You are here

A View From The Overlook: Safety Issue


The National Park Service and other federal law enforcement agencies have always had a guarded, nervous relationship with the National Rifle Association, and with good reason.

The 4.5-million-member NRA is the largest armed entity in the world; larger than the American army, larger even than the Chinese Army, and is vociferously truculent in assertion of its rights.

True, there are some NPS rangers who are duly ordained life-members of the NRA and who support it enthusiastically and religiously (the NRA does indeed have some aspects of a religion).

Other rangers are not so sure. One ranger, who shall remain anonymous, as he is still making a living with the NPS, had this to tell me:

“PJ, early in my NPS career, I became a firearms instructor. As part of that training and in order to gain certification, I was required to join the NRA. I was furious and complained to my supervisor. My peers looked at me like I was some wild-eyed commie.

"After joining the NRA, I received an amazing amount of NRA propaganda, including subscription to two of their publications. It was very instructive to experience the materials that were sent to their members. I now understood why they hold the severe positions that they do and how they become so rabid about these issues; total mind-bending propaganda similar to what might have been seen in World War II Germany. I know it sounds extreme, but after you read their publications, I am confident you will agree," Ranger X told me.

One person who apparently agreed with Ranger X was the 41st President of the United States, George H.W. Bush. Unlike Ranger X, President Bush was an NRA True Believer; a life member. However, Bush resigned his life membership. What happened?

Among other things, what happened was Wayne La Pierre, “spokesperson” for the NRA.

It seems that Wayne spoke.

Well, you say, that’s what “spokespersons” are supposed to do, right?

Except in the case of Wayne. Not a bad person, Wayne was sort of like your Uncle Fred.

Every family has an Uncle Fred. A decent enough chap, but there are certain things that send him into raging, crazy tirades. Uncle Fred believes that the Democrats are putting fluoride into the water supply to turn everyone into liberal zombies. Therefore, everyone at Thanksgiving dinner is warned not to mention (A) Democrats (B) Fluoride or (C) Water.

In the case of Wayne, some of the trigger words that will set him off are (A) federal agents (B) guns (C) gun control and of course, (D) the Second Amendment.

La Pierre had a dim view of federal agents before the April 1995 Oklahoma City bombing that killed 168 federal employees, including four commissioned federal law enforcement officers. Just days before the bombing he compared federal agents to some kind of fascists in a letter soliciting support for the NRA in its opposition to gun-control legislation.

“What did Wayne say that was so bad?” you ask.

Basically, Wayne said that the federal law enforcement officers were “Jack-booted thugs.”

After the bombing, President Bush resigned his life membership in the NRA with the following letter to La Pierre.

“…. Al Whicler, who served on my Secret Service detail when I was Vice President and President, was killed in Oklahoma City. He was no Nazi. He was a kind man, a loving parent, a man dedicated to serving his country and serve it well he did.

"I am a gun owner and an avid hunter. Over the years I have agreed with most of the NRA’s objectives, particularly your educational and training efforts and your fundamental stance in favor of owning guns.

"However, your broadside against federal agents deeply offends my own sense of decency and honor and it offends my concept of service to country. It indirectly slandered a wide array of government law enforcement officials who are out there, day and night, laying their lives on the line for all of us…”

Well said, Mr. President!

Now among the “wide array of government law enforcement officials” are the National Park Service's commissioned law enforcement park rangers, who don’t wear Jackboots and are not thugs. (Wayne may have watching too many old World War II movies on TV.)

Now, one of the problems of protecting the public is the “Security Bubble Illusion,” the fondly and widely held belief that somewhere, someplace, somehow, there is a ” Camelot of Safety,” an enchanted place where Nothing Bad Can Happen.

This is often described as being some rural village in the “Heartland" ---until, of course, something really horrific happens there.

Another “Camelot of Safety” is America’s National Parks where John Muir’s injunction to “Climb the mountains and get their good tidings!” is expected by the gentle and naive to cure even potential mass murderers of their desires.

