You are here

Updated: Interior Secretary Rules Oyster Farm Must Vacate Drakes Estero At Point Reyes National Seashore

Share

Editor's note: This updates with comment from Drakes Bay Oyster Co. owner Kevin Lunny.

Interior Secretary Ken Salazar, citing the value of wilderness and congressional intent, on Thursday ruled that an oyster farm at Drakes Estero in Point Reyes National Seashore must end its operations.

“I’ve taken this matter very seriously. We’ve undertaken a robust public process to review the matter from all sides, and I have personally visited the park to meet with the company and members of the community,” said Secretary Salazar. “After careful consideration of the applicable law and policy, I have directed the National Park Service to allow the permit for the Drakes Bay Oyster Company to expire at the end of its current term and to return the Drakes Estero to the state of wilderness that Congress designated for it in 1976. I believe it is the right decision for Point Reyes National Seashore and for future generations who will enjoy this treasured landscape.”

That decision, said oyster company owner Kevin Lunny, was a "devastating" one, one that he maintains was built on misconduct in the way the National Park Service handled the matter.

"I feel like the arguments that he's been giving by the Park Service haven't all been correct," said Mr. Lunny, referring to Park Service studies into the oyster farm's operations that have drawn questions from outside reviewers. "The Park Service hasn’t been straight with the public. And the Park Service is an agency that Secretary Salazar is in charge of. I can only assume that’s where he’s getting most of his information. I don’t think he learned everything he needed to know in a half-hour visit to the farm” last week.

The fate of an oyster company that employs roughly 30 workers who produce between 450,000-500,000 pounds of Pacific oyster meat a year for Bay Area outlets has been fanned in recently years by both U.S. Sen. Dianne Feinstein, an ardent supporter of the oyster company and its small workforce, and environmentalists and conservationists who wanted to see the estero granted official wilderness designation.

The oyster company's 40-year lease runs out this Friday, and Congress long ago said the estero should be designated as official wilderness once all non-conforming uses are removed from it. The 1976 legislation that set aside 25,370 acres of the national seashore as wilderness cited another 8,003 acres encompassing the estero that would be "essentially managed as wilderness, to the extent possible, with efforts to steadily continue to remove all obstacles to the eventual conversion of these lands and waters to wilderness status" -- and the oyster operation is seen as being incompatible with such a designation.

Secretary Salazar's decision, which was applauded in some corners and derided in others, came nine days after the Seashore staff quietly released its final environmental impact statement that assessed the oyster company's impacts on the estero. That document did not state a preference by the Seashore on whether the oyster company's lease should be extended, but cited the authority Congress gave the Interior secretary to extend the lease if he so desired.

In a release from Washington, D.C., U.S. Sens. Jeff Bingaman, D-New Mexico, Ron Wyden, D-Oregon, Mark Udall, D-Colorado, and Rep. Edward Markey, D-Massachusetts, spoke out in support of the secretary's decision to allow the oyster farm's permit to expire on November 30.

“We applaud the decision to follow the clear intent of Congress, as well as an agreement signed almost four decades ago to establish the nation's first marine wilderness on the West Coast at Point Reyes National Seashore,” the four said in a joint statement. “This decision will protect the ecological heart of the national seashore.”

The decision also was cheered by the National Parks Conservation Association, where President Tom Kiernan said the secretary's ruling allows "(T)his legendary place, long planned and paid for, (to be) returned to the public for an unprecedented marine wilderness visitor experience unmatched on the West Coast.”

Syliva Earle, a National Geographic Explorer in Residence, saluted "Secretary Salazar for his wisdom and statesmanship in choosing long-term public good over short-term private interests. Protecting Drakes Estero, America's only West Coast marine wilderness park, will restore health -- and hope -- for the ocean and for the interests of all of the people of this country.”

"Extremely disappointed" by the Secretary's decision was Sen. Feinstein, who said the "National Park Service’s review process has been flawed from the beginning with false and misleading science, which was also used in the Environmental Impact Statement."

"The Secretary’s decision effectively puts this historic California oyster farm out of business. As a result, the farm will be forced to cease operations and 30 Californians will lose their jobs.”

Though Mr. Lunny said he always knew there was a possibility that the farm's permit wouldn't be renewed, he held out hope that it would be. Whether the oysterman would try to seek a way to challenge the decision legally or otherwise, such as through legislation that could perhaps reverse Secretary Salazar's decision in some fashion, wasn't immediately clear.

“We don’t know," he replied when asked if he saw any options. "We just don’t know. We do have advisors, we do have lawyers. Of course, it’s the National Park Service against our family. And they have been in a single word very hostile. I don’t see us having any chance going toe to toe with them.”

Secretary Salazar said his finding "honors Congress's direction to 'steadily continue to remove all obstacles to the eventual conversion of these lands and waters to wilderness status' and thus ensures that these precious resources are preserved for the enjoyment of future generations of the American public, for whom Point Reyes National Seashore was created."

"As President Johnson said on signing the Wilderness Act in 1964, '(I)f future generations are to remember us with gratitude rather than contempt, we must leave them with something more than the miracles of technology," the secretary continued. "We must leave them with a glimpse of the world as it was in the beginning, not just after we got through with it."

Secretary Salazar gave the oyster company 90 days to remove "its personal property, including shellfish and racks, from the land and waters covered by the Reservation of Use and Occupancy and Special Use Permit," and said no commercial activities at the farm would be allowed after Friday. He also directed National Park Service Director Jon Jarvis to "use all existing legal authorizations at your disposal to help DBOC workers who might be affected by this decision, including assistance with relocation, employment opportunties, and training."

