There are some roads in the National Park System that just shouldn't be maintained. The "road to nowhere" in Great Smoky Mountains National Park is one. The current path of the Carbon River Road in Mount Rainier National Park is another.
But what about the Upper Stehekin Valley Road in North Cascades National Park? At least one congressman believes wilderness boundaries should be bent to reroute this deadend route out of the existing floodplain of the Stehekin River. With the full House Natural Resources Committee set to consider this bill Thursday, let's take a look at what's at stake.
The route, which is prone to washouts, provides access to Stephen Mather Wilderness trailheads and North Cascades National Park from the Lake Chelan National Recreation Area. Back in 2003 there was a flood of historic proportions that washed out the road. While some portions were rebuilt, the section beyond Car Wash Falls has remained impassable. Some are fine with that, others are not.
U.S. Rep. Doc Hastings, R-Washington, back in June introduced legislation that, while not specifically ordering the National Park Service to rebuild the road, suggested it do just that. His measure, H.B. 2806, gives the secretary of the Interior discretion to realign the wilderness area's boundaries in such a way that a better route for the road could be located while there would be no net loss in wilderness acreage. If he didn't want the road rebuilt, why introduce this measure?
During a hearing July 30 on the legislation, Washington state Sen. Linda Evans Parlette testified that the continued closure of the upper stretch of the road creates both an economic hardship for the Stehekin community and a visitation hardship for folks who don't have the ability to backpack in to the trailheads that once could be reached by vehicle.
"The closure of the Upper Valley Stehekin Road has had a negative effect on the economic viability of the Stehekin Community by limiting access to trailheads and rustic park facilities. It has also created a safety concern for valley residents and visitors," the state senator testified to the House Subcommittee on National Parks, Forests, and Public Lands. "With an impassible road above Car Wash Falls, vehicular access to multiple trailheads for recreational purposes, as well as fire and safety purposes, is impossible.
"In addition to trail access being diminished, there are a significant number of visitor facilities at Bridge Creek that used to be accessible by vehicle," added state Sen. Parlette. "These facilities include: a campground, corral, Ranger Patrol Cabin, National Register listed historic public shelter, pit toilets, and an emergency cabin maintained by Chelan County Public Utility District. There is also a six site campground and pit toilets at Cottonwood Camp that use to be accessible by vehicle."
But not everyone agrees the wilderness boundary should be moved to allow the road to be rebuilt. One of those is acting-National Park Service Director Dan Wenk. During his appearance before the subcommittee he pointed to issues with The Wilderness Act, the lack of visitor facilities at the end of the road, and, of course, the cost of rebuilding the road.
"The department opposes H.R. 2806 because of our concerns about potential impacts to the environment, inconsistency with the intention of the Wilderness Act, and our position of not rebuilding roads in parks in the Cascades after natural disasters where no visitor facilities are found along or at the end of the road," Mr. Wenk testified. "In addition, with limited financial resources, the planning, design, construction and maintenance of a new road are lower in priority than other needs of the National Park Service. Stehekin, Washington, is a small community within the Lake Chelan National Recreation Area, which is part of the North Cascades National Park Complex. The Stehekin Valley is only accessible by boat, float plane or hiking. Visitors arrive to Stehekin by means of one of these conveyances and do not typically bring cars. Cars generally are limited to those who live in or own property in Stehekin. There are approximately 85-95 year-round residents and about one-third are NPS employees or their dependents.
Following the 2003 flood, the Park Service prepared an environmental assessment looking at the issues involved with both rebuilding or rerouting the road. According to Mr. Wenk, that analysis "found that relocating and constructing the road in the Stephen Mather Wilderness could have significant impacts on active Northern Spotted Owl habitat, old-growth forests and wetlands. In addition, road construction is prohibited within wilderness areas. Both the rebuilding and the relocation alternatives also raised concerns about obtaining the funding needed to maintain the road in such a demanding environment. As a result of these findings, the NPS made the decision to formally close the road and rely on access by trail to the Upper Stehekin Valley."
Throwing its support behind the Park Service is the National Parks Conservation Association, which in late August wrote Rep. Nick Rahall, chairman of the Natural Resources Committee, to solicit his opposition to Rep. Hasting's bill.
