You are here

GAO Rules Interior Violated Law By Shifting Funds To Keep Parks Open During Shutdown

Share
Ruby Beach logjam, Olympic National Park / Rebecca Latson

The Government Accountability Office on Thursday ruled Interior Secretary Bernhardt broke the law by shifting FLREA funds to pay for park operations during the partial government shutdown/Rebecca Latson file

Interior Secretary David Bernhardt twice broke the law when he directed de facto National Park Service Director P. Daniel Smith to shift Federal Lands Recreation Enhancement Act funds to pay for maintenance and custodial work during the partial government shutdown early this year, the U.S. Government Accountability Office said Thursday.

Bernhardt directed the funding shift early in January as garbage was piling up in national parks and restrooms were becoming disgusting without daily cleaning. He gave Smith permission to use nearly $253 million in FLREA funds to bring back park maintenance staff and additional support to clean up and protect the parks during the 35-day shutdown.

At the time of the shift, Democrats in Congress and conservation groups sharply criticized the move and questioned its propriety. 

While the GAO sought an explanation from Interior on its view of the law regarding the funding shift, Interior did not respond, the report noted. "We take our responsibility to Congress seriously, and will not allow an agency’s lack of cooperation to interfere with Congress’s oversight of executive spending," the report's authors said in defending their decision to move forward with issuing an opinion in the matter.

In that ruling (attached below), which was requested by some members of Congress, the GAO said Thursday that Interior violated both the FLREA statute by using its revenues for a purpose other than the act directed, and the Antideficiency Act by spending funds "in excess or in advance of available appropriations, unless otherwise authorized by law."

In other words, while Interior expected Congress to replace the FLREA funds in the Park Service's operations budget once the shutdown ended, which indeed Congress did after the budget impasse with President Trump was resolved, GAO nevertheless said the dollars couldn't be spent on daily operations during the partial shutdown unless OKed by Congress because the Park Service did not have an appropriation for operations at the time. 

"If a program has no available appropriations, and no exception to the Antideficiency Act applies, the agency must commence an orderly shutdown and suspend its normal operations," the 17-page report said. "The agency may only resume its activities once Congress has enacted an appropriation."

At the National Parks Conservation Association, which had called for an investigation into the funding shift, President Theresa Pierno said Thursday evening that during the shutdown "the administration played a shell game with national park money in order to keep parks open. This jeopardized the parks themselves, and all who visited them. Today, after a months-long investigation, the Government Accountability Office agreed with NPCA and found that the Department of the Interior misused funds, breaking federal law. The Department of Interior must right this wrong and put guidelines in place to ensure this never happens again. Our national parks, and all who visit them, deserve nothing less.”

Using FLREA revenues for maintenance and custodial work during the partial government shutdown undermined the intent of the FLREA program, which specifies that revenues from entrance fees and other approved programs go to enhance the visitor experience. That could be through better facilities, more interpretive programs, or restored habitat.

The GAO agreed with that interpretation, pointing out that "FLREA authorizes NPS to use fees for 'repair, maintenance, and facility enhancement related directly to visitor enjoyment, visitor access, and health and safety.'"

"The statute as a whole contemplates that fees would be established in consideration of the benefit being provided to the visitor and that the site collecting the fee would retain the majority of collections for use at the site, such that visitors are contributing to their enhanced experience," the report's authors wrote.

Maintenance and custodial work, it went on, are to be charged against the Park Service's operations budget, and that's what the agency does when it presents its budget request to Congress, the GAO said.

"... even if we were to view both FLREA fees and (operations) appropriations legally as equally available for basic custodial services, here, because NPS has historically charged the (operations) appropriation for such expenses, and clearly elected to continue to charge the (operations) appropriation for such expenses in fiscal year 2019, as reflected in its congressional budget justification for fiscal year 2019, the (operations) appropriation was the only appropriation available for this purpose in fiscal year," the report said.

GAO said Bernhardt's order to redirect FLREA funds to pay for maintenance and custodial work during the partial shutdown "demonstrates a misunderstanding and misapplication of both the purpose statute, and the Antideficiency Act, and it tears at the very fabric of Congress’s constitutional power of the purse. We will consider any future application of this ... (approach) to be a knowing and willful violation of the Act, subjecting Interior officials to penalties."

Comments

So show me in the register where the regulations say the monies can't be spent as they were authorized by Congress. 


ecbuck:

Are hauling trash and cleaning bathrooms not visitor services?
  Do they not maintain health and safety?

