You are here

Share
A woman boulders at Joshua Tree National Park.

A woman climbs a large boulder at Joshua Tree National Park. / NPS Hannah Schwalbe

New Names For Old Routes

The climbing community reckons with a route-naming tradition that has allowed derogatory and offensive terms to endure.

By Kim O’Connell

Editor's note: Some readers might find language in this article offensive.

One of Angela Amos’s favorite places to go climbing is Annapolis Rocks along the Appalachian National Scenic Trail, a quartzite rock formation in Maryland with long layers of horizontal features. There, as she bends her fingers into cracks and holds, and presses her toes against the crag, all she thinks about is getting to the top. She doesn’t stop to think about being a Black woman in a sport that is still dominated by white men, or about how often Black people are made to feel unsafe or unwelcome in the outdoors. But those thoughts inevitably come later.

Recently, Amos weighed in on a discussion forum in the Potomac Appalachian Trail Club's Mountaineering Section, based on a request I’d made looking for members to talk to about growing national conversations about offensive climbing route names and efforts to change them. These conversations have ramped up in the last year as protests and ongoing dialogues about race and equity have happened across many sectors.

Traditionally, climbing routes are named by their first ascensionists—the first person to ascend the route—and are informal monikers. This means that they tend not to be endorsed by the National Park Service or other agencies and emblazoned on signs, but they are often found in climbing handbooks and websites. At best, names are often funny attempts at puns or riffs on pop culture references, reflecting climbing’s long counterculture roots. But at worst, route names are often what many would call racist, sexist, discriminatory, and otherwise offensive.

In 2020, the trade publication SNEWS (which changed its name to Outside Business Journal earlier this year), in collaboration with the 57Hours adventure app, surveyed readers and mountain guides about climbing route names. Among readers, 91 percent said they had encountered racist, misogynistic, or discriminatory route names “several times,” and 65 percent of mountain guides said the same.

On the Mountain Project website, which provides climbing details for nearly 250,000 routes (mostly in the United States), dozens of known routes in national parks feature names that have been deemed offensive. For example, multiple routes in the United States are called Trail of Tears, evoking the name of the 19th-century forced removal of Indigenous peoples from their homelands, including a route in Glen Canyon National Recreation Area.

A climbing route at Joshua Tree National Park widely known as Thin Line was originally named Limp Wristed F*ggot (and that name is still included as an alias on Mountain Project). A bouldering route at Mount Rushmore National Memorial is called Slant Eyes. And at New River Gorge National Park and Preserve, route names include references to the racist Sambo character, and several use the word "Tigger" in ways that suggest the n-word, such as "Another Tigger in the Morgue." Several route names include the word “p*ssy,” and there are routes originally called “Happiness in Slavery” (supposedly a reference from The Story of O) and “Slavery Wall.”

At New River Gorge, Eve West, chief of interpretation, visitor services, and cultural resources, says that the park has had some conversations with climbing groups about the name issue and takes route names into account when issuing climbing permits. "If a permit is approved, one of the conditions is that the park must approve the route name so we can make sure that it is consistent with park values," West says. (In response to our questions, officials at National Park Service headquarters in Washington have not yet provided a comment on this issue.

In response to my query on the PATC site, a member named Ernesto Moreira wrote that such discussion was “divisive” and an “uphill battle” given that the club is majority white and male (the presumption being that white people and males don’t want to discuss such things). “IMHO, who gives a rats tail about a climbing route’s name?” Moreira wrote. “In climbing, if you have an issue [with] the routes name, don’t climb it, period…or whatever. Simply no one cares.” (Moreira authorized that his comments could be shared with me.)

Another climber wrote, “Racy doesn’t necessarily mean misogynistic, it's all about context and the mindset of the FA’ers [first ascensionists]. For folks to come along and alter history out of ignorance is a shame.”

A woman climber leads Girl Scouts at Carderock

PATC climber Carol Clayton leads some Girl Scouts on a rock climbing adventure along the C&O Canal. / Kim O'Connell

“As a general matter I don’t understand why people are so committed to preserving and promoting injustice,” Amos says. “In the climbing route context, it’s not the same level of people getting slaughtered in the street. A climbing route name doesn’t kill people; I get that. But I’m surprised by how unwilling people are to talk about it or consider that there could be an issue.”

Although Mountain Project now redacts offensive names such as those listed above, the original names can still often be found in comments sections about each route. And a quick perusal of a long, multi-page thread on the topic on the Mountain Project page found that a significant portion of climbers claimed that changing route names is akin to censorship or a violation of free speech. Many users mocked and criticized those who thought re-evaluating some climbing route names was warranted. “I propose more penis, fart and homophobe names!” one person wrote. “PIs unite. Or just climb and shut the vag up!”

One group that has led this discussion about discriminatory and culturally appropriative route names is Brown Girls Climb, an organization that is designed to bring together women of color in the outdoors and help make the nation’s climbing routes more inclusive and welcoming. Another is the American Alpine Club (AAC), which has launched the Climb United initiative as a way to examine climbing traditions, including derogatory route names, that the organization says are exclusionary.

“The climbing community as a whole is accountable for the language we use to identify and describe the places where we climb,” said the AAC in a joint statement issued with Appalachian Mountain Club, Colorado Mountain Club, Mazamas, and The Mountaineers in August 2020. “We must own the toxicity in the practice of naming routes. It’s time for change.”

