A public meeting is set for October 7 to discuss a draft plan for recovering grizzly bears in the North Cascades.
A public meeting has been scheduled for early October to discuss a draft plan that aims to help grizzly bears return to the North Cascades of Washington state.
The meeting Oct. 7 on the Draft North Cascades Ecosystem Grizzly Bear Restoration Plan/Environmental Impact Statement is being hosted by the National Park Service and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Meeting participants will have an opportunity, through a lottery system, to provide up to two minutes of oral comment on the record.
Meeting location: Okanogan County Fairgrounds Agriplex, 175 Rodeo Trail Road, Okanogan, WA 98840
Doors Open: 5 p.m.
Orientation: 5 p.m. – 5:30 p.m.
Public comment: 5:30 p.m. – 8:30 p.m.
For more than two decades, biologists have been working to recover the North Cascades' grizzlies, a threatened species. And while more than a few reports of grizzly sightings in the ecosystem that stretches north to Canada are received by state and federal officials each year, most turn out to be black bears. The draft EIS outlines a few options for recovering grizzlies in the North Cascades, from releasing five to seven bears a year for five to ten years, releasing up to ten bears in one area for two consecutive summers, to an open-ended approach whereas a number of bears (probably between five and seven) would be released into the ecosystem each year until approximately 200 bears are roaming wild.
"Grizzly bears in the NCE are isolated from other grizzly bear populations. The nearest populations to the east are in the Kettle-Granby Grizzly Bear Population Unit (GBPU) in British Columbia and the Selkirk Mountains in Washington, Idaho, and British Columbia. Grizzly bears inhabit the remote areas east of the Okanogan River and west of the Kettle-Granby Mountains, but the very limited number of detections indicate that the populations are probably limited to a very small number of animals," the draft document notes.
"Few confirmed sightings of grizzly bears have been made in recent decades in the NCE on either side of the international border. The most recent confirmed observation within the U.S. portion of the NCE was in 1996, south of Glacier Peak," the draft explains. "The only direct evidence of reproduction during the past 25 years was a confirmed observation of a female and cub on upper Lake Chelan in 1991. Because of the small size and isolation of the NCE grizzly bear population, it is believed to be at significant risk of eventual extirpation. Biological consensus is that grizzly bears in the NCE would have difficulty recovering on their own and need some form of human intervention to achieve reproduction and eventual recovery."
The draft EIS is currently open for comment through October 24. The public is invited to view the draft and make comments online at this page. Written comments will be accepted in person at the meeting or by mail to: Superintendent’s Office, North Cascades National Park Service Complex, 810 State Route 20, Sedro Woolley, WA 98284.
Comments provided during the previous public comment period will also be considered. The NPS and USFWS will consider all additional comments received or postmarked no later than October 24, 2019.
Comments will not be accepted by fax, email, or any other way than those specified above. Bulk comments in any format (hard copy or electronic) submitted on behalf of others will not be accepted. Before including your address, phone number, email address, or other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be aware that your entire comment—including your personal identifying information—may be made publicly available at any time. While you can ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be able to do so.
Stories about:
Story Categories:
A copy of National Parks Traveler's financial statements may be obtained by sending a stamped, self-addressed envelope to: National Parks Traveler, P.O. Box 980452, Park City, Utah 84098. National Parks Traveler was formed in the state of Utah for the purpose of informing and educating about national parks and protected areas.
Residents of the following states may obtain a copy of our financial and additional information as stated below:
- Florida: A COPY OF THE OFFICIAL REGISTRATION AND FINANCIAL INFORMATION FOR NATIONAL PARKS TRAVELER, (REGISTRATION NO. CH 51659), MAY BE OBTAINED FROM THE DIVISION OF CONSUMER SERVICES BY CALLING 800-435-7352 OR VISITING THEIR WEBSITE. REGISTRATION DOES NOT IMPLY ENDORSEMENT, APPROVAL, OR RECOMMENDATION BY THE STATE.
- Georgia: A full and fair description of the programs and financial statement summary of National Parks Traveler is available upon request at the office and phone number indicated above.
- Maryland: Documents and information submitted under the Maryland Solicitations Act are also available, for the cost of postage and copies, from the Secretary of State, State House, Annapolis, MD 21401 (410-974-5534).
- North Carolina: Financial information about this organization and a copy of its license are available from the State Solicitation Licensing Branch at 888-830-4989 or 919-807-2214. The license is not an endorsement by the State.
- Pennsylvania: The official registration and financial information of National Parks Traveler may be obtained from the Pennsylvania Department of State by calling 800-732-0999. Registration does not imply endorsement.
- Virginia: Financial statements are available from the Virginia Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, 102 Governor Street, Richmond, Virginia 23219.
- Washington: National Parks Traveler is registered with Washington State’s Charities Program as required by law and additional information is available by calling 800-332-4483 or visiting www.sos.wa.gov/charities, or on file at Charities Division, Office of the Secretary of State, State of Washington, Olympia, WA 98504.
