You are here

Major Lodging Changes Coming To Yellowstone National Park

More guest rooms are being eyed at the Mammoth Hot Springs Hotel in Yellowstone under the park's proposal for a new lodging concession contract. Photo by David and Kay Scott.

Significant changes are in the offing for lodging operations in parts of Yellowstone National Park, where officials envision tens of millions of dollars of improvements.

The just released National Park Service contract proposal for Yellowstone indicates a number of major changes will take place in the park’s lodging facilities. The contract will run for 20 years and requires an estimated initial investment of nearly $45 million from the selected bidder. Additional outlays of $135 million will be required in a variety of facility improvements.

Xanterra Parks & Resorts, the existing concessionaire, currently operates all nine lodging facilities within the park. Xanterra is operating under a three-year extension that expires in November 2013, when the new contract is to take effect. The park’s other major concessionaire, Delaware North Companies Parks & Resorts, operates 12 general stores that are not part of the newly-issued contract proposal. Delaware North does own three hotels just outside the park’s west entrance in West Yellowstone, Montana.

Alternate Text
Frontier Cabin at Canyon. David and Kay Scott photo.

Major changes are due for a number of the park’s lodging facilities. As an indication of the mammoth size of the park’s concession operation, consider that in 2010 gross revenues of the concessionaire amounted to $86 million, and the Park Service received franchise fees from the concessionaire of more than $2 million. Not surprisingly, the largest outlay by far will be at Canyon, Yellowstone’s biggest lodging complex and the one with the greatest need for upgrading. Other major outlays will be required in Mammoth, Lake, and the Old Faithful area. Another expensive project will deal with the Fishing Bridge RV Park.

The major improvement programs and outlays include:

Mammoth Hotel Area ($6.1 million) - Renovation of the vacant Haynes Photo Shop (south across the parade ground from the hotel) so administrative offices currently in the hotel’s second floor can be moved there. Vacated space in the hotel will be reconfigured into seven additional guest rooms, including one suite, three rooms without private baths, and three rooms with private baths. Construction is to commence in 2015 and is to be completed the next year. In addition, 14 cabins currently used as employee housing will be returned to use as guest cabins, necessitating the concessionaire to acquire employee housing outside the park.

Old Faithful Area ($9.7 million) - Construction of a 77-room employee dormitory so 67 cabins currently used by employees can be returned to visitor use. This project is to commence by 2016 and reach completion by 2018.

Lake Yellowstone Hotel ($16.5 million less $8 million provided by the existing concessionaire) - Retrofitting the hotel for seismic structural stabilization. Expanding deli services (currently a small operation in the east wing) by moving the current hotel administrative services (currently near the lobby in the east wing) to an adjacent boiler building that is to be remodeled and retrofitted for seismic stabilization. This work is to be completed by 2015.

Lake Area ($14 million) - Construction by 2016 of a 60-room employee dormitory as a replacement for the existing dormitory that is to be demolished. The expected cost is $5.4 million. At Lake Lodge Cabins, the proposal calls for rehabilitation of 19 Pioneer cabin buildings, rehabilitation and relocation of 15 additional Pioneer cabin buildings, and relocation of six four-plex Western cabin buildings. The expected cost of Lake Lodge Cabin renovations is $8.6 million.

Canyon Area ($70.5 million) - Construction of five lodges with a total of 407 guest rooms.

Alternate Text
Frontier cabins, Old Faithful area. David and Kay Scott photo.

These include 60 lower-cost rooms with shared bathrooms, 10 suites, and 337 rooms similar to those currently in Dunraven and Cascade lodges that were constructed in 1999 and 1993, respectively. The new lodges will replace 407 guest rooms currently available in cabins that will be taken out. Thus, the number of guest rooms at Canyon will remain unchanged. The plan is to keep approximately 300 guest rooms open during the construction of the five lodges. Construction of the lodges is expected to be completed by 2018.

Fishing Bridge RV Park ($17.7 million) - Replacement of most of the infrastructure, redesign of three loops to handle larger RVs, remodeling of comfort stations and the camper services facility, and construction of a comfort station with showers. Construction is expected to take place in 2017 and 2018 when portions of the RV park may be closed.

In all, there will be a net increase of 88 guest rooms in the park.

