U.S. Rep. Rob Bishop, who chairs the House subcommittee that oversees national parks and other federal lands, says it is unconstitutional for the federal government to own those tracts.
And while the Utah Republican would like to see most federal lands in the West turned over to the states, he said the federal government can keep national parks "because they’re not moneymakers anyway."
Rep. Bishop made the comments recently in Las Vegas, where he was appearing at a Western Republican Leadership Conference meeting, part of which focused on federal control of public lands in the West.
According to a report from Think Progress, a nonpartisan arm of the Center for American Progress Action Fund, the congressman told those attending the conference that nowhere in the U.S. Constitution does it provide for such federal land ownership.
During a slide presentation to the conference the Republican said, "Federal government owns one out of every three acres in this country. If it’s west of Denver, it’s one out of every two acres. If this kind of federal control is good, then the Soviet Union should have been the Garden of Eden. But what this presents to us – and I defy you to find anywhere in the Constitution where this is allowable - but what it defines to us is – the second slide if you would – everything in red are the states that had the hardest time funding their educations system."
In its report on the meeting Think Progress pointed out that Article 4, Section 3, Clause 2 of the Constitution provides that “Congress shall have Power to dispose of and make all needful Rules and Regulations respecting the Territory or other Property belonging to the United States.”
Rep. Bishop also told Think Progress that he fully supports mining near Grand Canyon National Park, and says it would have "no impact on the Grand Canyon water or tourism that happens to be there."
U.S. Bureau of Land Management officials last week announced their preference to extend a moratorium on uranium mining around the Grand Canyon for 20 years. After a 30-day waiting period, Interior Secretary Ken Salazar will be able to sign off on the plan.
There has been legislation introduced into the U.S. House of Representatives to block the administration from enforcing the moratorium. In July the House Appropriations Committee amended Interior's budget bill to tie the administration's hands on the matter.
Comments
Could it be a pendulum swing when there have been excesses in reach and policy? Can neither factions reach a willingness to see the benefits of the other? Pay the bills, allow the tax payers to enrich their experiences/lives and be practical in approaches to acquiring new properties? With the examples of assaults on a private lease in PRNRA and forced removal of historic inholdings in many NPS parks it's not really a stretch to expect an equal and like pendulum in the other direction.
Having Rob Bishop as chair of the House subcommittee that oversees national parks and other federal lands is like having the fox as chair of the chicken house. J.
If the pendulum would just stop in the middle there wouldn't be a problem. Make all of us in the middle pretty happy as uneducated and as incapable of making smart decisions as we may be.
We should be blunt about Bishop and his kind that are flooding the cable networks and beginning to elect their clones to congress. Bishop fundamentally opposes the constitution of the United States. The idea that the House congressional leadership would permit someone to be a chairman of a congressional committee who does not believe in the constitution is outrageous. The powers were provided to government in the constitution because America was failing without it. Utah, Bishop's state, would not be a state at all if you believed his insanity. The Louisiana Purchase, the Alaska Purchase, the Gadsden Purchase and the Mexican War brought all the unowned land in those vast territories to the United States Government. Collectively Bishop and his kind fundmentally oppose the fundamental institutions that have made America great, and not just the National Park System. Their views need to be called out, and inexplicably this is not being done by the President. Thank you Traveler for letting us know what is at stake with these congressional "leaders."