Unfortunately, that is not in the mountains’ job description. Since humans visit national parks; this means the potential of random violence exists in even the smallest, most bucolic historical park. Even something as mundane as a dog off a leash can escalate into murderous violence. This was exactly the case at Pu’uhonua O Honaunau National Historical Park in Hawaii, and cost a responding park ranger his life.

More recently, Ranger Margaret Anderson was killed in Mount Rainier National Park on January 1, 2012, by a paranoid fugitive who was headed up the mountain toward the heavily used Paradise Visitor Center. The killer’s intentions are not known, but they were unlikely to have been pleasant. The killer’s plans were disrupted and in the ensuing manhunt, Mount Rainier itself exacted the ultimate vengeance.

There is no “Camelot of Safety” in national parks. Things happen. Last year, a mountain goat improbably gored a visitor to death.

So, with the smarmy oleaogeness of a crooked undertaker, the National Rifle Association offered a plan to protect the patrons of the national parks from dangers both animal and human.

How? Well, the NRA believes that everyone who visits a national park should potentially be armed and dangerous (to the bad guy or “bad” animal of course)

Now this is the kind of bizarre idea that normally shows up in publications like THUNDERBEAR, which the NPS can ignore.

Unfortunately, the NPS cannot safely ignore the NRA.

Using malleable congresspersons who, for whatever reason, agreed with their position, the NRA put sufficient pressure on the Department of Interior and the NPS to reverse a nearly 100-year-ban on firearms carry in the national parks.

To be sure, since parks were often adjacent to U.S. Forest Service or other public land where hunting was permitted, bringing unloaded, cased, and/or disassembled firearms through a park was OK. That all changed when the gun people won the right to carry fully operational, fully loaded guns in the parks, the rationale being defense against dangerous animals or people. (One envisions Wayne LaPierre being enveloped by an Everglades Python!)

Do the NPS Resource Management folks agree? Generally speaking, no.

The wildlife management folks understandably believe that their years of education and experience in animal behavior trump the knowledge of a used car salesman with the price of a Glock pistol.

The wildlife rangers point out that bison often manage people with false or bluff charges when us pesky two leggers get too close. However, the charge can become a real one if 9 mm rounds irritate the bison.

Some Yosemite National Park bears adopted a clever mugging strategy. While they would not directly attack a backpacker, they would seize the bottom end of the backpack and hold on. This is a Tug O’War that no human can win. The hiker is forced to abandon his pack.

Seems like a clear case for Mr. Glock or Mr. Colt, doesn’t it? Nope, the NPS believes that the bear should learn human avoidance, but not by dying, and the NPS would much prefer that you use the very effective bear sprays.

Ah, but what about the human predator? Again, the law enforcement ranger spends hundreds of hours in training, and later with that stern teacher, Experience, in learning when to shoot and when not to shoot. They prefer that you leave these decisions to the ranger.

“But what if there is no ranger available?” you ask. What if you are hiking a dark and lonely trail 20 miles from civilization and you come upon a strange and suspicious character, possibly a liberal or maybe even a Democrat, coming down the trail, directly toward you! What are you going to do? Shouldn’t you have the ability to shoot him?

Well, an actual and similar situation happened to David Michael Keane, son of the present president of the NRA. In the year 2002 The 21-year-old Mr. Keane was driving the George Washington Memorial Parkway, a unit of the National Park Service. An aggressive driver cut off Mr. Keane. There was not a park ranger in sight (never around when you need ‘em!) So young Mr. Keane hauled out his legal 9mm semiautomatic and fired one shot at the offending driver. The bullet shattered the rear window and lodged in the headrest of the driver’s seat. (Not bad shooting from a moving vehicle!)

