You are here

Traveler's View: National Parks Are Boring, Outside Magazine? Really???

Alternate Text
Are these people bored? Fayette Station Rapids, New River Gorge National River/NPS

Did you hear the news?

National parks, those wondrous and scenic expanses of Nature's eye candy, those wild and rumpled landscapes that test your skills and will kill you if you're not careful and prepared, or maybe just in the wrong place at the wrong time, are boring. They've been transformed -- or, perhaps, kept since their creation -- as "drive-through museums."

How did this happen with the National Park Service on watch for the past 98 years?

Apparently because the parks, the Western landscape parks, at least, are managed primarily to protect and preserve their landscapes, not as testing grounds for the latest recreational fad. They are, as Park Service Director Jon Jarvis told us back in March, losing their relevancy with the American public.

'œThere'™s a real relevancy problem with the parks,' Adam Cramer, the executive director of the Outdoor Alliance, told a writer from Outside Magazine. 'œThey'™re shutting off vectors like bikes and kayaks for people to have the kinds of meaningful experiences that are the genesis for a conservation ethic.'


Paddlers have been having "meaningful experiences" in the national parks for generations. In our Essential Guide To Paddling The Parks we list more than 90 units of the National Park System that welcome paddlers. They measure themselves (and have meaningful experiences) against the Colorado River through Grand Canyon National Park and Canyonlands National Park, down the Green and Yampa in Dinosaur National Monument, and against the Alaskan rivers that flow through Wrangell-St. Elias National Park and Preserve, Gates of the Arctic National Park and Preserve, and Noatak National Preserve, just to name some of the possibilities.

Alternate Text
It takes a good deal of effort, and lust for adventure, to kayak the far end of Glacier Bay in its namesake national park/Kurt Repanshek

Sea kayakers tour the lakes of Yellowstone, Voyageurs, and Acadia national parks, lose themselves for days and even weeks in the waters of Glacier Bay National Park and Preserve, explore the sea-like waters of Lake Superior in Apostle Islands and Pictured Rocks national lakeshores, and venture out into the watery landscapes of Cape Lookout National Seashore, Everglades National Park, and even Glen Canyon National Recreation Area (Lake Powell). Do they go in search of boredom?

Alternate Text
Kayaking the Potomac River at Great Falls Park. Boring? No. Crazy? Perhaps/NPS

White-water kayakers can choose from among the New River Gorge National River in West Virginia, the Gauley River National Recreation Area, also in West Virginia, Big South Fork River and Recreation Area in Tennessee, as well as the parks through which the Green and Colorado rivers run. There is no shortage of opportunities. There's even one in Washington, D.C.'s backyard, the Potomic River that roars through Great Falls Park.

Consider the climbing possibilities in places such as Denali National Park, Mount Rainier National Park, North Cascades National Park, Grand Teton National Park, Rocky Mountain National Park, and even on the cliffs of Acadia, and swallowing this "boring" concept gets tougher and tougher.

Really, the issue is not that the parks are "boring." Rather, the Outside article bemoans that they're not flung open to all recreational comers. But then, they weren't intended to be larger manifestations of your local city park.

Alternate Text
This Denali climber doesn't look bored/NPS

There's not a "relevancy problem" with the national parks, at least not when it comes to outdoors recreation. If you're bored with the opportunities in the national parks, you're not realizing the possibilities.

Set off, as Andrew Skurka did in 2010, on a 4,679-mile circumnavigation of Alaska on skis, packable raft, and hiking boots, and you won't be bored. You'll be challenged to stay alive in one of the most glorious and demanding settings in North America. Hike the 2,650-mile Pacific Crest Trail as blind hiker Trevor Thomas did, or the 2,184-mile Appalachian National Scenic Trail as Jennifer Pharr Davis did in record-setting time, in one five- or six-month bite and you'll be transformed, physically as well as mentally. You'll likely reorder your life. Discover, as two cavers did in Carlsbad Caverns National Park last Halloween, the largest subterranean room found there in decades, and you won't stop talking about it for a good while.

Are those the types of folks who are being "ostracized," as Grayson Schaffer put it?

In his article in Outside, Mr. Schaffer would have us believe that we need professional bike races through places such as Colorado National Monument, marathons run through Death Valley National Park, and to be able to launch ourselves, cloaked in a wingsuit, off El Capitan at Yosemite National Park to appreciate, savor, and enjoy national parks. Does base-jumping, an inherently dangerous endeavor that has killed two in Zion National Park in Utah this year already, nurture a conservation ethic...or fuel an adrenalin kick, one with a high-risk downside? 

How does any of that develop a conservation ethic? Such an ethic is achieved through soaking in the mountains, forests, rivers, lakes, and glaciers, appreciating them for their very existence, and seeking ways to conserve them.

