You are here

UPDATED: Hiring Freeze Blocks National Park Service Permanent Hiring, Seasonal Jobs Up In The Air

Share

Editor's note: This updates with the National Park Service's tally of vacant positions within the agency, efforts to see that law enforcement rangers and firefighters are exempt from the hiring freeze.

National Park Service officials have been told to stop filling vacant permanent positions throughout the National Park System under the federal hiring freeze President Trump ordered, though it remained unclear Wednesday which, if any, seasonal positions would be granted a waiver from the freeze.

President Trump in a memorandum on Monday called for an immediate hiring freeze to run up to 90 days, at which point he expected the Office of Management and Budget to produce a long-term plan to reduce the federal workforce. But for an agency like the Park Service, which annually hires thousands of seasonal workers, the document didn't spell out how the Service should proceed with those positions.

On Wednesday afternoon a memo sent out to management staff across the National Park System said Park Service officials were continuing to understand the process for obtaining exemptions to the hiring freeze. However, wrote NPS Chief Financial Officer Lena McDowall, what has been determined is that:

  • As of noon on January 22, 2017, no existing vacant positions may be filled, and no new positions may be created. Executive departments and agencies should not make any new offers of employment. Department and agency heads may make limited exceptions to ensure national security and public safety, but guidance on that waiver process has not been issued yet.
  • An individual who has received a job offer/appointment prior to January 22, 2017, and who has received documentation from the agency that specifies a confirmed start date on or before February 22, 2017, should report to work on that date.
  • For individuals who have received a job offer/ appointment prior to January 22, 2017, and who have received documentation from that agency that specifies a confirmed start date after February 22, 2017, we are awaiting additional guidance on the review process to determine whether these individuals should report to duty on the agreed upon start date.
  • Hiring for seasonal positions is currently underway. It is still unclear which types of seasonal positions may qualify for a waiver, so with the expectation that at least some exemptions will be granted for these positions and in recognition of the time it takes to hire and on-board seasonals, bureaus and offices should continue their seasonal hiring processes to identify qualified candidates who may be expeditiously selected when a freeze exemption is granted. No new offers of employment may be made until a freeze exemption is granted.
  • In addition, hiring processes for permanent wildland fire, law enforcement and other public safety positions should continue to identify qualified candidates. No new offers of employment should be made until a freeze exemption is granted.

According to personnel in the Park Service's Washington, D.C., headquarters, the latest "snapshot" of vacancies across the agency counted 1,731.

"The National Park Service is in coordination with the Office of Personnel Management and Office of Management and Budget on their guidance for implementing the hiring freeze. As with previous hiring freezes, the National Park Service will work with the Administration to ensure that we meet the needs of park visitors across the system," said Park Service chief spokesman Tom Crosson. "We realize that maintaining a full staff of firefighters and law enforcement officers at our parks is important for visitor safety. Therefore, per the provisions in the president’s memorandum, we will work with the Department of the Interior to ensure that personnel responsible for the safety and protection of our visitors and resources are exempt from this hiring freeze."

Park Service officials were in ongoing discussions with Interior Department, Office of Personnel Management, and Office of Management and Budget authorities to determine how seasonal positions would be handled under the freeze.

"Seasonal employees are critical to the National Park Service.  They help parks throughout the system provide quality and safe experiences for our visitors throughout peak visitation periods," said Mr. Crosson. "The NPS typically hires around 10,000 seasonal and other temporary employees throughout the year, with more than 8,000 of those on board during the peak summer visitation period."

One park superintendent, who agreed to discuss the memo anonymously, was optimistic that seasonal hiring would be allowed to go forward once the new administration realized the need for these workers.

"The Washington office is heavily engaged in trying to talk to the right people at Interior and (Office of Personnel Management) so they can explain the situation with seasonals and they are able to resolve that. It will come eventually," the superintendent said. "I’m pretty confident that it actually will get resolved pretty fast. And we will be able to hire seasonals, because seasonals aren’t what this is about. Every time we’ve had a hiring freeze in the past we’ve been able to hire seasonals. ... You can’t operate a Yosemite or a Yellowstone without a seasonal staff to collect the trash and protect the public safety. You just can’t do that, and it would adversely effect the local communities.”

But the superintendent was concerned that the eventual OMB plan might aim to reduce the federal workforce by ordering that once an employee retires that their specific position cannot be filled. If you let folks retire but don’t fill their position, you might lose a very valuable position, the superintendent said, adding that the best solution would be to give the Park Service a set personnel budget and let the agency decide which positions to fill.

At the National Parks Conservation Association, officials were alarmed by the latest developments and hoped the administration would move quickly to allow the Park Service to fill its seasonal needs.

“We’re still trying to figure out what the implications will be, but we are alarmed at the potential for an already understaffed Park Service to be further challenged to handle the great record number of visitors and care for resources that are increasingly falling into disrepair," said John Garder, NPCA's point person for budget and appropriations. "We’re concerned about how long it could take the administration to figure out the details as the hiring season for seasonal park rangers is upon us. Normally the Park Service would be looking to hire about 8,000 seasonal rangers at this time. And we are deeply concerned about whether or not they’ll be able to hire the front line workers of the Park Service, and if so when they might be given permission to do that.”

Last year's unofficial visitation tally for the National Park System was 6.4 percent above the then-record 307.2 million counted in 2015, said Mr. Garder. Some individual parks, though, saw double-digit increases, he said, pointing to Zion National Park, which saw a 17.6 percent increase, to 4,317,028

“If you look at some parks at the (visitation) increase from December '14 to December '16, you’re looking at shocking numbers for some parks. If you’re looking at parks like Zion, Rocky Mountain, it's crazy. These parks are already struggling to accommodate these visitors and do their normal work. The reality is they need more staff, not less," said Mr. Garder.