Bullets are strange things, once fired they cannot be recalled and they change lives forever. The aggressive driver was not injured (except for being scared out of his Okole, as the Hawaiians say). David Michael Keane on the other hand, could not unshoot that single bullet and it changed his life. He was arrested on December 5, 2002, pled guilty and was sentenced to ten years in federal prison where he was to learn anger management and the manufacture of interpretive signs for the NPS.

Something to think about.


Absolutely excellent, PJ. (But better duck because bullets will soon be flying.)

Here's a link to a cartoon in the Salt Lake Tribune that captures exactly the NRA's grip on Congress:

WARNING: The cartoon will certainly offend gun nuts.

Meanwhile, here in Utah, a person may obtain a concealed carry permit without ever having actually fired a gun.

Sorry to disappoint you Lee, but i dont have any real problem with the article. Noone should be forced to join the NRA to keep their job just as noone should be forced to join a union. The angry driver got what he deserved. Too bad PJ failed to mention the 1.5 to 2 million people a year that defend themselves or their property with a gun. Perhaps that is why someone would like to carry in a park.

Oh, and has the assertion that one need not fire a gun to get a concealed carry actually led to a problem incident that you can identify?

I will take one exception to PJs article. Contrary to the assertion that

"Basically, Wayne said that the federal law enforcement officers were “Jack-booted thugs” who got what was coming to them."

in respect to Oklahoma City, LaPierre's "Jack-booted thugs" comment was in an NRA solicitation letter that had nothing to do with nor made any reference to Oklahoma City. He never said nor implied the Oklahoma agents deserved anything. PJ's characterization is a total misrepresentation of the facts.

Furthermore, the NRA reputiated the comments and LaPierre later apoligized for the remark clarifing that he was referring to the activities of some agents (Waco perhaps) not government law enforcement in general.

PJ -

Thanks for a very entertaining and informative take on a timely topic.

I get it P.J. You don't like guns. You don't trust people with guns. You think everyone with a gun is criminal or crazy.

I won't address your take on the NRA. It's a strawman argument. The NRA represents their almost 5,000,000 members kinda like the trade unions do theirs.....

I am a law abiding citizen. I vote. I'm a veteran. I pay my taxes. I love the National Parks sites and visit them often. The NPS has arbitrarily banned possession of firearms in their sites forever. Two recent Supreme Court decisions clarified the individual right, included in the second amendment. Our current president signed the order permitting people like me to carry in parks.

My gun in a NPS site does not endanger anyone. I carry because I can. My specific reasons are not your business, it's my business. Don't put honest people in the same category with a murderer, a rapist, a thief or the insane.

This is not a political site. Politics occasional intrudes and is sometimes addressed by the moderator. Blatently political posts like yours today should not be allowed to be posted.

Second Amendment = okay

First Amendment = naughty

lee. You may not be aware but the first and second amendment refer to constraints on government, not on citizens. But i agree in that i would rather not stifle this speech.

re: "...has the assertion that one need not fire a gun to get a concealed carry actually led to a problem incident that you can identify?"

It didn't take long in a Google search to find an example of a bystander death involving shots fired by a CCA permit holder who had good intentions...but a sad outcome. In this case, a store clerk was accidentially killed by a shot fired by a CCA permit holder who pulled a weapon and tried to stop a robbery.

I think there are legitimate concerns about the lack of requirements in many states for hands-on training as a requirement for a handgun permit - and that training needs to include more that simply how to fire the weapon. It should include a demonstrated ability to hit what you're shooting at.

Yes, I realize that training doesn't guarantee the absense of stray shot victims; those incidents also occur involving trained police officers. However, as the number of untrained handgun toters rises, the potential for more tragic accidents is likely to grow. Training is simply a simple way to improve the odds for everyone involved.

Given the fact that we require people to demonstrate the ability to drive a vehicle before issuing a driver's license, the requirement for at least basic training for safe handgun use prior to licensing to carry those weapons in public places doesn't seem unreasonable.

Then again ... maybe some of those permit applicants are concerned they can't pass the hands-on test?

National Parks Traveler's Essential Park Guide