You are here

Traveler's View: National Park Service Shouldn't Contribute To Technological Disconnect With Nature


National park experiences should be about reconnecting with nature, not tagging your friends on Facebook or downloading movies in your lodge room. Shot of Green River entering the Gates of Lodore in Dinosaur National Monument by Kurt Repanshek.

For five days we floated through the deep, ruddy canyons gouged into the landscape of Dinosaur National Monument by the Green River, and for those days not a cell signal was tapped, not a phone conversation heard, not an app applied.

It was glorious.

Particularly enjoying this technological disconnect was my oldest son, a sound recording engineer who relished the fact that his cell wasn't beeping with texts or ringing with calls. No inbox to check for emails, no deadlines to meet. Just scenery to absorb, rapids to run, and quiet conversation to enjoy.

But there's a concern in some circles that visitors to America's national parks don't want such a disconnect, a forced downtime from Facebook or tweeting, from tagging friends in front of a sputtering Old Faithful. The National Park Service has heard those worries, and is embarking on a pilot project to explore expanded Wi-Fi and cellphone service in the National Park System.

Granted, more than likely if you're floating idly through the Gates of Lodore in Dinosaur or enjoying the view from the Goat Haunt Overlook in Glacier National Park you won't ever find a signal even if the pilot project gives way to full-blown wiring of the park system's front country.

But think of where such expanded service might reach. The bench-lined apron that fronts the Old Faithful Geyser in Yellowstone. The waysides along Skyline Drive in Shenandoah National Park that spill over with vacationers in summer and leaf-peepers in fall. The visitor center at Logan Pass in Glacier National Park. Possibly even Mesa Arch in Canyonlands National Park, Scotty's Castle in Death Valley National Park, the Cliff Palace at Mesa Verde National Park, or Hurricane Ridge in Olympic National Park.

It also might be ramped up at visitor centers and lodges, and perhaps even along roads that wind through parks and right up to trailhead sign-in registers.

Technology Is Wonderful, But We Do Need Breaks From It

Now, there's no doubt that techology can be a tremendous boon when it comes to interpreting the parks. But it also can turn visitors inward, glueing them to their tablets and smartphones, oblivious to their majestic surroundings. So detaching can it be that we're not enlightened by it, but rather debilitated.

"How many lives are we losing because people are too overwhelmed with technology and can’t get away from it?" said Richard Louv, author of The Nature Principle and Last Child in the Woods, a groundbreaking book that examined the so-called nature-deficit disorder that afflicts youngsters who shun the outdoors. "Just the cumulative of too much electronics in people’s lives, and I’m not anti-tech.

"The mantra of the Nature Principle, the new book, is the more high-tech our lives become, the more nature we need. We have to find that balance because there is evidence that too much technology in our lives does hurt our mental health, our physical health."

Mr. Louv, who told me the idea of expanding Wi-Fi and cell coverage in the parks is a "grim idea," that "(W)e need Wi-Fi free zones," addressed just this issue last summer in a column:

Scientists who study human perception no longer assume we have only five senses: taste, touch, smell, sight, and hearing. The number now ranges from a conservative 10 to as many as 30, including proprioception – the awareness of our body’s position in space, of where we are. We tend to block off many of our senses when we’re staring at a screen. Nature time can literally bring us to our senses.

But unplugging the power strip doesn’t always come naturally, even for those of us who, by nature, love nature. It requires a conscious act and a change of scenery.

This is one reason conservation is so important. These days, unplugged places are getting hard to find. Even some parks and campgrounds now offer Wi-Fi — the theory being that people just won’t get outdoors if they can’t tweet. (Insert bird joke here.) For sanity, what we really need are No Wi-Fi Zones and Phone-Silent Sanctuaries. Especially for people who can’t afford a cabin on private land.

This isn't some incredibly new, out of nowhere idea. Indeed, in moving forward with the pilot project, one that possibly could see concessionaires collaborating with national park friends groups and the Park Service to develop interpretive apps and charging for access, the Park Service seems to be ignoring studies that have examined technology and how it can stand in the way of "getting back to nature," advise from experts and, even, advise from former directors of the agency.

These studies and experts maintain that the lack of cell coverage is not an "irritant that adversely shapes memories of a park visit," as the National Park Hospitality Association suggests, but actually a benefit that helps us reconnect with nature.

* In 2009, the Outdoor Foundation, an arm of the Outdoor Industry Association, found that simply taking youngsters on a hike or a camp-out with campfire songs and s'mores might be more important to developing a lifetime love for the outdoors than loading the latest outdoor app on their phones.

* More recent studies demonstrate that getting away from it all, and unplugging as you go, improves your creativity. Psychologists at the University of Utah and the University of Kansas collaborated on a study that found that backpackers scored 50 percent better on a creativity test after spending four days in nature without their iPhones, 'Droids, and MP3 players.

* At America's Summit For National Parks last January in Washington, D.C., the audience was counciled that expanding the technological reach in the parks is not a panacea for waning interest in the parks.

Though technology should be maximized to showcase the value of the national parks, "dissemination of information may not be communication," said Robert Stanton, who served as Park Service director from August 1997 until January 2001. "We should never diminish the importance of personal communication. Interpretation is not intended to do something for the listener, but to encourage the listener to do something for themselves."

