tovar and Hopi House, Hermit's Rest, Phantom Ranch, Desert View Watchtower property and facilities plus housing.  With a guaranteed 4+ million visitors a year it could well be worth more but that's what the holdings were agreed to after the appraisal.  


Also, the Railway came to the South Rim in 1901.  There is such a rich Fred Harvey History at South Rim and the Southwest a "Retro-Branding" change in name and action from Xanterra to the original Fred Harvey would be welcomed by many, I believe.


I had stay brief and general befor and will need to do so here as well. If the canyon view visitor center has no view, if the new train station hub has no train, if the new recycling plant never put a chard of glass back, if the roads get moved befor ever opening up while others fill with debri at the slightest downpour...Then welcome to your NPS dollars at work. They will even feel like the true protecters of the park when you get service concessions without a concessionare.


they very well might just be worth the figure.

If noone is willing to step up and pay the price, they aren't worth the figure.


What comes with paying for the LSI is relinquishing ownership rights to the facilities to NPS.

Who in the world would do that?  Pay for buildings and then not own them?


Exactly, Ec.


Add comment

CAPTCHA

This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.

The Essential RVing Guide

The Essential RVing Guide to the National Parks

The National Parks RVing Guide, aka the Essential RVing Guide To The National Parks, is the definitive guide for RVers seeking information on campgrounds in the National Park System where they can park their rigs. It's available for free for both iPhones and Android models.

This app is packed with RVing specific details on more than 250 campgrounds in more than 70 parks.

You'll also find stories about RVing in the parks, some tips if you've just recently turned into an RVer, and some planning suggestions. A bonus that wasn't in the previous eBook or PDF versions of this guide are feeds of Traveler content: you'll find our latest stories as well as our most recent podcasts just a click away.

So whether you have an iPhone or an Android, download this app and start exploring the campgrounds in the National Park System where you can park your rig.