You are here

National Park Service Says Ranger Ranks On Decline

Mesa Verde ranger tour

The ranger ranks of the National Park Service have been declining/Kurt Repanshek

With the National Park Service's centennial 13 months off, the ranks of rangers patroling the parks and providing interpretive programs are on the decline, according to Park Service numbers provided to Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility.

Figures provided PEER indicate that in the decade spanning 2005 through 2014, the number of permanent law enforcement rangers in the National Park System dropped by nearly 14 percent (from 1,548 to 1,322) despite both an increase in the number of park units and a substantial hike in annual visitors, campers and hikers. The drop in seasonal rangers was even steeper. From 2006 (the first year full statistics were available) to 2014 there were nearly 27 percent (671 to 492) fewer seasonal rangers while “Peak seasonals” covering the peak month of August fell 7 percent (385 to 356) over that period.

The numbers seem to run counter to the National Park Service's intentions to put more seasonal rangers in the parks for the centennial, which arrives August 26, 2016. Park Service officials did not immediately respond Monday to inquiries about the numbers.

More people in more parks also bring with them greater demands for law enforcement services, ranging from poachers to drunk drivers to drug labs, PEER said in a release Monday. For example, publicly reported statistics indicate that:

* In 2014, national parks conducted 2,658 search-and-rescue operations, up from 2,348 the year before. Many of these incidents were life-and-death situations, involving serious injury or the prospect of fatalities absent ranger intervention;

* 2014 also saw 164 park visitor deaths, up from 148 and 143 the prior two years, respectively. Causes ranged from heart attacks and dehydration to drownings and fatal falls. The 2014 total includes 19 suicide deaths out of 44 attempts;

* and in 2014 there were reports of 15 murders, 162 rapes, attempted rapes or other sex offenses, five kidnappings and 358 assaults, as well as more than 3,000 thefts.

"Even as it trumpets record-breaking park crowds in 2014, NPS is gearing up a major outreach effort to drive visitation even higher next year as the agency celebrates its 2016 centennial," the PEER release said. "Of the more than $300 million in increased spending it is requesting for the upcoming fiscal year, only $2 million of that amount would go to law enforcement to increase numbers of seasonal law enforcement rangers."

At PEER, Executive Director Jeff Ruch said, “The Park Service not only has a huge maintenance deficit but it is building a sizeable public safety deficit as well. This myopic drive for more and more visitation threatens to outstrip the capacity of both the parks and their shrinking ranger corps.”

In response to a PEER request for information about how the staffing levels for park law enforcement are determined, the agency supplied this statement:

“The National Park Service utilizes the Law Enforcement Needs Assessment commonly referred to as a LENA as the risk based approach to identify and rank threats and assess agency vulnerabilities…The LENA incorporates multiple considerations including the types of activities that comprise the law enforcement workload…”

NPS was unable to provide PEER with records backing up this description, identify documents about how it works in practice or even supply a copy of a single LENA assessment. Moreover, this explanation suggests that the number of rangers should be increasing, not declining, as their workload grows, the group said.

“Park superintendents set the law enforcement level in their parks with no real oversight from above or check from folks in the field below,” said Mr. Ruch, noting that in 2014 NPS inexplicably reported the lowest number (12) of threats and assaults involving its law enforcement rangers since 2000, a total at odds with anecdotal accounts. “Before it pops the cork on its centennial, Park Service leadership should double-check that it has sufficient rangers to handle the celebration’s fallout.”


What happened to all of that beer money?

The respectful and intelligent people have left or are leaving. I've noticed this change at two local parks. They are tired of environmental agenda dictating them and the leftist politicization. What do you expect?

Keep drinking that conservative kool aid buddy!

The NPS and it's Superintendents have always had a love hate relationship with its cadre of Protection Rangers. Law Enforcement in the parks has always been considered a necessary evil by park managers. And with the ever shrinking federal budget, law enforcement continues to be short changed in many of the parks. Since I retired as Florida District Ranger at Gulf Islands National Seashore in 2000, I have watched the ranger ranks continue to plummet. I had a staff of 8 permanent rangers and three seasonal rangers, whereas today they might have 3-4 permanent Rangers. It is rather pathetic to say the least.

It's entertaining that the PEER study was about NPS Law Enforcement positions yet the National Parks Traveler picture is of an interpretive ranger. This just further shows the lack of respect of law enforcement in the NPS. Many in the NPS see LE as an evil, and in many parks an unnecessary evil. An example is the recent drama from the Acadia Superintendent's email to region director orate about the new NPS LE vehicles have the phrase "LAW ENFORCEMENT" in small writing and a badge on the vehicle.

The NPS has never respected it's LE staff

In many parks there are local police forces available and they are the ones who end up coming to the rescue when there is a real emergency. They have more experience and they are the ones I am going to call when the you know what hits the fan!

That's too bad you feel that way. Because, actually, most permanent Rangers are far more experienced regarding their park and crimes within it, as well criminal law and tactics, than their local counterparts, particularly in wilderness and rural areas. They also have access, like 4WD, and knowledge of access to areas that most of the local PDs do not. And, most of those PDs, in most areas--whether rural, wilderness, or even urban--not only cannot handle the addition of the park crimes because of staffing issues of their own, but don't want to either.

Actually, I should have clarified. Permanent Rangers who particularly worked their way through years of seasonal positions, survived by either ben lucky or pursuing training and experience wherever they could find it, rather than the Pro Ranger program, are far more experienced than the typical nearby police officer. Though nice idea, I can't in good conscious support the Pro Ranger program. But, in regards to local police forces, that is a joke.

Add comment


This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

National Parks Traveler's Essential Park Guide