Connect With The Landscape, Not Your Phones

Alan Latourelle, the chief executive officer of Parks Canada, told the audience that, in the face of diminishing visitation to Canada's parks, his agency approached its own centennial last year with a goal to reach youth and new residents of the country unfamiliar with its parks' offerings.

"Leave your technology at home and come experience the parks" was one of the messages Parks Canada used to connect with youth, said Mr. Latourelle. The point was not to abandon that technology, he stressed, but to take a break from it to experience the natural wonders of the country.

And while Fran Mainella, NPS director from July 2001 until October 2006, agreed technology can play an important role in gaining new visitors to the parks, she didn't believe it was wise to "turn parks into virtual tours."

"Use the techology to entice the young people into our parks," said the former director. But "we do not want it to consume how we experience the parks."

* A study published in February 2011 in PARKScience, a Park Service publication that integrates "research and resource management in the national parks," underscored the value of human connections between rangers and visitors.

Using interpretive ranger programs at Great Smoky as a case study, the authors of The Benefits of Live Interpretive Programs to Great Smoky Mountains National Park -- Marc J. Stern, Robert B. Powell, and Cathleen Cook -- noted that such programs... to reveal to park visitors the deeper meanings associated with parks’ cultural and natural resource. They can enhance visitors’ enjoyment by providing entertaining experiences or better orientation to the available sights, resources, and activities. They can effect emotional connections to landscapes, to animal or plant life, and to the history being interpreted. They can influence visitors’ attitudes to the park they are visiting, toward the National Park Service, or toward an ecosystem, a historical event, a social movement, or the environment or nature in general.

According to the article, more than 80 percent of the visitors who responded to a survey said ranger-led tours and programs "were important to the mission of the National Park Service."

More significantly, in light of the Park Service's desire to connect visitors to the parks and make them more aware of environmental systems and threats to them, the study also found that "(N)early 90% of respondents reported that attending a ranger-led program increased their appreciation of Great Smoky Mountains National Park and the National Park Service. More than 60% of respondents indicated that their awareness of environmental issues and this country’s cultural heritage increased."

The National Park Service, Mr. Louv told me, should be urging visitors to come to the parks "for your mental health and to increase your productivity when you get back to work, to help your kids do better at school by giving them a break from the computer, to get to know your kids better because you left the electronics home.

“You know," he added, "frankly, deep down I think that’s what people want a lot more than 24, 48 (more) hours with their machines.”

The current extent of Wi-Fi and cell coverage in the parks doesn't need to be expanded or enhanced. What the Park Service should be doing is promoting both the wonders and health benefits of unplugging and disconnecting and looking not at your phone or tablet, but at the spectacular landscape in front of you.


Thanks for this great article, Kurt. Now I just hope the NPS pays attention.

Well written Kurt. Even if I am for some expanded coverage, I agree with your premise of your article. I too think that the disconnect from electronics is important to my well being but not all parks are about hiking the back country. I am for keeping the coverage limited to certain limited areas. I do not think the back country needs any coverage. I also think that certain etiquette (turn ringers to silent for example) should be pushed and maybe enforced.

Is there a way to limit these electronics to INSIDE buildings?

A hotel would be perfect. A visitor center, maybe.

There seems to be a "horse-has-left-the-barn" aspect to all of this.

Today you can go to almost any campground in one the big parks and see and hear idling RVs and campers with running A/C units, small TVs, kids and adults with earbuds in, iPads being passed back and forth showing pictures, watching youtube, playing a game, and so on and on... Visitor's centers as well to some degree.

I'm for expansion of wifi to some extent. I agree mostly with what David Crowl above said. Rules and regulations for how and when your devices can be used, quiet areas, etc.

Meantime, funding to keep quality rangers, ranger programs and to clean and update park facilities is a must. Besides, an educated, well trained and engaging park ranger can pretty much make anyone forget they even own a smartphone.

Great article Kurt, Thank you. A very important part of the national park experience should be a disconnect from the technological world, with it's instant distraction from the sounds, sights and feelings of nature.

I absolutely agree with your sentiments, Kurt. The only thing whispering in my ear is from my years of working in emergency medical services and the what-if's.

Right now my two favorite drives around here are out to a no-cell coverage area of our local national park, or the two hour no-coverage drive up the road into the Yukon where we go to shop. I love listening to the wind in the trees and spotting the wildlife. As much as I love those two drives and as often as I enjoy them, I always have this niggling anxiety in the back of my mind; most likely something to do with getting more frail as I age.

There are satellite phones and other devices available for pure emergency use.

Expensive. But available.

today I watched a young lady and her friend eat a pizza for lunch. Neither ever set down the phones in their hands. They weren't using them, just holding them. Yesterday I watched a couple in a small intimate restaurant as they ate lunch. Mid forties, a married couple. While waiting for their orders, both spent the entire time staring into their respective telephone screens. Never spoke that I heard.

These incidents make me sympathetic to the argument that we need places to go where these tools don't intrude constantly...

The problem is more personal though....I see it in many of the comments here today... people seem to think the only way they can escape this is for there to be no signal...the simplier solution is to simply turn the darn things off when you want peace and quiet.

Add comment


This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

National Parks Traveler's Essential Park Guide