You are here

Op-Ed| The National Park Service Could Learn A Few Things From Its African Colleagues

Share
Alternate TextSafaris in national parks in Africa can lead to close encounters with wildlife, such as this cheeta/Sean Smith

Editor's note: Sean Smith is a former Yellowstone National Park ranger, and an award-winning conservationist, TEDx speaker, and author. He recently had the opportunity to visit some national parks in Tanzania, and returned home with thoughts of what the National Park Service might learn from its African colleagues.

I recently returned to the Northwest after a two-week Tanzanian safari. It was an amazing experience. The trip took us through Arusha, one of Tanzania’s larger cities, out to Tarangire and Serengeti national parks, and the Ngorongoro Conservation Area. The parks and conservation areas were filled with wildlife from the ubiquitous wildebeest to the rare black rhino.

African National Parks share many similarities with their American counterparts.

The parks are big. Serengeti, for example, is more than 3.7 million acres or roughly 1.5 times the size of Yellowstone. Put another way, Serengeti is larger than the state of Connecticut.

The parks are well-visited. Despite having to travel over many poorly maintained dirt roads, parks like the Serengeti and Ngorongoro see roughly 1 million tourists annually.

The parks protect natural and cultural resources. The Tanzanian Park Service, like its U.S. counterpart, protects both natural and cultural resources. Olduvai Gorge in the Ngorongoro Conservation Area protects one of the world’s most important historic sites and some of the oldest fossilized human remains. They like to say at Olduvai, if one traces his/her lineage back far enough, everyone is from Tanzania.

Yet, the Tanzania Park Service diverges from the U.S. National Park Service (NPS) on many issues.  The African approach on several issues is an approach the NPS should copy.

Conservation over Recreation

The Tanzania Park Service places conservation and the protection of natural resources and wildlife over private recreation. Nearly every visitor to Tanzania’s national parks has a guide. These guides receive extensive training on resource and wildlife protection. The guides are taught to get the visitors deep into the parks for close-up but safe interactions with the wildlife. Private recreation such as hiking, mountain biking, and swimming is practically non-existent.

Yet, despite this focus on guided rather than private access, park visitors report high satisfaction with their safari adventures.

Alternate Text
Elephants seemingly are habituated to humans and their vehicles/Sean Smith

Here in the United States, the NPS mistakenly promotes the idea that it has a dual mandate, one that requires the NPS to balance conservation with recreation. This is incorrect and the courts have consistently ruled that when there is a conflict between conservation and recreation, the law requires the Park Service to favor conservation. The Park Service’s continued pushing of the dual-mandate myth creates undue management headaches, as every recreation interest from snowmobiles to off-lease dog walkers demands access to the national parks. As a result, the national parks are compromised by questionable activities that in many instances do not require a national park setting to enjoy.

Africa takes conservation crimes seriously

Tanzanian park rangers and their African counterparts take environmental crimes seriously. During our safari, I asked our guide if the truck broke down, how would we contact the rangers for help? Our guide responded, “We wouldn’t. The rangers' job was to patrol the borders looking for poachers. We would have to get ourselves up and running again.”

This focus on poaching was recently rewarded when Tanzanian police arrested Feisal Muhammad Ali, the world’s most-wanted ivory trafficker. Meanwhile, rangers in South Africa shot and killed suspected rhino poachers. While I’m not advocating for the summary execution of park criminals, the U.S. government could do more to increase the understanding of the severity of environmental crimes. However, its handling of the Cliven Bundy standoff in Nevada and the courts' unwillingness to impose stiff penalties for poaching sends the message that resource crimes are no big deal.

Alternate Text
Hyena in the grass/Sean Smith

Focus on experiences

Another area of focus for the Tanzania park rangers is a on visitor experience rather than amenities. To say the roads of Serengeti and Ngorongoro are rough is an understatement. In some instances, park roads are little more than a mud streak. Meanwhile, the Tanzanian national parks spend little on so-called necessities such as Wi-Fi and cellphone coverage. Interpretive displays are often rudimentary and lack any high-tech whiz bang features found in the United States. However, they provide information in multiple languages, increasing public understanding of why the parks are important. 