National parks and their natural resources belong to you. The National Parks Traveler works to ensure you know how these essential places are being cared for.
Sign Up For Our Weekly Newsletter
Unsubscribe at any time.
INN Member
The easiest way to explore RV-friendly National Park campgrounds.
Here’s the definitive guide to National Park System campgrounds where RVers can park their rigs.
Our app is packed with RVing- specific details on more than 250 campgrounds in more than 70 national parks.
You’ll also find stories about RVing in the parks, tips helpful if you’ve just recently become an RVer, and useful planning suggestions.
Comments
Hope this can be worked out. Wherever feasible, these beautiful critters deserve to inhabit all of their former range. It's the right thing to do. Thank you to everyone involved!
rich question , do you hunt or camp or hike with your children in grizzly country ?, or do sit the house and feel compassionate about bears that kill and maul people every year?
Very hopeful for this plan.
Very bad idea. Bringing in a dangerous animal where people hike and ride is a very very bad idea.
Can't say this any better than it has already been said: Text from https://www.conservationnw.org/our-work/wildlife/northcascadesgrizzly/
Why Do We Need Grizzly Bears?
Grizzly bears are culturally and spiritually significant to First Nations throughout the Pacific Northwest and British Columbia. Grizzlies are seen as teachers, guides and symbols of strength and wisdom to indigenous peoples. They are a regional icon and a key part of our natural heritage.
Grizzly bears are considered an “umbrella” species, and they play an important role for healthy ecosystems. Habitat that supports grizzly bears also supports hundreds of other plants and animals and human needs, like clean water, healthy forests and quality outdoor opportunities.
Grizzly bears have been part of the Pacific Northwest landscape for thousands of years. We have an ethical and legal obligation to restore this native species. Grizzly bear recovery in the North Cascades is an important part of national efforts to restore endangered animals where suitable habitat still exists.
Introducing grizzlies to the North Cascades of Washington State is not needed. If grizzlies want to be here they will find their own way back. We already hace cougar encroaching into human environments because they are over populated. Leave Mother Nature alone to find the proper balance of our animals.
Obviously, Mother Nature was not left alone in the North Cascades region which resulted in the near exterpation of grizzly bears by humans. The bears are a keystonen species which impacts all other flora and fauna, both by therir presebce and their absence. Removing the bears has had a deleterious impact on the otherwisew rich ecosystem. Reingtroduciung gthe bears will help rebalance the ecosysterm. There was the hue and cry when Yellowstone iontroduced the wolf back into its historical range resulting in a greatly rebalanced ecosystem.
These comments about 'leaving mother nature alone' or 'the bears will find their way back if they want to' are absolutely hilarious. Let's kill them all and THEN decide to let nature run its course. Unbelieveable.
I believe you have that backwards.....human have encroached on the animals' environments. Humans are incredibly selfish.
more grizzly bears would mean less cougars.
Simply why? Who keeps coming up with the ideas of adding predators to areas where they are not needed.
I and many many people hunt and hike many miles up into the cascades, I already know the possibility of running into one is there. I already constantly watch my six first wolves and cougar no friggen way is it a good idea to add a grizzly bear into that scenario! Look at the number of people that hike the PCT a year, pretty sure none of them even carry protection from such a predator. The dinosaurs are extinct here for a reason...oh wait should we bring them back too.
I don't see any benefit in bringing in predators. Sounds to me like it's more for sport hunting reasons than anything else, and no I'm not anti-hunter.
As a tent camping person, I do not want to be ever exposed to Grizzy Bears again. I had enough terror when I visited Yellowstone Park and the Grizzlies would come through the camping area. Even RV's were not safe. The grizzlies would just tear out their doors or windows and enter the RV's Finally,I took to sleeping in my car (without any human food in the car) to protect myself. I checked the Washington map and see muliple National Recreation Areas such as Wilderness and National Parks. I guess we will have to forgo any use of those areas for lack of protection from the Grizzlies. I know that Black Bears are less dangerous. They just really want to get out of the way..not attack people. Much less aggresive. If the save the Grizzle Bear people want to reintroduce Grizzlies I recommend that you plant them into their citiy parks and see how they like deaing with Grizzles. Might teach them a lesson-start with Seattle or Bainbridge Island. We have already had serious problems with Cougars and Wolves attacking and/or killing hikers. Add Grizzles to that mix and they are going to drive us out our rights to use our parks as they were meant to be used. I have been to Darrington, Washington. I guess somedesk jockey decided that 12 miles out of Darrington was a pretty good place to start planting Grizzles. The town was noy very pleased at all. You brainiacks need to get off your desks and and computers. Get out in the field and do some real foot work. i recommend going to Canada to see how the
Diane, please provide newspaper reports of the Yellowstone incidents you cite, as well of the fatal wolf attacks in Washington state. The NPS in Yellowstone has not reported any such grizzly break-ins, and to the best of our knowledge there have been no fatal wolf attacks in the US in decades.