"You cannot reach Stehekin by car; the Stehekin Road is not connected to any road network. You can only get there by boat, plane or hiking. Vehicles can only reach this road by special shipment on a barge. One section of this road, leading into North Cascades National Park, has repeatedly been washed out by floods," pointed out the NPCA's Sean Smith. "Adequate access to the park is available on the remaining road network and by hiking and with stock.
"... Like many others, I too have a personal connection to the Stehekin road. As a former North Cascades’ ranger I was responsible for leading hikes, presenting evening programs and even shuttling visitors in the park van up and down the Stehekin Valley," added Mr. Smith. "What I found during my interaction with countless visitors is that they are deeply focused on their park experience. Put another way, retiring the Upper Stehekin Road may impact how people come to the park, but it’s unlikely to affect why they come. By focusing on the ultimate purpose of a park trip, the NPS better fulfills the real intent of the park visitor."
Stay tuned to the outcome of Thursday's committee meeting. Among those on the committee is U.S. Rep. Jeff Flake, R-Arizona, who takes pride in pointing out congressional earmarks that he considers to be pure pork. In recent weeks he has ridiculed a $143,000 earmark to the American Ballet Theater in New York City intended for educational activities, saying, “Congress continues to spend way tutu much," and a $100,000 earmark to Thomas More College in Crestview Hills, Kentucky for training programs in healthcare management.
“More is less,” Congressman Flake said.
Story Categories:
A copy of National Parks Traveler's financial statements may be obtained by sending a stamped, self-addressed envelope to: National Parks Traveler, P.O. Box 980452, Park City, Utah 84098. National Parks Traveler was formed in the state of Utah for the purpose of informing and educating about national parks and protected areas.
Residents of the following states may obtain a copy of our financial and additional information as stated below:
- Florida: A COPY OF THE OFFICIAL REGISTRATION AND FINANCIAL INFORMATION FOR NATIONAL PARKS TRAVELER, (REGISTRATION NO. CH 51659), MAY BE OBTAINED FROM THE DIVISION OF CONSUMER SERVICES BY CALLING 800-435-7352 OR VISITING THEIR WEBSITE. REGISTRATION DOES NOT IMPLY ENDORSEMENT, APPROVAL, OR RECOMMENDATION BY THE STATE.
- Georgia: A full and fair description of the programs and financial statement summary of National Parks Traveler is available upon request at the office and phone number indicated above.
- Maryland: Documents and information submitted under the Maryland Solicitations Act are also available, for the cost of postage and copies, from the Secretary of State, State House, Annapolis, MD 21401 (410-974-5534).
- North Carolina: Financial information about this organization and a copy of its license are available from the State Solicitation Licensing Branch at 888-830-4989 or 919-807-2214. The license is not an endorsement by the State.
- Pennsylvania: The official registration and financial information of National Parks Traveler may be obtained from the Pennsylvania Department of State by calling 800-732-0999. Registration does not imply endorsement.
- Virginia: Financial statements are available from the Virginia Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, 102 Governor Street, Richmond, Virginia 23219.
- Washington: National Parks Traveler is registered with Washington State’s Charities Program as required by law and additional information is available by calling 800-332-4483 or visiting www.sos.wa.gov/charities, or on file at Charities Division, Office of the Secretary of State, State of Washington, Olympia, WA 98504.
INN Member
The easiest way to explore RV-friendly National Park campgrounds.
Here’s the definitive guide to National Park System campgrounds where RVers can park their rigs.
Our app is packed with RVing- specific details on more than 250 campgrounds in more than 70 national parks.
You’ll also find stories about RVing in the parks, tips helpful if you’ve just recently become an RVer, and useful planning suggestions.
Comments
Pork is pork and wilderness is wilderness. This country definetely needs LESS PORK and leave our wilderness alone !!!
