You are here

Concessionaires Want More Investment, Business Opportunities, In National Parks

Share

National park concessionaires, deeply concerned over what they see as three decades of stagnant visitation to the National Park System, want Congress to authorize better marketing of the parks, longer "high" seasons in the parks they believe would generate more revenues for infrastructure improvements, and expanded concessionaire opportunities in the parks.

Those items were among a list of nine that Derrick Crandall, counselor of the National Park Hospitality Association, recently presented to a House appropriations subcommittee with responsibility for Interior, Environment and Related Agencies.

"Mr. Chairman and Members, I know you would agree that we need to get Americans back in touch with nature, engaged in physical activities and outdoor recreation, and connected to the magnificent culture, heritage and landscapes that are celebrated by our National Park System," Mr. Crandall said in remarks prepared for his appearance before the subcommittee on March 19.

"We need to reach out to youth to encourage them to share in the wonder and enjoyment of our National Parks and discourage the increasingly sedentary lifestyles that are contributing to our health care crisis. We need to expand park visitation to encourage minorities, disadvantaged communities, new Americans and urban residents to see their national parks for themselves and to build a broader constituency for America’s great outdoors. And, we need to find new and innovative ways to reinvest in the maintenance, restoration, and expansion of critical park infrastructure – much of which was built either by private investment when the national parks were first created, or in conjunction with the work of the Civilian Conservation Corps more than half a century ago."

While visitation to the National Park System reached a record 292.8 million in 2014, an increase of more than 19 million from 2013, NHPA officials say visitation has "actually declined if you discount new units added to the system."

The solution? According to NHPA, a range of initiatives should be implemented, including:

* Extend the Federal Lands Recreation Enhancement Act for two years to allow the Park Service to continue to collect fees for entry into park units and a variety of recreational activities, including backcountry usage, campgrounds, and boat launches;

* "(C)ontinuation and expansion of the Centennial Challenge Program. Encouraging non-profits, corporations and individuals to contribute toward important national park programs and projects...";

* Creation of a "National Park Outreach and Promotion Fund," funded by a transfer of 10 percent of the concessionaire franchise fees to "support NPS outreach and marketing efforts in partnership with states, gateway communities and concessioners;"

* Expanding the seasons at national parks, a move that would lead to increase visitor spending and franchise fees for the Park Service. These revenues, coupled with "investment requirements under new concessions contracts and appropriate use of existing Leasehold Surrender Interest" should be used to improve infrastructure in the park system.

"There has been a loss of rooms, of restaurant capacity, of services and of retail space in national parks over two decades, producing a corresponding decline in overnight stays and in the average length of visitor stays," Mr. Crandall told the subcommittee.

* More national park campgrounds should be managed by concessionaires "to improve visitor services and reduce operating costs";

* Concessionaires should be allowed to qualify for "historic tax credits from investments in structures" in the parks, and;

* Programs such as Youth Conservation Corps utilized in Yellowstone and Shenandoah national parks should be expanded across the system to "undertake construction, reconstruction and maintenance projects," possibly at a savings for the Park Service.

During a conversation with the Traveler last week, Mr. Crandall said the concessionaires don't expect the Park Service to "dramatically" expand road systems in national parks, but would like to see facility improvements and additions and believe it can be done without posing a great competitive threat to lodging and dining options in gateway communities.

"We seem to be headed in just one direction (in the parks): No increase, reduce, reduce," he said. "While that may be appropriate for Yosemite Valley, while that may be appropriate for portions of Yellowstone, I think for the park system overall, that's not a wise tactic.

"... I think what we're really saying, there is still an opportunity to enhance the ability of visitors to enjoy their park experience in a small portion of the footprint of our National Park System, and by doing that, just have a more robust experience when they're in the parks," Mr. Crandall went on.

"We're not talking about adding dramatically to the road system of the national parks because people now by and large see the parks out of their windshields. The last thing I would ever say is that that's justification for building more roads. But I would say that when you look at Yosemite Valley, and you have 1,500 rooms, which is down dramatically from what we used to have, and only 800 of those have bathrooms, I'm not afraid to say at some point we should look at how we upgrade those rooms so that 1,500 rooms have 1,500 bathrooms."

How Congress responds to the concessionaires remains to be seen, but Mr. Crandall plans to continue discussions with the appropriate committee and subcommittee chairs and ranking members.

"I'd say we got an enthusiastic level of support from all of the members of Congress that we talked to," he said in reference to his recent appearance before the subcommittee. "And that includes even people on the minority side. They all agree that they want to continue a successful pattern of providing services for the visitors in the parks through private sector investment in things like lodges."

Comments

Villains come in all shapes and sizes, Alfred.  So does greed.  Where is Teddy and his trust-busting Big Stick when we need him?