The groups have committed to working collaboratively with climbers to change exclusionary route names, provide anti-racism and anti-harassment training, and determine how to audit and edit publications and websites to remove offensive route names. This initiative includes the Climbing United Route Name Task Force, a group of climbers and publishers (including Climbing and Alpinist magazines and Mountaineers Books) working on developing best practices around publishing route names, including an ever-expanding list of unacceptable words.

The Access Fund is another group working on the route name issue. “Although blatantly bigoted or cruel route names may be an easy call for revision, many routes fall into a gray area,” the Access Fund wrote in an article on the topic. “But there is a line—there is no place for racism, misogyny, homophobia, or other forms of bigotry within our community….We can maintain climbing’s counterculture roots and celebrate our independent spirit without using language that harms fellow climbers.” These efforts often include reaching out to first ascensionists to offer them the chance to change their own route names.

“A lot of people are saying that this is window dressing, that it’s performative and not going to change anything,” says Carol Clayton, another PATC climber. “My attitude is that yes, it’s performative, and the performative has a place. We don’t do all the deep digging and changing [on difficult issues] and then say ‘let’s get to the fringe things.’ This kind of stuff sparks conversation.”

“It’s encouraging that these conversations are happening,” Amos says. “And already some routes have been renamed. I see the momentum building.”

A rock climber at Joshua Tree National Park

A climber at Joshua Tree National Park. / NPS Lian Law

Support National Parks Traveler

National Parks Traveler is a small, editorially independent 501(c)(3) nonprofit media organization. The Traveler is not part of the federal government nor a corporate subsidiary. Your support helps ensure the Traveler's news and feature coverage of national parks and protected areas endures. 

EIN: 26-2378789

A copy of National Parks Traveler's financial statements may be obtained by sending a stamped, self-addressed envelope to: National Parks Traveler, P.O. Box 980452, Park City, Utah 84098. National Parks Traveler was formed in the state of Utah for the purpose of informing and educating about national parks and protected areas.

Residents of the following states may obtain a copy of our financial and additional information as stated below:

  • Florida: A COPY OF THE OFFICIAL REGISTRATION AND FINANCIAL INFORMATION FOR NATIONAL PARKS TRAVELER, (REGISTRATION NO. CH 51659), MAY BE OBTAINED FROM THE DIVISION OF CONSUMER SERVICES BY CALLING 800-435-7352 OR VISITING THEIR WEBSITE WWW.FRESHFROMFLORIDA.COM. REGISTRATION DOES NOT IMPLY ENDORSEMENT, APPROVAL, OR RECOMMENDATION BY THE STATE.
  • Georgia: A full and fair description of the programs and financial statement summary of National Parks Traveler is available upon request at the office and phone number indicated above.
  • Maryland: Documents and information submitted under the Maryland Solicitations Act are also available, for the cost of postage and copies, from the Secretary of State, State House, Annapolis, MD 21401 (410-974-5534).
  • North Carolina: Financial information about this organization and a copy of its license are available from the State Solicitation Licensing Branch at 888-830-4989 or 919-807-2214. The license is not an endorsement by the State.
  • Pennsylvania: The official registration and financial information of National Parks Traveler may be obtained from the Pennsylvania Department of State by calling 800-732-0999. Registration does not imply endorsement.
  • Virginia: Financial statements are available from the Virginia Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, 102 Governor Street, Richmond, Virginia 23219.
  • Washington: National Parks Traveler is registered with Washington State’s Charities Program as required by law and additional information is available by calling 800-332-4483 or visiting www.sos.wa.gov/charities, or on file at Charities Division, Office of the Secretary of State, State of Washington, Olympia, WA 98504.

Comments

This is just silly. We have more important issues to be concerned with involving the National Parks. Leave the names alone.


Harry A. Butowsky:

This is just silly. We have more important issues to be concerned with involving the National Parks. Leave the names alone.

Sure.  Because something patently offensive is OK.

 

https://www.thelily.com/climbing-routes-are-riddled-with-racist-and-miso...

Melissa Utomo, a 29-year-old Asian American Web developer, is used to being the only woman and person of color when she rock-climbs.

A few years back, on a climbing trip to Wyoming, she was in just that position when her group arrived at a big section of Ten Sleep Canyon called the "Slavery Wall." As the climbers challenged themselves on some of the wall's routes, the troubling names mounted: "Happiness in Slavery." "Welfare Crack."

Heck - California State Parks had an issue with the name of a prominent sandbar at Folsom State Recreation area named "Negro Bar".  It was previously known under a more offenive name.  I guess that's OK.


Add comment

CAPTCHA

This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.

The Essential RVing Guide

The Essential RVing Guide to the National Parks

The National Parks RVing Guide, aka the Essential RVing Guide To The National Parks, is the definitive guide for RVers seeking information on campgrounds in the National Park System where they can park their rigs. It's available for free for both iPhones and Android models.

This app is packed with RVing specific details on more than 250 campgrounds in more than 70 parks.

You'll also find stories about RVing in the parks, some tips if you've just recently turned into an RVer, and some planning suggestions. A bonus that wasn't in the previous eBook or PDF versions of this guide are feeds of Traveler content: you'll find our latest stories as well as our most recent podcasts just a click away.

So whether you have an iPhone or an Android, download this app and start exploring the campgrounds in the National Park System where you can park your rig.