You are here

Fatal Grizzly Mauling In Yellowstone National Park Highlights Need For Better Safety Practices By Hikers

Share

Do you know how to safely hike in bear habitat? Most hikers either don't know, or don't take precautions/NPS

Being attacked by a bear while hiking the backcountry of Yellowstone, Grand Teton, or Glacier national parks no doubt is near the top of concerns of most hikers, but not enough are taking adequate precautions when they venture into the bears' realm.

That's the takeaway from last summer's fatal mauling of a solo hiker in Yellowstone National Park who had gone out for a pre-work hike by himself and was quickly taken down by a sow grizzly.

"The unfortunate death of Mr. Lance Crosby highlights the importance of following recommended safety procedures when hiking in grizzly bear habitat," wrote the authors of a Board of Revew investigation into Mr. Crosby's death last August 6. "Increasing numbers and distribution of grizzly bears in the Yellowstone ecosystem increase the possibility of bear-human encounters. There is no guarantee of safety when hiking in bear country, even when all recommended safety procedures are followed.

"However, the BOR believes it is important to recognize that of the six human fatalities caused by grizzly bears in the Yellowstone ecosystem since 2010, five involved hikers. Of the five hiker fatalities, four involved solitary hikers, none of whom carried bear spray. The other hiker fatality involved two hikers who were not carrying bear spray and who ran from a bear they encountered on a trail. The bear then chased the running hikers, killing one of them."

The trail Mr. Crosby traveled on his morning hike - the Elephant Back Loop - was a popular one with both park employees based at Lake and with guests staying at the Lake Hotel, Lake Lodge and Cabins, and nearby Bridge Bay Campground. It was less than four miles in length, though a nearby ridge accessed from the trail was a popular spot with employees.

Mr. Crosby had gone out by himself, dressed in long pants, a T-shirt with a long-sleeved collared shirt on top of that, and hiking boots. He was not carrying bear spray; friends said "he thought bear spray would make him complacent, less vigilant while he was out there. He wanted to use his senses, his vigilance," Kerry Gunther, Yellowstone's bear management biologist, said at the time.

The Montanan was fairly typical of others who hike in bear country, according to the BOR report.

"It is an unfortunate fact that the majority of hikers in Yellowstone National Park do not follow recommended safety procedures to reduce the risk of bear attacks. As stated in the BOR report, in a recent suvey of 7,770 people day-hiking (2,669 groups) in Yellowstone National Park, 60 percent of the hiking groups had fewer than the recommended party size of three people for hiking in bear country, and 14 percent were lone hikers. Of the 7,770 day-hikers surveyed, only 1,061 (13.6 percent) carried bear spray," the report stated.

The BOR recommends the following safety procedures when hiking in bear habitat:

* Be Vigilant. Watch for both bears and signs of bears, such as scat, tracks and feeding sites, and be especially cautious when hiking off-trail. "Bears may be more likely to respond aggressively in off-trail areas where they don't expect to encounter people," the report said. "However, bears frequenty use maintained trails and encounters may occur anywhere."

* Carry Bear Spray. "Bear spray has proven to be effective at stopping aggressive bear behavior during surprise encounters when the person involved has time to deploy it."

* Make Noise. This can alert bears to your presence and so reduce the chance of a surprise encounter.

* Don't Run. Running "can trigger a chase response in a bear. In addition, jogging in bear country increases the odds of surprise encounters at close distances and surprised bears are more likely to be aggresive."

* Do Not Hike Alone. "hiking in group sizes of three or more people or traveling by horseback is known to reduce the risks of bear attack."

The BOR noted that the land management agencies within the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem, including Yellowstone National Park, all have bear safety messaging programs.

"However, adherence to these safety practices is generally low, indicating that current messsaging is not successful at changing peoples' actual behavior in bear country," the group said. "The BOR encourages all land and wildlife management agencies in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem to continue efforts to improve bear safety information and education programs, with the goal of achieving greater adherence to these safety practices by all recreationalists and among day-hikers in particular who have a low level of compliance with bear safety procedures."

Comments

http://www.outsideonline.com/1899301/shoot-or-spray-best-way-stop-chargi...

The full study is available, but costs about $45 to obtain a copy.

Then there is this from Field and Stream. 

http://www.fieldandstream.com/articles/hunting/2008/12/use-pepper-spray-...

It appears that there really has been only one study of this subject, so all articles I could find reference it.

Of course, one will also find a few opinion pieces here and there that argue guns are better.  But those appear to have about the same value as opinion pieces trying to provide reasons for not wearing safety belts in moving vehicles.  Several of those were written by people who claimed to have been pepper sprayed in law enforcement training or by someone using pepper spray for people.  There is a BIG, BIG difference between people spray and bear spray.

But to each his own.  We are all free to choose and then if we are ever faced with the decison to shoot or spray, we can tell our stories to a lot of very interested listeners.  If we survive.


It's impossilbe to make a valid comparison of the studies on bear spray and firearms. The majority of bear-human encounters in the 2 studies on bear spray are about people--including wildlife professionals--using bear spray to haze curious or non-aggressive bears. All data in Efficacy of Firearms for Deterrence in Alaska is about people using guns for self-defense during "bear attacks." ("We compiled information about bear attacks from readily accessible state and federal records, newspaper accounts, books, and anecdotal information that spanned the years 1883-2009.")  The authors also said, "Firearms failed to protect people for a variety of reasons including lack of time to respond (27%)." The bear spray study did not include data on people who did not have time to respond with bear spray. It'absurd to compare the results of these studies. The bogus bear spray vs. bullets debate stems from biologists behaving like used car salesmen. By hyping bear spray with misleading or meaningless statistics, the NPS and other agencies give people false confidence. Public safety would be better served by emphasizing that people should not put themselves in a situation where they need to use bear spray. To be prepared for a surprise encounter with a grizzly, people should carry bear spray in hand, not in a "quickly accessible" hip-holster as recommended by the NPS and other agencies.

 


I would only be in known bear country with a firearm. I wish to use all my resources to preserve my life. I would hate to need to use deadly force, I'm a human with the option to defend myself with a firearm, and feel if I want to be in the wild, prepare for it best I know how, and preservation of life is 1# in my book.


Add comment

CAPTCHA

This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.

The Essential RVing Guide

The Essential RVing Guide to the National Parks

The National Parks RVing Guide, aka the Essential RVing Guide To The National Parks, is the definitive guide for RVers seeking information on campgrounds in the National Park System where they can park their rigs. It's available for free for both iPhones and Android models.

This app is packed with RVing specific details on more than 250 campgrounds in more than 70 parks.

You'll also find stories about RVing in the parks, some tips if you've just recently turned into an RVer, and some planning suggestions. A bonus that wasn't in the previous eBook or PDF versions of this guide are feeds of Traveler content: you'll find our latest stories as well as our most recent podcasts just a click away.

So whether you have an iPhone or an Android, download this app and start exploring the campgrounds in the National Park System where you can park your rig.