Thank you for blogging on this very important topic. As you pointed out, the National Park Service has opposed H.B. 2806, in part because of the 1988 Washington Parks Wilderness Act sponsored by former Senator Dan Evans. Senator Evans, however, recently testified in favor of H.B. 2806, saying, “It was my intent when I sponsored the Park Wilderness Bill of 1988 to protect the unique features of these splendid Parks but not to make access more difficult for those seeking the unusual experience of a wilderness park. I believe very strongly that continued protection of our wilderness national parks depends on the active support of visitors, hikers, and climbers who act of champions for our national parks. If we make access substantially more difficult we reduce the number of visitors and ultimately the numbers of citizens and taxpayers who know enough about these parks to want to protect them.
H.R. 2806, if passed, would allow rebuilding of the road on the old wagon trail – the site of the original road before the Civilian Conservation Corps relocated it in the flood plain. The legislation also specifically states that there be no net loss of wilderness area. Anyone interested in this issue can read more about it at my Web site - http://src.leg.wa.gov/news/2009/Parlette/073009Congress.htm - or in this Seattle P-I column - http://www.seattlepi.com/connelly/410318_joel21.html.
Senator Linda Evans Parlette
The thought of making a local OFF LIMITS to satisfy some serria club wonk is absurd
culling land and managing it as a public trust is a obligation of humanity
you cannot manage what you cannot access.
a mechanic cannot fix your car if he cant open the hood
and a doctor cannot treat your illness unless he can make you say ahhhh ,
and listen to your ticker and smell your breath and draw blood
I was raised in the Serria Club and i remember when idealism was tamed with
common sense and objective goals, now we have a kabbalistic enviromental witchcraft
that loaths the mear observation of nature by humanity as somthing dirty and nasty.
build the proper road , regulate its ingress and egress, and i would love to visit the most beautiful
country on Gods green earth
thats my 2 cents
I support the preservation of Pacific Northwest rivers, including the Stehekin River in North Cascades National Park. For decades, the National Park Service (NPS) has managed the Stehekin River in order to protect the public from the DEVELOPER MINDSET such as those of Doc Hastings who failed in his attempts to develop the Hanford Reach.
The NPS is a steward of public interest that served to mitigate damage from floods to private property that has/had inappropriate development by owners who have showed no respect or consideration for the flood plains of the Stehekin River.
In this Country, we do not NEED a road to everwhere and the upper Stehekin Valley is one of those areas. We managed to cut one of the Nation's great wilderness areas in half with the North Cascade Highway. The exponential increase of use to these areas by outdoor enthusiasts needs to be respected. The stock of wilderness areas is decreasing disproportionatelyt to the demands of a spirling population in the State of Washington. "Do the Math!". For those who desire an automobile tour of wildeness, or desire to live in such an area, many already exist in Washington and other areas of the Nation...use them rather than spoiling the resoruces of the next generation with an insatiable lust for mindless accessability.
Stehekin floods are important to the health of the river and very according the 100-year experience rating. Accordingly, they have become more frequent but a natural state of rivers that we must respect and allow in our planning. They are powerful and due to the lack of respect for flood plains and unsafe corridors for building sites, millions of dollars in property damage has unnecessarily occurred that should be borne by those property owners and sellers of property who continue to VIOLATE flood plains.
Alternative 2 of the Stehekin River Corridor Implementation Plan restores the river by allowing it to utilize the flood plain and will remove NPS buildings and private structures from the channel migration zone. Alternative 2 should also contain a clause that has strict guidelines so that no development occurs within the flood plain of the Stehekin River and that such violations will not be compensated, but rather assessed for any cost of clean-up and other expenses incurred as the result of property damage to public or private holdings. I support the portions of Alternative 2, that will:
Thank you for considering my comments and I look forward to seeing the conservation of the Stehekin River and Valley through methods that preserve its integrity for future generations.
I believe Blitzer is on to something. Since the Sierra Club and others have realized the income that can be realized by verbalizing the word"environment," it's hard to decipher the difference in motivation between them and the reputation that open pit coal mine executives have. Endless court battles paid for by taxpayers including their own fees and the, apparently, pimping of groups for public consumption (and donations). The temptation is certainly there and personally witnessed at some levels of the "business." I would like increased scrutiny by some people that have a real concept of what we're facing, REALLY! Am I being too harsh here?
Get Real is what I'm getting at.
Thanks,
Rich