But it appears that the Times must be one of those terrible liberal papers that seeks to demean those who work hard to succeed while praising the lazy people who fall victim to the schemes the hard workers hatch.

Just as people who fall victim to some park concessionaires are too gullible for their own good even if they can afford big prices for poor service.

 


Actually, Lee, the Seattle Times is a very conservative paper--at least the ownership is. As for Theodore Roosevelt "missing in action," I have often felt that way myself. He showed the robber barons how to make even more money by breaking up the inefficiencies of their monopoly holdings. Imagine the mobile homes Warren Buffett could sell if he charged only market interest rates. At least, it will be interesting to see what he says tomorrow morning on CNBC. And he had better not say I didn't know about it. That excuse is reserved for Hillary Clinton.

Now, how do we connect this back to parks? The founding fathers and mothers of the national park system realized that the parks needed to be regulated, too. Since the parks would generally be single operators, government needed to make some rules. The system isn't perfect, but it sure beats the used car lots we are reading about in The Seattle Times today.


Since Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway has been mentioned:  http://www.berkshirehathaway.com/

a reminder that much of Buffett's weath is being donated 

to the Gates Foundation and to his children's Foundations.

We would prefer Xanterra to be owned by Buffett's Berkshire

than by Philip Anschutz who has donated to Univ. Colorado

Medical Campus.


. The Lupus link includes reforms brought about by ACA!

Of course it does.  It would be a pretty lousy site if it didn't.  But note you used the word "includes".  It is not limited to reforms brought about by ACA.  In other words, there were other insurance options available before ACA was enacted.

That abomination was one of many made moot by ACA.

You are kidding, right?  I am an independent contractor, self employed, no medicare, medicaid or company insurance.  I buy my own insurance.  Since ACA was enacted my rates have more than doubled with higher deductibles and fewer doctors. 

As I said before, I do believe there should be a provision for pre-existing conditions - as long as you had pre-existing insurance. 


Tell that to all the people whose insurance was cancelled when they became ill.  Tell that to all the people who were denied insurance when they lost insurance due to a job change.  Tell that to all the people who are now insured who didn't have a chance before.

All those stories about rates and deductibles doubling may well be fantasies -- either that or the people making those claims need to start looking for other insurance companies.  Or perhaps they are just getting a taste of the medicine others were forced to swallow in the past.

ACA is one of the very best things to have happened in this country in a long, long time.

 


What you say, Lee, and thanks for saying it. It takes heart and courage to open up on the personal stuff. Unfortunately, there are those who take any self exposure as a rhetorical opportunity - like exposing tender neck flesh in a swordfight by pulling back your armor. Those who would go for blood on a personal issue in an online discussion are beneath respect.

After 20 years as a professional nurse and a prior ten years of donating my skills for free I easily qualify as an expert witness on the sad state of comingled medical needs, medical resources, and mercenary opportunism. Fighting to get my patients the care they need and deserve finally burned me out at age 65. Both personally and as an EMS veteran, you know what I'm referring to.

Don't worry about the shameless, like little barky dogs nipping at your heels. Making a nest egg off of the comingled banking and insurance companies at the expense of your fellow co-citizens divests you of credibility as a human being. Ayn Rand died a discredited crank on Social Security, and is a lousy role model, let alone pin--up model.

 

ACA is indeed one of the very best things to have happened in this country in a long, long time, and if that frosts the bippy of those whose vested interests it threatens so be it. Pay them the same mind you would pay a little barky toothless dog.

 

 


Tell that to all the people whose insurance was cancelled when they became ill. Tell that to all the people who were denied insurance when they lost insurance due to a job change. Tell that to all the people who are now insured who didn't have a chance before.

Well since two out three of those things didn't happen before ACA I won't have much telling to do but I do believe there should be a remedy for those that had insurance, became ill, and then lost their insurance.  ACA kind of does that, but doesn't require having insurance before the illness- a major  fallacy .  Further ACA has massive other shortcomings.  If you think ACA will lead to better healthcare in the future, you are the one living the fantasy.  But then the ACA is just part of your great entitlement mentality.


Since the comments on this post no longer are pertinent to the post, we're going to close it down. You can continue your discussion via email.


The Essential RVing Guide

The Essential RVing Guide to the National Parks

The National Parks RVing Guide, aka the Essential RVing Guide To The National Parks, is the definitive guide for RVers seeking information on campgrounds in the National Park System where they can park their rigs. It's available for free for both iPhones and Android models.

This app is packed with RVing specific details on more than 250 campgrounds in more than 70 parks.

You'll also find stories about RVing in the parks, some tips if you've just recently turned into an RVer, and some planning suggestions. A bonus that wasn't in the previous eBook or PDF versions of this guide are feeds of Traveler content: you'll find our latest stories as well as our most recent podcasts just a click away.

So whether you have an iPhone or an Android, download this app and start exploring the campgrounds in the National Park System where you can park your rig.