You are here

Home » Retirees Coalition Asks Congress To Oppose Snowmobiles

Retirees Coalition Asks Congress To Oppose Snowmobiles

Share

Published Date

December 4, 2006

    The Coalition of National Park Service Retirees has gone to Congress to head-off efforts by outgoing Senator Conrad Burns of Montana and outgoing Representative Richard Pombo to keep snowmobiles in Yellowstone no matter what science recommends.
    A letter from the coalition was hand-delivered this morning to Senators Reid, Durbin, Dorgan, Feinstein, and Bingaman along with Representatives Rahall, Christensen, Pelosi and Hoyer. In it the coalition states that the pro-snowmobile riders Burns and Pombo want to attach to an Interior Department spending bill "ignore repeated scientific findings of the National Park Service and Environmental Protection Agency and would force a radical departure from NPS' overarching duty to conserve national parks.
    "By mandating a continuation of snowmobile use, the riders prescribe a future in our country's oldest national park that would include levels of air and noise pollution and disturbance of wildlife that NPS has determined are readily avoidable by providing full public access to Yellowstone with snowcoaches rather than snowmobiles."

    You can find the entire letter here. In it the coalition's executive council goes point-by-point through key sections of the National Park Service's Management Policies, highlighting areas of the manual that argue quite clearly against the current form of snowmobile use in Yellowstone and Grand Teton national parks.
    I wonder if the coalition sent a carbon copy of the letter to Mary? After all, she has spoken out in favor of snowmobiles in Yellowstone, and just last month park officials released a draft environmental impact statement in which the preferred alternative called for continuation of the current limit of 720 snowmobiles per day.

Support National Parks Traveler

Your support for the National Parks Traveler comes at a time when news organizations are finding it hard, if not impossible, to stay in business. Traveler's work is vital. For nearly two decades we've provided essential coverage of national parks and protected areas. With the Trump administration’s determination to downsize the federal government, and Interior Secretary Doug Burgum’s approach to public lands focused on energy exploration, it’s clear the Traveler will have much to cover in the months and years ahead. We know of no other news organization that provides such broad coverage of national parks and protected areas on a daily basis. Your support is greatly appreciated.

 

EIN: 26-2378789

Support Essential Coverage of Essential Places

A copy of National Parks Traveler's financial statements may be obtained by sending a stamped, self-addressed envelope to: National Parks Traveler, P.O. Box 980452, Park City, Utah 84098. National Parks Traveler was formed in the state of Utah for the purpose of informing and educating about national parks and protected areas.

Residents of the following states may obtain a copy of our financial and additional information as stated below:

  • Florida: A COPY OF THE OFFICIAL REGISTRATION AND FINANCIAL INFORMATION FOR NATIONAL PARKS TRAVELER, (REGISTRATION NO. CH 51659), MAY BE OBTAINED FROM THE DIVISION OF CONSUMER SERVICES BY CALLING 800-435-7352 OR VISITING THEIR WEBSITE. REGISTRATION DOES NOT IMPLY ENDORSEMENT, APPROVAL, OR RECOMMENDATION BY THE STATE.
  • Georgia: A full and fair description of the programs and financial statement summary of National Parks Traveler is available upon request at the office and phone number indicated above.
  • Maryland: Documents and information submitted under the Maryland Solicitations Act are also available, for the cost of postage and copies, from the Secretary of State, State House, Annapolis, MD 21401 (410-974-5534).
  • North Carolina: Financial information about this organization and a copy of its license are available from the State Solicitation Licensing Branch at 888-830-4989 or 919-807-2214. The license is not an endorsement by the State.
  • Pennsylvania: The official registration and financial information of National Parks Traveler may be obtained from the Pennsylvania Department of State by calling 800-732-0999. Registration does not imply endorsement.
  • Virginia: Financial statements are available from the Virginia Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, 102 Governor Street, Richmond, Virginia 23219.
  • Washington: National Parks Traveler is registered with Washington State’s Charities Program as required by law and additional information is available by calling 800-332-4483 or visiting www.sos.wa.gov/charities, or on file at Charities Division, Office of the Secretary of State, State of Washington, Olympia, WA 98504.

Comments

Submitted by admin on December 5, 2006 - 9:49am.
This is incredible. Study after study after study find that snowmobiles are just plain bad for Yellowstone, its wildlife, its low-impact visitors and the Park Service employees who keep the place running. Yet, here again we have another effort by two block-headed legislators to enshrine the snowmobiling culture. When will real people stand up and just do the right thing?!

Submitted by admin on December 7, 2006 - 10:34pm.
REAL people don't mind snowmobiles...just elitist enviro-whackos!!!

Submitted by Kurt Repanshek on December 8, 2006 - 6:27am.
Could you logically explain why someone who prefers to minimize pollution in national parks is "elitist"? "Protectionist" I can see, "elitist" I can't. Curiously, on another post you adamantly argue that the Founding Fathers intended taxes to go only towards national defense. Well, the founding founders (Congress) of the National Park Service directed that it conserve the resources in national parks, and the NPS's own Management Policies direct it to protect the parks from impacts that impair those parks. Too, the Clean Air Act mandates that Yellowstone officials preserve their Class I Airshed status. Snowmobile studies in Yellowstone clearly show that the current fleet of snowmobiles that enter the park impact it, and so the NPS would only be doing its congressionally mandated job by banning snowmobiles. If, on the one hand, you truly believe the Founding Fathers intended taxes only to be spent on defense, on the other you have to also accept the Park Service's congressionally directed mandate and observance of its own Management Policies. You can't support one and not the other.

Donate Popup

The National Parks Traveler keeps you informed on how politics impact national parks and protected areas.

Become a sustaining member.

INN Member

The easiest way to explore RV-friendly National Park campgrounds.

The Essential RVing Guide to the National Parks

Here’s the definitive guide to National Park System campgrounds where RVers can park their rigs.

Our app is packed with RVing- specific details on more than 250 campgrounds in more than 70 national parks.

You’ll also find stories about RVing in the parks, tips helpful if you’ve just recently become an RVer, and useful planning suggestions.

The Essential RVing Guide to the National Parks

FREE for iPhones and Android phones.