According to NPCA:

  • Based on the latest available data, the National Park Service had more than ten percent fewer staff in Fiscal Year 2015 compared to five years prior.
  • A contributor to the growth of the $12 billion park service maintenance backlog has been lack of staff to perform day-to-day maintenance and repair jobs that keep the backlog from growing
  • In 2015, NPS only had 58 cents out of every dollar needed just to keep up with the backlog

“Congressman (Ryan) Zinke in his testimony to be the next Interior secretary said very clearly that two of his main priorities are to address the maintenance backlog and to provide the resources that park rangers need," said Mr. Garder. "We’re overjoyed to see that, but this (presidential) memorandum, depending on how it’s implemented, would seriously challenge his commitment to parks, becaue you can’t repair parks without rangers. And they’re certainly not going to have the resources they need to take care of visitors if there are fewer of them out there.

"It’s important to remember that it’s not just the seasonal rangers who are the face of the Park Service to the visitors, it's also the professionals: the scientists, the archaeologists, the cultural resource specialists, the wildlife biologists. These are our national treasures, our cultural and national heritage.”

Comments

National Park Advocate Ken Burns on Idiot Trump, the Liar

 

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/ken-burns-donald-trump_us_575daa58e4...


"the best solution would be to give the Park Service a set personnel budget and let the agency decide which positions to fill." I whole heatedly agree.
Having been through more downsizings or "rightsizings" than I care to, being given a staff number or percentage to reduce is the least efficient means. Given an overall budget to work with provides much more flexibility and helps reduce the impact.


I would agree with ecbuck that the seasonal freeze is normal, if he did not ruin his good sense by throwing in the bit about getting another job. Not only callous, but inefficient. NPS needs the best people it can get, and does not need to keep making it harder and harder for people to want to work there.

However, it is reasonable for this or any administration to request a freeze, even if it is stupid. They feel they need a freeze because in a case like Department of Interior the newcomers are very few and they have more that 60 to 70,000 people to manage.  Because Policy is budget, as you fill all open positions before they have their eye on the ball, they risk having some decisive position filled by people who want to go in a different direction, or more to the point, they lose the opportunity to change direction, by changing the open job descriptions.

This will not happen to Seasonals. But imagine if you can an incoming admistration like Jarvis at the beginning of the Obama administration who wanted to have more racial diversity.  Because the Seasonal positions are about the only real hiring in numbers the NPS does, if you wanted to require your managers to make sure they opened recruitment to more than the usual group of Seasonals, you would need time to circulate that direction.

It is 'stupid' because it is especially late this time.  There was chaos in the transition of the Trump administration, because the people Chris Christie assigned the to job did not do anything because they did not expect a Trump win, as they were so far down the food chain they were not in the know about the upcoming Putin/WikiLeak/Comey email interventions.  They started everything over again AFTER the vote, way too late.

But to some extent all new Administrations coming in must be nervous about taking on governing, and most put some brakes on hiring, although perhaps not as panicked as this group.

As to resisting this Administration by government employees, it is pretty stupid and naive.  It also shows a lack of faith in the United States.  Government employees give up and get things other citizens do not. In good faith, you should never assume the worst, but in good faith make your pitch to the new administration about what the laws of the US require and your best recommendation on how to do the job within the money available.  

If you prejudged the answer, particularly in this case where these people are all over the map as to what they do or do not believe, or even if they believe anything at all, you could get the worst of the deal.  I remember a time when environmentalists were opposing what they THOUGHT a senate committee chairman would do in pending legislation.  They thought he would open it all up to logging.  In fact, he wanted to put it in Wilderness.  But he got so pissed at being attacked in the Media and through letters, that he dropped the Wilderness idea, which left the way open to the people who wanted logging.

If professionals start acting as cynical as the trolls in the public (and two or three on this site as well), we will politicite the entire process, and no one will have faith that anyone is acting openly for the public good.  Everyone will appear to be a partisan schemer.  I am surprised someone like Ray Bane would not stand up for the integrity of the public servant, but advocates politicizing the civil service response to the President.


agreed!


I hope that is not the strategy: that bad upkeep and services will cut down the number of visitors per year.  I dread to think that this is intended as a move toward disabling/closing national parks to make them available to private interests for exploitation.  NP supporters, BEWARE - keep your eyes and ears open about this, please.


True story. My husband may not have the job he loves and lives for. 


Yeah, accept that it is much ado about somthing. Clearly, you don't have damn clue how seasonal hiring works.  Typical.  Currently, all work on hiring has to stop and can't continue until we get the go ahead.  I have to put in my hiring packets months ahead of time so that my fee collectors and rangers can pass their background checks before their start dates.  Reference checks and interviews need to be done RIGHT NOW, so that I can get paperwork started on background checks so that my staff can start on time in April.  Any delay in that timeline, will lead to seasonal employees not starting on time, and campgrounds and visitors centers not opening. 


This was my first thought, i visit the smokies at least twice a year. They have had a rough couple months with the fires, they don't need this. 


The Essential RVing Guide

The Essential RVing Guide to the National Parks

The National Parks RVing Guide, aka the Essential RVing Guide To The National Parks, is the definitive guide for RVers seeking information on campgrounds in the National Park System where they can park their rigs. It's available for free for both iPhones and Android models.

This app is packed with RVing specific details on more than 250 campgrounds in more than 70 parks.

You'll also find stories about RVing in the parks, some tips if you've just recently turned into an RVer, and some planning suggestions. A bonus that wasn't in the previous eBook or PDF versions of this guide are feeds of Traveler content: you'll find our latest stories as well as our most recent podcasts just a click away.

So whether you have an iPhone or an Android, download this app and start exploring the campgrounds in the National Park System where you can park your rig.