Comments

Only you brought up the ranches, although Salazar showed his biases by asking that the standard special use permits for the ranches be doubled in length to 20 years. While they are technically not in designated or potential wilderness (as is the oyster farm shore operations which were terminated) they do have a significant impact on Drakes Estero. The runoff flows into Drakes Estero and it was probably the oysters as filter feeders that kept the environment in check.

Be careful what you wish for, since you might just get it.


Via Landscapes for Livestock:

RANGE magazine

RANGE MAGAZINE FRIENDS: Please add your voice to those of our friends at the Drakes Bay Oyster Company in California: another example of a family business being bullied out of existence by lies and enviro-Nazi slander. Watch for a feature in the next issue. Here's the letter from Laura Voth of Livestock for Landscapes:

Dear Secretary Salazar,

As a fellow Coloradoan who voted for you when you ran for senate, I am extremely dismayed and disappointed at your decision not to renew the Drakes Bay Oyster Company's permit. As a former Bureau of Land Management employee

with experience in the NEPA process and in wilderness management, I have followed this issue closely and have been horrified at the behavior of the National Park Service. Their misuse of science has threatened the integrity
of scientists everywhere, and their underhanded methods destroyed the integrity of the agency itself, and the Department of the Interior.

Since the NPS's own rules and regulations do not prohibit the coexistence of the oyster farm and potential wilderness I cannot understand your decision at all. It seems very ill-informed. What you have done is to allow a few
special interests within the National Park Service to attack and eliminate a small family business.

I cannot find the words to express how little I think of you, and your decision. You actions reflect poorly on Colorado, and on Department of the Interior.

Sincerely,
Kathy Voth
http://www.livestockforlandscapes.com/


YPW: Since the "Reply" function isn't nesting replies, maybe it wasn't clear, but I was replying to IMTNBKE rather than to you. (And maybe you aren't replying to me, either—who knows?)

If you read back, you'll see that MTNBKE brought up the cattle and grazing in relation to the Wilderness Act, and therefore, that was the context of my response. It had nothing to do with the seashore as a whole and the impacts cattle have. Just as I made no comment on the environmental impact of the oyster operation. For me it was always a strictly procedural/policy question about congressional intent and legal interpretation. Which, by the way, is also what Secty. Salazar said in his letter.


Mike Painter:
YPW: Since the "Reply" function isn't nesting replies, maybe it wasn't clear, but I was replying to IMTNBKE rather than to you. (And maybe you aren't replying to me, either—who knows?)

If you read back, you'll see that MTNBKE brought up the cattle and grazing in relation to the Wilderness Act, and therefore, that was the context of my response. It had nothing to do with the seashore as a whole and the impacts cattle have. Just as I made no comment on the environmental impact of the oyster operation. For me it was always a strictly procedural/policy question about congressional intent and legal interpretation. Which, by the way, is also what Secty. Salazar said in his letter.

Formatting for quotes has to be done manually using EZCode.

As far as Congressional intent goes, Salazar received several letters from the lead author of the Point Reyes Wilderness Act - John Burton. He was adamant that the intent was never to force out the oyster farm but to allow the area to remain potential wilderness indefinitely. Right now there are several potential wilderness areas that remain so indefinitely - especially the High Sierra Camps in Yosemite. I've felt that policy decisions drive them staying, and a policy decision is what drove out Drakes Bay Oyster Company.


The National Seashore was created in full cognizance of the long-term productive and sensitive relationship between agriculture and the surrounding wilderness in West Marin. Former Assemblyman William Bagley and former U.S. Reps. John Burton and Pete McCloskey backed the ongoing lease for the oyster farm, saying they had no intent to kick it out when they worked to establish the national park in 1965. It is unfortunate that certain NPS officials took it upon themselves to force Drakes Bay Oyster Company (DBOC) out at the urging of several environmental groups who have no relationship to the region, and are interested in extending wilderness as a matter of principle. The Lunny family has been a superb steward of the land and seashore that make up DBOC. Oysters create a natural filtering system for the estuary. DBOC keeps their property open to hikers and kayakers, and offer educational programs to increase awareness of the importance of the estuary as both a source of food and as a place of natural beauty. The local and state economy benefit from DBOC. Furthermore, NPS scientists engaged in a reckless and somewhat underhanded effort to generate proof of ecological harm to the estuary by DBOC when there was none. Salazar's decision to terminate the DBOC lease at the last minute (limiting time for appeal) was political and not at all based on law or science as he purports. We can only hope that the Lunny family will find some support in the courts.


I too also hope the Luny family will find support in the courts. Overreach on steroids I believe this case is. No one appreciates the outdoors more than I do, I believe but what this does is seperates even further from connection to the resourse. Citizens come to Drake's Bay and consume oysters. What is it that NPS provides in exchange that connects visitors to the environment more than a resource that is any more natural. This whole prospectus is flawed and an example of NPS run amock. The decision needs to be reviewed and reversed. It might show that NPS is capable of realizing they are wrong and correct a VERY bad decision. That would be a positive.


Obama/Salazar policy and that's NOT good! Sucks, really!


Add comment

CAPTCHA

This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.

The Essential RVing Guide

The Essential RVing Guide to the National Parks

The National Parks RVing Guide, aka the Essential RVing Guide To The National Parks, is the definitive guide for RVers seeking information on campgrounds in the National Park System where they can park their rigs. It's available for free for both iPhones and Android models.

This app is packed with RVing specific details on more than 250 campgrounds in more than 70 parks.

You'll also find stories about RVing in the parks, some tips if you've just recently turned into an RVer, and some planning suggestions. A bonus that wasn't in the previous eBook or PDF versions of this guide are feeds of Traveler content: you'll find our latest stories as well as our most recent podcasts just a click away.

So whether you have an iPhone or an Android, download this app and start exploring the campgrounds in the National Park System where you can park your rig.