You are here

Op-Ed | New Video Defends Amtrak’s Long-Distance Trains

Share
Amtrak's Empire Builder stops at East Glacier, Montana/Craig Thorpe

Amtrak's Empire Builder stops at East Glacier, Montana/Craig Thorpe

            Will Glacier National Park lose its venerable Empire Builder? The fix is in, warn rail advocates across the West.

By Alfred Runte 

Give Amtrak credit for remaining consistent; it has never wanted its long-distance trains. Nor apparently does President Trump, who vows to veto any transportation bill sustaining them.

“Imagine getting rid of all of the trains that serve Trump Country,” notes Tony Trifiletti, executive director of All Aboard Arizona. “Does the president care so little about the people who voted him into office?”

By "Trump Country," Trifiletti includes Amtrak’s Empire Builder to Glacier National Park. Now in its 90th year of service, the Empire Builder makes three stops along the southern boundary of the park.

“No Empire Builder to Glacier? That’s unthinkable,” he declares.

Although not specific to the national parks, the threats to continued passenger train travel is laid out in a new video by the Western Interstate Trains Coalition, which Trifiletti also leads.

“We have to protect these trains. They’re Amtrak’s cash cows and Amtrak knows it. Unfortunately, Amtrak has always preferred the Northeast Corridor, ironically, what President Trump himself calls The Swamp," said Trifiletti. "Why? Because Boston to Washington via New York are the tracks Amtrak owns. Everywhere else it has to work with the landlord railroads, who know Amtrak is weak and treat it accordingly.”

“If we lose the long-distance trains, we will never get them back,” he believes. “In 1981 we lost the last train to Yellowstone, which remains a blow to that park. If all people can do is come by car, no wonder the national parks are ailing.”

Ideally, Congress will buck the president and save the trains, but even that would be just short-term.

“Amtrak’s long-distance equipment is shot,” Trifiletti notes. “They’ve been starving those trains for years. Ultimately, the country will have to do something different, like demand the railroads take back their trains.”

The Empire Builder is celebrating its 90th year in 2019

The Empire Builder is celebrating its 90th year in 2019

The rebuilding would be costly, Trifiletti admits, but in the long term more efficient.

“Think of it this way,” he suggests. “We currently have 24 presidential candidates in the Democratic Party wringing their hands over climate change. But not one has said a peep about this solution—better trains for the country and fewer cars. It’s not just how we fuel our cars; it is rather the car itself. Think of the sprawl, itself demanding of an asphalt jungle that is literally eating our landscape alive.”

“Let’s make a deal,” he suggests. “The railroads take back their passenger trains and we guarantee them a profit. Would that be cheaper than CO2 emissions from concrete, asphalt, and urban sprawl? I’m no climate scientist, but I believe in common sense. No one is going to solve climate change by sticking with the car.”

Obviously, President Trump disagrees—and Amtrak. Only the Northeast Corridor deserves good trains. We will see how that plays out in November 2020. Meanwhile, if ever you wanted to go to Glacier National Park by train, Trifiletti suggests you do it now.

Comments

I always understood those trains to be money-losers, not 'cash cows.'


I always understood those trains to be money-losers, not 'cash cows.'

Thats what the official numbers indicate but train proponents argue the accounting is "wrong"

 


Send a copy of this along with an autographed copy of your book, Allies of the Earth, to President Trump. Aybe he will learn something.


Ok, so your darling socialists running for president have said climate change is the big issue and the only solution they offer you is more taxes. You are ok with that.

Yet your darling leaders have yet to embrace train travel as a partial solution to climate change. Yet you adore them.

You think Trump is bad because he doesn't make train travel a priority.  They all have the same view yet 20 of them are crusaders and one is evil for having the same view!

Now let's add to this the fact that the front runners have been in positions to fix both problems for many years yet have done nothing but talk about it around election time...

Hmmmm... who is the evil ones?


Vegas Voice- be gentle with the Professor, he actually is far more reasonable then many others.  He does have a love affair with trains that might be more justifiable by nostalgia than economics but unlike others he doesn't have a blind hatred for our President and he doesn't oppose everything the President would like to do just because the President wants to do it.  He has posted similar missives during past administrations.  If only the progressives could be as consistent. 

 


One thing Trump does is change his mind if he hears a persuasive argument.   Runte, NPS director and many other constituencies should unite and work on a response that makes it up to the Oval Office. Unfortunately CA set a bad example with its bullet  train debacle.  So there is a mountain to climb but  the argument for maintaining long distance trains can be made in part by pointing to the money saved by maintaining and upgrading what already exists.  


Some photos from a recent ride on the Amtrak Empire Builder

https://adobe.ly/327CoPd

 


"Send a copy of this along with an autographed copy of your book, Allies of the Earth, to President Trump. Aybe he will learn something."

Waste of a good book.  He's not a reader.  Or a thinker. 


Add comment

CAPTCHA

This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.

INN Member

The easiest way to explore RV-friendly National Park campgrounds.

The Essential RVing Guide to the National Parks

Here’s the definitive guide to National Park System campgrounds where RVers can park their rigs.

Our app is packed with RVing- specific details on more than 250 campgrounds in more than 70 national parks.

You’ll also find stories about RVing in the parks, tips helpful if you’ve just recently become an RVer, and useful planning suggestions.

The Essential RVing Guide to the National Parks

FREE for iPhones and Android phones.