You are here

You Can Ride Your Own Horse At Bryce Canyon National Park, But You Have To Hire A Guide


You can bring your own horse to Bryce Canyon National Park in Utah's redrock country and ride off into the shimmering sunset, but under a rule change you'll likely have to hire a guide from the concessionaire who offers trail rides.

Barring any significant push-back during a 30-day public comment period expected to open today, the rule change will seemingly be a first in the National Park System, where the American horsewoman/man long has been welcomed to head down the trail on their own. 

"People have explored the canyonlands area on horseback for over a hundred years. In fact, many routes created by cowboys and sheepherders have become popular four-wheel-drive roads and hiking trails," notes the Canyonlands National Park website.

On Yellowstone National Park's website, officials note that, "Traveling in the Yellowstone backcountry with horses, mules or llamas is an exciting way to see the park."

Bryce Canyon also long has welcomed the private equestrian. But now it seems that they'll have to pay a stranger to guide them down the trail no matter their horsemanship.

Or maybe not. 

The announcement of the proposal was juggled a bit raggedly. A press release from the park went out Wednesday, indicating that the guiding requirement would take effect April 1. That met with some eyebrow-raising among those who follow a listserve pertaining to management and protection of the National Park System; some of the comments from those well-familiar with Bryce Canyon questioned the need for such a requirement.

The release also caught officials at the National Park Service's Intermountain Region Office in Denver off-guard, and after meetings there and phone calls to the park on Thursday it was decided to open the matter to a 30-day public comment period. 

A check of the other Utah national parks -- Arches, Canyonlands, Capitol Reef, and Zion -- found no similar requirement that park visitors with their own stock pay a local guide to lead them on rides. Yellowstone, Grand Teton, Great Smoky Mountains, Shenandoah, Yosemite, Sequoia, and Grand Canyon national parks also all invite riders into their landscapes without a requirement that they hire a local guide.

James Doyle, chief of communications for the Intermountain Region Office, said Thursday that safety concerns were behind the rule change.

"To further clarify what we have in mind, we're going to offer a 30-day public comment period on some of these proposed rule changes," he said. "I think the proposed changes, they're in response to some safety concerns on the trails. There are just a couple of trails and they're kind of narrow, and we need to do some education about trail etiquette and things like that. I think the primary driver to the changes is A), some safety issues on the trails and B) some resource damage issues that occur when people aren't guided, when they're kind of off on their own."

However, Mr. Doyle didn't have any statistics from the park pertaining to safety-related incidents involving either private riders or concession-led riders, and couldn't cite any resource damage. Officials at the park could not immediately be reached for that information, either.

Also unanswered were how many private equestrians visit the park each year, and how many trail riders the concessionaire takes into the park.

Bryce Canyon's initial press release said that going forward private equestrians would have to coordinate their rides so as not to interfere with those offered by Canyon Trail Rides, the park concessionaire. Additionally, private groups would have to hire a guide from Canyon Trail Rides "to insure safety and protection for visitors and park resources alike."

Under the rule change, Canyon Trail Rides would schedule private stock rides daily at 7:30 a.m. and 12:30 p.m. Riders must make arrangements for the guide a minimum of 48 hours in advance of coming to the park. An unspecified fee would be charged for the guiding service, based on the number of riders, the release said.


It would be good to do an FOIA request for the all documents that support this decision. It sound suspicious.

It is interesting that the NPS in this case would require a private horse person to hire a concession guide to ride a trail in Bryce Canyon. It maybe there are issues with horses on some of the trails, I am not familiar with the situation. But why a private citizen needs to hire a commercial outfitter to ride his/her horse on one of the park trails needs much further explanation.

More details -- and a potential solution -- coming Monday, Ron...

As a private horse owner/trail rider and a recreation professional who once managed a dude string I have an opinion. A requirement to hire a "guide" is totally unnecessary and problematic. There are so many good trail apps available, plus maps, and actual trail markings on the ground that people should not get lost in any National park these days. Damage control of resources by various user groups in always a concern and can be minimized by education. "Leave No Trace" programs would provide some good ideas and have handouts available.

Who would "certify" said guides so that consumers would be sure that the person they hired was competent in all phases of horsemanship, safety, attitude, ect? Many dude concessionaires hire less then competent individuals or even use volunteers who enjoy a free ride now and again.
Who would insure said guides for their omissions and liability toward horse owning Consumers? These "guides" would be as liable as any riding instructor or trainer for what happened to individual horses and riders on the trail and yet they would be totally unfamiliar with the personalities involved. Big trouble for all!!

In a poll on facebook to 5000 "Hags with Nags", the majority who responded would not visit a National Park if they had to hire a guide when riding their personal horses. Or that maybe they would hire a guide for the first ride but not everytime. Cutting down on the number of visitors should not be a goal of the NPS.

I see the biggest problem potential being one where private and dude horses with riders of varying skill levels mix on the same trail.
I also see this issue being one where concessionairs want to make more money and the NPS pandering to their needs. I wonder if Marinas will send a guide with every rented or private boat, or if every hiker needs a guide?
There are many solutions to whatever problems exist besides this suggested course of action.

As a private horse owner and avid trail rider. I just spent 6 weeks in Big Bend State park, Texas, where you don't have to stay on trails. My 6 weeks were fine without the help of a guide. If horses why not bikes, hikers and 4 wheelers all cause the same threats. As one of the posts put it education is best tool not another way to baby sit or make something harder. I for one pack out more garbage than I take in. I think a lot of people do. Let's keep the parks for the people not just the wealthy.

Add comment


This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

National Parks Traveler's Essential Park Guide