You are here

Researchers Say Mesa Verde National Park's Far View Reservoir Wasn't For Water

Alternate Text
Mummy Lake at Mesa Verde./Rebecca Latson.

Was "Mummy Lake," now known as Far View Reservoir, really an ancient Anasazi reservoir? Not according to new research, which claims the 12-foot deep circular brick structure at Mesa Verde National Park instead was created for ceremonial purposes.

For nearly a century the structure was thought to have been built more than 1,000 years ago to hold water for watering Anasazi gardens. But research presented in the Journal of Archaeological Science says that wasn't the intent at all. Rather, the archaeologists believe "that it is an unroofed ceremonial structure, and that it serves as an essential component of a Chacoan ritual landscape."

"A wide constructed avenue articulates Mummy Lake with Far View House and Pipe Shrine House," adds Dr. Larry Benson in an abstract to the article that appeared in the Journal's March 6 edition. "The avenue continues southward for approximately 6 km, where it apparently divides, connecting with Spruce Tree House and Sun Temple/Cliff Palace. The avenue has previously been interpreted as an irrigation ditch fed by water impounded at Mummy Lake; however, it conforms in every respect to alignments described as Chacoan roads."

In an interview with Western Digs, Dispatches from the Ancient American West, Dr. Benson added that 1,000 years ago there wasn't a way to capture enough rain to fill the structure.

'œWhat we found out was that the area that could drain into Mummy Lake wasn'™t any larger than the area of the Mummy Lake feature,' the retired archaeologist said. 'œTherefore, there was not much water that could be provided to Mummy Lake during a normal water year.

'œIf you look at how much water you could ever put into the depression, it gets no more than several inches in the wettest year in history,' he added, 'œand that would'™ve been evaporated out by July or so. During an average year, the water doesn'™t even stay there as late as June."


Having visited this site on several occasions over the years I always found it diffcult to view this structure as a lake or reservoir for the same reasons mentioned in this article.  This site more resembles an acknowledged Hohokam ballcourt which can be seen  in central Arizona  than a poorly designed reservoir which would have captured minimal water and would have been the only of its kind known.  Both aites seen to share similar construction guidelines and parameters although it is possible that neither is an actual ballcourt I would bet that the function as designed was the same or similar..

Add comment


This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

National Parks Traveler's Essential Park Guide