The bottom line to all this appears to be that the Park Service has decided the time has come to undertake some long-delayed major projects that will be quite costly. In return, they are allowing the concessionaire (and the park, through added franchise fees) to take in additional revenues with added guest rooms, upgraded guest rooms that will almost certainly be rented at a higher price, a longer season for many rooms, and added food and beverage service that will in some cases be subject to an extended season.

The NPS is also taking the unusual step of allowing a 20-year concession contract, double the length of the typical contract for national park lodging facilities. It would be difficult to entice a concessionaire to agree to all the stipulated construction and renovations using a 10-year contract. The minimum franchise fee under the new contract is 6.8 percent of gross revenues. This seems considerably higher than the same fee under the existing contract that appears to be 2.5 percent based on gross revenues and the franchise fee paid in 2010.

Alternate Text
Pioneer cabin, Lake area. David and Kay Scott photo.

Using 2010 gross revenues of $86 million, the new franchise fee of 6.8 percent would produce nearly triple the amount paid by the concessionaire to the Park Service. Unless the concessionaire operates on narrower margins, it would also suggest the cost of lodging and food will increase to cover the higher fee.

The changes will result in more overnight guests, especially in the Old Faithful area where additional rooms will be made available. Consider the masses of visitors and vehicles in this area with the current room count and then add an additional 67 cabins being released for public use. Additional overnight guests, in turn, will require additional employees. And the beat goes on.


David and Kay Scott are the authors of The Complete Guide To The National Park Lodges. Along with updates in their recently released 7th edition of the book is the insertion of full-color images from lodges and settings in the national parks.

Featured Article


I rember stawing in the Frontier Cabins when I was little. Even though they are old (really Old) I hate to see them go. A cabin is always nicer to experience nature!

Having worked at Canyon Village for several seasons, we agree with "Anonymous" that a cabin is a nice way to experience nature. We recall a young father with several children saying that he was thankful for these very affordable accomodations, and now we hear of plans to destroy many of them. Our grandchildren finding a porcupine under our Frontier Cabin was a highlight of a family vacation. We appreciate that some desire the generic luxury such as the Cascade Lodge, but you truly experience Yellowstone when a buffalo is shaking your cabin by rubbing against it with his shoulder. We can't believe that in the 21st century the idea of an economy room is one with a shared bath. Are you going to let your child go down the hall alone in the middle of the night? We feel there is room for both simple and luxury accomodations. The Lake and Old Faithful solutions seem a better alternative than several more luxury hotels.

I am so happy to hear that some of the renovations are being considered... however, my daughter and I have been coming to Yellowstone for the past nine summers and we ALWAYS stay the majority of our time at Canyon... WE LOVE IT!!! As said above, the frontier cabins are simple and primitive but staying there is one of the highlights of our trip. We love the Snow Lodge but are most happy at Canyon. Wish they weren't taking this away. And, too, the food in the Park leaves a lot to be desired... expensive and not enough variation. Also, the hours are not conducive to folks like us who like to go watch wildlife until almost dark or hike, etc. Most of the time, by the time we get back to the cabins, the food vendors are closed!!!!!!! Not good! All in all, Yellowstone is our "happy place" and we love going back in time there. Wish they would leave it alone!!

I have been coming to the park since I was probably 6 months and I am 56. I have seen many changes and the prices go up and up. We always stay in cabins but even this year we are going to stay in a tent because we can't afford the cost of the cabins this year. But my biggest complaint has been the concessionaires. They have already driven the price of a meal outrageous as far as we are concerned. We are and have been really unhappy with Xanterra and the high prices they brought into the region when they were put in as concessionaires years ago. I think it is really sad when families have to struggle to go visit our national parks. They are for everyone not just the elite and rich. I don't mind a wide margin but there should always be a range. People that can afford, they can stay in the higher priced rooms and then a family can still stay in a budget cabin but the food prices need to reflect that also. I remember the time a few years ago when we hadn't eaten in the park for awhile and we went into Roosevelt to eat dinner. Sticker shock doesn't even come close. $15 for a chicken dinner. there were 3 of us and that was the cheapest thing on the menu. So, we bought 2 and split them because we were expecting to pay about 25-30 for the three of us and we drank water. Needless to say that was the last time we ate dinner in the park. Now we drive outside the park. At that same visit I heard a family of 5 getting BACK into their car , kids crying, because the family left because they couldn't afford the meal and were going to go somewhere else. That shouldn't happen in our national parks. Its for everyone.