There's supposed to be a process to go through when using money.  Spending can certainly be supplemental with regards to maintenance and visitor services, but the GAO indicates that it can't be a substitute for normal appropriations.  This is from the report:

As discussed below, we conclude that Interior violated the purpose statute when, during the shutdown, it obligated FLREA fees for expenses that it would normally charge to ONPS appropriations. Because NPS did not have an ONPS appropriation at the time that it incurred the obligations at issue, Interior also violated the Antideficiency Act and should report its violation as required by 31 U.S.C. SS 1351. As explained below, while Interior should correct its Antideficiency Act violation, it must report the violation to Congress and enumerate actions it has taken to prevent recurring violations in the event of future funding lapses. With this decision, we will consider such violations in the future to be knowing and willful violations of the Act.

And the Antideficiency Act (31 USC 1341):

SS1341. Limitations on expending and obligating amounts

(a)(1) An officer or employee of the United States Government or of the District of Columbia government may not--

(A) make or authorize an expenditure or obligation exceeding an amount available in an appropriation or fund for the expenditure or obligation;

(B) involve either government in a contract or obligation for the payment of money before an appropriation is made unless authorized by law;

(C) make or authorize an expenditure or obligation of funds required to be sequestered under section 252 of the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985; or

(D) involve either government in a contract or obligation for the payment of money required to be sequestered under section 252 of the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985.

Again, from the report:

The Antideficiency Act prohibits obligations or expenditures in excess or in advance of available appropriations, unless otherwise authorized by law. 31 U.S.C. SS 1341(a), B-329955, May 16, 2019; B-329603, Apr. 16, 2018; B-327432, June 30, 2016. If a program has no available appropriations, and no exception to the Antideficiency Act applies, the agency must commence an orderly shutdown and suspend its normal operations. B-330720, Feb. 6, 2019. The agency may only resume its activities once Congress has enacted an appropriation. Id.

Here, Interior violated the Antideficiency Act when it obligated FLREA fees during the shutdown for expenses that ordinarily would have been charged to its ONPS appropriation. FLREA fees were not available for this purpose and, at that time, Interior had no appropriation for this purpose. Interior must report its violation as required by the Act. 31 U.S.C. SSSS 1341(a), 1351.

 


ecbuck:

So show me in the register where the regulations say the monies can't be spent as they were authorized by Congress.

Antideficiency Act.  Again, read the report and see what it says.  FLREA funds can be used for maintenance, but not in order to overcome sequestration (8 USC 1341(a)(1)(C)).

https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCODE-2011-title31/html/USCODE-2011...

SS1341. Limitations on expending and obligating amounts

(a)(1) An officer or employee of the United States Government or of the District of Columbia government may not--

(C) make or authorize an expenditure or obligation of funds required to be sequestered under section 252 of the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985; 


How would the antideficiency act apply?  The funds were approved through 2020.  There was no Congressional appropriation necessary.   Furthermore, they were specifically approved for visitor services and health and safety.  Certainly removing trash and maintaining bathrooms fits into "health and safety".


You win ecbuck - I should know better than to challenge your superior ignorance on this topic.

You have either not read the report, including the hot links to policy and regulation as well as annual appropriation laws (which will answer your schoolboy chants of show me, show me) - or you really do think you have more knowledge of appropriation law than the General Counsel at GAO. 

I've no more time worth wasting doing your homework.

 


Its so funny. People bitched and moaned when the parks were closed on the first government shut down and now are bitching and moaning they were kept open.  Just shows some people aren't happy if they aren't bitching and moaning.  


ecbuck:

How would the antideficiency act apply?  The funds were approved through 2020.  There was no Congressional appropriation necessary.   Furthermore, they were specifically approved for visitor services and health and safety.  Certainly removing trash and maintaining bathrooms fits into "health and safety".

This is pretty simple.  During sequestration, it's not legal to overcome requirements to not spend by using FLREA fees as a rainy day fund.


ecbuck:

Its so funny. People bitched and moaned when the parks were closed on the first government shut down and now are bitching and moaning they were kept open.  Just shows some people aren't happy if they aren't bitching and moaning.

We wanted a budget deal to end the impasse and not an end-around meant to prop up public relations.  These parks also should have been shut down.


The Essential RVing Guide

The Essential RVing Guide to the National Parks

The National Parks RVing Guide, aka the Essential RVing Guide To The National Parks, is the definitive guide for RVers seeking information on campgrounds in the National Park System where they can park their rigs. It's available for free for both iPhones and Android models.

This app is packed with RVing specific details on more than 250 campgrounds in more than 70 parks.

You'll also find stories about RVing in the parks, some tips if you've just recently turned into an RVer, and some planning suggestions. A bonus that wasn't in the previous eBook or PDF versions of this guide are feeds of Traveler content: you'll find our latest stories as well as our most recent podcasts just a click away.

So whether you have an iPhone or an Android, download this app and start exploring the campgrounds in the National Park System where you can park your rig.