Rather than providing distractions, the Tanzanian parks focus on preserving authentic experiences. An authentic experience is one that improves a visitor’s appreciation and understanding of park wildlife and natural features, while allowing low-impact intimate interaction with those resources. Unfortunately, many U.S. park activities significantly diminish authentic experiences.

America’s National Park Service will celebrate its 100th birthday in 2016. During the upcoming year, it’s expected the NPS will seek public comment on how best to ensure the park system and Service reach their bicentennial. The agency should look to Africa for guidance.

Sean Smith is a former Yellowstone Ranger, and an award winning conservationist, TEDx speaker, and author. He writes national park thrillers from his home in the shadow of Mount Rainier National Park. To learn more about his conservation work and novels, check out his blog: www.seandavidsmith.blogspot.com or follow him on twitter: @parkthrillers

Featured Article

Comments

But if the resources that make the park a park are not conserved, then where are we?

Ethiopia


You are an "elite snob" . . .

How am I a snob?

(Whipperin was referring to Americans who "can afford to go there."  How is a comparison to Africans relevant to my comment?)


I'm not a "rich elite snob."

But you are far richer than the average African.  How much did you spend for your visit?  Probably more than the average life earnings of an African.  You are an "elite snob" relative to the vast majority of those on this planet.  Is that what  your want, only those that can spend their life earnings can go to a National Park?  You may be in the 99% in America but you are in the 1% of the world. And you should thank our Constitution and Capitalist economic system for it.

 


Because we were comparing an African park to an American park.

No, the comparison was among Americans who could or couldn't afford to go there.

The fact you could afford to go there when the vast majority of Africans can't, is the point

How do you know Africans can't afford to go to an African national park?  When I was there, it was full of Africans. 

And again, how am I a snob?


How is a comparison to Africans relevant to my comment?)

Because we were comparing an African park to an American park.  The fact you could afford to go there when the vast majority of Africans can't,  is the point. He wasn't refering to "Americans that can go there" he was making the point that the African Park was a play ground for the (relatively) rich, not a park for the Africans - or the African animals for that matter.


No, the comparison was among Americans who could or couldn't afford to go there.

No it wasn't.  Show me where he said anything about Americans going to Africa.

When I was there, it was full of Africans.

Ok. What percentage of the 1 million visitors to Serengeti and Ngorongoro are native to the host country?


No it wasn't. Show me where he said anything about Americans going to Africa.

@ 6:59.

 What percentage of the 1 million visitors to Serengeti and Ngorongoro are native to the host country?

Beats me.  What does that have to do with your claim that Africans can't afford to go to African NPs? 

Yet again, how am I snob?  Or is there no basis for the name-calling?


@ 6:59.

Not a word in that post about American's going to African parks.

What does that have to do with your claim that Africans can't afford to go to African NPs? ?

The average Tanzanian income is less than $1,000 a year.   The park fees alone are 50-100 per day.  Accomodations are $400 a night and up.  Add to that the guide fee. The average Tanzanian does not go to the Serengeti.  Is that what you want for our National Parks?


Add comment

CAPTCHA

This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.

The Essential RVing Guide

The Essential RVing Guide to the National Parks

The National Parks RVing Guide, aka the Essential RVing Guide To The National Parks, is the definitive guide for RVers seeking information on campgrounds in the National Park System where they can park their rigs. It's available for free for both iPhones and Android models.

This app is packed with RVing specific details on more than 250 campgrounds in more than 70 parks.

You'll also find stories about RVing in the parks, some tips if you've just recently turned into an RVer, and some planning suggestions. A bonus that wasn't in the previous eBook or PDF versions of this guide are feeds of Traveler content: you'll find our latest stories as well as our most recent podcasts just a click away.

So whether you have an iPhone or an Android, download this app and start exploring the campgrounds in the National Park System where you can park your rig.