I loved my little cabin at Lake Lodge, and the cafeteria nearby was surprisingly affordable. Having never visited Yellowstone before last autumn, I truly didn't know what to expect. I discovered I had chosen the perfect location for an inexpensive stay at the park. Renovations are always needed, and will be ongoing for such a popular park. But if costs increase too dramatically, it becomes harder for many people to plan a vacation there. So glad I visited when I did (before construction projects and probable cost increases).

I agree that it's a little bit upsetting to see many of the affordable cabin lodging options taken out, although I would note that there are quite a few basic employee cabins that seem to be going back for public lodging. However, 300 cabins being taken out at the Canyon area in favor of more expensive lodging would appear to cater to a more monied crowd. The lodge rooms in Canyon are currently $178 as opposed to the $98 (I remember it was cheaper when I visited) for the Frontier Cabins.

Also - the park dining options are always tricky when there's only one place to dine in an area, and they decided to go upscale. The areas with cafeteria style dining are more affordable to some degree, but that's primarily in the Canyon, Lake, and Old Faithful areas.

Right now there is a certain amount of competition for dining, since Delaware North runs many restaurants in separate buildings as Yellowstone General Stores. The Canyon soda fountain isn't terribly expensive. It's also practical to prepare your own meals to some degree, although you'd need to bring a stove and find a place where you can cook. I believe that has to be a picnic table that has a BBQ grill.

Wat hasn't gone up in price in this country? Are you aware, that Yellowstone, is a main source of revenue, for all of our National Parks in this country? I can remember getting a cabin in the Park for $5.00, but I also bought a car for under $1000 too. Inflation has effected all of us over the years. Our National Parks are still, the very best, and affordable, option for a family to vacation in. One need to plan ahead and budget accordingly. I think that Yellowstone is the most amazing place in this planet. There are ways to be able to afford to go and enjoy the Park. One just has to do a little research.

Wat hasn't gone up in price in this country? Are you aware, that Yellowstone, is a main source of revenue, for all of our National Parks in this country? I can remember getting a cabin in the Park for $5.00, but I also bought a car for under $1000 too. Inflation has effected all of us over the years. Our National Parks are still, the very best, and affordable, option for a family to vacation in. One need to plan ahead and budget accordingly. I think that Yellowstone is the most amazing place in this planet. There are ways to be able to afford to go and enjoy the Park. One just has to do a little research.


Yellowstone is not the main source of revenue for NPS. Taxpayer dollars are the main source of revenue. If you're talking entrance fee collection, then Yellowstone probably isn't even top 5. Yosemite and Grand Canyon have more visitors, and don't have a combined entrance fee where a group entering another national park (Grand Teton) can pay somewhere else with the fees going to that park. I'm thinking that Zion (charges per person during the peak season) might take in as much entrance revenue as Yellowstone and perhaps Mount Rainier is close.

If you're referring to concession revenues in Yellowstone, that goes to Xanterra and Delaware North right now. Yellowstone may be the largest single concession because of the location and number of rooms available, but it's not exactly the "main" source across all of NPS.

The criticism isn't necessarily that prices are inevitably going up. It's that the prices are going up because NPS is deliberately approving projects that replace rustic economy units with "upscale" lodging as well as trying to discourage camping in backhanded ways. After the Merced River floods in the mid 90s, about half the campsites in Yosemite Valley were taken out without any replacements. There is talk that Yosemite Lodge might get more rooms, but they go for over $200 a night. Right now there is no place in Mt Rainier NP for campers to shower. When the old Giant Forest Village at Sequoia NP was removed (and I agree with the rationale) with its affordable cabins, a campground, and affordable dining, the replacement was Wuksachi Lodge a few miles north. They replaced cabins that would probably now go for $80/night with upscale lodge rooms that go for upwards of $200/night. Then the deli/market with affordable meals was replaced with a fancy restaurant with $20 menu items. I would just drive to Lodgepole and dine at the snack bar.

What they're doing is adding about 140 economy rooms while taking out 400. That's why you're hearing complaints. I stayed in the budget cabins. They weren't fancy. They needed a bit of renovation. However, they were clean and reminded me of my youth when my family would stay in simple spartan accommodations at rock bottom prices.

Add comment


This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

National Parks Traveler's Essential Park Guide