The fallacy of Mr. Schaffer's argument can even be found elsewhere in Outside. In March 2012 the publication ran a story about "12 National Park Adventures Off the Beaten Path." It pointed to:

* river kayaking in Olympic National Park;

* pedaling over the Going-to-the-Sun Road in Glacier National Park and continuing on to Waterton Lakes National Park in Alberta, Canada;

* sea kayaking (with fresh lobster for dinner) at Acadia National Park;

* sea kayaking among the whales and icebergs in Glacier Bay National Park, (where you might share your camps with brown bears);

* climbing among the boulders and outcrops of Joshua Tree National Park;

* climbing to the 13,770-foot summit of the Grand Teton in its namesake park;

* hoisting a pack on your back and hiking for five days through Isle Royale National Park with hopes of catching a wolf's howl;

* or mountain biking in places such as Mammoth Cave National Park in Kentucky, Santa Monica Mountains National Recreation Area in California, Big South Fork River and Recreation Area in Tennessee, or New River Gorge National River in West Virginia.

And there was nary a mention of boredom or lack of opportunities. 

That same year, Outside ran an article by Michael Lanza, an occasional contributor to the Traveler, on "The 10 Best National Park Adventures With Kids," and there were no mountain bikes or wingsuits necessary, (although hiking boots, sea kayaks, cross-country skis, and backpacks were).

Finally, we have to wonder what point Mr. Grayson was trying to make when he wrote: 

The nonprofit Outdoor Alliance, a Washington, D.C., umbrella group for human-powered-advocacy organizations like American Whitewater, climbing'™s Access Fund, and the International Mountain Bicycling Association (IMBA), has 100,000 members and skews toward a Gen Y demographic. By comparison, the National Parks Conservation Association (NPCA), the historical champion of the national parks, has 500,000 members with a median age in the sixties.

Is he stereotyping older folks as sedentary folks? Surely that can't be the case, can it? I know and encounter plenty of folks in their sixties and older out enjoying the parks in active recreational pursuits. Indeed, one friend in her 70s rows her own raft down the Yampa and Green rivers through Class III and IV rapids in Dinosaur National Monument, and another still climbs mountains. There are other examples, but the point is that entering one's seventh decade doesn't automatically equate with avoiding the outdoors and retiring to the couch.

The national parks were meant for testing our physical skills, yes, but that basic skill still is walking. Hiking, climbing, cross-country skiing, and paddling are part of walking. Those activities say look at the wilderness, not look at me. Extreme sports are the epitome of 'œlook at me. Look what I can do!" Fine, put that in an arena, not in a national park. Give it an X Games channel. If Outside Magazine wishes to be Sports Illustrated, tell us now when we may expect the swimsuit issue. But don'™t call that loving the national parks.

Unfortunately, the blame lies chiefly with the National Park Service and its government narcissists, who, too, have lost their sense of history. As Peggy Noonan writes in The Wall Street Journal, government has simply 'œgone too far.' Government has listened to everyone except the people it should be listening to, and sadly, that also goes for our national parks.

Featured Article


It's apparent, after reading this clown's list of unboring activities, that if it doesn't generate MONEY for someone, then it's boring.

Outside Magazine is boring...

Hmmmmm.  I just got onto Outside Magazine's online site and found a fascinating article about the nether reaches of the Colorado River that certainly was worth reading.  Earlier this year I kayaked part of the Colorado just above Yuma and later got to see the dry riverbed where it used to flow into Mexico.  The article explains some of the economic excuses for failing to wisely use this river's water.  Here's a link in case anyone is interested:

But once again, money trumps wisdom.

When Outside began publishing years ago I was excited about a magazine that did the "outdoors." However, very quickly realized that they would "sell" anything for $$$$.  They were packed full of cigarette aids and that was the end of support from me! Such a contradiction!!  They did eventtually drop the cig ads. Thank you NATIONAL PARK SERVICE for exposing them and standing up to them once again!! Great articlle. There isn't any way to "fix" out of contact with reality at their level of publishing!  They make the news media look almost " truthful"  and and we all know how FAR off center they are! 

I don't get the last paragraph blaming narcisim or or shortsightedeness of goverment officials. It really comes out of nowhere. Can you point to specific examples?

"Outside Magazine is boring..."  ha ha ha ha ha, bingo.. Random Walker you nailed it.  And yes Linda they need to sell Ads to make $. And I can forgive them for that, but still, even though the writing is occassionaly excellent, I haven't been a fan of Outside for a long time. They pander to a certain type of reader: Male readers, young readers, and the type that buys lots of gear that rarely gets used.
But, am I mistaken to recall that the NPS itself was the first one to bring media attention to the alleged relevancy "problem" ? 

Reports are that Jarvis said this in a major speech to the commercialization/privatization interests at the American Recreation Coalition at their annual lovefest, Partners Outdoors, on June 9th:

. . .agency director Jonathan B. Jarvis said he would seek out any and all sources of new revenues for the parks, in addition to appropriations, in anticipation of an NPS Centennial in 2016.


". . .My approach to that is to launch a multi-platform, complicated-partnership, industry-backed, philanthropic centennial initiative that will really build this relationship with the next generation.”

He's already established that the Park Service is a whore. Now he's just dickering over the price.

Yes, really. Over regulated, misguided use of resources, and more have created more than a relevancy problem. If you alinnate, de-prioritize, and reduce visitor access, this is the result. It's a difficult balance which the NPS/DOI have failed miserably. Jarvis and his progressive ilk are the problem. What a mess you guys have created.

National Parks Traveler's Essential Park Guide