I'm thinking in terms of a wound where an animal scraped/rubbed the bark off of a pine.
My bet is a bear, rubbing to mark territory or to scratch an itch, but I won't feel bad if it is porcupine (obviously lower on the tree) or even other wildlife.
The layer on top appears to have an embedment of organic debris, a mix of mud and dirt perhaps. So if the base layer has been scrubbed by a glacier, are we in Glacier National Park?
Help support us– the one source for journalism dedicated to our National Parks.
Comments
Is it petrified piece of wood in the Petrified Forest National Park?
It reminds me a little of pipestone
Ranger Holly
http://web.me.com/hollyberry
I like the tree idea.
I'm thinking in terms of a wound where an animal scraped/rubbed the bark off of a pine.
My bet is a bear, rubbing to mark territory or to scratch an itch, but I won't feel bad if it is porcupine (obviously lower on the tree) or even other wildlife.
Maybe its petrified tree showing some missing bark.
Not volcanic glass, not amber, not pipestone. John's close, very close, but it's not sedimentary.
And no, not petrified tree.
The layer on top appears to have an embedment of organic debris, a mix of mud and dirt perhaps. So if the base layer has been scrubbed by a glacier, are we in Glacier National Park?